The USDA can't say "climate Change" or Global Warming"

[cnm]

That chart ends 17 years ago. Also, calling us "rightard dumb fucks" gets you no respect. Please keep the debate clean.

The chart is right up to date you rightard dumb fuck. You deserve no respect.

 

[Auld Phart]

and making the cover of Time was pretty much mainstream then.

One article. If you want to panic over that, feel free.

you want more?

How many?

If I posted links to 100 articles, you still wouldn't accept the results.

Why should I bother?

Here, look them up yourself.

global cooling 1970's - Yahoo Search Results

 

[TNHarley]

At this point, its just what you want to believe. . people that believe in this are willing to throw away sovereignty, change peoples lives and habits, and tax more. And that is a problem for me.
stop eating meat
stop having so many kids
stop driving
stop flying

You are pretending that because the solution may be difficult means the problem does not exist.

No im not.
If i believe in anything, it is actual solutions. I fucking hate using bandaids to cover problems. Most of the problems we have cant be fixed with easy shit.

 

[cnm]

while this scientist is claiming we only add 5% more c02. 5%?

What scientist is this? We have added 100% of CO2 from 200ppm odd to 400ppm odd.

 

[cnm]

Here, look them up yourself.

Don't see any in there. Again, if you want to alarm yourself over magazine articles instead of what scientists say, fill your boots.

 

[Auld Phart]

Here, look them up yourself.

Don't see any in there. Again, if you want to alarm yourself over magazine articles instead of what scientists say, fill your boots.

Don't see anything in there?

Odd...

that's where I got the Time article.

Appears your mind is closed, and you like it that way.

 

[cnm]

If i believe in anything, it is actual solutions.

You have to accept the problem before you can conceive actual solutions. You are refusing to accept the problem because the solutions are too difficult. It's in your post, ffs.

 

[cnm]

that's where I got the Time article.

One article. Be alarmed.

 

[Auld Phart]

that's where I got the Time article.

One article. Be alarmed.

More than one article in that search.

You'd have noticed that if you had actually looked.

Your closed mind has become tedious.

Don't bother me further

 

[cnm]

I note you haven't produced any more articles.

 

[cnm]

Don't bother me further

No worries, snivelling pussies who won't produce their evidence aren't worth the effort.

 

[TNHarley]

If i believe in anything, it is actual solutions.

You have to accept the problem before you can conceive actual solutions. You are refusing to accept the problem because the solutions are too difficult. It's in your post, ffs.

I question whether there is a problem. Thats the whole problem.

 

[Auld Phart]

Don't bother me further

No worries, snivelling pussies who won't produce their evidence aren't worth the effort.

I gave you a list of thousands of links to Global Cooling 1970s.

You sluffed it off.

Your problem, not mine.

Some 'researcher' you are, has to be hand fed.

 

[cnm]

I question whether there is a problem.

Exactly. You deny the best knowledge science can produce while having nothing to replace it but denial.

 

[cnm]

I gave you a list of thousands of links to Global Cooling 1970s.

Bullshit. Like I'm going to trawl through google pages to make your argument for you. You couldn't even produce another article. I produced data on what scientists were actually saying, not journalists.

 

[TNHarley]

I question whether there is a problem.

Exactly. You deny the best knowledge science can produce while having nothing to replace it but denial.

Filling in holes with assumption isnt knowledge. Its assumption.

 

[cnm]

Filling in holes with assumption isnt knowledge. Its assumption.

The holes are filled with evidence. You have shown you don't know knowledge when you see it, rather you deny it with a wall of invincible ignorance. Here is some knowledge, again. Do you accept it?

Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis: Analysis Graphs and Plots

 

[cnm]

Here is some more knowledge, the temperature record of the last 2000 years. Do you accept this?

Global Warming : Feature Articles

 

[Auld Phart]

I gave you a list of thousands of links to Global Cooling 1970s.

Bullshit. Like I'm going to trawl through google pages to make your argument for you. You couldn't even produce another article. I produced data on what scientists were actually saying, not journalists.

Not my fault you're a chickenshit

 

[Derelict_Drvr]

Ignorance? I just kicked your ass with several links showing the govt has falsified global warming data to scam the American people.

No, you gave some links to assertions from deniers. Woo hoo.

And you're presenting "facts"(?) from alarmists. Two sides of the same coin.

Neither side s totally correct. And your assertions that climate change is somehow a new phenomenon are totally wrong. Actual, provable science such as tree rings and ice cores have proven that Earth climate is in constant flux. Your implication that's not true are a misguided reliance on heresay and pseudo-science.

The fact that I learned these things in Jr. High School science class defines the depths to which our current education system has fallen. In a effort to prevent a student from feeling bad about themselves, schools a passing kids out of high school that in my day wouldn't have passed out of elementary school. A sad turn of affairs to be sure.