The Tides Have Turned! Their Narrative Is Breaking It's Not Working Anymore!

You of course are wrong.

Judge says E Jean Carroll allegation Trump raped her is âsubstantially trueâ in court dismissal

“As the court explained in its recent decision denying Mr Trump’s motion for a new trial on damages and other relief [in the New York case] … based on all of the evidence at trial and the jury’s verdict as a whole, the jury’s finding that Mr Trump ‘sexually abused’ Ms Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally – in other words, that Mr Trump in fact did ‘rape’ Ms Carroll as that term commonly is used and understood in contexts outside of the New York penal law.”
Zzz. A pontification from a judge doesn’t actually alter the jury’s determination.
 

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll​


The verdict was split: Jurors rejected Carroll's claim that she was raped, finding Trump responsible for a lesser degree of sexual abuse.

Trump was not charged with rape.
 
Zzz. A pontification from a judge doesn’t actually alter the jury’s determination.
It did fit the definition. Just because a jury says not enough evidence to prove something, does make that something go away. Facts are what Trump was found to have committed -- sexual assault, fits anyone's definition of rape. I bet even Bill Clinton agrees on that one.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: IM2
It did fit the definition. Just because a jury says not enough evidence to prove something, does make that something go away. Facts are what Trump was found to have committed -- sexual assault, fits anyone's definition of rape. I bet even Bill Clinton agrees on that one.
Wrong. The jury concluded that there wasn’t even sufficient evidence to meet the lower burden proof of a civil case.

End of story.
 
Which was the E Jean Carrol is telling the truth when she says Trump sexually assaulted her.
Nope. It means a civil jury accepted the claim. It doesn’t mean Trump did any sexual assault, much less a “rape.”
 
"I would rather be grabbed by the pussy, than have a pussy for a President"

that is what people are saying.
What people? People who believe Mr. Trump actually cares about them?
:auiqs.jpg:

Just ask anyone he's ever said was the best and then flt his petty wrath

4 co conspirators.jpg
 
Bill was caught in a consensual relationship. It was earlier this year a judge ruled that Trump had committed rape in the E Jean Carrol defamation case. Put the costumes and cosplay down boys. You're only embarrassing yourselves.
From liberal, Trump hating, Newsweek
"This is a much lower standard than in criminal trials, in which the prosecution's contentions must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt," Florey said. "The preponderance standard could be satisfied if the jury is only 51 percent confident that the plaintiff's version of events is true, whereas in a criminal trial, the jury must have near certainty that the prosecution is correct.

"Liability for sexual assault means that the jury has concluded that the plaintiff has satisfied the preponderance of the evidence standard and that the defendant must pay damages to compensate the victim. There are no criminal consequences to a finding of liability."

The word "liability" is also key. As Notre Dame Law School professor Jay Tidmarsh, an expert in complex civil litigation and civil procedure, told Newsweek, "civil cases do not speak of 'guilt' or 'innocence'" but instead "use the language 'liable' or 'not liable,'" as reporting of the jury's verdict repeated.
 
Nope. It means a civil jury accepted the claim. It doesn’t mean Trump did any sexual assault, much less a “rape.”
Hello?!

:auiqs.jpg:

A Civil Jury full of Liabilities: "We accept the claim of something that doesn't mean what the claim claims."

That's why Mr. Trump was fined -- did the crime, pay the fine.
 

Forum List

Back
Top