The Right To Destroy Jewish History

[Mindful]

 

[rylah]

I still hope for peace in Palestine. Picking at scabs doesn't help. Why not do the right thing?

That's why you're so afraid of dialogue?

Our problem is that Islam has no vision for 'peace',
but through submission to the yoke of Arab imperialism.
Which is neither just, nor 'peaceful' to even Arabs themselves.

 

[Sixties Fan]

 

[Sixties Fan]

Part 1

It is becoming increasingly difficult for Zionists and pro-Israel activists to engage in dialogue, participate in panels or appear on the media to discuss issues relating to Israel.

No, not because the discourse is reaching intolerable depths of incivility or animosity, nor because of the increase in antisemitic hatred introduced into the conversation although that aspect, while central, is not new.

It is so due to the unbelievable ignorance, lack of knowledge and inability to grasp context. A minimal level of comprehension is missing.

I think that there needs to be a minimal level of knowledge of historical facts before serious intellectual intercourse can be conducted on Twitter or other digital platforms, including the “Comments” sections at student newspapers, news websites and other type-in-your-rant-and-insult locations.

Test yourself​

To further that goal, I list below a few typical questions that should be asked of the participants who wish to engage in dialogue on topics of the current Arab conflict with Israel, the history of Zionism, the history of the Middle East and other issues, like Jewish world domination that occasionally creep (literally) into the exchange of opinions.

1. The name Palestine is the country in which Jesus was born. True or false?

2. Is Nablus an Arab name of a city in Palestine or a pronunciation corruption of the Latin Neapolis?

3. In 1919-20, Arab residents of the area soon to become the territory of the reconstituted Jewish national home referred to themselves as Southern Syrians and demanded they not be separated from Greater Syria. True or false?

Entrance Exam for Engagement with Zionists, Whether Insults or Serious Debate | United with Israel

There needs to be a minimal level of knowledge of historical facts before serious intellectual intercourse can be conducted on Twitter or other type-in-your-rant-and-insult locations.

unitedwithisrael.org

 

[Sixties Fan]

Part 2

4. In Ze’ev Jabotinsky’s 1923 article “The Iron Wall,” that was built of stone, iron or is it just a figure of speech?

5. In the Koran 17:1, the Prophet Muhammed was taken “to al-Masjid al- Aqsa,” the Furthest Mosque. As Muhammed died in 632 C.E., and Al-Aqsa was built later, is this a contradiction?

6. If pre-state immigration to Mandate Palestine included Jews from Yemen, Egypt, Morocco, Syria, Lebanon, Tunisia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Algeria, Sudan and Iran, why would Zionism be considered a “European movement”?

7. Avraham Shlomo Zalman Tzoref was stabbed by an Arab in Jerusalem in 1851 for repurchasing the Hurva Synagogue property and died. A) Was he Zionist? B) Was he an Arab terrorist?

8. During World War II, the leader of the Arabs of Mandate Palestine, the Mufti Amin al-Husseini, lived in Berlin and regularly broadcast pro-Nazi content, including references to a “worldwide Jewish conspiracy” that controlled the British and U.S. governments, and sponsored Soviet communism; and that “world Jewry” aimed to infiltrate and subjugate Palestine. Was the Mufti a Nazi, a Nazi collaborator or just an anti-Zionist?

Entrance Exam for Engagement with Zionists, Whether Insults or Serious Debate | United with Israel

There needs to be a minimal level of knowledge of historical facts before serious intellectual intercourse can be conducted on Twitter or other type-in-your-rant-and-insult locations.

unitedwithisrael.org

 

[Sixties Fan]

Part 3

9. Does the term “East Jerusalem” only refer to neighborhoods of Jerusalem to the east of a “West Jerusalem” or also to the south and north?

10. Abdullah I bin Al-Hussein was born in Mecca, the Hejaz, in 1881. When he arrived in the territory of Transjordan at Ma’an on Nov. 21, 1920, did he become a Transjordanian, a Jordanian or a Palestinian? Or did he remain a Hejazi?

11. UNRWA (the U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees) defines a refugee from Palestine as one who lived there from June 1, 1946, to May 15, 1948. Do you think just two years is too short or too long a period of residence in the country to qualify?

12. The message of the chanted slogan “From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be free!” means: a) Palestine’s geographical boundaries are the Jordan River and the Persian Gulf? b) a final acceptance of the 1947 Partition Plan? c) Israel ceases to exist?

13. Does the 1949 Geneva Convention, Article 49, actually define “settlement activity” as “illegal” or does it read: “The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies”?

Entrance Exam for Engagement with Zionists, Whether Insults or Serious Debate | United with Israel

There needs to be a minimal level of knowledge of historical facts before serious intellectual intercourse can be conducted on Twitter or other type-in-your-rant-and-insult locations.

unitedwithisrael.org

 

[Sixties Fan]

Part 4

14. The text of the January 1919 Faisal-Weizmann Agreement reads in Article 1: “The Arab State and Palestine.” If there is an “Arab State,” is that “Palestine” a) another Arab state? b) a Jewish Zionist state? c) a Hejazi colony?

15. In 1964, when the Palestine Liberation Organization was founded, three years prior to the Six-Day War, what “Palestine” were they liberating: a) Jordan? b) the West Bank and Gaza? c) Israel?

16. Disregarding your answer to the previous question, why was an Arab Palestine not established between the years 1948 and 1967?

P.S. If you wish to text a Jewish friend or relative with this examination, it is suggested that you select any four questions and ask them at the upcoming Passover seder.

Entrance Exam for Engagement with Zionists, Whether Insults or Serious Debate | United with Israel

There needs to be a minimal level of knowledge of historical facts before serious intellectual intercourse can be conducted on Twitter or other type-in-your-rant-and-insult locations.

unitedwithisrael.org

 

[Sixties Fan]

Veteran journalist and media critic Ira Stoll consistently identifies problematic coverage in The New York Times, exposing an agenda that disparages the State of Israel and promotes dangerous messages about Jews in the diaspora.

This week, the former managing editor of The Jerusalem Postpointed out in an Algemeiner piece a truly disturbing statement published in The New York Times that seems to question basic facts related to the Jewish people and the Land of Israel.

Specifically, Stoll analyzed an article by a New York Timescorrespondent named Raja Abdulrahim in which she claims that “Israel insists that there has been a Jewish presence in [Judea and Samaria] for thousands of years.” She makes this statement in the context of promoting the narrative that modern Jewish towns in those areas are somehow “illegal” under “international law.”

Setting aside the fact that the so-called “illegality of these towns has been rejected by the U.S. State Department and debunked by actual legal experts like George Mason University’s Professor Eugene Kontorovich, Abdulrahim’s ignores established historical facts by implying that Jewish presence in the Land of Israel is merely a contention or the opinion of one side in the conflict.

Israel doesn’t simply “insist” that Jews lived in Judea and Samaria for thousands of years. The historical record, archeological artifacts, carbon dating, and authenticated evidence proves that Jews lived in the Land of Israel for thousands of years.

As CAMERA senior research analyst Gilead Ini pointed out in a tweet referenced in Stoll’s Algemeiner piece, “This is the same paper, by the way, that had questioned whether Jewish temples existed on Jerusalem’s Temple Mount,” adding that the paper was “eventually compelled to correct the piece.”

Ini continues, “It’s the same paper that told readers—as a criticism of Israel!—that ‘East Jerusalem was exclusively Arab in 1967.’ Unmentioned: It had been ‘exclusively Arab’ for a mere 19 years, only because Jews were ethnically cleansed from the area in 1948.”

Stoll adds, “[Y]ou get the strange formulation of an entire country — Israel — insisting on something, as if it’s a cranky restaurant customer or a petulant child. It’s almost like the Times is afraid of investigating the underlying facts for fear that they might disturb the newspaper’s far-left readers, or hamper the reporter’s ability to operate freely in the Palestinian Authority-controlled West Bank.”

(full article online)

Fake History: NY Times Spreads This Dubious Statement About Jews in Israel | United with Israel

The New York Times exposes its own bias again with a statement about Jewish presence in the Land of Israel that questions basic historical facts.

unitedwithisrael.org

The New York Times Erases Jews. (Again.)

Once again, the New York Times has taken aim at Jewish history. Once again, in doing so, the paper has shown that, given the

www.camera.org

 

[Sixties Fan]

 

[Sixties Fan]

In preparation of throwing rocks at Jews and Israeli police, Palestinian youths spent the night taking larger boulders and breaking them up to make them the ideal size for hurling and for slinging, as this video shows:

(vide online)

On the east side of the Temple Mount there are thousands of huge boulders piled up. My tour guide for my last visit in 2019, Rabbi Chaim Richman of the Temple Institute, pointed out to me that some of them are carved - meaning that they were part of ancient buildings, possibly even the Temple itself. Here's a screenshot from that visit.


The rocks that these Arab "worshippers" are destroying so they can throw them at Jews could be of inestimable archaeological value.

These photos of the rocks in preparation for throwing show at least some that had obviously been previously used for some building purpose, with 90 degree corners and smooth surfaces:



UNESCO claims to care so much about protecting heritage sites. They routinely condemn Israeli archaeologists who are extraordinarily careful with their methods of digging and preserving ancient treasures.

Yet in the most sacred and archaeologically sensitive spot on the planet, the people who pretend to care so much about preserving cultural heritage are completely silent.

Someone should really ask UNESCO why that is.

(full article online)

The rocks Arabs throw at police might be priceless archaeological - or sacred - artifacts

Blogging about Israel and the Arab world since, oh, forever.

elderofziyon.blogspot.com

 

[surada]

Always changing the discussion, never answering anything. Always crying, screaming for the innocence of extremist Arabs who wanted to, and did, kill Jews in order to try to stop Israel from becoming a State.

Where did I blame the Mufti for the Holocaust?

He is responsible for what happened in Iraq in 1941.
And responsible for he death of Bosnian Jews.

And, yes, he is responsible for not as many Jews being saved from being killed by the Nazis, because his violence forced the British to cut down the number of Jewish immigrants and forced too many back to Europe.


Are you going to continue to show your Christian theology education to us, instead of answering questions and accepting the facts of history?

Did you, or anyone you know, meet the Mufti at any time, that you are always so defensive of him?


He kills Jews outside of the Mandate for Palestine, in Iraq and Bosnia, and you cannot understand what he really was for and against?

He made arrangements to save Jews by going to Spain. The Zionists stopped that.

 

[Sixties Fan]

He made arrangements to save Jews by going to Spain. The Zionists stopped that.

And of course you do have a link to this heroic action on Al Husseini's part.

Please share.

 

[Sixties Fan]

He made arrangements to save Jews by going to Spain. The Zionists stopped that.

Do you read, write, speak or understand Arabic?

 

[surada]

Do you read, write, speak or understand Arabic?

Very little. Blaming the mufti is stupid. The population of Palestine doubled in 15 years with European Jews who were largely socialists. 600,000 Zionists. Do you support illegal immigration and creating refugees?

 

[Sixties Fan]

Very little. Blaming the mufti is stupid. The population of Palestine doubled in 15 years with European Jews who were largely socialists. 600,000 Zionists. Do you support illegal immigration and creating refugees?

You allege something, show no proof.

Do you support attacks on Jews on their ancient homeland and all over the world?

Do you support the destruction of Israel so that Islam can have back the 20% the Jews have been allowed to keep of the 100% of their homeland?

80% of the Jewish homeland is under Islamic control.

That is more than enough for Islam.

Islam which did not care between 1948 and 1967 to create a Palestinian State via the conquerors of Gaza and Judea and Samaria, Egypt and Jordan.

And since then, Islam continues to not care about a Palestinian state, only about destroying a Jewish one.

Do you support the endless destruction of Jewish archeology by Islam?

It is Ramadan. Take a good look at what Arabs in Israel and Judea and Samaria are doing with Jewish Holy Sites, and have been doing for quite a few decades.

The amazing thing is that not ONE of this holy sites is holy to the Muslims attacking them, even though they insist that they are descended from Abraham.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Very little. Blaming the mufti is stupid. The population of Palestine doubled in 15 years with European Jews who were largely socialists. 600,000 Zionists. Do you support illegal immigration and creating refugees?

Hitler created refugees.

The British, afraid of the Arab violence, cut down on the legal immigration of Jews to the Mandate for Palestine created to rebuild the Jewish Nation.

You have no proof of the accusation that most Jews from Europe were socialists, whatever that means.

Hertzl and others Legally acquired the right to rebuild the Jewish Nation ON the Jewish Homeland.

Thousands of Arabs illegally immigrated to the Mandate
of Palestine, thanks to the Arab leadership which did not want Jews to be allowed to return to their ancient homeland, and did not want the State of Israel to come to be. And thanks to the British who looked away.


Are you clear about that part of history, now?

 

[surada]

Hitler created refugees.

The British, afraid of the Arab violence, cut down on the legal immigration of Jews to the Mandate for Palestine created to rebuild the Jewish Nation.

You have no proof of the accusation that most Jews from Europe were socialists, whatever that means.

Hertzl and others Legally acquired the right to rebuild the Jewish Nation ON the Jewish Homeland.

Thousands of Arabs illegally immigrated to the Mandate
of Palestine, thanks to the Arab leadership which did not want Jews to be allowed to return to their ancient homeland, and did not want the State of Israel to come to be. And thanks to the British who looked away.


Are you clear about that part of history, now?

Yes they were socialists and Bolsheviks.

 

[surada]

The Palestine Communist Party 1919 - 1948 on JSTOR

Joel Beinen, The Palestine Communist Party 1919 - 1948, MERIP Reports, No. 55 (Mar., 1977), pp. 3-17

www.jstor.org

 

[Indeependent]

The Palestine Communist Party 1919 - 1948 on JSTOR

Joel Beinen, The Palestine Communist Party 1919 - 1948, MERIP Reports, No. 55 (Mar., 1977), pp. 3-17

www.jstor.org

The Kibbutz was the only true instance of Communism in history.
Everybody did what they could and everybody got what they needed.
Only Jews could do that without guns or threats of imprisonment.
Your jealousy is embarrassing.

 

[surada]

The Kibbutz was the only true instance of Communism in history.
Everybody did what they could and everybody got what they needed.
Only Jews could do that without guns or threats of imprisonment.
Your jealousy is embarrassing.

Socialist Workers Party (Mandatory Palestine) - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org