The Russia Hoax--Clinton Schema to Clear Hillary and Frame Donald Trump?

[beautress]

Right Wing non-science fiction?

Only if your mind is nailed shut, hm? You naughty boy.

Who asked for help from the Russians?

Did you read the book or review the interviews? That could help you with your question, doll.

Who had a vested interest in asking for and receiving help from the Russians?

Dude, the CLINTONS, lol...…...to the tune of 25 to 63 million reasons. Read the Solomon piece why don't you! It is the crux of Republicans spin on the collusion. It will if nothing else; inform you, and in the process, may learn something.

Remember...……...to debate an issue, you must be aware of BOTH sides of the argument. The John Solomon piece is free, not a book, and will lay out for you exactly what the other side thinks and why!

There was no collusion. Collusion is a term that applies to financial impropriety. "Collusion is a non-competitive clandestine or sometimes illegal agreement between rivals that attempts to disrupt the market's equilibrium."

It was a stupid charge to make and it is still going around because people on the left don't want to face it, they have been lied to by their own party, their own television DNC shills that they love to listen to and eat popcorn. That's because they misunderstand language definitions and assume the media they love, sponsored by their DNC leadership are telling the truth. There isn't a whit of truth in the annoying misuse of the party to charge collusion against an innocent President of the United States.

Naughty, naughty, naughty!

 

[danielpalos]

Who had a vested interest in asking for and receiving help from the Russians?

Here, just in case you can't find it! John Solomon: "The case for Russia collusion … against the Democrats" | WVSports.com

Can you elaborate on this:

Simpson, Steele and Perkins Coie all walked Trump-Russia related allegations into the FBI the summer before the election, prompting agents who openly disliked Trump to launch a counterintelligence probe of the GOP nominee shortly before Election Day.

From my understanding, Your guys showed up as a national security concern and not being Patriotic enough in their Acts. Why any recusal from Your guy's own AG?

1. Because a counter intelligence operation has to go through certain channels, and they did not. Why is that so? Because if you or I proclaim that Russia is on the verge of launching a nuke at us and it is not checked out by the powers that be 1st, misinformation could be the start of WWIII. That is EXACTLY why counter intelligence; which is what this was, has to go through certain channels.

How does that happen in any Professional organization?

Good question, I have no idea.

Let me tell you---------->the Democrats are by far the most savvy politically, of this there is no doubt. Democrats ALWAYS control the political narrative of what the population speaks about. Maybe it has to do with them exerting more control over the MSM and Hollywood, I really do not know.

I do know that Sessions did NOT do the Trump team any favors when he recused himself, nor did he do the Democrats any favors either.

Why?

Because the bad political move by Sessions has allowed this to continue unabated for over 2 years, and if it all comes out as a fabrication, the Democrats are going to look really bad and uninformed, maybe even liars.

If Sessions would have held his ground, most of this would have already been resolved within 6 or 8 months of Trump taking office. Now you have both sides in a hard camp, and the one that comes out with egg on their face is going to get smoked in 2020. Politically, it is very, very, bad for our country, and both sides should have the smarts to admit it!

You are implying a Professional organization was unProfessional.

 

[beautress]

I don't know how someone could write a serious book on an investigation that is still a black box of secrecy. Just to get it book length would mean it is mostly conjecture and fabrication.

I tend to think any “investigation” by our criminal government, isn’t likely to expose the truth.

Because it's being led by one of the world's top criminals?

Yes, but only if Hillary were that leader. Trump is likely a criminal too, but no one exceeds Hillary on criminality.

Plus with Trump, the MSM is kicking his ass very day. With Hillary, they would be licking her ass very day, as they did with Big Ears.

Actually, he is not. Those who have ever owned a business know the importance of being true, honest, and fair in all transactions. Business people don't last if they do not perform in a decent, honest way, and perform honest deals consistently. That brings home the bacon in business and in human relations. Trump fits the honesty parameter in business. And, he expects the same from his staff.

in right wing fantasy; All you You say is always right.

I detect projection in your first phrase and confusion in the second part of your wannabe sentence attempting to marginalize a person who knows the difference. Poor little boy.

 

[beautress]

Here, just in case you can't find it! John Solomon: "The case for Russia collusion … against the Democrats" | WVSports.com

Can you elaborate on this:

Simpson, Steele and Perkins Coie all walked Trump-Russia related allegations into the FBI the summer before the election, prompting agents who openly disliked Trump to launch a counterintelligence probe of the GOP nominee shortly before Election Day.

From my understanding, Your guys showed up as a national security concern and not being Patriotic enough in their Acts. Why any recusal from Your guy's own AG?

1. Because a counter intelligence operation has to go through certain channels, and they did not. Why is that so? Because if you or I proclaim that Russia is on the verge of launching a nuke at us and it is not checked out by the powers that be 1st, misinformation could be the start of WWIII. That is EXACTLY why counter intelligence; which is what this was, has to go through certain channels.

How does that happen in any Professional organization?

Good question, I have no idea.

Let me tell you---------->the Democrats are by far the most savvy politically, of this there is no doubt. Democrats ALWAYS control the political narrative of what the population speaks about. Maybe it has to do with them exerting more control over the MSM and Hollywood, I really do not know.

I do know that Sessions did NOT do the Trump team any favors when he recused himself, nor did he do the Democrats any favors either.

Why?

Because the bad political move by Sessions has allowed this to continue unabated for over 2 years, and if it all comes out as a fabrication, the Democrats are going to look really bad and uninformed, maybe even liars.

If Sessions would have held his ground, most of this would have already been resolved within 6 or 8 months of Trump taking office. Now you have both sides in a hard camp, and the one that comes out with egg on their face is going to get smoked in 2020. Politically, it is very, very, bad for our country, and both sides should have the smarts to admit it!

You are implying a Professional organization was unProfessional.

I learned it from watching the video you did not watch, then verifying it in a legal dictionary. It's not that hard to get at the truth if you didn't snore your way through communications class in college, doll.

 

[imawhosure]

Here, just in case you can't find it! John Solomon: "The case for Russia collusion … against the Democrats" | WVSports.com

Can you elaborate on this:

Simpson, Steele and Perkins Coie all walked Trump-Russia related allegations into the FBI the summer before the election, prompting agents who openly disliked Trump to launch a counterintelligence probe of the GOP nominee shortly before Election Day.

From my understanding, Your guys showed up as a national security concern and not being Patriotic enough in their Acts. Why any recusal from Your guy's own AG?

1. Because a counter intelligence operation has to go through certain channels, and they did not. Why is that so? Because if you or I proclaim that Russia is on the verge of launching a nuke at us and it is not checked out by the powers that be 1st, misinformation could be the start of WWIII. That is EXACTLY why counter intelligence; which is what this was, has to go through certain channels.

How does that happen in any Professional organization?

Good question, I have no idea.

Let me tell you---------->the Democrats are by far the most savvy politically, of this there is no doubt. Democrats ALWAYS control the political narrative of what the population speaks about. Maybe it has to do with them exerting more control over the MSM and Hollywood, I really do not know.

I do know that Sessions did NOT do the Trump team any favors when he recused himself, nor did he do the Democrats any favors either.

Why?

Because the bad political move by Sessions has allowed this to continue unabated for over 2 years, and if it all comes out as a fabrication, the Democrats are going to look really bad and uninformed, maybe even liars.

If Sessions would have held his ground, most of this would have already been resolved within 6 or 8 months of Trump taking office. Now you have both sides in a hard camp, and the one that comes out with egg on their face is going to get smoked in 2020. Politically, it is very, very, bad for our country, and both sides should have the smarts to admit it!

You are implying a Professional organization was unProfessional.

No I am not! I am implying that the politicians at the top who were installed to run it were. That is why PROTOCOL was not followed, or the rules in place would have stopped it in its tracks.

 

[beautress]

​

Ran across this book at Amazon and wondered if anyone has read this book, and do you think it is true or false?

Right Wing non-science fiction?

Only if your mind is nailed shut, hm? You naughty boy.

Who asked for help from the Russians?

Did you read the book or review the interviews? That could help you with your question, doll.

Who had a vested interest in asking for and receiving help from the Russians?

This is not a trial by idiots, doll. Your party is banking on your own self-imposed ignorance, like one of the persons above who posts inanities, but doesn't have the courage to read the book to verify or disqualify. That's how the DNC controls people. First they lie about their opponent. Then they provide 10 liars to vouch for the first lie. Then they vilify anyone who questions them and go as far as having their children vilify their target's children at school for added misery on top of being lied about. When and if they win, they bankrupt the government in celebration of their "win" weakening the treasury of the United States of America from providing for the common defense. That in and of itself leads to enemies of the country committing atrocities against this nation, time and again. Right now, criminally invasive immigrants are flooding the school system and causing schools to have to quadruple their funding one way or another. They wind up having to pass laws to steal peoples' inheritances, farms, real estate, and pass death taxes that are way over the top, cause farm families to have to sell their properties at a loss to bigger and bigger businesses. It's bringing a feudal system into a free country. In order to make people forget what a feudal system is, the DNC has to take people's eye off the freedoms they have so that they can remove all the freedom they can in order to create a serfdom while they willfully and idly squander tax money on luxury vacations to Puerto Rico and other ports o' call for themselves.

And the leftists dream on rather than following up on the truth of the matter, which might just expose the lies they started off telling in the first place to gain extraordinary benefits for themselves at the loss of the nation's freedoms, property, and good will. All because you democrats do absolutely nothing to check up on the truth or lies your party feeds you with constantly, creating a separate and alternative universe in which you punish the very people who bring home the bacon to the country.

Your best defense against lies is to look things up in the dictionary when you are unacquainted with a term. In the case of the charge of collusion, you need a specific type of dictionary: a legal dictionary. Other informal sources miss the mark due to common misusage of the term by -- yep, the DNC disinformation specialists who lie to win you and lie to hold you.

 

[Seawytch]

Only if your mind is nailed shut, hm? You naughty boy.

Who asked for help from the Russians?

Did you read the book or review the interviews? That could help you with your question, doll.

Who had a vested interest in asking for and receiving help from the Russians?

Dude, the CLINTONS, lol...…...to the tune of 25 to 63 million reasons. Read the Solomon piece why don't you! It is the crux of Republicans spin on the collusion. It will if nothing else; inform you, and in the process, may learn something.

Remember...……...to debate an issue, you must be aware of BOTH sides of the argument. The John Solomon piece is free, not a book, and will lay out for you exactly what the other side thinks and why!

There was no collusion. Collusion is a term that applies to financial impropriety. "Collusion is a non-competitive clandestine or sometimes illegal agreement between rivals that attempts to disrupt the market's equilibrium."

It was a stupid charge to make and it is still going around because people on the left don't want to face it, they have been lied to by their own party, their own television DNC shills that they love to listen to and eat popcorn. That's because they misunderstand language definitions and assume the media they love, sponsored by their DNC leadership are telling the truth. There isn't a whit of truth in the annoying misuse of the party to charge collusion against an innocent President of the United States.

Naughty, naughty, naughty!

The crime is conspiracy, not collusion. Oh yeah, then there's all the obstruction of justice.

Trump Keeps Saying “No Collusion” Because He Doesn’t Understand Collusion

Rocah: Well yeah, I’ve been saying this actually since he first started tweeting. I think first of all, Trump has no idea what the conspiracy law means and how it works. So when he says, It’s a witch hunt, no collusion, what he was actually saying is, I had no phone calls. I had no meetings. I didn’t do this. And I think he may actually believe that as long as he didn’t do that, and this is common. I mean, we should point out this is common amongst criminals.

I can’t tell you how many people, cooperators I met with, who thought they hadn’t done anything wrong because they hadn’t actually had face-to-face or phone-to-phone conversations or email contact with the other person whom they were charged in a conspiracy with. It took a while. It would take a while in those proffer sessions to explain to people. You don’t have to. That’s not how conspiracy law works. This is a widely used law that is very broad and you can actually join a conspiracy with someone you actually have never even met. That’s sort of the point of the law, right? It’s to capture whether you’re working toward a common scheme. So I think Trump doesn’t understand that even if he didn’t know, let’s assume for a moment, every part of what was going on here: how they were going to throw the election, or when exactly that was going to happen. As long as he had some idea of the understanding of the broad purpose of what they were doing and he did something, anything material to sort of facilitate that in some way, that could put him in that conspiracy.​

 

[easyt65]

Illegal Russian Collusion was / is real....it just involved the Clintons, not Trump. When will snowflakes finally admit that? How much more evidence has to be exposed proving that before they accept / acknowledge that?



Private interests that closed deals with Vladimir Putin and his agents — thanks to then–secretary of state Hillary Clinton’s public favors — gave the Clinton Foundation, the Clintons’ de facto slush fund, between $152 million and $173 million.
-- It operated a veritable full-employment program for the courtiers in Hillary’s “government in waiting” during the Obama years and financed much of the Clintons’ global travels. Donations to the Clinton Foundation were, in essence, gift-wrapped presents for the Clintons.

PERSONAL ENRICHMENT TIED TO RUSSIA:

"Hillary’s March 2009 button-pushing “Russian reset” ceremony with Moscow’s foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, triggered this particular bonanza. Hillary captured its essence in March 2010 when she told former Soviet propagandist Vladimir Pozner on First Channel TV: “Our goal is to help strengthen Russia.”




The Clintons also strengthened their coffers. Three key transactions compose their pro-Kremlin graft.

1. 'THE RUSSIA-BOEING BONANZA':
“The Ex-Im Bank would welcome an application for financing from Rosavia to support its purchase of Boeing aircraft,” Hillary said in Moscow on October 13, 2009.
-- Three days later “Boeing formally submitted its bid for the Russian deal.” Kremlin-owned Rostekhnologii decided on June 1, 2010, to buy up to 50 Boeing 737s for Aeroflot, Russia’s national airline. Price: $3.7 billion. That August 17, Boeing gave the Clinton Foundation $900,000 to “help support the reconstruction of Haiti’s public-education system”.

2. HILLARY FACILITATES RUSSIAN INDUSTRIAL ESPIONAGE:
Hillary pushed Skolkovo, “a high-tech corridor in Russia modeled after our own Silicon Valley,” as she explained in Moscow in October 2009. Her State Department colleagues encouraged 22 top American venture capitalists to tour Skolkovo in May 2010. Her Dept of State convinced Cisco, Google, and Intel, among others, to open shop in Skolkovo. By 2012, 28 “Key Partners” from the U.S., Europe, and Russia supported this project.

The US Army, backed by the FBI, however, exposed Skolkovo as being "arguably an overt alternative to clandestine industrial espionage.”

Call it 'Influence Peddling', 'Quid Pro Quo', or just plain old treason in helping the Russians conduct Industrial Espionage on the US..."Never mind this threat to U.S. national security - The Clintons got paid. An August 2016 Government Accountability Institute study titled From Russia with Money reported that 17 of Skolkovo’s “Key Partners” plied Bill with speaking fees or gave the Clinton Foundation between $6.5 million and $23.5 million."

3. URANIUM ONE? HILLARY AND BILL GOT PAID...AGAIN!
Russia’s State Atomic Energy Corporation, Rosatom, announced on June 8, 2010, a $1.3 billion bid for a majority stake in Canada’s Uranium One. Its assets included 20 percent of American reserves of the main ingredient in atomic bombs. Hillary was one of nine federal-agency chiefs on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, which evaluated this strategically sensitive proposal. As America’s chief diplomat, Hillary could have sunk it. She didn’t. Despite top Republican lawmakers’ grave reservations, CFIUS approved Rosatom’s offer and handed the Kremlin one fifth of U.S. uranium supplies.

Before, during, and after CFIUS’s review, “shareholders involved in this transaction had transferred approximately $145 million to the Clinton Foundation or its initiatives.”


All told, the companies and investors in these Russia-strengthening deals gave the Clinton Foundation between $152 million and $173 million. If Robert Mueller seeks Russian collusion, it’s right there....all supported by facts, documents, records, and key testimony!


Clinton-Russia Collusion: Plenty of Evidence | National Review


.

 

[rightwinger]

But, but.........what about Hillary?
<sob>

 

[beautress]

Who asked for help from the Russians?

Did you read the book or review the interviews? That could help you with your question, doll.

Who had a vested interest in asking for and receiving help from the Russians?

Dude, the CLINTONS, lol...…...to the tune of 25 to 63 million reasons. Read the Solomon piece why don't you! It is the crux of Republicans spin on the collusion. It will if nothing else; inform you, and in the process, may learn something.

Remember...……...to debate an issue, you must be aware of BOTH sides of the argument. The John Solomon piece is free, not a book, and will lay out for you exactly what the other side thinks and why!

There was no collusion. Collusion is a term that applies to financial impropriety. "Collusion is a non-competitive clandestine or sometimes illegal agreement between rivals that attempts to disrupt the market's equilibrium."

It was a stupid charge to make and it is still going around because people on the left don't want to face it, they have been lied to by their own party, their own television DNC shills that they love to listen to and eat popcorn. That's because they misunderstand language definitions and assume the media they love, sponsored by their DNC leadership are telling the truth. There isn't a whit of truth in the annoying misuse of the party to charge collusion against an innocent President of the United States.

Naughty, naughty, naughty!

The crime is conspiracy, not collusion. Oh yeah, then there's all the obstruction of justice.

Trump Keeps Saying “No Collusion” Because He Doesn’t Understand Collusion

Rocah: Well yeah, I’ve been saying this actually since he first started tweeting. I think first of all, Trump has no idea what the conspiracy law means and how it works. So when he says, It’s a witch hunt, no collusion, what he was actually saying is, I had no phone calls. I had no meetings. I didn’t do this. And I think he may actually believe that as long as he didn’t do that, and this is common. I mean, we should point out this is common amongst criminals.

I can’t tell you how many people, cooperators I met with, who thought they hadn’t done anything wrong because they hadn’t actually had face-to-face or phone-to-phone conversations or email contact with the other person whom they were charged in a conspiracy with. It took a while. It would take a while in those proffer sessions to explain to people. You don’t have to. That’s not how conspiracy law works. This is a widely used law that is very broad and you can actually join a conspiracy with someone you actually have never even met. That’s sort of the point of the law, right? It’s to capture whether you’re working toward a common scheme. So I think Trump doesn’t understand that even if he didn’t know, let’s assume for a moment, every part of what was going on here: how they were going to throw the election, or when exactly that was going to happen. As long as he had some idea of the understanding of the broad purpose of what they were doing and he did something, anything material to sort of facilitate that in some way, that could put him in that conspiracy.​

The only conspiracy committed here, sir know-it-all, is the DNC leadership conspiring to ruin President Trump for winning an election George Soros paid the big bucks for the Democrats to win. Of course you didn't win. The American people are intolerant of being lied to on each and every individual issue with the added threat of taking people's life savings away from them so the Democrats can have the same power the KGB had in Khrushchev's Russia that was patterned to remove Stalin's staff by secretive deaths inflicted against key players..

 

[imawhosure]

Who asked for help from the Russians?

Did you read the book or review the interviews? That could help you with your question, doll.

Who had a vested interest in asking for and receiving help from the Russians?

Dude, the CLINTONS, lol...…...to the tune of 25 to 63 million reasons. Read the Solomon piece why don't you! It is the crux of Republicans spin on the collusion. It will if nothing else; inform you, and in the process, may learn something.

Remember...……...to debate an issue, you must be aware of BOTH sides of the argument. The John Solomon piece is free, not a book, and will lay out for you exactly what the other side thinks and why!

There was no collusion. Collusion is a term that applies to financial impropriety. "Collusion is a non-competitive clandestine or sometimes illegal agreement between rivals that attempts to disrupt the market's equilibrium."

It was a stupid charge to make and it is still going around because people on the left don't want to face it, they have been lied to by their own party, their own television DNC shills that they love to listen to and eat popcorn. That's because they misunderstand language definitions and assume the media they love, sponsored by their DNC leadership are telling the truth. There isn't a whit of truth in the annoying misuse of the party to charge collusion against an innocent President of the United States.

Naughty, naughty, naughty!

The crime is conspiracy, not collusion. Oh yeah, then there's all the obstruction of justice.

Trump Keeps Saying “No Collusion” Because He Doesn’t Understand Collusion

Rocah: Well yeah, I’ve been saying this actually since he first started tweeting. I think first of all, Trump has no idea what the conspiracy law means and how it works. So when he says, It’s a witch hunt, no collusion, what he was actually saying is, I had no phone calls. I had no meetings. I didn’t do this. And I think he may actually believe that as long as he didn’t do that, and this is common. I mean, we should point out this is common amongst criminals.

I can’t tell you how many people, cooperators I met with, who thought they hadn’t done anything wrong because they hadn’t actually had face-to-face or phone-to-phone conversations or email contact with the other person whom they were charged in a conspiracy with. It took a while. It would take a while in those proffer sessions to explain to people. You don’t have to. That’s not how conspiracy law works. This is a widely used law that is very broad and you can actually join a conspiracy with someone you actually have never even met. That’s sort of the point of the law, right? It’s to capture whether you’re working toward a common scheme. So I think Trump doesn’t understand that even if he didn’t know, let’s assume for a moment, every part of what was going on here: how they were going to throw the election, or when exactly that was going to happen. As long as he had some idea of the understanding of the broad purpose of what they were doing and he did something, anything material to sort of facilitate that in some way, that could put him in that conspiracy.​

So then, we now have a CONSPIRACY, lol.

You are 100% correct...….a conspiracy to go around the rules put in place, to INSURE that counter intelligence operations could NOT be started, without following a certain PROTOCOL!

That is where your house of cards is going to collapse, and more, and more is being reported about it.

You seem to HATE President Trump. Fine, I have no problem with that. But let me 1st person to tell you that---------->you will soon have a person you will hate 5 times as much, and that is going to be the new AG-)

Your side painted themselves in this corner, and now you have no paint thinner to get out, lol.

See what happened in Virginia? Wonder how that happened-)

Wait about a month after the AG is installed, and lets see what happens to Schiff, and he will be the 1st of at the very least, a handful of your most far Left benefactors, that are going to bite the proverbial, "political dust!"

 

[beautress]

​

Ran across this book at Amazon and wondered if anyone has read this book, and do you think it is true or false?

Nice attempt at gas lighting there, conservative republican.

Sez the spider to the fly.

 

[Seawytch]

Did you read the book or review the interviews? That could help you with your question, doll.

Who had a vested interest in asking for and receiving help from the Russians?

Dude, the CLINTONS, lol...…...to the tune of 25 to 63 million reasons. Read the Solomon piece why don't you! It is the crux of Republicans spin on the collusion. It will if nothing else; inform you, and in the process, may learn something.

Remember...……...to debate an issue, you must be aware of BOTH sides of the argument. The John Solomon piece is free, not a book, and will lay out for you exactly what the other side thinks and why!

There was no collusion. Collusion is a term that applies to financial impropriety. "Collusion is a non-competitive clandestine or sometimes illegal agreement between rivals that attempts to disrupt the market's equilibrium."

It was a stupid charge to make and it is still going around because people on the left don't want to face it, they have been lied to by their own party, their own television DNC shills that they love to listen to and eat popcorn. That's because they misunderstand language definitions and assume the media they love, sponsored by their DNC leadership are telling the truth. There isn't a whit of truth in the annoying misuse of the party to charge collusion against an innocent President of the United States.

Naughty, naughty, naughty!

The crime is conspiracy, not collusion. Oh yeah, then there's all the obstruction of justice.

Trump Keeps Saying “No Collusion” Because He Doesn’t Understand Collusion

Rocah: Well yeah, I’ve been saying this actually since he first started tweeting. I think first of all, Trump has no idea what the conspiracy law means and how it works. So when he says, It’s a witch hunt, no collusion, what he was actually saying is, I had no phone calls. I had no meetings. I didn’t do this. And I think he may actually believe that as long as he didn’t do that, and this is common. I mean, we should point out this is common amongst criminals.

I can’t tell you how many people, cooperators I met with, who thought they hadn’t done anything wrong because they hadn’t actually had face-to-face or phone-to-phone conversations or email contact with the other person whom they were charged in a conspiracy with. It took a while. It would take a while in those proffer sessions to explain to people. You don’t have to. That’s not how conspiracy law works. This is a widely used law that is very broad and you can actually join a conspiracy with someone you actually have never even met. That’s sort of the point of the law, right? It’s to capture whether you’re working toward a common scheme. So I think Trump doesn’t understand that even if he didn’t know, let’s assume for a moment, every part of what was going on here: how they were going to throw the election, or when exactly that was going to happen. As long as he had some idea of the understanding of the broad purpose of what they were doing and he did something, anything material to sort of facilitate that in some way, that could put him in that conspiracy.​

The only conspiracy committed here, sir know-it-all, is the DNC leadership conspiring to ruin President Trump for winning an election George Soros paid the big bucks for the Democrats to win. Of course you didn't win. The American people are intolerant of being lied to on each and every individual issue with the added threat of taking people's life savings away from them so the Democrats can have the same power the KGB had in Khrushchev's Russia that was patterned to remove Stalin's staff by secretive deaths inflicted against key players..

 

[danielpalos]

I tend to think any “investigation” by our criminal government, isn’t likely to expose the truth.

Because it's being led by one of the world's top criminals?

Yes, but only if Hillary were that leader. Trump is likely a criminal too, but no one exceeds Hillary on criminality.

Plus with Trump, the MSM is kicking his ass very day. With Hillary, they would be licking her ass very day, as they did with Big Ears.

Actually, he is not. Those who have ever owned a business know the importance of being true, honest, and fair in all transactions. Business people don't last if they do not perform in a decent, honest way, and perform honest deals consistently. That brings home the bacon in business and in human relations. Trump fits the honesty parameter in business. And, he expects the same from his staff.

in right wing fantasy; All you You say is always right.

I detect projection in your first phrase and confusion in the second part of your wannabe sentence attempting to marginalize a person who knows the difference. Poor little boy.

you need more than fallacy, to convince me.

 

[whitehall]

It makes sense if you aren't an angry psychotic leftie.

 

[Seawytch]

Did you read the book or review the interviews? That could help you with your question, doll.

Who had a vested interest in asking for and receiving help from the Russians?

Dude, the CLINTONS, lol...…...to the tune of 25 to 63 million reasons. Read the Solomon piece why don't you! It is the crux of Republicans spin on the collusion. It will if nothing else; inform you, and in the process, may learn something.

Remember...……...to debate an issue, you must be aware of BOTH sides of the argument. The John Solomon piece is free, not a book, and will lay out for you exactly what the other side thinks and why!

There was no collusion. Collusion is a term that applies to financial impropriety. "Collusion is a non-competitive clandestine or sometimes illegal agreement between rivals that attempts to disrupt the market's equilibrium."

It was a stupid charge to make and it is still going around because people on the left don't want to face it, they have been lied to by their own party, their own television DNC shills that they love to listen to and eat popcorn. That's because they misunderstand language definitions and assume the media they love, sponsored by their DNC leadership are telling the truth. There isn't a whit of truth in the annoying misuse of the party to charge collusion against an innocent President of the United States.

Naughty, naughty, naughty!

The crime is conspiracy, not collusion. Oh yeah, then there's all the obstruction of justice.

Trump Keeps Saying “No Collusion” Because He Doesn’t Understand Collusion

Rocah: Well yeah, I’ve been saying this actually since he first started tweeting. I think first of all, Trump has no idea what the conspiracy law means and how it works. So when he says, It’s a witch hunt, no collusion, what he was actually saying is, I had no phone calls. I had no meetings. I didn’t do this. And I think he may actually believe that as long as he didn’t do that, and this is common. I mean, we should point out this is common amongst criminals.

I can’t tell you how many people, cooperators I met with, who thought they hadn’t done anything wrong because they hadn’t actually had face-to-face or phone-to-phone conversations or email contact with the other person whom they were charged in a conspiracy with. It took a while. It would take a while in those proffer sessions to explain to people. You don’t have to. That’s not how conspiracy law works. This is a widely used law that is very broad and you can actually join a conspiracy with someone you actually have never even met. That’s sort of the point of the law, right? It’s to capture whether you’re working toward a common scheme. So I think Trump doesn’t understand that even if he didn’t know, let’s assume for a moment, every part of what was going on here: how they were going to throw the election, or when exactly that was going to happen. As long as he had some idea of the understanding of the broad purpose of what they were doing and he did something, anything material to sort of facilitate that in some way, that could put him in that conspiracy.​

So then, we now have a CONSPIRACY, lol.

You are 100% correct...….a conspiracy to go around the rules put in place, to INSURE that counter intelligence operations could NOT be started, without following a certain PROTOCOL!

That is where your house of cards is going to collapse, and more, and more is being reported about it.

You seem to HATE President Trump. Fine, I have no problem with that. But let me 1st person to tell you that---------->you will soon have a person you will hate 5 times as much, and that is going to be the new AG-)

Your side painted themselves in this corner, and now you have no paint thinner to get out, lol.

See what happened in Virginia? Wonder how that happened-)

Wait about a month after the AG is installed, and lets see what happens to Schiff, and he will be the 1st of at the very least, a handful of your most far Left benefactors, that are going to bite the proverbial, "political dust!"

Um...no. But it's nice you have a very active fantasy life. Try not to let it bleed over into real life.

 

[danielpalos]

Can you elaborate on this:

From my understanding, Your guys showed up as a national security concern and not being Patriotic enough in their Acts. Why any recusal from Your guy's own AG?

1. Because a counter intelligence operation has to go through certain channels, and they did not. Why is that so? Because if you or I proclaim that Russia is on the verge of launching a nuke at us and it is not checked out by the powers that be 1st, misinformation could be the start of WWIII. That is EXACTLY why counter intelligence; which is what this was, has to go through certain channels.

How does that happen in any Professional organization?

Good question, I have no idea.

Let me tell you---------->the Democrats are by far the most savvy politically, of this there is no doubt. Democrats ALWAYS control the political narrative of what the population speaks about. Maybe it has to do with them exerting more control over the MSM and Hollywood, I really do not know.

I do know that Sessions did NOT do the Trump team any favors when he recused himself, nor did he do the Democrats any favors either.

Why?

Because the bad political move by Sessions has allowed this to continue unabated for over 2 years, and if it all comes out as a fabrication, the Democrats are going to look really bad and uninformed, maybe even liars.

If Sessions would have held his ground, most of this would have already been resolved within 6 or 8 months of Trump taking office. Now you have both sides in a hard camp, and the one that comes out with egg on their face is going to get smoked in 2020. Politically, it is very, very, bad for our country, and both sides should have the smarts to admit it!

You are implying a Professional organization was unProfessional.

I learned it from watching the video you did not watch, then verifying it in a legal dictionary. It's not that hard to get at the truth if you didn't snore your way through communications class in college, doll.

a right wing video?

individuals may lapse; a Professional organization may not.

 

[imawhosure]

Who had a vested interest in asking for and receiving help from the Russians?

Dude, the CLINTONS, lol...…...to the tune of 25 to 63 million reasons. Read the Solomon piece why don't you! It is the crux of Republicans spin on the collusion. It will if nothing else; inform you, and in the process, may learn something.

Remember...……...to debate an issue, you must be aware of BOTH sides of the argument. The John Solomon piece is free, not a book, and will lay out for you exactly what the other side thinks and why!

There was no collusion. Collusion is a term that applies to financial impropriety. "Collusion is a non-competitive clandestine or sometimes illegal agreement between rivals that attempts to disrupt the market's equilibrium."

It was a stupid charge to make and it is still going around because people on the left don't want to face it, they have been lied to by their own party, their own television DNC shills that they love to listen to and eat popcorn. That's because they misunderstand language definitions and assume the media they love, sponsored by their DNC leadership are telling the truth. There isn't a whit of truth in the annoying misuse of the party to charge collusion against an innocent President of the United States.

Naughty, naughty, naughty!

The crime is conspiracy, not collusion. Oh yeah, then there's all the obstruction of justice.

Trump Keeps Saying “No Collusion” Because He Doesn’t Understand Collusion

Rocah: Well yeah, I’ve been saying this actually since he first started tweeting. I think first of all, Trump has no idea what the conspiracy law means and how it works. So when he says, It’s a witch hunt, no collusion, what he was actually saying is, I had no phone calls. I had no meetings. I didn’t do this. And I think he may actually believe that as long as he didn’t do that, and this is common. I mean, we should point out this is common amongst criminals.

I can’t tell you how many people, cooperators I met with, who thought they hadn’t done anything wrong because they hadn’t actually had face-to-face or phone-to-phone conversations or email contact with the other person whom they were charged in a conspiracy with. It took a while. It would take a while in those proffer sessions to explain to people. You don’t have to. That’s not how conspiracy law works. This is a widely used law that is very broad and you can actually join a conspiracy with someone you actually have never even met. That’s sort of the point of the law, right? It’s to capture whether you’re working toward a common scheme. So I think Trump doesn’t understand that even if he didn’t know, let’s assume for a moment, every part of what was going on here: how they were going to throw the election, or when exactly that was going to happen. As long as he had some idea of the understanding of the broad purpose of what they were doing and he did something, anything material to sort of facilitate that in some way, that could put him in that conspiracy.​

So then, we now have a CONSPIRACY, lol.

You are 100% correct...….a conspiracy to go around the rules put in place, to INSURE that counter intelligence operations could NOT be started, without following a certain PROTOCOL!

That is where your house of cards is going to collapse, and more, and more is being reported about it.

You seem to HATE President Trump. Fine, I have no problem with that. But let me 1st person to tell you that---------->you will soon have a person you will hate 5 times as much, and that is going to be the new AG-)

Your side painted themselves in this corner, and now you have no paint thinner to get out, lol.

See what happened in Virginia? Wonder how that happened-)

Wait about a month after the AG is installed, and lets see what happens to Schiff, and he will be the 1st of at the very least, a handful of your most far Left benefactors, that are going to bite the proverbial, "political dust!"

Um...no. But it's nice you have a very active fantasy life. Try not to let it bleed over into real life.

Hehehehehehehehehe, your best defense was Sessions recusal, and Rosenstein running the show. All that is about to disappear.

But let me tell you...………………..your side is screwed. At the bare minimum, the Russian story is going to be proven false, but I believe it is going to get worse, much worse for your side than that.

And personally, I don't blame you. After singing the same song for a couple of years that kept your side in business, I to would be hesitant to quit singing it also-)

 

[danielpalos]

It makes sense if you aren't an angry psychotic leftie.

in right wing fantasy, everything right wingers say is always right.

 

[danielpalos]

Can you elaborate on this:

From my understanding, Your guys showed up as a national security concern and not being Patriotic enough in their Acts. Why any recusal from Your guy's own AG?

1. Because a counter intelligence operation has to go through certain channels, and they did not. Why is that so? Because if you or I proclaim that Russia is on the verge of launching a nuke at us and it is not checked out by the powers that be 1st, misinformation could be the start of WWIII. That is EXACTLY why counter intelligence; which is what this was, has to go through certain channels.

How does that happen in any Professional organization?

Good question, I have no idea.

Let me tell you---------->the Democrats are by far the most savvy politically, of this there is no doubt. Democrats ALWAYS control the political narrative of what the population speaks about. Maybe it has to do with them exerting more control over the MSM and Hollywood, I really do not know.

I do know that Sessions did NOT do the Trump team any favors when he recused himself, nor did he do the Democrats any favors either.

Why?

Because the bad political move by Sessions has allowed this to continue unabated for over 2 years, and if it all comes out as a fabrication, the Democrats are going to look really bad and uninformed, maybe even liars.

If Sessions would have held his ground, most of this would have already been resolved within 6 or 8 months of Trump taking office. Now you have both sides in a hard camp, and the one that comes out with egg on their face is going to get smoked in 2020. Politically, it is very, very, bad for our country, and both sides should have the smarts to admit it!

You are implying a Professional organization was unProfessional.

No I am not! I am implying that the politicians at the top who were installed to run it were. That is why PROTOCOL was not followed, or the rules in place would have stopped it in its tracks.

Why not this time but why for other times? Special pleading requires special consideration.