The Righties seem to have trouble with this...

[Katzndogz]

When obama released the talking points about it being a video he knew then that it wasn't true. That makes it a lie.

 

[velvtacheeze]

Oh really? Show me ANY evidence that suggests that video had anything to do with the Benghazi attack! There is NONE!

Made up talking points - to draw attention away from their failure.

The Cairo protest was about the video, and it was entirely plausible to think that the Benghazi protest was too. There was no lie. There was being incorrect in the fog of such events, which is understandable. The right is making a mountain out of a molehill. No wonder Mitt lost. Your side has NO credibility on foreign policy since your side mismanaged the Iraq War so badly.


Seriously, conservatives have already failed to blame Obama for the attack, and he easily won reelection. Mitt deserved to lose, and we'd be bogged down in Syria now if he hadn't.

You guys can;t even accept the truth when your own are telling it to you. The video was a pathetic excuse with no basis to reality. Arguing otherwise just proves that you are incapable of handling the truth.

The truth is that it was an attack on the US, and not a scandal of the Democratic Party. Despite all this over-the-top wing nut outrage, Obama easily won reelection, and the GOP failures in Iraq and the economy were the number one reason why. Yes, two elections in a row because Bush was so bad. It's your side that needs to handle that truth, learn from your mistakes, and moderate your policies to be more attractive to the American voter.

 

[Obamanation]

That wasn't a lie.

Get with the program even the smart lefty's are starting to admit this.

There was no lie. No one lied. There is being wrong though. They were wrong about the video's role. Being wrong and lying are too different things.

For instance, the Bush WH was wrong about WMD in Iraq. They did not lie about them. They believed their bad intel, disbelieved the good intel, and thought they were doing the right thing. The costs of them being wrong was devastating and we're still reeling from the GOP mistake of the Iraq War. A mistake more costly than Benghazi, and the conservative anger we see today about mistakes would have been helpful during the Iraq War. Thanks for nothing.

The difference is that ZERO's folks CHANGED the talking points with no reason other that to hide the fact that al qaeda was still running rampant in the region. It was a LIE....

Bush was using the same info gathered all over the free world and even the dems had those reports. If was believed TRUE by virtually everyone.

 

[bodecea]

Number one --- It was spawned by a video.

Nope. Haven't completed the task.

Yes, I have...

No, you have not. Unless being mistaken for a few days is considered a lie. IF so, every initial report on any event is most likely a lie.

Remember the reports about a bomb at the JFK Library? A Lie.

Remember the reports that Gabby Gifford dies of her wounds? A Lie.

Remember the reports that the Boston Bomber was still in Watertown? A Lie.

 

[bodecea]

That wasn't a lie.

Get with the program even the smart lefty's are starting to admit this.

There was no lie. No one lied. There is being wrong though. They were wrong about the video's role. Being wrong and lying are too different things.

For instance, the Bush WH was wrong about WMD in Iraq. They did not lie about them. They believed their bad intel, disbelieved the good intel, and thought they were doing the right thing. The costs of them being wrong was devastating and we're still reeling from the GOP mistake of the Iraq War. A mistake more costly than Benghazi, and the conservative anger we see today about mistakes would have been helpful during the Iraq War. Thanks for nothing.

The Righties fail to see the difference.

 

[bodecea]

When obama released the talking points about it being a video he knew then that it wasn't true. That makes it a lie.

Prove that.

 

[OriginalShroom]

Number one --- It was spawned by a video.

That wasn't a lie.

The mere fact that you say that statement wasn't a lie shows how much of a partisan hack you've become.

 

[Obamanation]

Nope. Haven't completed the task.

Yes, I have...

No, you have not. Unless being mistaken for a few days is considered a lie. IF so, every initial report on any event is most likely a lie.

Remember the reports about a bomb at the JFK Library? A Lie.

Remember the reports that Gabby Gifford dies of her wounds? A Lie.

Remember the reports that the Boston Bomber was still in Watertown? A Lie.

It's not a mistake when you change talking points from "terrorism" to "video", behind closed doors... There was no mistake! There was LYING!!!

 

[bodecea]

Number one --- It was spawned by a video.

That wasn't a lie.

The mere fact that you say that statement wasn't a lie shows how much of a partisan hack you've become.

Remember...to RWrs...there is no difference between a Mistake and a Lie.

 

[bodecea]

Yes, I have...

No, you have not. Unless being mistaken for a few days is considered a lie. IF so, every initial report on any event is most likely a lie.

Remember the reports about a bomb at the JFK Library? A Lie.

Remember the reports that Gabby Gifford dies of her wounds? A Lie.

Remember the reports that the Boston Bomber was still in Watertown? A Lie.

It's not a mistake when you change talking points from "terrorism" to "video", behind closed doors... There was no mistake! There was LYING!!!

Then why was the term "terrorism" used almost from the very beginning?

 

[Obamanation]

When obama released the talking points about it being a video he knew then that it wasn't true. That makes it a lie.

Prove that.

They changed the reports from "terrorism" to "video". That is proof! There was NEVER any indication of the "video" having any role in the attack at all!!

It was a lie!!!!

You know it as well as everyone else. There is no debate about it. You can chose to ignore the facts --- but they are STILL FACTS!!!

 

[velvtacheeze]

Get with the program even the smart lefty's are starting to admit this.

There was no lie. No one lied. There is being wrong though. They were wrong about the video's role. Being wrong and lying are too different things.

For instance, the Bush WH was wrong about WMD in Iraq. They did not lie about them. They believed their bad intel, disbelieved the good intel, and thought they were doing the right thing. The costs of them being wrong was devastating and we're still reeling from the GOP mistake of the Iraq War. A mistake more costly than Benghazi, and the conservative anger we see today about mistakes would have been helpful during the Iraq War. Thanks for nothing.

The difference is that ZERO's folks CHANGED the talking points with no reason other that to hide the fact that al qaeda was still running rampant in the region. It was a LIE....

Bush was using the same info gathered all over the free world and even the dems had those reports. If was believed TRUE by virtually everyone.

It wasn't a lie. I could swear I made that clear. There was no lie. And editing talking points is common. When has a talking point sheet be agreed to on the first draft? What the heck. They aren't allowed to edit talking points? Are they being "uppity" when they do that?

Talking points? We're talking about talking points? " Practice? Practice? We're talking about practice? "

 

[Yurt]

obama knew it had nothing to do with the video

he lied

/thread

 

[ScienceRocks]

Our freedom of speech needs to be defended by call cost. This is all I'll say.

 

[Wyatt earp]

That wasn't a lie.

Get with the program even the smart lefty's are starting to admit this.

Still haven't completed the task.

What task? not my fault you were watching America's got talent that week. I have been reading some of the libs comments on here and other forums that are admiting it and then you have ABC news.

 

[bodecea]

obama knew it had nothing to do with the video

he lied

/thread

Prove it.

 

[velvtacheeze]

Oh really? Show me ANY evidence that suggests that video had anything to do with the Benghazi attack! There is NONE!

Made up talking points - to draw attention away from their failure.

Wait. Are you saying that the statements in the first few days about that guy's video IS A LIE? Or is it a mistake?

Please be clear.

A LIE made in an attempt to form a scapegoat and take publicity off of the fact that Obama had been repeatedly been telling the public how he had decimated Alquada.

Clear enough?

Not clear enough. Try harder. Like linking to proof that Obama "had been repeatedly been telling the public how he had decimated Alquada"

He never did any such thing. He did kill it's leader though, which Bush promised to do but failed. His whole Presidency was a a megaflop. No wonder Obama easily won, twice.

 

[Yurt]

Benghazi Documents Scrubbed of Terror Reference: ABC News Digital Report

Benghazi Talking Points Memos: Documents Scrubbed of Terror Reference, Revised 12 Times: Exclusive | Video - ABC News

that is a lie

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Wait. Are you saying that the statements in the first few days about that guy's video IS A LIE? Or is it a mistake?

Please be clear.

A LIE made in an attempt to form a scapegoat and take publicity off of the fact that Obama had been repeatedly been telling the public how he had decimated Alquada.

Clear enough?

Not clear enough. Try harder. Like linking to proof that Obama "had been repeatedly been telling the public how he had decimated Alquada"

He never did any such thing. He did kill it's leader though, which Bush promised to do but failed. His whole Presidency was a a megaflop. No wonder Obama easily won, twice.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=GQjztrnJzCM]Obama: "Al Qaeda Has Been Decimated" - YouTube[/ame]

 

[BlindBoo]

Number one --- It was spawned by a video.

That wasn't a lie.

Oh really? Show me ANY evidence that suggests that video had anything to do with the Benghazi attack! There is NONE!

Made up talking points - to draw attention away from their failure.

To Libyans who witnessed the assault and know the attackers, there is little doubt what occurred: a well-known group of local Islamist militants struck the United States Mission without any warning or protest, and they did it in retaliation for the video. That is what the fighters said at the time, speaking emotionally of their anger at the video without mentioning Al Qaeda, Osama bin Laden or the terrorist strikes of 11 years earlier. And it is an explanation that tracks with their history as members of a local militant group determined to protect Libya from Western influence.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/16/w...hazi-investigation.html?_r=2&ref=todayspaper&

The fighters said at the time that they were moved to act because of the video, which had first gained attention across the region after a protest in Egypt that day. The assailants approvingly recalled a 2006 assault by local Islamists that had destroyed an Italian diplomatic mission in Benghazi over a perceived insult to the prophet. In June the group staged a similar attack against the Tunisian Consulate over a different film, according to the Congressional testimony of the American security chief at the time, Eric A. Nordstrom.

Eric A. Nordstrom, hummm that name sound familiar...........