Lakhota
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #7,421
It's about time we had some gun control hearings. I've also heard talk of possible 3-D gun legislation.
Government really has no jurisdiction over any weapon you make yourself.
It certainly should, because such undetectable weapons place us all in danger - especially on public transportation.
No, it shouldn't. If a criminal uses any gun in a crime we can already arrest them. If a criminal is caught with any gun, they can already be arrested for simple possession of the gun......the only thing that puts us in danger is stupid policies like the ones you promote....
So, it doesn't bother you that scanners can't detect 3-D plastic guns at airports?
There are many reasons for alarm, as I explained in an expert declaration filed in the states’ lawsuit. First, a plastic firearm would rarely be detectable by metal detectors, which are the standard public safety protocol at airports, stadiums, concert halls, public buildings like courthouses, and, increasingly, schools. Although the federal Undetectable Firearms Act requires guns to include enough metal to set off a metal detector, the requirement can be evaded easily by simply not including the non-operable piece of metal in the 3D-printed gun. And for those who say that plastic firearms are ineffective because of their propensity to blow up, a 2013 test by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives of Defense Distributed’s 3D-printed handgun, the “Liberator,” showed it fired without fail all eight times it was tested.
3D-Printed Plastic Guns: Five Reasons to Worry
Last edited: