Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually it does. As the USSC ruled against Trump. Once his private information was given to a third party, they were ceded to a third party, who is subject to subpoena as ordinary business records.Nope. The 4th amendment makes an exception for subpoenas, and having your taxes done by someone else doesn't invalidate your 4th Amendment rights.
All you proved is that you're a total dumbass.
That's all confidential, moron.The irony is, if they subpoenaed Trump for his taxes, all he would have had to turn over was his tax returns. Instead they subpoenaed his tax preparers, and requested all the paperwork they had from Trump.Uh...hey genius...trump doesnt have an army of CPAs. He has weisselberg and a tax firm he hires to do his taxes. Weisselberg is charged with multiple felonies and the tax firm gave up the booty under subpoena.
What is described there is 100% illegal, and you and the Todderino don't understand what you are reading.totally legal.
No shit Sherlock, that's why you need a subpoena to get it.That's all confidential
Trump is downplaying tax cheating on things like company cars, or company apartments, instead of denying his company cheated on their taxes.My experience with you is that you're totally full of shit.
The irony is, if they subpoenaed Trump for his taxes, all he would have had to turn over was his tax returns. Instead they subpoenaed his tax preparers, and requested all the paperwork they had from Trump.
Not once you give them to a third party.That's all confidential, moron.
Actually because the information was given to a third party, they became business records, subject to ordinary subpoena.No shit Sherlock, that's why you need a subpoena to get it.That's all confidential
No serious person could believe that you lose your 4th Amendment rights because someone does your taxes. The USSC ruled incorrectly.Actually it does. As the USSC ruled against Trump. Once his private information was given to a third party, they were ceded to a third party, who is subject to subpoena as ordinary business records.Nope. The 4th amendment makes an exception for subpoenas, and having your taxes done by someone else doesn't invalidate your 4th Amendment rights.
All you proved is that you're a total dumbass.
Sorry, but it holds for anyone in a position of trust.The irony is, if they subpoenaed Trump for his taxes, all he would have had to turn over was his tax returns. Instead they subpoenaed his tax preparers, and requested all the paperwork they had from Trump.Not once you give them to a third party.That's all confidential, moron.
Confidentiality only holds with your doctor, your lawyer or your clergy.
Funny that only criminals are affected. Poor souls.No serious person could believe that you lose your 4th Amendment rights because someone does your taxes. The USSC ruled incorrectly.
Information you give to a business, becomes that businesses records. Which are subject to normal government oversight by subpoena.No serious person could believe that you lose your 4th Amendment rights because someone does your taxes. The USSC ruled incorrectly.
Are the records you give to your lawyer subject to normal government oversight by subpoena?Information you give to a business, becomes that businesses records. Which are subject to normal government oversight by subpoena.No serious person could believe that you lose your 4th Amendment rights because someone does your taxes. The USSC ruled incorrectly.
You give up your privacy when you share them with others.
Nope. Just ask your mother.Sorry, but it holds for anyone in a position of trust.
Everyone who files a return is affected, you fucking dumbass.Funny that only criminals are affected. Poor souls.No serious person could believe that you lose your 4th Amendment rights because someone does your taxes. The USSC ruled incorrectly.
You tell us, expert. When are they and when arent they? And when they are, does that represent a third party giving the government your confidential info (hint: yes)?Are the records you give to your lawyer subject to normal government oversight by subpoena?
They are never subject to subpoena, moron.You tell us, expert. When are they and when arent they? And when they are, does that represent a third party giving the government your confidential info (hint: yes)?Are the records you give to your lawyer subject to normal government oversight by subpoena?
Wrong. As usual.They are never subject to subpoena
Are the records you give to your lawyer subject to normal government oversight by subpoena?
Face it: you're full of shit.
Confidentiality only holds with your doctor, your lawyer or your clergy.
Confidentially only holds for information given to a privileged person (lawyer, doctor, clergy) for privileged information matching their role.Wrong. As usual.They are never subject to subpoena
