Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Obama and Democrats fomented lawlessness and division, well here we are. Without division and lawlessness, bigotry and intolerance the Democratic party would not exist.
Yet under Trump protests have turned DEADLY. With Mr. alt-right facing 2nd degree murder. What's his excuse for running down a crowd of people like ISIS started doing? Black Cars matter?
You meet force with force. It has been that way since the dawn of time. The left bused paid counter protestors in. They came for one purpose. They wanted trouble, they got it. Simple as that.
You do not have the right to use force. It's the job of the police to meet force with force, not yours.
Obama and Democrats fomented lawlessness and division, well here we are. Without division and lawlessness, bigotry and intolerance the Democratic party would not exist.
Yet under Trump protests have turned DEADLY. With Mr. alt-right facing 2nd degree murder. What's his excuse for running down a crowd of people like ISIS started doing? Black Cars matter?
Now point out how many people were shot yesterday. Mkay?The first amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees:
"the right of the people peaceably to assemble"
When watching the videos of yesterday's protest and counter protest, a large number of the people at the protest were armed - many had helmets and shields as well as various weapons ranging from clubs to pepper spray to guns.
It's apparent that these people were at best anticipating violence, and may have intended to incite violence.
The Constitution does NOT have a right to violent protest. It does note cite a right to gather as an armed mob.
The violence at yesterdays protest would probably have been a whole lot less if no one on either side had weapons of any type, and if they did not any protective gear.
Even wearing protective gear shows that they are anticipating violence. Anyone who foes to a protest while anticipating violence has no right to go to that protest.
It seems that protest groups go far beyond their Constitutional right - if they intend to incite violence or even anticipate violence, they are no longer within their Constitutional rights.
In the future, if anyone shows up at a protest or counter protest with weapons or protective gear, they should immediately be arrested. If a sizable number have weapons or protective gear, the police should use whatever means necessary to end the protest!
Apparently wherever there were weapons on display the Antifa assholes decided not to attack anyone.
Regardless of what weapon was used, a person was murdered yesterday. If no one had any weapons or protective gear, there would have been less violence and passions would not have risen to the level that hey did. Most likely no one would have been killed.
Wow! What utter nonsense. You think that this is the first time there's been violence at a protest?
Obviously this was not the first time there has been violence at protests.
That is why the police should confiscate any weapons or protective gear. If needed tey should arrest people who are armed, and if neede they should disperse the protest entirely.
Any reasonable cause for the police believing that a protest will turn violent should justify action by the police - or National Guard if needed.
No...if it is legal to carry a weapon in public...it is legal, and the police have no ability to disarm those people. They have complete ability to arrest violent attackers. And thank you for showing that you are more than willing to strip Rights away from people who have done nothing wrong. That is quintessential leftist thinking.
Now point out how many people were shot yesterday. Mkay?The first amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees:
"the right of the people peaceably to assemble"
When watching the videos of yesterday's protest and counter protest, a large number of the people at the protest were armed - many had helmets and shields as well as various weapons ranging from clubs to pepper spray to guns.
It's apparent that these people were at best anticipating violence, and may have intended to incite violence.
The Constitution does NOT have a right to violent protest. It does note cite a right to gather as an armed mob.
The violence at yesterdays protest would probably have been a whole lot less if no one on either side had weapons of any type, and if they did not any protective gear.
Even wearing protective gear shows that they are anticipating violence. Anyone who foes to a protest while anticipating violence has no right to go to that protest.
It seems that protest groups go far beyond their Constitutional right - if they intend to incite violence or even anticipate violence, they are no longer within their Constitutional rights. Why is that?
In the future, if anyone shows up at a protest or counter protest with weapons or protective gear, they should immediately be arrested. If a sizable number have weapons or protective gear, the police should use whatever means necessary to end the protest!
Apparently wherever there were weapons on display the Antifa assholes decided not to attack anyone.
Funny chit. The assholes were your white supremacist assholes who I saw using their Nazi torches as weapons.
Fuck you & your white supremacist friends.
The protests have turned deadly from the left....
and have been lucky that they haven't killed anyone yet....
Indeed, add to that they are the founders of the KKK.Yet, when you have proof of how violent liberals are, it's only prudent to be armed. Cry and wail about it all you want, NOTHING will change that and we are NOT going to be disarmed.Tell that to the antifa thugs throwing urine and starting fights.Your premise is flawed in the basis that the protesters had every reason to believe that they would need to defend themselves. And they were right! Thread fail... NEXT!!!
If they believe that there will be a need to defend themselves, then they apparently believe that the protest will be violent.
They only have a right to peaceful protest. They do not have a right to violent protest.
As I've said the prohibition against violence applies to everyone equally.
Obama and Democrats fomented lawlessness and division, well here we are. Without division and lawlessness, bigotry and intolerance the Democratic party would not exist.
Obama and Democrats fomented lawlessness and division, well here we are. Without division and lawlessness, bigotry and intolerance the Democratic party would not exist.
Yet under Trump protests have turned DEADLY. With Mr. alt-right facing 2nd degree murder. What's his excuse for running down a crowd of people like ISIS started doing? Black Cars matter?
So you are concerned about the death of 1 American citizen? Newsflash illegals have killed thousands of American citizens yet Dem's defend and protect them explain that.
2nd Amendment. the have a right to be armed. A protest doesn't become violent simply because someone is carrying.
No, but if it becomes violent, it becomes DEADLY simply because someone is carrying.
So you are concerned about the death of 1 American citizen?.
Indeed! The democrats have turned deadly. Take care when you are around them.Obama and Democrats fomented lawlessness and division, well here we are. Without division and lawlessness, bigotry and intolerance the Democratic party would not exist.
Yet under Trump protests have turned DEADLY. With Mr. alt-right facing 2nd degree murder. What's his excuse for running down a crowd of people like ISIS started doing? Black Cars matter?
Now point out how many people were shot yesterday. Mkay?
Apparently wherever there were weapons on display the Antifa assholes decided not to attack anyone.
Regardless of what weapon was used, a person was murdered yesterday. If no one had any weapons or protective gear, there would have been less violence and passions would not have risen to the level that hey did. Most likely no one would have been killed.
Wow! What utter nonsense. You think that this is the first time there's been violence at a protest?
Obviously this was not the first time there has been violence at protests.
That is why the police should confiscate any weapons or protective gear. If needed tey should arrest people who are armed, and if neede they should disperse the protest entirely.
Any reasonable cause for the police believing that a protest will turn violent should justify action by the police - or National Guard if needed.
No...if it is legal to carry a weapon in public...it is legal, and the police have no ability to disarm those people. They have complete ability to arrest violent attackers. And thank you for showing that you are more than willing to strip Rights away from people who have done nothing wrong. That is quintessential leftist thinking.
In Constituional law there are often conflicts between constitutional rights. The SCOTUS decides which rights 'trump' each other.
You may have the right to bear arms, but in the case of protests (assembly) the requirement that the protest be peaceful trumps the right to bear arms. YOu're right to bear arms is suspended while participating in a protest.
You have a choice whether or not to attend a protest. If you feel that you need to armed, you should not attend,
You may have the right to bear arms, but in the case of protests (assembly) the requirement that the protest be peaceful trumps the right to bear arms. YOu're right to bear arms is suspended while participating in a protest.,
You meet force with force. It has been that way since the dawn of time. The left bused paid counter protestors in. They came for one purpose. They wanted trouble, they got it. Simple as that.
You do not have the right to use force. It's the job of the police to meet force with force, not yours.
Then you are a total fucking retard. You just stated that no one has the right of self defense. Crawl back under your pink security blanket.
Obama and Democrats fomented lawlessness and division, well here we are. Without division and lawlessness, bigotry and intolerance the Democratic party would not exist.
Yet under Trump protests have turned DEADLY. With Mr. alt-right facing 2nd degree murder. What's his excuse for running down a crowd of people like ISIS started doing? Black Cars matter?
So you are concerned about the death of 1 American citizen? Newsflash illegals have killed thousands of American citizens yet Dem's defend and protect them explain that.
Yes, we are concerned with the death of a single individual. We are also concerned by people, like yourself, who refuse to recognize people's individuality.
The millions of illegals who have not killed anyone are NOT responsible for the actions of those who have,
Yet, when you have proof of how violent liberals are, it's only prudent to be armed. Cry and wail about it all you want, NOTHING will change that and we are NOT going to be disarmed.Tell that to the antifa thugs throwing urine and starting fights.Your premise is flawed in the basis that the protesters had every reason to believe that they would need to defend themselves. And they were right! Thread fail... NEXT!!!The first amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees:
"the right of the people peaceably to assemble"
When watching the videos of yesterday's protest and counter protest, a large number of the people at the protest were armed - many had helmets and shields as well as various weapons ranging from clubs to pepper spray to guns.
It's apparent that these people were at best anticipating violence, and may have intended to incite violence.
The Constitution does NOT have a right to violent protest. It does note cite a right to gather as an armed mob.
The violence at yesterdays protest would probably have been a whole lot less if no one on either side had weapons of any type, and if they did not any protective gear.
Even wearing protective gear shows that they are anticipating violence. Anyone who foes to a protest while anticipating violence has no right to go to that protest.
It seems that protest groups go far beyond their Constitutional right - if they intend to incite violence or even anticipate violence, they are no longer within their Constitutional rights.
In the future, if anyone shows up at a protest or counter protest with weapons or protective gear, they should immediately be arrested. If a sizable number have weapons or protective gear, the police should use whatever means necessary to end the protest!
If they believe that there will be a need to defend themselves, then they apparently believe that the protest will be violent.
They only have a right to peaceful protest. They do not have a right to violent protest.
As I've said the prohibition against violence applies to everyone equally.
So? That isn't a reason to strip someone of their right. .
So you are concerned about the death of 1 American citizen?.
Benghazi was about the death of 4 americans. So congress should hold at least 1/4 as many investigations (that makes at least 2) for one American.
Regardless of what weapon was used, a person was murdered yesterday. If no one had any weapons or protective gear, there would have been less violence and passions would not have risen to the level that hey did. Most likely no one would have been killed.
Wow! What utter nonsense. You think that this is the first time there's been violence at a protest?
Obviously this was not the first time there has been violence at protests.
That is why the police should confiscate any weapons or protective gear. If needed tey should arrest people who are armed, and if neede they should disperse the protest entirely.
Any reasonable cause for the police believing that a protest will turn violent should justify action by the police - or National Guard if needed.
No...if it is legal to carry a weapon in public...it is legal, and the police have no ability to disarm those people. They have complete ability to arrest violent attackers. And thank you for showing that you are more than willing to strip Rights away from people who have done nothing wrong. That is quintessential leftist thinking.
In Constituional law there are often conflicts between constitutional rights. The SCOTUS decides which rights 'trump' each other.
You may have the right to bear arms, but in the case of protests (assembly) the requirement that the protest be peaceful trumps the right to bear arms. YOu're right to bear arms is suspended while participating in a protest.
You have a choice whether or not to attend a protest. If you feel that you need to armed, you should not attend,
Bull shit. Since when?
The democrats have turned deadly. Take care when you are around them.
.....and antifa have attacked peaceful protestors all across the country and have been lucky that they haven't killed anyone yet....
