protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 57,112
- 18,355
- 2,250
- Thread starter
- #141
FALSE! I most certainly did NOT agree to that. In fact I showed that, by far, white women are victims of AA, which is more White VICTIMIZATION. Your drivel talk about stolen land is a pile of crap, and I haven't seen a shred of evidence pertaining to it, and even if you did have some, so what ? It's not a Black thing. I told you that before.No such thing as Black privledge since AA is not just for Blacks. We have already agreed white women benefit from AA more than anyone else. Thats actually more white privilege. The fact that the stolen land is now owned by whites is more white privilege.Whatever the hell it is your babbling about, it has nothing to do with Black Privilege 1964-2014, and White victimization 1964-2014. So please talk ON TOPIV, Mr. Diversion.Dont care about what white land was taken. i'm talking about returning Black land. Whites losing their land by the hands of other whites have nothing to do with this.And by violating the 1964 Civil right law. You're under arrest. And for your edification, much more land was taken from Whites than from Blacks, so don't try give me that crap that it's a Black thing.Naw. I'm talking returning land stolen by whites from Blacks back to them. I'm talking about giving back the original 40 acres Blacks told Sherman they wanted and Jackson rescinded. If the US cant or wont do this then we do it the slow way via AA.Redistribution is OK. I am a lifelong LIBERAL on economics. I support raising taxes on the rich to at least 70% (maybe higher). I support raising the minimum wage. I support workers rights, and various cases of business regulation. But AA is cold-blooded, malicious racial discrimination, and anybody who supports it ought to be arrested and jailed.