Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
doesn't stop speeding or drunk driving. There is that!! Doesn't stop someone from driving head on to another vehicle. Not one regulation stops that. Hell, it doesn't even stop guilty drivers of continuing to drive and buy cars. They can buy any car they can afford.Unless your car is old enough, then NONE of those apply. And, none of those government regulations reduces the basic capabilities of the vehicle.
Not one.
Yes I read that at that time, the term well regulated meant more like self disciplined. I would ask citizens and govt and party leaders to agree that the law applies to LAW abiding defenders of the law, and does not authorize anyone to abuse arms to Violate laws elsewhere in the Bill of Rights and Constitution. The purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to ENFORCE and DEFEND the same laws and due process that police are sworn to defend. If we can get that interpretation straight, then we don't need to add extra legislation because of people misinterpreting this law to mean anyone can use a gun to commit criminal abuses threats or violations which is inconsistent with the rest of the Bill of Rights the 2nd Amendment is part of.The term is……Well Regulated MILITIA
There was a specific interpretation of what a Well Regulated Militia was.
A Militia with a defined organization, that knew who its members were, had definite training and practice and knew what type of arms they had available
doesn't stop speeding or drunk driving. There is that!! Doesn't stop someone from driving head on to another vehicle. Not onre regulation stops that.
The OP is about guns, stick to the topic.Seat belts
Visibility regulations
Emissions limits
Etc.,etc., etc.
and needed ammunition.Yes, in order for a militia to be IN GOOD WORKING ORDER, they needed to HAVE GUNS THAT WORKED
DURRRRRR
just remove all armed guards from all government buildings and call it a day.Yes I read that at that time, the term well regulated meant more like self disciplined. I would ask citizens and govt and party leaders to agree that the law applies to LAW abiding defenders of the law, and does not authorize anyone to abuse arms to Violate laws elsewhere in the Bill of Rights and Constitution. The purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to ENFORCE and DEFEND the same laws and due process that police are sworn to defend. If we can get that interpretation straight, then we don't need to add extra legislation because of people misinterpreting this law to mean anyone can use a gun to commit criminal abuses threats or violations which is inconsistent with the rest of the Bill of Rights the 2nd Amendment is part of.
Liberals who don't believe in Constitutional laws as limiting Govt are like Atheists who don't believe in the Bible and pick pieces "out of context" to destroy the whole point purpose and meaning of that principle.
You get a totally different meaning abusing laws this way. That's not the fault of the believers who have a more consistent interpretation. So those citizens shouldn't be punished just because others keep imposing their own interpretations that create these conflicts.
We need to resolve the conflicts first, then we can write corrective policies after we agree what the problems and solutions really are!
can they fail a training course??Required training for owners is not controlling arms.
Required training for owners is not controlling arms.
Asshole traitor!Hypocrite!
Lol this doesn’t dispute what he said.
I did not participate in or applaud J6!Asshole traitor!
Precisely what makes you a traitor. Protesting the results of an election is democracy in action not insurrection.I did not participate in or applaud J6!
Owning a car isn't a right like gun ownership. Something demscum are too stupid to figure out.All sorts of restrictions have been placed on cars. So, you agree they should be placed on guns too?
He like all libs hate research, makes them look bad.You might want to do a little research into the damage a musket ball would do to the human body before spouting off.
Nothing in the Constitution says you cannot have restrictions on the ownership armsOwning a car isn't a right like gun ownership. Something demscum are too stupid to figure out.
What does "infringe" mean?Nothing in the Constitution says you cannot have restrictions on the ownership arms
