The Righties seem to have trouble with this...

[Caroljo]

That wasn't a lie.

Oh really? Show me ANY evidence that suggests that video had anything to do with the Benghazi attack! There is NONE!

Made up talking points - to draw attention away from their failure.

The Cairo protest was about the video, and it was entirely plausible to think that the Benghazi protest was too. There was no lie. There was being incorrect in the fog of such events, which is understandable. The right is making a mountain out of a molehill. No wonder Mitt lost. Your side has NO credibility on foreign policy since your side mismanaged the Iraq War so badly.


Seriously, conservatives have already failed to blame Obama for the attack, and he easily won reelection. Mitt deserved to lose, and we'd be bogged down in Syria now if he hadn't.

Hey dummy....they've already proven that there was NO PROTEST going on in Benghazi! Why do you have to keep lying about this? Makes you look pretty stupid...........

Prior to the attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi late in the evening on Sept. 11, there was no protest outside the compound, a senior State Department official confirmed today, contradicting initial administration statements suggesting that the attack was an opportunistic reaction to unrest caused by an anti-Islam video.
State Department: No video protest at the Benghazi consulate | The Cable

 

[Sunshine]

In 5 sentences or less.....what are the Lies stated by the Administration about Benghazi.

Start with the reason for the attack:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAwMpL7POyo]Obama: 'The Future Must Not Belong To Those Who Slander The Prophet Of Islam' - YouTube[/ame]

 

[bodecea]

Remember the threads about about the U.S. Ambassador was raped? Lies.

no

btw...why is this thread still going? you have been shown the lies, you should have the courtesy to shut your thread down. it is an embarrassment. even lefty news outlets like ABC have reported obama lied.

sucks to be you.

A mistake over a few hectic days is NOT a lie. Oh, wait...in HateObamaLand it is.

 

[bodecea]

In 5 sentences or less.....what are the Lies stated by the Administration about Benghazi.

Start with the reason for the attack:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAwMpL7POyo]Obama: 'The Future Must Not Belong To Those Who Slander The Prophet Of Islam' - YouTube[/ame]

Was that a Lie or a Mistake corrected within days?

 

[bodecea]

In 5 sentences or less.....what are the Lies stated by the Administration about Benghazi.

In 5 sentences or less? Is that the most information liberals can process at one time?

Actually, I was trying to make it easy for Righties to articulate. Maybe I should have asked for crayons.

 

[bodecea]

Remember....this was a LIE too:

Leila Fowler Killing: 12-Year-Old Brother Of Victim Arrested, To Be Charged With Homicide

As was this a LIE :

http://www.usnews.com/news/newsgram...nster-provided-shots-at-house-cooked-for-them

And it looks like Rubio LIED here:

http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/05/13/18230699-officials-who-dont-exist-cant-resign?lite

 

[Caroljo]

That wasn't a lie.

Oh really? Show me ANY evidence that suggests that video had anything to do with the Benghazi attack! There is NONE!

Made up talking points - to draw attention away from their failure.

To Libyans who witnessed the assault and know the attackers, there is little doubt what occurred: a well-known group of local Islamist militants struck the United States Mission without any warning or protest, and they did it in retaliation for the video. That is what the fighters said at the time, speaking emotionally of their anger at the video without mentioning Al Qaeda, Osama bin Laden or the terrorist strikes of 11 years earlier. And it is an explanation that tracks with their history as members of a local militant group determined to protect Libya from Western influence.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/16/w...hazi-investigation.html?_r=2&ref=todayspaper&

The fighters said at the time that they were moved to act because of the video, which had first gained attention across the region after a protest in Egypt that day. The assailants approvingly recalled a 2006 assault by local Islamists that had destroyed an Italian diplomatic mission in Benghazi over a perceived insult to the prophet. In June the group staged a similar attack against the Tunisian Consulate over a different film, according to the Congressional testimony of the American security chief at the time, Eric A. Nordstrom.

Eric A. Nordstrom, hummm that name sound familiar...........

I cannot believe that you are actually still blaming the video.....wow.

 

[Caroljo]

There was no lie. No one lied. There is being wrong though. They were wrong about the video's role. Being wrong and lying are too different things.

For instance, the Bush WH was wrong about WMD in Iraq. They did not lie about them. They believed their bad intel, disbelieved the good intel, and thought they were doing the right thing. The costs of them being wrong was devastating and we're still reeling from the GOP mistake of the Iraq War. A mistake more costly than Benghazi, and the conservative anger we see today about mistakes would have been helpful during the Iraq War. Thanks for nothing.

The difference is that ZERO's folks CHANGED the talking points with no reason other that to hide the fact that al qaeda was still running rampant in the region. It was a LIE....

Bush was using the same info gathered all over the free world and even the dems had those reports. If was believed TRUE by virtually everyone.

It wasn't a lie. I could swear I made that clear. There was no lie. And editing talking points is common. When has a talking point sheet be agreed to on the first draft? What the heck. They aren't allowed to edit talking points? Are they being "uppity" when they do that?

Talking points? We're talking about talking points? " Practice? Practice? We're talking about practice? "

TWELVE times??????? Why would they have to do that???

 

[Caroljo]

That wasn't a lie.

And the moon is made of cheese,pigs fly and the sun sets in the east.

No hope for this one.

The attackers and witnesses to the attack said it was a spontaneous attack by militiamen angry over the video. I'll believe them over GOP partisans motivated by getting revenge for losing two elections in a row because the GOP mishandled the Iraq War and lost foreign policy credibility.

Doesn't surprise me you would believe people that want us dead before believing your fellow Americans. This is what it's come down to.....you hate the right so much that you would probably help the terrorists to get rid of us.

 

[bodecea]

And the moon is made of cheese,pigs fly and the sun sets in the east.

No hope for this one.

The attackers and witnesses to the attack said it was a spontaneous attack by militiamen angry over the video. I'll believe them over GOP partisans motivated by getting revenge for losing two elections in a row because the GOP mishandled the Iraq War and lost foreign policy credibility.

Doesn't surprise me you would believe people that want us dead before believing your fellow Americans. This is what it's come down to.....you hate the right so much that you would probably help the terrorists to get rid of us.

No, they are more YOUR buds. Conservative. Religious. Crazy.

 

[MeBelle]

Remember the reports about a bomb at the JFK Library? A lie.

Remember the reports that Gabby Gifford dies of her wounds? A lie.

Remember the reports that the Boston Bomber was still in Watertown? A lie.

Which is the exact reason why I refuse to pay attention to any 'details' of initial reports of any tragedy.
Our heads would explode if we believed every non-sourced 'detail' that immediately comes out.

 

[Caroljo]

No, you have not. Unless being mistaken for a few days is considered a lie. IF so, every initial report on any event is most likely a lie.

Remember the reports about a bomb at the JFK Library? A Lie.

Remember the reports that Gabby Gifford dies of her wounds? A Lie.

Remember the reports that the Boston Bomber was still in Watertown? A Lie.

It's not a mistake when you change talking points from "terrorism" to "video", behind closed doors... There was no mistake! There was LYING!!!

Then why was the term "terrorism" used almost from the very beginning?

Obama made a comment about "terrorist acts"....he NEVER said that attack in Benghazi was an act of terrorism. Hell, almost 2 weeks later he was STILL blaming the video...and they new it wasn't that as the attack was happening. There is nothing you or anyone else can say to cover that lie.

 

[Caroljo]

obama knew it had nothing to do with the video

he lied

/thread

Prove it.

Why? You won't believe anything anyway. You know damn well they all lied, the proof is out there, but you just ignore it like a good little robot!

 

[bripat9643]

Number one --- It was spawned by a video.

Lie two: The White House reported the facts as soon soon as they obtained them.

 

[Sunshine]

In 5 sentences or less.....what are the Lies stated by the Administration about Benghazi.

Start with the reason for the attack:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAwMpL7POyo]Obama: 'The Future Must Not Belong To Those Who Slander The Prophet Of Islam' - YouTube[/ame]

Was that a Lie or a Mistake corrected within days?

That was a lie, a deliberate lie that put a man's life in danger. And it goes 180 out from the Constitution and the SCOTUS rulings of the last 50 years! He is a fucking lawyer and he knows that.

 

[bripat9643]

In 5 sentences or less.....what are the Lies stated by the Administration about Benghazi.

Start with the reason for the attack:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAwMpL7POyo]Obama: 'The Future Must Not Belong To Those Who Slander The Prophet Of Islam' - YouTube[/ame]

Was that a Lie or a Mistake corrected within days?

It was a lie because they had the facts from day one.

 

[Antares]

There is no task, you show yourself to be no more than another brain dead moron.

You would protect Obama even if he was caught selling State Secrets.

You are american excrement.

lol

even the lefty news media are reporting on the lies

take your head out of the sand

Nope. You haven't completed the task.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

obama knew it had nothing to do with the video

he lied

/thread

Prove it.

Why? You won't believe anything anyway. You know damn well they all lied, the proof is out there, but you just ignore it like a good little robot!

Unsurprisingly, that’s very childish, and indeed indicates there is no ‘proof.’

 

[bripat9643]

Prove it.

Why? You won't believe anything anyway. You know damn well they all lied, the proof is out there, but you just ignore it like a good little robot!

Unsurprisingly, that’s very childish, and indeed indicates there is no ‘proof.’

There is abundant proof. For starters, there are all twelve versions of the talking points that Susan Rice spewed over the Sunday Morning talk shows.

 

[Yurt]

Prove it.

Why? You won't believe anything anyway. You know damn well they all lied, the proof is out there, but you just ignore it like a good little robot!

Unsurprisingly, that’s very childish, and indeed indicates there is no ‘proof.’

unsurprisingly, you ignore the truth that is out there

you ignore obama's lies

again, unsurprisingly