There is an active shooter at a Florida Highschool

There, fixed that for you.
Nope, those people were killed with a gun.

Yeah, by another person. The gun can't kill people by itself. You seem to forget that there's always a person behind the gun in situations like these.
So? If the asshole today didn’t have a gun, he wouldn’t have been able to kill 17 people.
A knife? A bomb?

YES! He would have.
A knife would not have killed 17 people and bombs are illegal. Great point ya made there. :thup:
There is a rudimentary, fundamental reason why our founding fathers sought to ensure that the citizenry of this nation never have their right to bear arms infringed upon... and it wasn't about recreation, not even about hunting, or honor dueling the guy who stole your GF.... What the heck was that reason... and did it supersede tragic mass shootings , like the ones that are happening so frequently these days.....???? If you don't know the tenets that your freedoms are based on, giving you the answers is pointless anyway.
 
No, clown shoes. You're the one with all the answers.

:lmao:

More than you, apparently.

:lol:

Let's not kid ourselves. You don't actually have any answers. You're just desperately trying to find a way to use this tragedy for political points.

Well no, but I seem to be scoring them in spite of it.

I hope that keeps you warm at night, counting your "points" over a pile of dead kids.

Unfortunate. But the incident has nothing to do with any guns I may or may not own.

Did I say it did, fuckwit?

You must have mistaken me for someone as disgusting and craven as you are.
 
You're not a liberal? Saw the error of your ways?

How would any of those prevent school shootings?

There is one way to do that. Allow admins and techers to arm themselves if they choose. That would make shooters think twice about doing it and make them a lot more hesitant to run around shooting people.

Conservatives recognize that, leftists want more carnage and do everything they can to get it. They use every shooting to push for making it easier for the next shooter to safely kill more people. To say they don't realize what they are doing is disingenuous and doesn't make them not responsible for the reality of what they do

Because it has been proven time and time again in other countries that rules and regs make the chances of these things happening must less probable.

Acutally with your last paragraph that is untrue. Nothing has changed as far as I can tell. Nothing. Thus you still have mass shootings.


That's nice...


plan on just requesting people turn in their semi-auto firearms, or go house to house to collect them?

(what are the odds of them getting any turned in in Chicago)

Good way to get shot
 
You're not a liberal? Saw the error of your ways?

How would any of those prevent school shootings?

There is one way to do that. Allow admins and techers to arm themselves if they choose. That would make shooters think twice about doing it and make them a lot more hesitant to run around shooting people.

Conservatives recognize that, leftists want more carnage and do everything they can to get it. They use every shooting to push for making it easier for the next shooter to safely kill more people. To say they don't realize what they are doing is disingenuous and doesn't make them not responsible for the reality of what they do

Because it has been proven time and time again in other countries that rules and regs make the chances of these things happening must less probable.

Acutally with your last paragraph that is untrue. Nothing has changed as far as I can tell. Nothing. Thus you still have mass shootings.


That's nice...


plan on just requesting people turn in their semi-auto firearms, or go house to house to collect them?

(what are the odds of them getting any turned in in Chicago)
maybe the broken ones for cash to buy a bag of meth
 
There, fixed that for you.
Nope, those people were killed with a gun.

Yeah, by another person. The gun can't kill people by itself. You seem to forget that there's always a person behind the gun in situations like these.
So? If the asshole today didn’t have a gun, he wouldn’t have been able to kill 17 people.
A knife? A bomb?

YES! He would have.
A knife would not have killed 17 people and bombs are illegal. Great point ya made there. :thup:
Lolololol

And you think them being illegal would have stopped him from sneaking that stuff into the building?

Holy smokes. Quite the compelling point you have there.
 
By the way.....

This tragedy happened in Debbie Wasserman Schultz Distric (FL-23)

Just letting you know. That's all.
What’s your point?

no point just letting people know, it relates to this overall news.

by the way....do you happen to know, Faun, why did Nicolas Cruz posted Allahu Akbar in his Instagram?

nikolas cruz (@cruz_nikolas) • Instagram photos and videos
Oh? How does Debbie Wasserman-Schultz relate to this news? Do you realize what a moron you are? Is that the relation you’re trying to establish?


It was in her distric that this happened.

It relates to the overall news.

But you don't seem to know why Cruz ,the shooter wrote Allahu Akbar in his Instagram

I get it ;)
No, you don’t get it.

You’re too stupid to get it.

Want proof?

That’s not Debbie’s District, it’s Ted Deutch’s. :lmao:

Florida’s 22nd Congressional District - FL-22 Representatives & District Map - GovTrack.us

1233796371590.gif


But hey, thanks for proving me 100% right when I say you’re a moron. :badgrin:
 
Nope, more people are killed by guns by other people.

There, fixed that for you.
Nope, those people were killed with a gun.

Yeah, by another person. The gun can't kill people by itself. You seem to forget that there's always a person behind the gun in situations like these.
So? If the asshole today didn’t have a gun, he wouldn’t have been able to kill 17 people.
. No, if he would have been dealt with properly, he wouldn't have been able to gain access to the gun, a car, a truck, a knife or even a homemade bomb if somehow capable.
 
[ Quit deflecting the issue by way of using all your tired leftist talking points. They don't work anymore.

What do you mean they won't work anymore? They've never been tried in the US so you don't know if they'd work or not.

Deflecting what? The US is the only first-world country where this is an issue. It is also the only first world country that has a plethora of guns that are easily available to its population. You think there is NO correlation between the two? Really? THAT is the problem, not WHO is using the guns, but the fact your country is awash with them. YOU can deflect all you want, but that is the truth. And until that is addressed you are going to have more mass shootings.
 
Nope, those people were killed with a gun.

Yeah, by another person. The gun can't kill people by itself. You seem to forget that there's always a person behind the gun in situations like these.
So? If the asshole today didn’t have a gun, he wouldn’t have been able to kill 17 people.
A knife? A bomb?

YES! He would have.
A knife would not have killed 17 people and bombs are illegal. Great point ya made there. :thup:
Lolololol

And you think them being illegal would have stopped him from sneaking that stuff into the building?

Holy smokes. Quite the compelling point you have there.
No, I think being illegal would have made it more difficult for him to buy the gun.
 
Bull shit. The first thing the liberals did here was to run to the board and start a thread cheering the carnage. You know they love this, stop lying

You pick out one or two people for that, and I can point towards one or two on the other side stepping on the dead bodies of the kids to say they wouldn't have been killed if MORE people had guns.

There are probably some. But the left loves to politicize death, it's a huge thing to them.

There is no way to keep 300 million guns from a psycho. Just having a few guns among unknown admins and teachers and the shooting not knowing which ones would have saved a lot of lives and likely prevented the shooting.

There's an obvious reason why the vast number of shootings are in so called gun free zones. Problem being that sign is a "criminals come here" sign. Law abiding citizens are the ones who abide by the law. Who saw that coming?

Leftists want only government to be armed. Are they cheering the propaganda for this? You betcha, most of them are

Yes there is a real good reason so many shootings happen in gun free zones... it's because they are places that are often the most vulnerable for people to kill people. But if he hadn't had access to an AR-15... chances are he wouldn't have been able to kill so many people.

The only reason that was effective was because he could freely run around the halls knowing no one was going to be able to shoot back. That is the primary issue. And that is specifically what I'm blaming leftists for, making murderers safer.

Think about that. If you know there are roughly five guns in a school and has no idea who has them, you aren't going to run around the halls shooting people like this kid did

So having bullets flying in 2 directions with people running all around would be safer? REALLY? You've watched too many action movies. School teachers aren't exactly Annie Oakley.

So, what should we do then? Let it happen?
 
You're not a liberal? Saw the error of your ways?

How would any of those prevent school shootings?

There is one way to do that. Allow admins and techers to arm themselves if they choose. That would make shooters think twice about doing it and make them a lot more hesitant to run around shooting people.

Conservatives recognize that, leftists want more carnage and do everything they can to get it. They use every shooting to push for making it easier for the next shooter to safely kill more people. To say they don't realize what they are doing is disingenuous and doesn't make them not responsible for the reality of what they do

Because it has been proven time and time again in other countries that rules and regs make the chances of these things happening must less probable.

Acutally with your last paragraph that is untrue. Nothing has changed as far as I can tell. Nothing. Thus you still have mass shootings.


That's nice...


plan on just requesting people turn in their semi-auto firearms, or go house to house to collect them?

(what are the odds of them getting any turned in in Chicago)

If you knew how to use Google, type in "Chicago gun buyback" and you will see that it has been happening there for a few years now.
 
School shootings are seldom ideologically or politically motivated. This isn’t a left right issue.
I'm willing to bet everything I own, he wasn't an NRA member.

Ill go farther. His politics leans LEFT.

Frankly, I don't give a damn what his political leanings are. He needs to be swiftly escorted off this mortal plane.

Whoa! Mortal plane! How long have you been saving that one up, Sir Dumbfuck?
 
That's nice...

plan on just requesting people turn in their semi-auto firearms, or go house to house to collect them?

(what are the odds of them getting any turned in in Chicago)

It's a time thing. You have a general amnesty and over the next decade you slowly start getting the illegal ones off the street. Not that hard at all. As long as the laws are in place and LEOs have the authority, it'll happen. It is not an overnight solution. No solution ever will be. That is the problem with you Yanks and your two-minute celebrity culture. You want everything to happy NOW, NOW, NOW!!!
 
Last edited:
Frankly, I don't give a damn what his political leanings are. He needs to be swiftly escorted off this mortal plane.
I don't care what you care about.

We need to understand the thinking that breeds these killers. Constitutionalists don't create these killers. The left, however, breeds them like flies.

That's enough!

I'm going to try to stomach some dinner now.

Somehow, I think you'll manage.
 
That's nice...

plan on just requesting people turn in their semi-auto firearms, or go house to house to collect them?

(what are the odds of them getting any turned in in Chicago)

It's a time thing. You have a general amnesty and over the next decade you slowly start getting the illegal ones of the street. Not that hard at all. As long as the laws are in place and LEOs have the authority, it'll happen. It is not an overnight solution. No solution ever will be. That is the problem with you Yanks and your two-minute celebrity culture. You want everything to happy NOW, NOW, NOW!!!

And if no one complies?

Hmmm ...?
 
as previously posted:


"maybe the broken ones for cash to buy a bag of meth"
 
That's nice...

plan on just requesting people turn in their semi-auto firearms, or go house to house to collect them?

(what are the odds of them getting any turned in in Chicago)

It's a time thing. You have a general amnesty and over the next decade you slowly start getting the illegal ones of the street. Not that hard at all. As long as the laws are in place and LEOs have the authority, it'll happen. It is not an overnight solution. No solution ever will be. That is the problem with you Yanks and your two-minute celebrity culture. You want everything to happy NOW, NOW, NOW!!!

You Yanks? Are you even an American? If not pound sand
 
Yeah, by another person. The gun can't kill people by itself. You seem to forget that there's always a person behind the gun in situations like these.
So? If the asshole today didn’t have a gun, he wouldn’t have been able to kill 17 people.
A knife? A bomb?

YES! He would have.
A knife would not have killed 17 people and bombs are illegal. Great point ya made there. :thup:
Lolololol

And you think them being illegal would have stopped him from sneaking that stuff into the building?

Holy smokes. Quite the compelling point you have there.
No, I think being illegal would have made it more difficult for him to buy the gun.
Well, if you think that, you're sadly mistaken. Making something illegal does not prevent it from happening. Just like making guns illegal would not stop people from getting them.

Think, Faun, think!
 

Forum List

Back
Top