Procrustes Stretched
Dante's Manifesto
Yep. And unlike you, my reading and comprehension skills are intact.Do you read the links you post?
You're setting up strawmen again, Frankie.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep. And unlike you, my reading and comprehension skills are intact.Do you read the links you post?
Yep. And unlike you, my reading and comprehension skills are intact.
You're setting up strawmen again, Frankie.
ty TrollUnfair!
Only leftists are allowed to set up strawmen.
How do you know they haven't mistaken a natural climate fluctuation - which the geologic record is littered with - for AGW?Little Frankie Doo Doo
Carbon Dioxide Concentration | NASA Global Climate Change
Vital Signs of the Planet: Global Climate Change and Global Warming. Current news and data streams about global warming and climate change from NASA.climate.nasa.gov
Oh wait!
Science.
Doesn't carbon dioxide in the atmosphere come from natural sources?
Doesn't carbon dioxide in the atmosphere come from natural sources?
Yes, there are, but the only new process on Earth that has been identified that can account for the significant tipping of Earth's carbon balance is human activity, including deforestation, biomass burning, cement production, and—especially—fossil-fuel emissions.www.climate.gov
To all:Borrowing a page from Arthur C Clarke, "There is Life on Europa!"
The JWST just discovered that some advanced alien civilization has been making internal combustion engines and pumping planet killing CO2 into the atmosphere of Jupiter's Moon Europa!
Nothing else fits the facts! As we learned on our home planet, no natural process can produce CO2.
Europa is experiencing Climate Change
Scientists found CO2 on Europa. Here’s why it’s important
"In the last few weeks of September 2023, two teams of scientists using the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) discovered the presence of carbon dioxide (CO2) on the surface of Jupiter’s icy moon Europa. This discovery could have implications for the search for life elsewhere in the universe."
The Deniers will, of course, try to chalk this up to some inexplicable "natural process" But we KNOW what causes CO2 don't we?
"‘… relay this information to Earth. Tsien destroyed three hours ago. I’m only survivor. Using my suit radio - no idea if it has enough range, but it’s the only chance. Please listen carefully. THERE IS LIFE ON EUROPA. I repeat: THERE IS LIFE ON EUROPA." --Arthur C Clarke, 2010: Odyssey Two
Sorry, you seem confused. Your question is for a climate scientist.How do you know they haven't mistaken a natural climate fluctuation - which the geologic record is littered with - for AGW?
Actually anyone can understand the oxygen isotope curve which is the temperature record of the planet.Sorry, you see confused. Your question is for a climate scientist.
Would you like me to provide the email addresses of some climate scientists, so that you can pursue your in-no-way-total-bullshit curiosity?
I'm not a science denier.How do you know they haven't mistaken a natural climate fluctuation - which the geologic record is littered with - for AGW?
. If you understood it, i think you would be able to make a point, instead of interrogating nonscientist strangers on a message board. Have at it.Actually anyone can understand the oxygen isotope curve which is the temperature record of the planet.
Sure you are. You deny that the geologic record is littered with warming and cooling trends that were not caused by CO2 or orbital forcing. You deny that the planet cooled for millions of years with atmospheric CO2 greater than 600 ppm. You deny that the previous interglacial period was 2C warmer with 26 ft higher seas and 120 ppm less atmospheric CO2 than today.I'm not a science denier.
No he isn't.You deny that the geologic record is littered with warming and cooling trends that were not caused by CO2 or orbital forcing.
I do understand it. Don't you? It's not that complicated... temperature versus time.. If you understood it, i think you would be able to make a point, instead of interrogating nonscientist strangers on a message board. Have at it.
You deny it too. Prove me wrong. Tell me that everything I just wrote is what the science tells us about the past temperatures of the planet and that you accept them. I don't believe you can.No he isn't.
This is a lie.
You are a very dishonest poster, ding.
It sure doesn't seem like you do. Probably because you haven't managed to make a single relevant point about it.I do understand it. Don't you? It's not that complicated... temperature versus time.
I do not deny science. You do.Sure you are. You deny that the geologic record is...
Of course I have made relevant points about each and every single one of those pieces of empirical climate evidence.It sure doesn't seem like you do. Probably because you haven't managed to make a single relevant point about it.
Guess who definitely des understand it...
The people who discovered that data and taught and teach us everything we will ever know about it.
So you agree that the planet cooled for millions of years with atmospheric CO2 greater than 600 ppm?I do not deny science. You do.
Why would I discuss a complicated scientific topic with an uneducated slob? I will just defer to the scientific community. Thanks, though.Of course I have made relevant points about each and every single one of those pieces of empirical climate evidence.
I'd be happy to discuss what each one means in the Bull Ring with you.
Don't feed the sealion trolls.So you agree that the planet cooled for millions of years with atmospheric CO2 greater than 600 ppm?