The Second Amendment Was A Failure From The Start, And Should Have Been Repealed 200 Years Ago

[bripat9643]

So, you confess that a well-regulated militia is the reason for granting the right to bear arms? But then, contradict yourself by declaring that the right extends beyond its stated purpose. How fucking dense is that?

I want to clarify that beyond the 2ndA I appreciate a right to bear arms for sport and protection. I just don't accept that it is unabridged to the point of denying reasonable restraint.

The right doesn't extend beyond what the law states, that the right to bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

 

[bripat9643]

So, you confess that a well-regulated militia is the reason for granting the right to bear arms? But then, contradict yourself by declaring that the right extends beyond its stated purpose. How fucking dense is that?

I want to clarify that beyond the 2ndA I appreciate a right to bear arms for sport and protection. I just don't accept that it is unabridged to the point of denying reasonable restraint.

The term "reasonable restraint" means no restraint.

 

[Flash]

While the above post attempts some legitimate points, it is overloaded with ad hominem making it a bore to sort through.

The reality is that this is a simple issue. The 2ndA has both an operative clause granting the right of the people to bear arms, and a prefatory clause establishing the reason for that right (a well-regulated militia). I read the whole sentence while you ignore part of it.

Your stupidity comes from the fact that issue was settled in the Heller case and you are simply too uneducated to understand it.

You keep harping on something that is a moot point. In the Heller case Scalia spent some time explaining how that prefatory clause did nothing to prevent the Second from being an individual right. I used Ad hominem because you have peanut butter in your ears and don't want to hear the truth.

If you are going to be a dumbass don't get your panties in wad because you are called on it.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So, you confess that a well-regulated militia is the reason for granting the right to bear arms? But then, contradict yourself by declaring that the right extends beyond its stated purpose. How fucking dense is that?

I want to clarify that beyond the 2ndA I appreciate a right to bear arms for sport and protection. I just don't accept that it is unabridged to the point of denying reasonable restraint.

So, you confess that a well-regulated militia is the reason for granting the right to bear arms?

No.

But then, contradict yourself by declaring that the right extends beyond its stated purpose.

The right existed before the Constitution was written.

How fucking dense is that?

Your ignorance approaches the density of osmium.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Did you cherry-pick 2015?

I found something completely different in 2022.

Gun Violence by State 2024

worldpopulationreview.com

I will confess that the differences are sometimes fairly small. However, if a little inconvenience in buying/possessing firearms saves lives, we need to at least indulge a rational dialogue on the subject.

Did you cherry-pick 2015?

Nope.
That was the wiki entry that came up, top of my Google search.

I found something completely different in 2022.

Yours is "gun death rate" not "gun murder rate".

However, if a little inconvenience in buying/possessing firearms saves lives, we need to at least indulge a rational dialogue on the subject.

Schools are gun-free zones. Has that little inconvenience saved lives?

 

[BLUE COLLAR]

Did you cherry-pick 2015?

Nope.
That was the wiki entry that came up, top of my Google search.

I found something completely different in 2022.

Yours is "gun death rate" not "gun murder rate".

However, if a little inconvenience in buying/possessing firearms saves lives, we need to at least indulge a rational dialogue on the subject.

Schools are gun-free zones. Has that little inconvenience saved lives?

Well, whoever reached back to 2015 (for wiki) likely did not do so simply because it was the most pertinent year. But if comparing Cal to Tex doesn't work for you, try comparing the US to most every other country.

Hell, most people shot dead in Mexico are shot with guns originating in the US. And there it is, the profit motive for not regulating the militia.

 

[BLUE COLLAR]

So, you confess that a well-regulated militia is the reason for granting the right to bear arms?

No.

But then, contradict yourself by declaring that the right extends beyond its stated purpose.

The right existed before the Constitution was written.

How fucking dense is that?

Your ignorance approaches the density of osmium.

Your capacity for indulging name-calling and personal insult tells me a lot about you.

 

[Failzero]

But but Pancho Villa could have taken 1/4 of Texas if there was no 2A/RTKBA ( notice I said “ Take” not Hold

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Well, whoever reached back to 2015 (for wiki) likely did not do so simply because it was the most pertinent year.

Maybe it was the most recent one when the page was created?
If you have the same info for 2021, post it up buttercup.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Your capacity for indulging name-calling and personal insult tells me a lot about you.

Name calling? Where?

 

[BLUE COLLAR]

Your stupidity comes from the fact that issue was settled in the Heller case and you are simply too uneducated to understand it.

You keep harping on something that is a moot point. In the Heller case Scalia spent some time explaining how that prefatory clause did nothing to prevent the Second from being an individual right. I used Ad hominem because you have peanut butter in your ears and don't want to hear the truth.

If you are going to be a dumbass don't get your panties in wad because you are called on it.

I bolded the personal insults. Be advised that they do not affect my panties. Rather, I highlight them in demonstrating the low grade of the above argument.

If you are suggesting that Heller cannot be overturned, I'd suggest you familiarize yourself with the US Constitution. Not only will it be overturned but you will register your toys, prove your proficiency with same and report all private party sales (especially to the Cartel and other criminals). Otherwise, you are free to keep your toys (in a locked cabinet), defend your person/home, and go Duck Slaughtering with the ghost of Scalise... maybe Dick Cheney will tag along, have a few drinks, shoot someone in the face and leave the scene of the crime.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

But if comparing Cal to Tex doesn't work for you,

Looks like it didn't work for you. LOL!

 

[BLUE COLLAR]

Maybe it was the most recent one when the page was created?
If you have the same info for 2021, post it up buttercup.

I can accept that the entry may have been made some time ago, and that you hurried a google and slurped it up.

Here's one covering 2020. You don't have to know how to read, just note that the lighter colors are the safer places to live.

Stats of the States - Firearm Mortality

www.cdc.gov

 

[BLUE COLLAR]

Looks like it didn't work for you. LOL!

The premature ejaculation is yours.

 

[BLUE COLLAR]

The term "reasonable restraint" means no restraint.

In who's dictionary?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I can accept that the entry may have been made some time ago, and that you hurried a google and slurped it up.

Here's one covering 2020. You don't have to know how to read, just note that the lighter colors are the safer places to live.

Stats of the States - Firearm Mortality

www.cdc.gov

Why are you linking to gun deaths instead of gun murders?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The premature ejaculation is yours.

Are you sad because I refuted your claim?

 

[Flash]

I bolded the personal insults. Be advised that they do not affect my panties. Rather, I highlight them in demonstrating the low grade of the above argument.

If you are suggesting that Heller cannot be overturned, I'd suggest you familiarize yourself with the US Constitution. Not only will it be overturned but you will register your toys, prove your proficiency with same and report all private party sales (especially to the Cartel and other criminals). Otherwise, you are free to keep your toys (in a locked cabinet), defend your person/home, and go Duck Slaughtering with the ghost of Scalise... maybe Dick Cheney will tag along, have a few drinks, shoot someone in the face and leave the scene of the crime.

You don't know a damn thing about Heller, do you Moon Bat?

Let me explain it to you so that you won't embarrass yourself with your ignorance any more.

Dick Heller was a retired DC policeman. Never had any trouble with the law and was in fact a very responsible individual.

Heller wanted a firearm in his home for protection because as we all know DC is a Democrat run city with enormous crime. Being a former policeman he very well knew the danger.

The fucking asshole Democrats in DC said that Heller could not have the firearm in his own home. They infringed upon his right to keep and bear arms as is guaranteed in the Bill of Rights.

He sued and the Supreme Court took the case.

DC argued they had the right to infringe upon Heller's right to keep and bear arms for several reasons, one of them being that he was not a member of a "well regulated militia".

The Supreme Court found that Dick Heller was denied his Constitutional rights. The majority opinion of the Court was the right to keep and bear arms is an individual right and that it was not connected in any shape or form to any membership in any organization, including a militia.

They order DC to let Dick Heller to keep and bear his arm.

Later the Court found the same thing in the McDonald case because the filthy ass Democrats in Chicago were doing the same oppressive anti Constitutional shit as the Democrats in DC were doing.

That is the law of the land now.

However, as we have learned over and over again we can't trust the Courts to protects our Liberties any more than we can trust the Legislative or Executive branches.

Libtards are hell bent in destroying our Liberty and one day may be able to turn this country into a Socialist shithole. Stealing the 2020 election showed us what they are capable of doing. Heaven help us all if the goddamn Liberals ever get majority control of the Supreme Court because we can kiss our Liberty goodbye.

 

[BLUE COLLAR]

Your stupidity comes from the fact that issue was settled in the Heller case and you are simply too uneducated to understand it.

You keep harping on something that is a moot point. In the Heller case Scalia spent some time explaining how that prefatory clause did nothing to prevent the Second from being an individual right. I used Ad hominem because you have peanut butter in your ears and don't want to hear the truth.

If you are going to be a dumbass don't get your panties in wad because you are called on it.

Regarding what I bolded in your post:

So, if someone has PB in their ears, they hear ad hominem but not rational conversation? This might be true as an ad hominem is more likely delivered by someone who is angry, screaming, and out of control. I hope they are not carrying a weapon when acting this way. They could be interpreted as dangerous and shot by the unregulated militia.

 

[Failzero]

My War Trophy " WW2 Bringback " 1911A1 is the Flagship of my HG collection