C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
Not selling handgun ammunition and 5.56 NATO is pointless.
But prohibiting open carry is appropriate.
But prohibiting open carry is appropriate.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because the sight of a holstered gun is likely to cause a panic among the ignorant.Not selling handgun ammunition and 5.56 NATO is pointless.
But prohibiting open carry is appropriate.
Because the sight of a holstered gun is likely to cause a panic among the ignorant.Not selling handgun ammunition and 5.56 NATO is pointless.
But prohibiting open carry is appropriate.
Would this person have had as much "emotional turbulence, if he knew he could quit and applied for unemployment compensation, before it got to this point?"Officials said Monday that the suspect had been fired by his employer, Journey Oil Field Services, on Saturday morning. He called 911 and the FBI’s national tip line after his dismissal and made “rambling” statements “about some of the atrocities that he felt he had gone through,” Christopher Combs, special agent in charge of FBI’s San Antonio division, said at a press conference.
And they did nothing about it. F.B.I. - For Blatant Inaction
Not even baby steps.More Big Retailers Ask Customers Not To Openly Carry Guns In Stores
Walgreens and CVS have joined similar calls from Kroger and Walmart following multiple mass shootings in recent weeks.
Well, baby steps are better than no steps at all.
![]()
Our gun laws need major changes!
![]()
Our gun laws need major changes!
Da fuq kinda BS is that? Nobody needs a "license" to buy guns.
And if he was "committed", he never would have legally been able to pass the background check.
![]()
Our gun laws need major changes!
![]()
Our gun laws need major changes!
Da fuq kinda BS is that? Nobody needs a "license" to buy guns.
And if he was "committed", he never would have legally been able to pass the background check.
Ask the NRA why he had these guns. They defend nuts with guns - and fight hard against legislation to prevent it.
Alex Jones Loses Another Legal Battle In Sandy Hook Defamation Case
Good news! He belongs in prison!
![]()
Our gun laws need major changes!
Da fuq kinda BS is that? Nobody needs a "license" to buy guns.
And if he was "committed", he never would have legally been able to pass the background check.
Ask the NRA why he had these guns. They defend nuts with guns - and fight hard against legislation to prevent it.
You're an idiot. The NRA has nothing to do with morons getting their hands on guns.
Do you even know what the NRA does?
![]()
Our gun laws need major changes!
Da fuq kinda BS is that? Nobody needs a "license" to buy guns.
And if he was "committed", he never would have legally been able to pass the background check.
Ask the NRA why he had these guns. They defend nuts with guns - and fight hard against legislation to prevent it.
You're an idiot. The NRA has nothing to do with morons getting their hands on guns.
Do you even know what the NRA does?
Funny. I was an NRA member for many years - until it was hijacked by radicals in 1977. Also, the NRA fights legislation to prevent mentally ill from having access to guns. Google it...
How NRA’s true believers converted a marksmanship group into a mighty gun lobby