The turtle says Biden impeachment “Not good for the country”

Illegal nature of the hold is the official finding of GAO.


There has never been any official explanation from Trump's administration for the hold...because there was no legitimate explanation of it.
The Biden administration does a hundred illegal things every day. For instance, allowing illegal aliens loose into the country is illegal.
 
I now that's the current cover story, but previously Biden and his minions claimed he never spoke with any of Hunter's "business partners." And you certainly don't participate in over 20 conference calls with people you don't even know by pure chance.
Or invite them to the White House and the VP residence 36 times.
 

No, MITCH…what is not good for the country is having a POTUS taking bribes from foreign countries.

He is compromised. His bribes from Ukraine led to this extended war that was over in March 2022, and mayblead us into WWIII.

Biden must be impeached.

Eff Mitch.

China prob has the turtle on the payroll.

turtle mitch.jpg
 
Democrats lost the House and MAGA Republicans are as popular as you are which I can tell you that ain’t popular at all!
They are 1000 times more popular than Biden the criminal.
Of course, we all understand that you posted that because you are so concerned about electing republicans.
 
I now that's the current cover story, but previously Biden and his minions claimed he never spoke with any of Hunter's "business partners." And you certainly don't participate in over 20 conference calls with people you don't even know by pure chance.

NOPE. What Biden said was that he doesn't know about his son's bussiness dealings and there has not been any real evidence that he did.

Archers testimony was that he has never seen Joe Biden disccuss bussiness and the only communication he witnessed was of casual social sort.

But even if it can be shown that Biden in fact lied and knew something about his son dealings, is that a crime make? Still need evidence that he not only knew but commited official acts as part of a corrupt deal.
 
Last edited:
Multi-decade politicians are far worse for the country, Mitch. If impeachment helps get rid of one, great. If standing strokes during press conferences help, that’s good as well.
 
I agree. Impeachment is a joke and waste of a process as the Democrats showed us with Trump. As Michelle Obama would say, when they go low, we go high.

Focus on the campaign. Democrats are not thrilled with Biden in that they are more motivated to defend Biden vs. promote and celebrate him as the best choice for America.

Democrats would be best served if they bring in a new candidate. It would be a much easier win.
 
Biden indicted a political opponent 3 times
New York and the Special Counsel appointed by the AG have indicted Trump on various criminal charges. We await the decision from Ga.
Since when is contesting an election illegal
All states have a process of contesting elections. Starting a riot on Jan 6th, the ceremonial date where Congress counts the certified state votes, is not one of the procedures for contesting any State election.

"There's no question, none, that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day," "The people who stormed this building believed they were acting on the wishes and instructions of their president, and having that belief was a foreseeable consequence of the growing crescendo of false statements, conspiracy theories and reckless hyperbole which the defeated president kept shouting into the largest megaphone on planet Earth."

The truth is that he tried to investigate Biden corruption.
Nope he just wanted an announcement of an investigation into Biden. His GOP friends on Faux "the Liars Channel" would take care of the rest.
 
You keep posting pure bullshit.

What Biden said was that he doesn't know about his son's bussiness dealings and there has not been any real evidence that he did.
He said he never discussed Hunter's "business deals" with him. That was clearly a lie. Devon archer's testimony proves that he did.

Archers testimony was that he has never seen Joe Biden disccuss bussiness and the only communication he witnessed was of casual social sort.
Joe called Hunter to be on those calls. He obviously discussed them before they occurred and probably after.
 
New York and the Special Counsel appointed by the AG have indicted Trump on various criminal charges. We await the decision from Ga.
In other words, Biden's minions indicted him. How is that any different?

All states have a process of contesting elections. Starting a riot on Jan 6th, the ceremonial date where Congress counts the certified state votes, is not one of the procedures for contesting any State election.
Trump didn't start the riot, jackass.

"There's no question, none, that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day," "The people who stormed this building believed they were acting on the wishes and instructions of their president, and having that belief was a foreseeable consequence of the growing crescendo of false statements, conspiracy theories and reckless hyperbole which the defeated president kept shouting into the largest megaphone on planet Earth."
Who are you quoting, dumbass? That doesn't prove shit.

Nope he just wanted an announcement of an investigation into Biden. His GOP friends on Faux "the Liars Channel" would take care of the rest.
Even if that's true, where's the crime?
 
I now that's the current cover story, but previously Biden and his minions claimed he never spoke with any of Hunter's "business partners." And you certainly don't participate in over 20 conference calls with people you don't even know by pure chance.

You were not on the call either and do not get to just make up whatever you want about them.

There was someone that did participate in the calls - his description of them to Congress doesn't support the notion that there was any corruption going on.
 
No, they’re not but telling you reality is like telling the wall reality, and neither one of you understands it, well maybe the wall would…
yeah, listen to the Dim drone talking about reality.
 
You were not on the call either and do not get to just make up whatever you want about them.

There was someone that did participate in the calls - his description of them to Congress doesn't support the notion that there was any corruption going on.
Sure it does.

What am I making up?
 
Nope. He heard them ask Hunter to "call DC" for help in getting Shokin fired.
Lots of people in DC that could help with the pressure and Hunter spoke to his dad nearly everyday. When the Neo-GOP makes shit up, they make shit up. Still, it doesn't prove that the pressure to fire him wasn't international or bipartisan either.
 
He said he never discussed Hunter's "business deals" with him. That was clearly a lie. Devon archer's testimony proves that he did.


Joe called Hunter to be on those calls. He obviously discussed them before they occurred and probably after.

Archer said he has never seen Joe Biden disccuss any bussines, his communication was casual socializing.

What the hell are you talking about?
 
Lots of people in DC that could help with the pressure and Hunter spoke to his dad nearly everyday. When the Neo-GOP makes shit up, they make shit up. Still, it doesn't prove that the pressure to fire him wasn't international or bipartisan either.
How many times do you suppose Mike Pence speaks to 20 Ukrainian "businessmen" on a so-called "casual call?"
 
Archer said he has never seen Joe Biden disccuss any bussines, his communication was casual socializing.

What the hell are you talking about?
Right, "casual socializing" on a conference call with 20 Ukrainian "businessmen."

Is there anything so absurd that you won't believe it if the party tells you to believe it?
 

Forum List

Back
Top