There Is No "Far Right" In This Country

[sealybobo]

1. There is no "far right" in this country.
Yet....the very same folks who poke fun at religious Americans, by comparing God with Santa Claus, go on and on.....

"F**k the far right."
MARCO RUBIO: I 'Absolutely' Support Tuition Breaks For Illegal Aliens

'Or Sanders, who does even better against the far right tard candidates'
BUSTED ! – Republican State of Union Response Carried Amnesty Pledge in Spanish Version…

'I bet this will drive the far right loons insane:'
Nikki Haley rebukes Trump in State of the Union rebuttal

'Uh.. there is very much a "far right" in this country.'
The Delusional Candidate

'... what the far right reactionaries are posting.'
Another reason Americans WANT to see Obama and Obamacare GO!!!

'...for some time now the most and loudest noise has come from the Far Right.'
Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

"...how insane the far right is."
Yes, You're A Communist





2. There is no "far right" in this country. So... how to explain the constant reference to this meme by Leftists?

One fact of life is that hearing a phrase often enough, one tends to accept it without spending the effort of examining same. The term "Far Right," used in a cavalier yet effective manner by the Left, is one of those terms.

Yet...upon examination....it proves to be imaginary, very much like the benefits of communism....or ObamaCare.




3. It is a well know axiom that, to see what the Left is doing, note what they are blaming the other side of doing.
One regularly sees the Leftists, Liberals, Progressives, Democrats, whatever....railing against the "Far Right," using "Far Right" as a pejorative, an imprecation.
And....BTW.....there certainly is a Far Left.


But I'll prove that "Far Right" doesn't exist.

there you go again with the 1,2, 3, bits of total bull shit that only you and right wing nut jobs care about ... a bunch of useless information that hasn't any bearing on anything

If its that complicated that her thought can't be explained in an elevator pitch, its probably bullshit.

See what I mean about the profanity, and it's association with Liberals.

Funny because it seems the people who like Trump the most are you flaming far right wingers. Talking about Megan Kelly and her period, making fun of a guy with a disability, etc. You love it when Trump is vulgar and crude and blunt but not me? Interesting.

 

[sealybobo]

I won't use any profanity w/ you Politicalspice

Your thread IS outrageous though. No eXtreme rw when we all lived through the Teapub Primaries of 2010 where anyone on the Right who was even PERCIEVED to be a Moderate was "Primaries out"

And now 8 years later they are trying to pass off one of the worst tea baggers as the only real Republican on stage. The rest apparently are just RINO's.

Talk about re-defining what your party is. So she shouldn't be surprised when she loses the next election, and the next, and the next, when they keep trying to push the extreme fringe element of their party on us.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/09/senators-have-had-it-with-ted-cruzs-shutdown.html#

Why have they had it with him? Is he the only one who knows what the constitution says? How can so many disagree with him?

Ted Cruz’s diabolical shutdown strategy: Why the GOP senator wants to watch the world burn

 

[hazlnut]

1. There is no "far right" in this country.
Yet....the very same folks who poke fun at religious Americans, by comparing God with Santa Claus, go on and on.....

"F**k the far right."
MARCO RUBIO: I 'Absolutely' Support Tuition Breaks For Illegal Aliens

'Or Sanders, who does even better against the far right tard candidates'
BUSTED ! – Republican State of Union Response Carried Amnesty Pledge in Spanish Version…

'I bet this will drive the far right loons insane:'
Nikki Haley rebukes Trump in State of the Union rebuttal

'Uh.. there is very much a "far right" in this country.'
The Delusional Candidate

'... what the far right reactionaries are posting.'
Another reason Americans WANT to see Obama and Obamacare GO!!!

'...for some time now the most and loudest noise has come from the Far Right.'
Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

"...how insane the far right is."
Yes, You're A Communist





2. There is no "far right" in this country. So... how to explain the constant reference to this meme by Leftists?

One fact of life is that hearing a phrase often enough, one tends to accept it without spending the effort of examining same. The term "Far Right," used in a cavalier yet effective manner by the Left, is one of those terms.

Yet...upon examination....it proves to be imaginary, very much like the benefits of communism....or ObamaCare.




3. It is a well know axiom that, to see what the Left is doing, note what they are blaming the other side of doing.
One regularly sees the Leftists, Liberals, Progressives, Democrats, whatever....railing against the "Far Right," using "Far Right" as a pejorative, an imprecation.
And....BTW.....there certainly is a Far Left.


But I'll prove that "Far Right" doesn't exist.

Look here. See that ugly pig. That's a 'far rightard."

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. There is no "far right" in this country.
Yet....the very same folks who poke fun at religious Americans, by comparing God with Santa Claus, go on and on.....

"F**k the far right."
MARCO RUBIO: I 'Absolutely' Support Tuition Breaks For Illegal Aliens

'Or Sanders, who does even better against the far right tard candidates'
BUSTED ! – Republican State of Union Response Carried Amnesty Pledge in Spanish Version…

'I bet this will drive the far right loons insane:'
Nikki Haley rebukes Trump in State of the Union rebuttal

'Uh.. there is very much a "far right" in this country.'
The Delusional Candidate

'... what the far right reactionaries are posting.'
Another reason Americans WANT to see Obama and Obamacare GO!!!

'...for some time now the most and loudest noise has come from the Far Right.'
Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

"...how insane the far right is."
Yes, You're A Communist





2. There is no "far right" in this country. So... how to explain the constant reference to this meme by Leftists?

One fact of life is that hearing a phrase often enough, one tends to accept it without spending the effort of examining same. The term "Far Right," used in a cavalier yet effective manner by the Left, is one of those terms.

Yet...upon examination....it proves to be imaginary, very much like the benefits of communism....or ObamaCare.




3. It is a well know axiom that, to see what the Left is doing, note what they are blaming the other side of doing.
One regularly sees the Leftists, Liberals, Progressives, Democrats, whatever....railing against the "Far Right," using "Far Right" as a pejorative, an imprecation.
And....BTW.....there certainly is a Far Left.


But I'll prove that "Far Right" doesn't exist.

there you go again with the 1,2, 3, bits of total bull shit that only you and right wing nut jobs care about ... a bunch of useless information that hasn't any bearing on anything

If its that complicated that her thought can't be explained in an elevator pitch, its probably bullshit.

See what I mean about the profanity, and it's association with Liberals.

Funny because it seems the people who like Trump the most are you flaming far right wingers. Talking about Megan Kelly and her period, making fun of a guy with a disability, etc. You love it when Trump is vulgar and crude and blunt but not me? Interesting.

You're speaking to me?

See if you can find any post of mine with respect to any particular candidate.

Then, apologize.

 

[sealybobo]

I know the point you're trying to make. You pervert the Constitution.

Our government has a role to solve problems as they come up. Lots of problems have come up since the founders started this country. They didn't have it all figured out

"I know the point you're trying to make. You pervert the Constitution."

More smoke and mirrors than a fire in a brothel.



I do so hate to pummel a dead horse...but don't tap dance around.

This was your task:
Now then......if your examples..." Alito, Roberts, Ryan, bush, Romney, koch brothers and ALEC" are the imaginary "Far Right," you should be able to provide some examples of their positions that run counter to the traditions that serve as the basis of this nation's founding.

You can't.

There is no 'Far Right'....only a Far Left, folks who wish to destroy the foundations of America.

I can easily provide definitive examples of you Leftists destroying the principles that made America great.
I know you recognize that, because you're afraid to ask me to prove it.


Case closed.

Yea but you think public land schools and healthcare are unconstitutional. That's debatable. Anyone who thinks those things are unconstitutional is far right wing radical.

Times have changed and so should you.

You can attempt to change the subject as you like.

I believe I've made and proven my point: you stated that there is no Far Left, but there is a Far Right.

Clearly, you couldn't be more wrong.




"Times have changed and so should you."

I consider this your admission, as I stated, that you no longer believe in the traditional values of America.

The irony is that those values are what allows you to state that position.

What value do you think allow me to speak my mind? I certainly don't object to free speech.

Reality is defined by actions, not words.

If you vote for a Democrat, a Liberal, a Progressive, a socialist, then you vote against free speech.

At what point does great wealth held in a few hands harm democracy, threatening to turn a democratic republic into an oligarchy? Thomas Jefferson explicitly suggested that if individuals became so rich that their wealth could influence or challenge government, then their wealth should be decreased upon their death. Thus the death tax was born. The majority of the signers of the Constitution were actually acting against their own best economic interests when they put their signatures on that document, just as had the majority of the signers of the Declaration of Independence. Why was the Constitutional Convention held in secret behind locked doors, and why did James Madison not publish his own notes of the Convention until 1840, just after the last of the other participants had died? The reason was that most of the wealthy men among the delegates were betraying the interests of their own economic class. They were voting for democracy instead of oligarchy. Their writings show that they truly believed they were doing sacred work, something greater than themselves, their personal interests, or even the narrow interests of their wealthy constituents back in their home states.
Since the so-called "Reagan revolution" more than cut in half the income taxes the multimillionaires and billionaires among us pay, wealth has concentrated in America in ways not seen since the era of the Robber Barons, or, before that, pre-revolutionary colonial times. At the same time, poverty has exploded and the middle class is under economic siege. And now come the oligarchs - the most wealthy and powerful families of America - lobbying Congress that they should retain their stupefying levels of wealth and the power it brings, generation after generation. They say that democracy doesn't require a strong middle class, and that Jefferson was wrong when he said that "overgrown wealth" could be "dangerous to the State." They say that a permanent, hereditary, aristocratically rich ruling class is actually a good thing for the stability of society. Let's make sure that we don't end up like so many Latin American countries, where a handful of super-rich families rule their nations, and democracy is more show than substance.
The Founders of our republic fought a war against an aristocratic, oligarchic nation, and were very clear that they didn't want America to ever degenerate into aristocracy, oligarchy, or feudalism/fascism. We must hold to their vision of an egalitarian, democratic republic.
- See more at: How Rich is Too Rich For Democracy?

 

[sealybobo]

1. There is no "far right" in this country.
Yet....the very same folks who poke fun at religious Americans, by comparing God with Santa Claus, go on and on.....

"F**k the far right."
MARCO RUBIO: I 'Absolutely' Support Tuition Breaks For Illegal Aliens

'Or Sanders, who does even better against the far right tard candidates'
BUSTED ! – Republican State of Union Response Carried Amnesty Pledge in Spanish Version…

'I bet this will drive the far right loons insane:'
Nikki Haley rebukes Trump in State of the Union rebuttal

'Uh.. there is very much a "far right" in this country.'
The Delusional Candidate

'... what the far right reactionaries are posting.'
Another reason Americans WANT to see Obama and Obamacare GO!!!

'...for some time now the most and loudest noise has come from the Far Right.'
Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

"...how insane the far right is."
Yes, You're A Communist





2. There is no "far right" in this country. So... how to explain the constant reference to this meme by Leftists?

One fact of life is that hearing a phrase often enough, one tends to accept it without spending the effort of examining same. The term "Far Right," used in a cavalier yet effective manner by the Left, is one of those terms.

Yet...upon examination....it proves to be imaginary, very much like the benefits of communism....or ObamaCare.




3. It is a well know axiom that, to see what the Left is doing, note what they are blaming the other side of doing.
One regularly sees the Leftists, Liberals, Progressives, Democrats, whatever....railing against the "Far Right," using "Far Right" as a pejorative, an imprecation.
And....BTW.....there certainly is a Far Left.


But I'll prove that "Far Right" doesn't exist.

there you go again with the 1,2, 3, bits of total bull shit that only you and right wing nut jobs care about ... a bunch of useless information that hasn't any bearing on anything

If its that complicated that her thought can't be explained in an elevator pitch, its probably bullshit.

See what I mean about the profanity, and it's association with Liberals.

Funny because it seems the people who like Trump the most are you flaming far right wingers. Talking about Megan Kelly and her period, making fun of a guy with a disability, etc. You love it when Trump is vulgar and crude and blunt but not me? Interesting.

You're speaking to me?

See if you can find any post of mine with respect to any particular candidate.

Then, apologize.

Sorry. I confused you with another right wing **** I talk to from time to time.

 

[regent]

If true, more evidence that America is a very liberal nation. Then again, maybe the conservatives are making another effort to be known as liberal. Either way....

 

[Mac1958]

There's a hard Right, a hard Left, and a more sane majority somewhere in the middle.

Unfortunately, the ends of the spectrum make a vast majority of the noise.
.

 

[PoliticalChic]

there you go again with the 1,2, 3, bits of total bull shit that only you and right wing nut jobs care about ... a bunch of useless information that hasn't any bearing on anything

If its that complicated that her thought can't be explained in an elevator pitch, its probably bullshit.

See what I mean about the profanity, and it's association with Liberals.

Funny because it seems the people who like Trump the most are you flaming far right wingers. Talking about Megan Kelly and her period, making fun of a guy with a disability, etc. You love it when Trump is vulgar and crude and blunt but not me? Interesting.

You're speaking to me?

See if you can find any post of mine with respect to any particular candidate.

Then, apologize.

Sorry. I confused you with another right wing **** I talk to from time to time.

You begin our exchange with the statement that there is no Far Left, but is a Far Right.

I simply rammed your words back down your throat, using logic, and education.

I gave you every opportunity to provide examples of radical positions by any of the individuals you claimed were Far Right, with the aim of showing how said positions ran counter to traditional and historic American values, and attitudes.

Of course, you couldn't.



Further, I asked if you'd like me to provide a bunch of Far Left positions that were the very antithesis of
traditional and historic American values, and attitudes.

Wisely, you declined to have me present those.


Then you made some claim about my support of a particular candidate....and I suggested you find any such post.
Of course, there aren't any.


Now your attempt is absurd statement: "Sorry. I confused you with another right wing **** I talk to from time to time."

Where do you find any hint that you have the ability to 'confuse' me?

Seems, rather, that I've both run circles around you, and put you in your place fairly firmly.

That's the truth, isn't it.

 

[Theowl32]

If true, more evidence that America is a very liberal nation. Then again, maybe the conservatives are making another effort to be known as liberal. Either way....

Remember when you said something about human nature and you insinuated that liberals are all about nature then I asked you if Bruce Jenner is in fact a man or woman and you did not answer that?

Cause I do.

There Is No "Far Right" In This Country

Post number 484.

 

[PoliticalChic]

there you go again with the 1,2, 3, bits of total bull shit that only you and right wing nut jobs care about ... a bunch of useless information that hasn't any bearing on anything

If its that complicated that her thought can't be explained in an elevator pitch, its probably bullshit.

See what I mean about the profanity, and it's association with Liberals.

Funny because it seems the people who like Trump the most are you flaming far right wingers. Talking about Megan Kelly and her period, making fun of a guy with a disability, etc. You love it when Trump is vulgar and crude and blunt but not me? Interesting.

You're speaking to me?

See if you can find any post of mine with respect to any particular candidate.

Then, apologize.

Sorry. I confused you with another right wing **** I talk to from time to time.

I misunderstood your post....I realize you were saying that you thought I was someone else.
Understood.
Thank you.

 

[PoliticalChic]

If true, more evidence that America is a very liberal nation. Then again, maybe the conservatives are making another effort to be known as liberal. Either way....

"...maybe the conservatives are making another effort to be known as liberal."


Conservatives are liberals....the original liberals: classical liberals.

You modern Liberals purloined the name because it was held in high regard....and substituted 'Liberal' for the name you had, Socialists.


Simple enough to prove: classical liberals stood for individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

You, the American version of the 20th century Soviet oppression, stand for the collective, socialism, and unlimited government control

Please don't lie again....if you are able to control same.

 

[regent]

If true, more evidence that America is a very liberal nation. Then again, maybe the conservatives are making another effort to be known as liberal. Either way....

Conservatives are liberals....the original liberals: classical liberals.

You modern Liberals purloined the name because it was held in high regard....and substituted 'Liberal' for the name you had, Socialists.


Simple enough to prove: classical liberals stood for individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

You, the American version of the 20th century Soviet oppression, stand for the collective, socialism, and unlimited government control

Please don't lie again.

Yes, liberals during the 1700's were for many changes to government, changes to the status of the common folk, to monarchs, to the noble class and so on, but one of the traits of liberalism is change and change they do. You must remember it is the conservatives that want to return to the 1700's, with an elite class and the rest. By the time conservatives accept the "all men are created equal" concept liberals will have moved on still in the pursuit of happiness for all Americans not just the elite.

 

[PoliticalChic]

If true, more evidence that America is a very liberal nation. Then again, maybe the conservatives are making another effort to be known as liberal. Either way....

Conservatives are liberals....the original liberals: classical liberals.

You modern Liberals purloined the name because it was held in high regard....and substituted 'Liberal' for the name you had, Socialists.


Simple enough to prove: classical liberals stood for individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

You, the American version of the 20th century Soviet oppression, stand for the collective, socialism, and unlimited government control

Please don't lie again.

Yes, liberals during the 1700's were for many changes to government, changes to the status of the common folk, to monarchs, to the noble class and so on, but one of the traits of liberalism is change and change they do. You must remember it is the conservatives that want to return to the 1700's, with an elite class and the rest. By the time conservatives accept the "all men are created equal" concept liberals will have moved on still in the pursuit of happiness for all Americans not just the elite.

So....I caught you lying, and this farrago is your attempt to....what...get off the floor?

Sadly....you've proven that you cannot control the lying.


Conservatives still stand for
individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


While you stand for the doctrines that resulted in the slaughter of 100 million human beings.


Whittaker Chambers wrote in his book WITNESS that liberals are/were incapable of ever effectively fighting Communism because they did not see anything in Communism that was antithetical to their own beliefs. In short, Liberals are Communists and Communists are Liberals.

 

[regent]

If true, more evidence that America is a very liberal nation. Then again, maybe the conservatives are making another effort to be known as liberal. Either way....

Conservatives are liberals....the original liberals: classical liberals.

You modern Liberals purloined the name because it was held in high regard....and substituted 'Liberal' for the name you had, Socialists.


Simple enough to prove: classical liberals stood for individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

You, the American version of the 20th century Soviet oppression, stand for the collective, socialism, and unlimited government control

Please don't lie again.

Yes, liberals during the 1700's were for many changes to government, changes to the status of the common folk, to monarchs, to the noble class and so on, but one of the traits of liberalism is change and change they do. You must remember it is the conservatives that want to return to the 1700's, with an elite class and the rest. By the time conservatives accept the "all men are created equal" concept liberals will have moved on still in the pursuit of happiness for all Americans not just the elite.

So....I caught you lying, and this farrago is your attempt to....what...get off the floor?

Sadly....you've proven that you cannot control the lying.


Conservatives still stand for
individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


While you stand for the doctrines that resulted in the slaughter of 100 million human beings.


Whittaker Chambers wrote in his book WITNESS that liberals are/were incapable of ever effectively fighting Communism because they did not see anything in Communism that was antithetical to their own beliefs. In short, Liberals are Communists and Communists are Liberals.

I do?

 

[Moonglow]

If true, more evidence that America is a very liberal nation. Then again, maybe the conservatives are making another effort to be known as liberal. Either way....

Conservatives are liberals....the original liberals: classical liberals.

You modern Liberals purloined the name because it was held in high regard....and substituted 'Liberal' for the name you had, Socialists.


Simple enough to prove: classical liberals stood for individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

You, the American version of the 20th century Soviet oppression, stand for the collective, socialism, and unlimited government control

Please don't lie again.

Yes, liberals during the 1700's were for many changes to government, changes to the status of the common folk, to monarchs, to the noble class and so on, but one of the traits of liberalism is change and change they do. You must remember it is the conservatives that want to return to the 1700's, with an elite class and the rest. By the time conservatives accept the "all men are created equal" concept liberals will have moved on still in the pursuit of happiness for all Americans not just the elite.

So....I caught you lying, and this farrago is your attempt to....what...get off the floor?

Sadly....you've proven that you cannot control the lying.


Conservatives still stand for
individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


While you stand for the doctrines that resulted in the slaughter of 100 million human beings.


Whittaker Chambers wrote in his book WITNESS that liberals are/were incapable of ever effectively fighting Communism because they did not see anything in Communism that was antithetical to their own beliefs. In short, Liberals are Communists and Communists are Liberals.

So now we see the madness of self delusion...

 

[Moonglow]

If true, more evidence that America is a very liberal nation. Then again, maybe the conservatives are making another effort to be known as liberal. Either way....

Conservatives are liberals....the original liberals: classical liberals.

You modern Liberals purloined the name because it was held in high regard....and substituted 'Liberal' for the name you had, Socialists.


Simple enough to prove: classical liberals stood for individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

You, the American version of the 20th century Soviet oppression, stand for the collective, socialism, and unlimited government control

Please don't lie again.

Yes, liberals during the 1700's were for many changes to government, changes to the status of the common folk, to monarchs, to the noble class and so on, but one of the traits of liberalism is change and change they do. You must remember it is the conservatives that want to return to the 1700's, with an elite class and the rest. By the time conservatives accept the "all men are created equal" concept liberals will have moved on still in the pursuit of happiness for all Americans not just the elite.

So....I caught you lying, and this farrago is your attempt to....what...get off the floor?

Sadly....you've proven that you cannot control the lying.


Conservatives still stand for
individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


While you stand for the doctrines that resulted in the slaughter of 100 million human beings.


Whittaker Chambers wrote in his book WITNESS that liberals are/were incapable of ever effectively fighting Communism because they did not see anything in Communism that was antithetical to their own beliefs. In short, Liberals are Communists and Communists are Liberals.

I do?

Hello comrade, care to share a bottle of vodka while we kill people for not playing along? Of course it includes a lot of goose stepping, and beluga caviar...

 

[Moonglow]

Why even churches are communistic in nature along with heaven ,,,according to Polyvinylchic....

 

[Moonglow]

There is no such thing as the 'Far Left'.

Because to the liberals and progressives there are no boundaries or limits to their political delusions. ......

Says the Muslim that wants a theocracy in the USA...

 

[Centinel]

Our government has a role to solve problems as they come up. Lots of problems have come up since the founders started this country. They didn't have it all figured out

When the states established their union, the created the federal government and gave it a very limited set of powers. You can find these powers listed in article I, section 8. As you can see, the states never delegated to congress the power to "solve problems as they come up". Congress may only enact legislation that comports with the legislative powers granted to it by the states.