The Righties seem to have trouble with this...

[BlindBoo]

That wasn't a lie.

Oh really? Show me ANY evidence that suggests that video had anything to do with the Benghazi attack! There is NONE!

Made up talking points - to draw attention away from their failure.

The Cairo protest was about the video, and it was entirely plausible to think that the Benghazi protest was too. There was no lie. There was being incorrect in the fog of such events, which is understandable. The right is making a mountain out of a molehill. No wonder Mitt lost. Your side has NO credibility on foreign policy since your side mismanaged the Iraq War so badly.


Seriously, conservatives have already failed to blame Obama for the attack, and he easily won reelection. Mitt deserved to lose, and we'd be bogged down in Syria now if he hadn't.

Witnesses say that ther was no protest, however the motivation of the attackers was the video.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/16/w...hazi-investigation.html?_r=2&ref=todayspaper&

 

[Wyatt earp]

That wasn't a lie.

Get with the program even the smart lefty's are starting to admit this.

There was no lie. No one lied. There is being wrong though. They were wrong about the video's role. Being wrong and lying are too different things.

For instance, the Bush WH was wrong about WMD in Iraq. They did not lie about them. They believed their bad intel, disbelieved the good intel, and thought they were doing the right thing. The costs of them being wrong was devastating and we're still reeling from the GOP mistake of the Iraq War. A mistake more costly than Benghazi, and the conservative anger we see today about mistakes would have been helpful during the Iraq War. Thanks for nothing.

Ok you have a point, But defend what Susan Rice did? It was a cover up and then (politcal chic has a thread about the debates) and that host implied on National t.v. that Obama said all along it was a terror attack. not true.

 

[Zoom-boing]

Wait. Are you saying that the statements in the first few days about that guy's video IS A LIE? Or is it a mistake?

Please be clear.

A LIE made in an attempt to form a scapegoat and take publicity off of the fact that Obama had been repeatedly been telling the public how he had decimated Alquada.

Clear enough?

Not clear enough. Try harder. Like linking to proof that Obama "had been repeatedly been telling the public how he had decimated Alquada"

He never did any such thing. He did kill it's leader though, which Bush promised to do but failed. His whole Presidency was a a megaflop. No wonder Obama easily won, twice.

Decimated? No. But he did say that his admin put AQ on a "path of decline that will be difficult to reverse".

The Country Reports on Terrorism 2011 issued by the State Department hailed the killing of bin Laden, the founder and sole leader of the terrorist group for 22 years, calling it an event that "highlighted a landmark year in the global effort to counter terrorism."

The report noted other killings of top terrorists such as Atiya Abdul Rahman, al-Qaeda's second-in-command, who was taken out not long after bin Laden's death. The State Department said that as a result the terrorist network is "on a path of decline that will be difficult to reverse."

State Dept. report says al-Qaeda in decline, hails Obama's actions - National Law Enforcement | Examiner.com


eta: Oh, I stand corrected. He did say AQ had be decimated. Thanks, GMU!

 

[bodecea]

Remember the threads about about the U.S. Ambassador was raped? Lies.

 

[Truthseeker420]

Number one --- It was spawned by a video.

That wasn't a lie.

Oh really? Show me ANY evidence that suggests that video had anything to do with the Benghazi attack! There is NONE!

Made up talking points - to draw attention away from their failure.

You think all the protests in Libya and other ME countries were just coincidence with the organized attack on the embassy ?

 

[bodecea]

Get with the program even the smart lefty's are starting to admit this.

There was no lie. No one lied. There is being wrong though. They were wrong about the video's role. Being wrong and lying are too different things.

For instance, the Bush WH was wrong about WMD in Iraq. They did not lie about them. They believed their bad intel, disbelieved the good intel, and thought they were doing the right thing. The costs of them being wrong was devastating and we're still reeling from the GOP mistake of the Iraq War. A mistake more costly than Benghazi, and the conservative anger we see today about mistakes would have been helpful during the Iraq War. Thanks for nothing.

Ok you have a point, But defend what Susan Rice did? It was a cover up and then (politcal chic has a thread about the debates) and that host implied on National t.v. that Obama said all along it was a terror attack. not true.

Do they still continue to cover up, or do they acknowledge that it wasn't video protests?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

A LIE made in an attempt to form a scapegoat and take publicity off of the fact that Obama had been repeatedly been telling the public how he had decimated Alquada.

Clear enough?

Not clear enough. Try harder. Like linking to proof that Obama "had been repeatedly been telling the public how he had decimated Alquada"

He never did any such thing. He did kill it's leader though, which Bush promised to do but failed. His whole Presidency was a a megaflop. No wonder Obama easily won, twice.

Decimated? No. But he did say that his admin put AQ on a "path of decline that will be difficult to reverse".

The Country Reports on Terrorism 2011 issued by the State Department hailed the killing of bin Laden, the founder and sole leader of the terrorist group for 22 years, calling it an event that "highlighted a landmark year in the global effort to counter terrorism."

The report noted other killings of top terrorists such as Atiya Abdul Rahman, al-Qaeda's second-in-command, who was taken out not long after bin Laden's death. The State Department said that as a result the terrorist network is "on a path of decline that will be difficult to reverse."

State Dept. report says al-Qaeda in decline, hails Obama's actions - National Law Enforcement | Examiner.com

He did to make that claim. I even posted a video of it.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=GQjztrnJzCM]Obama: "Al Qaeda Has Been Decimated" - YouTube[/ame]

 

[velvtacheeze]

That wasn't a lie.

Oh really? Show me ANY evidence that suggests that video had anything to do with the Benghazi attack! There is NONE!

Made up talking points - to draw attention away from their failure.

To Libyans who witnessed the assault and know the attackers, there is little doubt what occurred: a well-known group of local Islamist militants struck the United States Mission without any warning or protest, and they did it in retaliation for the video. That is what the fighters said at the time, speaking emotionally of their anger at the video without mentioning Al Qaeda, Osama bin Laden or the terrorist strikes of 11 years earlier. And it is an explanation that tracks with their history as members of a local militant group determined to protect Libya from Western influence.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/16/w...hazi-investigation.html?_r=2&ref=todayspaper&

The fighters said at the time that they were moved to act because of the video, which had first gained attention across the region after a protest in Egypt that day. The assailants approvingly recalled a 2006 assault by local Islamists that had destroyed an Italian diplomatic mission in Benghazi over a perceived insult to the prophet. In June the group staged a similar attack against the Tunisian Consulate over a different film, according to the Congressional testimony of the American security chief at the time, Eric A. Nordstrom.

Eric A. Nordstrom, hummm that name sound familiar...........

The actual attackers say it was the video , and witnesses on the scene say it was too, but were supposed to instead believe a bunch of GOP losers that it was an undefeated Al Queada. The same boobs & stooges that think rape can't cause pregnancy, and that Obama was born in Kenya are to believed over the actual attackers? I think not.

 

[chikenwing]

Number one --- It was spawned by a video.

That wasn't a lie.

And the moon is made of cheese,pigs fly and the sun sets in the east.

No hope for this one.

 

[BlindBoo]

Get with the program even the smart lefty's are starting to admit this.

There was no lie. No one lied. There is being wrong though. They were wrong about the video's role. Being wrong and lying are too different things.

For instance, the Bush WH was wrong about WMD in Iraq. They did not lie about them. They believed their bad intel, disbelieved the good intel, and thought they were doing the right thing. The costs of them being wrong was devastating and we're still reeling from the GOP mistake of the Iraq War. A mistake more costly than Benghazi, and the conservative anger we see today about mistakes would have been helpful during the Iraq War. Thanks for nothing.

The difference is that ZERO's folks CHANGED the talking points with no reason other that to hide the fact that al qaeda was still running rampant in the region. It was a LIE....

Bush was using the same info gathered all over the free world and even the dems had those reports. If was believed TRUE by virtually everyone.

WTF are you talking about. The Lybian president claimed other wise right before Embassador Rice went on the air. Frankly no one has proven the motivation of the attacker yet and only a few Western news organization have even interviewed eye witnesses. Anyone with a brain knew the talking points were for PR.

If talkinig points and PR are legitmate reasons to impeach a sitting president then no president would ever last out his first term let alone be relected.

 

[chikenwing]

Oh really? Show me ANY evidence that suggests that video had anything to do with the Benghazi attack! There is NONE!

Made up talking points - to draw attention away from their failure.

To Libyans who witnessed the assault and know the attackers, there is little doubt what occurred: a well-known group of local Islamist militants struck the United States Mission without any warning or protest, and they did it in retaliation for the video. That is what the fighters said at the time, speaking emotionally of their anger at the video without mentioning Al Qaeda, Osama bin Laden or the terrorist strikes of 11 years earlier. And it is an explanation that tracks with their history as members of a local militant group determined to protect Libya from Western influence.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/16/w...hazi-investigation.html?_r=2&ref=todayspaper&

The fighters said at the time that they were moved to act because of the video, which had first gained attention across the region after a protest in Egypt that day. The assailants approvingly recalled a 2006 assault by local Islamists that had destroyed an Italian diplomatic mission in Benghazi over a perceived insult to the prophet. In June the group staged a similar attack against the Tunisian Consulate over a different film, according to the Congressional testimony of the American security chief at the time, Eric A. Nordstrom.

Eric A. Nordstrom, hummm that name sound familiar...........

The actual attackers say it was the video , and witnesses on the scene say it was too, but were supposed to instead believe a bunch of GOP losers that it was an undefeated Al Queada. The same boobs & stooges that think rape can't cause pregnancy, and that Obama was born in Kenya are to believed over the actual attackers? I think not.

Is it the water?

 

[velvtacheeze]

Number one --- It was spawned by a video.

That wasn't a lie.

And the moon is made of cheese,pigs fly and the sun sets in the east.

No hope for this one.

The attackers and witnesses to the attack said it was a spontaneous attack by militiamen angry over the video. I'll believe them over GOP partisans motivated by getting revenge for losing two elections in a row because the GOP mishandled the Iraq War and lost foreign policy credibility.

 

[Wyatt earp]

There was no lie. No one lied. There is being wrong though. They were wrong about the video's role. Being wrong and lying are too different things.

For instance, the Bush WH was wrong about WMD in Iraq. They did not lie about them. They believed their bad intel, disbelieved the good intel, and thought they were doing the right thing. The costs of them being wrong was devastating and we're still reeling from the GOP mistake of the Iraq War. A mistake more costly than Benghazi, and the conservative anger we see today about mistakes would have been helpful during the Iraq War. Thanks for nothing.

Ok you have a point, But defend what Susan Rice did? It was a cover up and then (politcal chic has a thread about the debates) and that host implied on National t.v. that Obama said all along it was a terror attack. not true.

Do they still continue to cover up, or do they acknowledge that it wasn't video protests?

No they admited after a while. But like I said during the debates, it was implied that Obama said it was a terror attack from the get go and I remember watching SNL the next Saturday and they blasted Romney with it. So the low information voter thought it was true and Romney was a fool. with Benghazi I think, It was a lie, cover up at first and then they found out they couldnt get away with it and told the truth. I know people died but I dont think Obama commited any crime. Like with the other 9/11 not much a POTUS could do except take out the Nuclear football and start firing off nukes every which way. I guess.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Terrorists or witnesses in Libya are credible sources to frame talking points around but a couple of AMERICAN cops acted stupidly

 

[bodecea]

Well...it looks like the Authorities initially LIED in this case out of Central California:

Leila Fowler Killing: 12-Year-Old Brother Of Victim Arrested, To Be Charged With Homicide

 

[Yurt]

Remember the threads about about the U.S. Ambassador was raped? Lies.

no

btw...why is this thread still going? you have been shown the lies, you should have the courtesy to shut your thread down. it is an embarrassment. even lefty news outlets like ABC have reported obama lied.

sucks to be you.

 

[Wyatt earp]

That wasn't a lie.

And the moon is made of cheese,pigs fly and the sun sets in the east.

No hope for this one.

The attackers and witnesses to the attack said it was a spontaneous attack by militiamen angry over the video. I'll believe them over GOP partisans motivated by getting revenge for losing two elections in a row because the GOP mishandled the Iraq War and lost foreign policy credibility.

Lmao...... It was spontaneous? who the hell walks around with these weapons? Rocket-propelled grenades, hand grenades, assault rifles, 14.5 mm anti-aircraft machine guns and artillery mounted on gun trucks, diesel canisters, and mortars? A bunch of kids pissed off at a video? Serious weapons. I think.

 

[Wyatt earp]

That wasn't a lie.

And the moon is made of cheese,pigs fly and the sun sets in the east.

No hope for this one.

The attackers and witnesses to the attack said it was a spontaneous attack by militiamen angry over the video. I'll believe them over GOP partisans motivated by getting revenge for losing two elections in a row because the GOP mishandled the Iraq War and lost foreign policy credibility.

Lmao...... It was spontaneous? who the hell walks around with these weapons? Rocket-propelled grenades, hand grenades, assault rifles, 14.5 mm anti-aircraft machine guns and artillery mounted on gun trucks, diesel canisters, and mortars? A bunch of kids pissed off at a video? Serious weapons. I think. dont you?

 

[whitehall]

In 5 sentences or less.....what are the Lies stated by the Administration about Benghazi.

In 5 sentences or less? Is that the most information liberals can process at one time?

 

[squeeze berry]

lol

lefties on full tilt