- Apr 21, 2010
- 99,141
- 60,450
![]()
Four people arrested for INTENTIONALLY starting blazes as wildfires rage
FOUR people have now been arrested on the West Coast for deliberately starting blazes as wildfires rage. Cops detained two men in Washington, a man in Oregon and a woman in California as the desper…www.the-sun.com
They even look like A-holes
They need some hard time. People have died haven't they? Almost makes one wonder why they would do so. Paid by some developer directly or in a round about way? I imagine it's cheaper to clear trees that aren't there than those that are, if, there was any such intention.
Some are blaming it on global warming for another cash grab, when it's clear as was to be expected, it was man man.
Some are completely mis-understanding what is being said. That would be you.
Global warming isn't causing the fires. Its contributing to the destruction. In some cases, the more violent thunderstorms are responsible as well. However, those that blame GW for the thunder/lightning storms seem to forget we had these storms for ever. Now, the dryness from perhaps the hottest years on record...that is global warming.
![]()
NASA Says 2020 Tied for Hottest Year on Record
Meanwhile NOAA put the year just behind 2016 in the charts, but it was remarkably hot by either agency’s measurewww.scientificamerican.com
No, it isn't. These huge fires are the result of a century of forest mismanagement. Period.
The huge fires are raging in red states too--just not near population centers. Your blob never talks about that. Its not mis-management. It's fire season coupled with changing weather that's resulted in drier than normal conditions.
I have never claimed it is a red/blue state issue. It is simply a result of a policy to stop all fires no matter what. We figured out about 30 years ago that that is not good for the forests.
Add to that the fact that it is SUMMER, and yeah, it's hot and dry. Duh. It's NORMAL.
You haven't noticed an increase in the severity and regularity of natural disasters? I'm not surprised.
That's because there has been none. The forest fires are worse because instead of sagebrush at 4 feet high, it is now 30 feet high.
But there is no increase in frequency. In fact, compared to the 1950's the frequency is less.
Thomas Swetnam, professor emeritus at the University of Arizona who studies forest fires, tells Doyle Rice at USA Today that it’s not necessarily the case that more people are maliciously setting fires or that Smokey Bear has failed in his mission to educate the public. Instead, Swetnam says that climate change is the biggest driver of increased fires. An increase in drought, fuel buildup in unburned forests, earlier springs and higher temperatures are all contributing to more combustible forests. So the same actions that might have caused a small, easily extinguished fire decades ago are now creating dangerous infernos.![]()
Study Shows 84% of Wildfires Caused by Humans
Over the last 21 years, debris burning, arson and campfires have combined with climate change to make the fire season much longerwww.smithsonianmag.com
Did you notice that the "study" was run through a computer model? All you have to do is compare the numbers of fires from the 1940's (when accurate record keeping began) to the present day.
The only reason you run those numbers through a model is to CHANGE them.
In other words, to falsify the results. The actual raw data shows no increase in severity or occurrence.