Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If we don't let you vent then you will never shut the fuck up. And you might say something that would make us think up how in the fuck to get you to shut the fuck up and go back to making babies and digging ditches.There are no natural rights. And liberalism doesn't need them or even the concept of them. Freedom of speech is - common sense.Ah, yes. You just got done saying that you are against the concept of natural rights.Ah. no.RightyTighty sure is funny. These are the people who claim to be the direct ideological descendants of the Founding Fathers, yet they condemn everything the Founders stood for.That you view liberalism as "bullshit" is not surprising, you are a fascist, after all.
What's sensical about it? Snowflakes argue all the time that I don't have the right to offend them.
Nothing of the kind. Unlike you I can see all sides of a question.You're admitting that you have absolutely no principles.Just because I'm a liberal doesn't mean I can't see an even better way to do things. Democracy and capitalism suck, they're also the best we have in most cases.ROFL! Some "liberal" you are.We have a new Dear Leader, who wants to be the Orange King. And I have a lot of problems with that but there is something to be said for a benevolent dictatorship - they don't get fucked up in the politics like we do.Actually, if some Hitleresque Democrat came to power and eliminated all those rights, Righty would have no argument against it.So if we took you into the desert away from your "liberal" massahs, you you would lose your right to speech, religion, arming yourself for protection?
Are you sure you've thought this through, Herr Himmler?
You're admitting that you have absolutely no principles.Just because I'm a liberal doesn't mean I can't see an even better way to do things. Democracy and capitalism suck, they're also the best we have in most cases.ROFL! Some "liberal" you are.We have a new Dear Leader, who wants to be the Orange King. And I have a lot of problems with that but there is something to be said for a benevolent dictatorship - they don't get fucked up in the politics like we do.Actually, if some Hitleresque Democrat came to power and eliminated all those rights, Righty would have no argument against it.So if we took you into the desert away from your "liberal" massahs, you you would lose your right to speech, religion, arming yourself for protection?
Are you sure you've thought this through, Herr Himmler?
There are no natural rights. If Saudi Arabia can shoot your ass, and they can if you are there, then you never had a right to life unless - they said so. It's not natural, it's man-made.When I'm out the US, I am no longer protected by the Constitution unless I am in a US territory. I might have human rights, granted by another nation, but that's the end of that.
You have no right to free speech in - Paris. You are under French law then.
If you are out of the USA, then the government of the country you are in may not be restrained from INFRINGING the rights that you naturally poses, but no one "takes" them. The rights are there by nature, thugs might infringe on your rights, but they neither grant nor revoke rights.
What you're admitting is that there is no line of behavior that you aren't willing to step over. In other words, you have no principles of any kind. You're the perfect citizen for a dictatorship.Nothing of the kind. Unlike you I can see all sides of a question.You're admitting that you have absolutely no principles.Just because I'm a liberal doesn't mean I can't see an even better way to do things. Democracy and capitalism suck, they're also the best we have in most cases.ROFL! Some "liberal" you are.We have a new Dear Leader, who wants to be the Orange King. And I have a lot of problems with that but there is something to be said for a benevolent dictatorship - they don't get fucked up in the politics like we do.Actually, if some Hitleresque Democrat came to power and eliminated all those rights, Righty would have no argument against it.
That isn't what a right is, moron. It's not a guarantee that certain things won't happen to you. It's a rule that says some actions are morally acceptable while others are not.There are no natural rights. If Saudi Arabia can shoot your ass, and they can if you are there, then you never had a right to life unless - they said so. It's not natural, it's man-made.When I'm out the US, I am no longer protected by the Constitution unless I am in a US territory. I might have human rights, granted by another nation, but that's the end of that.
You have no right to free speech in - Paris. You are under French law then.
If you are out of the USA, then the government of the country you are in may not be restrained from INFRINGING the rights that you naturally poses, but no one "takes" them. The rights are there by nature, thugs might infringe on your rights, but they neither grant nor revoke rights.
OK then, an anti-globalist and an anarchist working together.You're admitting that you have absolutely no principles.Just because I'm a liberal doesn't mean I can't see an even better way to do things. Democracy and capitalism suck, they're also the best we have in most cases.ROFL! Some "liberal" you are.We have a new Dear Leader, who wants to be the Orange King. And I have a lot of problems with that but there is something to be said for a benevolent dictatorship - they don't get fucked up in the politics like we do.Actually, if some Hitleresque Democrat came to power and eliminated all those rights, Righty would have no argument against it.
He is a fascist. He is part of the Soros Reich. The first thing they shed is any and all integrity.
He's a perfect example of the kind of loathsome moral reptiles that government universities are pumping out today.You're admitting that you have absolutely no principles.Just because I'm a liberal doesn't mean I can't see an even better way to do things. Democracy and capitalism suck, they're also the best we have in most cases.ROFL! Some "liberal" you are.We have a new Dear Leader, who wants to be the Orange King. And I have a lot of problems with that but there is something to be said for a benevolent dictatorship - they don't get fucked up in the politics like we do.Actually, if some Hitleresque Democrat came to power and eliminated all those rights, Righty would have no argument against it.
He is a fascist. He is part of the Soros Reich. The first thing they shed is any and all integrity.
Well, you know....that shotgun........True liberals are always a small number. The Founders were. Most, like you, can't handle it.I always am.Careful what ya wish for....
Obviously not...
If you had put any thought into your civil war you'd have realized you are vastly outnumbered and outgunned.
The founders had guns. Something you leftist abhore.
democrat hero James Hodgkinson had a couple of guns, despite advocating for confiscation.
OTH, he couldn't shoot for shit..
The logical conclusion is that we should outlaw Democrats, not guns.True liberals are always a small number. The Founders were. Most, like you, can't handle it.I always am.Careful what ya wish for....
Obviously not...
If you had put any thought into your civil war you'd have realized you are vastly outnumbered and outgunned.
The founders had guns. Something you leftist abhore.
democrat hero James Hodgkinson had a couple of guns, despite advocating for confiscation.
OTH, he couldn't shoot for shit..
To get the US moving again would I go with a benevolent dictatorship for a few years? Fuck yeah. It's a compromise but what we have now isn't working. It was never meant to last this long, not even close to this long. 20 years they thought.What you're admitting is that there is no line of behavior that you aren't willing to step over. In other words, you have no principles of any kind. You're the perfect citizen for a dictatorship.Nothing of the kind. Unlike you I can see all sides of a question.You're admitting that you have absolutely no principles.Just because I'm a liberal doesn't mean I can't see an even better way to do things. Democracy and capitalism suck, they're also the best we have in most cases.ROFL! Some "liberal" you are.We have a new Dear Leader, who wants to be the Orange King. And I have a lot of problems with that but there is something to be said for a benevolent dictatorship - they don't get fucked up in the politics like we do.
Name even one action that is always - unacceptable? Good lick with that.That isn't what a right is, moron. It's not a guarantee that certain things won't happen to you. It's a rule that says some actions are morally acceptable while others are not.There are no natural rights. If Saudi Arabia can shoot your ass, and they can if you are there, then you never had a right to life unless - they said so. It's not natural, it's man-made.When I'm out the US, I am no longer protected by the Constitution unless I am in a US territory. I might have human rights, granted by another nation, but that's the end of that.
You have no right to free speech in - Paris. You are under French law then.
If you are out of the USA, then the government of the country you are in may not be restrained from INFRINGING the rights that you naturally poses, but no one "takes" them. The rights are there by nature, thugs might infringe on your rights, but they neither grant nor revoke rights.
Murder, theft, fraud, extortion, assault.Name even one action that is always - unacceptable?That isn't what a right is, moron. It's not a guarantee that certain things won't happen to you. It's a rule that says some actions are morally acceptable while others are not.There are no natural rights. If Saudi Arabia can shoot your ass, and they can if you are there, then you never had a right to life unless - they said so. It's not natural, it's man-made.When I'm out the US, I am no longer protected by the Constitution unless I am in a US territory. I might have human rights, granted by another nation, but that's the end of that.
You have no right to free speech in - Paris. You are under French law then.
If you are out of the USA, then the government of the country you are in may not be restrained from INFRINGING the rights that you naturally poses, but no one "takes" them. The rights are there by nature, thugs might infringe on your rights, but they neither grant nor revoke rights.
We could outlaw guns and nuts, but what would you people do for fun? There aren't that many whore houses and family reunions (for finding your next date) around.The logical conclusion is that we should outlaw Democrats, not guns.True liberals are always a small number. The Founders were. Most, like you, can't handle it.I always am.
Obviously not...
If you had put any thought into your civil war you'd have realized you are vastly outnumbered and outgunned.
The founders had guns. Something you leftist abhore.
democrat hero James Hodgkinson had a couple of guns, despite advocating for confiscation.
OTH, he couldn't shoot for shit..
Nice attempt to deflect from the issue under discussion.We could outlaw guns and nuts, but what would you people do for fun? There aren't that many whore houses and family reunions (for finding your next date) around.The logical conclusion is that we should outlaw Democrats, not guns.True liberals are always a small number. The Founders were. Most, like you, can't handle it.Obviously not...
If you had put any thought into your civil war you'd have realized you are vastly outnumbered and outgunned.
The founders had guns. Something you leftist abhore.
democrat hero James Hodgkinson had a couple of guns, despite advocating for confiscation.
OTH, he couldn't shoot for shit..
None of those hold up.Murder, theft, fraud, extortion, assault.Name even one action that is always - unacceptable?That isn't what a right is, moron. It's not a guarantee that certain things won't happen to you. It's a rule that says some actions are morally acceptable while others are not.There are no natural rights. If Saudi Arabia can shoot your ass, and they can if you are there, then you never had a right to life unless - they said so. It's not natural, it's man-made.When I'm out the US, I am no longer protected by the Constitution unless I am in a US territory. I might have human rights, granted by another nation, but that's the end of that.
You have no right to free speech in - Paris. You are under French law then.
If you are out of the USA, then the government of the country you are in may not be restrained from INFRINGING the rights that you naturally poses, but no one "takes" them. The rights are there by nature, thugs might infringe on your rights, but they neither grant nor revoke rights.
You are welcome to return to it? WTF was it?Nice attempt to deflect from the issue under discussion.We could outlaw guns and nuts, but what would you people do for fun? There aren't that many whore houses and family reunions (for finding your next date) around.The logical conclusion is that we should outlaw Democrats, not guns.True liberals are always a small number. The Founders were. Most, like you, can't handle it.
The founders had guns. Something you leftist abhore.
democrat hero James Hodgkinson had a couple of guns, despite advocating for confiscation.
OTH, he couldn't shoot for shit..
The logical conclusion is that we should outlaw Democrats, not guns.You are welcome to return to it? WTF was it?Nice attempt to deflect from the issue under discussion.We could outlaw guns and nuts, but what would you people do for fun? There aren't that many whore houses and family reunions (for finding your next date) around.The logical conclusion is that we should outlaw Democrats, not guns.The founders had guns. Something you leftist abhore.
democrat hero James Hodgkinson had a couple of guns, despite advocating for confiscation.
OTH, he couldn't shoot for shit..
Your "logical conclusion", huh?The logical conclusion is that we should outlaw Democrats, not guns.You are welcome to return to it? WTF was it?Nice attempt to deflect from the issue under discussion.We could outlaw guns and nuts, but what would you people do for fun? There aren't that many whore houses and family reunions (for finding your next date) around.The logical conclusion is that we should outlaw Democrats, not guns.democrat hero James Hodgkinson had a couple of guns, despite advocating for confiscation.
OTH, he couldn't shoot for shit..
Most gun deaths will be GOP. That won't work.The logical conclusion is that we should outlaw Democrats, not guns.You are welcome to return to it? WTF was it?Nice attempt to deflect from the issue under discussion.We could outlaw guns and nuts, but what would you people do for fun? There aren't that many whore houses and family reunions (for finding your next date) around.The logical conclusion is that we should outlaw Democrats, not guns.democrat hero James Hodgkinson had a couple of guns, despite advocating for confiscation.
OTH, he couldn't shoot for shit..
