The Truth about Mormons

[JakeStarkey]

No, there has never been more evidence for the BoM.

Only more wishful hopes.

 

[Avatar4321]

Silly argument. Christians and atheists and Muslims are all blood thirsty groups.

true, but according to whats been posted here only christians have permission to be...

Who on earth has claimed that?

 

[Avatar4321]

'
The Book of Mormon is a load of rubbish concocted by a charlatan, filled with nonsense, disproven on all historical points from here to doomsday, and which serious science regards with contempt.

However, the Smithsonian has to tippy-toe writing about it, because they dare not cause a ruckus with the ignorant, superstitious fools who regard it as the Word of God.

What matters is that the Smithsonian Statement destroys any reason a rational person could believe in Mormonism, and that it does so quickly, and in ways anyone can understand.

Smithsonian Statement Regarding The Book of Mormon

Mormons have responded to the statement, but they do so with a lot of complex and meaningless warbeling that can only convince someone who wants desperately to believe in Mormonism. When reading that nonsense I doubt most Mormons even understand it. Nevertheless, they think so many complex sentences and big words must be true.

The Smithsonian statement is completely irrelevant and was addressed and refuted DECADES ago.

The only way to know whether the Book of Mormon is true is to ask God.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The Smithsonian Statement has never been refuted.

 

[daws101]

Silly argument. Christians and atheists and Muslims are all blood thirsty groups.

true, but according to whats been posted here only christians have permission to be...

Who on earth has claimed that?

the crusaders is a good place to start..

 

[Uncensored2008]

the crusaders is a good place to start..

Is it 1088 already? damn but the years fly by....

Standard Disclaimer: What a ridiculous troll you are. What wonderful entertainment your foolish antics provide us all... Don't ever change!

 

[daws101]

the crusaders is a good place to start..

Is it 1088 already? damn but the years fly by....

Standard Disclaimer: What a ridiculous troll you are. What wonderful entertainment your foolish antics provide us all... Don't ever change!

your quip is relevant how?

I love it when you minimize and rationalize the destructive side of faith and the "white race".
we are no better or no worse than all the "races"...for assholes like you it's an insurmountable concept.

 

[Uncensored2008]

your quip is relevant how?

I love it when you minimize and rationalize the destructive side of faith and the "white race".
we are no better or no worse than all the "races"...for assholes like you it's an insurmountable concept.

The Crusades were relevant - a thousand years ago.

Today, not so much.

Keep on..

 

[daws101]

your quip is relevant how?

I love it when you minimize and rationalize the destructive side of faith and the "white race".
we are no better or no worse than all the "races"...for assholes like you it's an insurmountable concept.

The Crusades were relevant - a thousand years ago.

Today, not so much.

Keep on..

lol! by that twisted logic everything that ever happened would not be relevant... for assholes like you it's an insurmountable concept.

 

[Avatar4321]

true, but according to whats been posted here only christians have permission to be...

Who on earth has claimed that?

the crusaders is a good place to start..

Forgive me, but I thought we were talking about people actually in this discussion.

And the crusades were in response to agression from muslims.

 

[daws101]

Who on earth has claimed that?

the crusaders is a good place to start..

Forgive me, but I thought we were talking about people actually in this discussion.

And the crusades were in response to agression from muslims.

that's true but it has no relevance ..both parties believe in the same god...and mutually tossed the thou shalt not kill..commandment out with the chamber pot.

 

[Uncensored2008]

lol! by that twisted logic everything that ever happened would not be relevant... for assholes like you it's an insurmountable concept.

As with bread, there is a shelf life to events.

 

[Uncensored2008]

that's true but it has no relevance ..both parties believe in the same god...and mutually tossed the thou shalt not kill..commandment out with the chamber pot.

In fairness to the Muslims, they actually have a "Thou SHALL kill" commandment.

 

[daws101]

lol! by that twisted logic everything that ever happened would not be relevant... for assholes like you it's an insurmountable concept.

As with bread, there is a shelf life to events.

tell the muslims jews and christians that..

 

[daws101]

that's true but it has no relevance ..both parties believe in the same god...and mutually tossed the thou shalt not kill..commandment out with the chamber pot.

In fairness to the Muslims, they actually have a "Thou SHALL kill" commandment.

it would seem the christians do to :
The relationship of Christianity and violence is the subject of controversy because some of its teachings advocate peace, love and compassion, whereas other teachings have been used to justify the use of violence.[1][2][3] Peace, compassion and forgiveness of wrongs done by others are key elements of Christian teaching. However, Christians have struggled since the days of the Church Fathers with the question of when the use of force is justified. Such debates have led to concepts such as just war theory. Throughout history, certain teachings from the Old Testament, the New Testament and Christian theology have been used to justify the use of force against heretics, sinners and external enemies.

In Letter to a Christian Nation, critic of religion Sam Harris writes that "...faith inspires violence in at least two ways. First, people often kill other human beings because they believe that the creator of the universe wants them to do it... Second, far greater numbers of people fall into conflict with one another because they define their moral community on the basis of their religious affiliation..."[4] However, Professor David Bentley Hart argues that while "Some kill because their faith commands them to" others "kill because they have no faith and hence believe all things are permitted to them. Polytheists, monotheists, and atheists kill - indeed, this last class is especially prolifically homicidal, if the evidence of the twentieth century is to be consulted.".[5]

Christian theologians point to a strong doctrinal and historical imperative within Christianity against violence, particularly Jesus' Sermon on the Mount, which taught nonviolence and "love of enemies". For example, Weaver asserts that Jesus' pacifism was "preserved in the justifiable war doctrine that declares all war as sin even when declaring it occasionally a necessary evil, and in the prohibition of fighting by monastics and clergy as well as in a persistent tradition of Christian pacifism."[
Christianity and violence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Uncensored2008]

tell the muslims jews and christians that..

Why?

Muslims attacked yesterday - no need to go back very far.

All you Atheist bigots can come up with is events a thousand years in the past.

Standard Disclaimer: Yeah, it sort of does make you seem desperate....

 

[daws101]

tell the muslims jews and christians that..

Why?

Muslims attacked yesterday - no need to go back very far.

All you Atheist bigots can come up with is events a thousand years in the past.

Standard Disclaimer: Yeah, it sort of does make you seem desperate....

really? our guys have been knocking off their guys for better than 10 years now ..as always your minimizing.

 

[Avatar4321]

the crusaders is a good place to start..

Forgive me, but I thought we were talking about people actually in this discussion.

And the crusades were in response to agression from muslims.

that's true but it has no relevance ..both parties believe in the same god...and mutually tossed the thou shalt not kill..commandment out with the chamber pot.

Whether we both believe in the same God is debatable. And the command is "Thou shall not murder." Self defense. Fighting in wars, etc are not a violation of that commandment. So it's completely relevant

 

[daws101]

s to your intentional misrepresentation of the passage BULLSHIT!
exodus 20:13
King James Version (KJV)
13 Thou shalt not kill.
IS UNAMBIGUOUS....

 

[numan]

Hitler was addicted to amphetamines.

Caused by his doctors -- and Hitler's own ignorance.

.