There's No Arguing With This Logic

[DrLove]

Here's an idea - Trumpublicans should waste more time on legislation to ban Sharia Law in this country.
Oh WAIT - It's already here!

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Nukes make you safe. Thats why we have them. Every country should have nukes.

Just a hint: it is a wasted effort that you apply, proving, on a daily basis, what a moron you are.

Really.

Everyone knows it, and your place in that firmament is assured



1. Hussein Obama:
March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.



2. The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the Non-ProliferationTreaty or NPT, is an international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, and to further the goal of ...
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia


3.war criminal - an offender who violates international law during times of war
offender, wrongdoer - a person who transgresses moral or civillan
war criminal

No nuclear power has ever been attacked. Japan would have been safe if it had nules. Why should any country be denied nules ?

"Why should any country be denied nules (sic) ?"



No answer is necessary.


You've proven everything I stated.

Its because you are incapable of forming an answer. You always run away when asked a question.

 

[westwall]

But they ARE suicidal idiots. If they get a bomb, they will use it. The only question is, on whom.

I can think of some other backward-assed 3rd century Muzzy nutbars who also have The Bomb: the Pakistanis.

Why don't we get in their faces about it too?

Because other than their wars with India, and turning a blind eye to the Taliban, they haven't fomented international terrorism.

 

[PoliticalChic]

But they ARE suicidal idiots. If they get a bomb, they will use it. The only question is, on whom.

I can think of some other backward-assed 3rd century Muzzy nutbars who also have The Bomb: the Pakistanis.

Why don't we get in their faces about it too?

How about we prevent Iran from becoming Pakistan.

How's that for a plan, rather than your attitude?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Nukes make you safe. Thats why we have them. Every country should have nukes.

Just a hint: it is a wasted effort that you apply, proving, on a daily basis, what a moron you are.

Really.

Everyone knows it, and your place in that firmament is assured



1. Hussein Obama:
March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.



2. The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the Non-ProliferationTreaty or NPT, is an international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, and to further the goal of ...
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia


3.war criminal - an offender who violates international law during times of war
offender, wrongdoer - a person who transgresses moral or civillan
war criminal

No nuclear power has ever been attacked. Japan would have been safe if it had nules. Why should any country be denied nules ?

"Why should any country be denied nules (sic) ?"



No answer is necessary.


You've proven everything I stated.

Its because you are incapable of forming an answer. You always run away when asked a question.

"Why should any country be denied nules (sic) ?"

Look....you're an imbecile, and have no prob proving it yourself.

What more is there to say?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Here's an idea - Trumpublicans should waste more time on legislation to ban Sharia Law in this country.
Oh WAIT - It's already here!

This is far more accurate:


Democrats support Sharia, and this:

. According to Tawfik Hamid, in his book, “Inside Jihad,” it is imperative to ask if a prospective Muslim immigrant supports the following aspects of Sharia:

A) Killing of Apostates, those who decide to leave the religion

B) Beating of women, and stoning them to death for infractions

C) Calling Jews Pigs and Monkeys

D) Declaring war on non-Muslims either to convert them, or to have them pay a second-class citizen tax

E) Enslave and rape female war prisoners, as in Darfur

F) Fight and kill Jews as preparation for the end days

G) Kill gays






Let's not forget these aims of the Democrat Party....

"Immigration To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing thePresident to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart




"Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S."
Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S. - Breitbart




Remember when the Democrat Party was an American party?

 

[PoliticalChic]

But they ARE suicidal idiots. If they get a bomb, they will use it. The only question is, on whom.

I can think of some other backward-assed 3rd century Muzzy nutbars who also have The Bomb: the Pakistanis.

Why don't we get in their faces about it too?

Because other than their wars with India, and turning a blind eye to the Taliban, they haven't fomented international terrorism.

Not so sure about that.....the ISI created the Taliban....

But....once they have nukes, it is too late.

Hence, Hussein Obama's rush to guarantee nukes to Iran.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Iran has nukes ... get over it ... what they want are Xboxes and Chevy Volts ... the crap they get from China is as bad as the stuff made in ... er ... China ... opps ...

Wife beating is common to many cultures ... India has the problem of 8-year-old girls bleeding to death on their wedding night ... I'm old enough to remember when a man's wife was his property, and beating her to death was his own affair ... Christians demand their women remain silent in the Church and obey her husband in all ways ... or get beat ...

Hit a man hard enough, you'll break your hand ... but women are soft and pliable ... a man can just wail on her and not even break a sweat ...

Glok model 30, in your purse ... just one slug on target and he'll quit beating you ... practice on the range by aiming at the crotch ... tape up the best patterns in the front room ... "look honey, I'm getting better at shooting the balls off a man" ...

Another unsatisfied customer venting from the 2016 election.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Nukes make you safe. Thats why we have them. Every country should have nukes.

hmmmm...now what kind of person would advocate the possession of WMD's for their countries enemies?...Tommy, I will give you credit for saying what all the other liberals believe but are afraid to admit.

 

[DrLove]

Here's an idea - Trumpublicans should waste more time on legislation to ban Sharia Law in this country.
Oh WAIT - It's already here!

This is far more accurate:

Democrats support Sharia, and this:

. According to Tawfik Hamid, in his book, “Inside Jihad,” it is imperative to ask if a prospective Muslim immigrant supports the following aspects of Sharia:

A) Killing of Apostates, those who decide to leave the religion

B) Beating of women, and stoning them to death for infractions

C) Calling Jews Pigs and Monkeys

D) Declaring war on non-Muslims either to convert them, or to have them pay a second-class citizen tax

E) Enslave and rape female war prisoners, as in Darfur

F) Fight and kill Jews as preparation for the end days

G) Kill gays

Let's not forget these aims of the Democrat Party....

"Immigration To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing thePresident to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart

"Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S."
Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S. - Breitbart

Remember when the Democrat Party was an American party?

Yer gonna cite BREITBART with regard to Muslim immigration?

Sorry Chic, but I lived in Boise ID for 20 years prior to moving to the beach in Oregon this year for semi-retirement. Boise was the fastest growing city in the country (2018 per Forbes).

Though a purple city and still fairly conservative, they are officially "immigrant friendly" and have taken in more Syrian refugees than LA and NYC combined.

https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article102000997.html

Of course, that came to somewhat of a screeching halt under the Mango Menace and his creepy lil sidekick Mr Miller.

But I can tell you this. Boise's Muslim immigrants have been model citizens and hard workers. There has been no attempt to install Sharia Law in local government. Please stop being so fearful of your own shadow.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Here's an idea - Trumpublicans should waste more time on legislation to ban Sharia Law in this country.
Oh WAIT - It's already here!

This is far more accurate:

Democrats support Sharia, and this:

. According to Tawfik Hamid, in his book, “Inside Jihad,” it is imperative to ask if a prospective Muslim immigrant supports the following aspects of Sharia:

A) Killing of Apostates, those who decide to leave the religion

B) Beating of women, and stoning them to death for infractions

C) Calling Jews Pigs and Monkeys

D) Declaring war on non-Muslims either to convert them, or to have them pay a second-class citizen tax

E) Enslave and rape female war prisoners, as in Darfur

F) Fight and kill Jews as preparation for the end days

G) Kill gays

Let's not forget these aims of the Democrat Party....

"Immigration To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing thePresident to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart

"Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S."
Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S. - Breitbart

Remember when the Democrat Party was an American party?

Yer gonna cite BREITBART with regard to Muslim immigration?

Sorry Chic, but I lived in Boise ID for 20 years prior to moving to the beach in Oregon this year for semi-retirement. Boise was the fastest growing city in the country (2018 per Forbes).

Though a purple city and still fairly conservative, they are officially "immigrant friendly" and have taken in more Syrian refugees than LA and NYC combined.

https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article102000997.html

Of course, that came to somewhat of a screeching halt under the Mango Menace and his creepy lil sidekick Mr Miller.

But I can tell you this. Boise's Muslim immigrants have been model citizens and hard workers. There has been no attempt to install Sharia Law in local government. Please stop being so fearful of your own shadow.

Why would anyone try to advance the view that it is Republicans who want to flood the nation with illegal aliens and unvetted Muslims, raised in nations suited more to war than peace?

Why....other than the fact that you are a government school grad who has never tried to think for himself.


BTW.....
Nearly half of 600 Muslim-American citizens polled who plan to vote in the 2012 presidential election believe parodies of Muhammad should be prosecuted criminally in the U.S., and one in eight say the offense is so serious violators should face the death penalty.

The poll also found 40 percent of Muslims in America believe they should not be judged by U.S. law and the Constitution, but by Shariah standards.

One in eight respondents said they think those Americans who criticize or parody Islam should face the death penalty, while another nine percent said they were unsure on the question,” he said." 40 Percent of US Muslim Voters Want Islamic Law 12 Percent Want Death for Blasphemers FrontPage Magazine

 

[DrLove]

Here's an idea - Trumpublicans should waste more time on legislation to ban Sharia Law in this country.
Oh WAIT - It's already here!

This is far more accurate:

Democrats support Sharia, and this:

. According to Tawfik Hamid, in his book, “Inside Jihad,” it is imperative to ask if a prospective Muslim immigrant supports the following aspects of Sharia:

A) Killing of Apostates, those who decide to leave the religion

B) Beating of women, and stoning them to death for infractions

C) Calling Jews Pigs and Monkeys

D) Declaring war on non-Muslims either to convert them, or to have them pay a second-class citizen tax

E) Enslave and rape female war prisoners, as in Darfur

F) Fight and kill Jews as preparation for the end days

G) Kill gays

Let's not forget these aims of the Democrat Party....

"Immigration To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing thePresident to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart

"Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S."
Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S. - Breitbart

Remember when the Democrat Party was an American party?

Yer gonna cite BREITBART with regard to Muslim immigration?

Sorry Chic, but I lived in Boise ID for 20 years prior to moving to the beach in Oregon this year for semi-retirement. Boise was the fastest growing city in the country (2018 per Forbes).

Though a purple city and still fairly conservative, they are officially "immigrant friendly" and have taken in more Syrian refugees than LA and NYC combined.

https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article102000997.html

Of course, that came to somewhat of a screeching halt under the Mango Menace and his creepy lil sidekick Mr Miller.

But I can tell you this. Boise's Muslim immigrants have been model citizens and hard workers. There has been no attempt to install Sharia Law in local government. Please stop being so fearful of your own shadow.

Why would anyone try to advance the view that it is Republicans who want to flood the nation with illegal aliens and unvetted Muslims, raised in nations suited more to war than peace?

Why....other than the fact that you are a government school grad who has never tried to think for himself.


BTW.....
Nearly half of 600 Muslim-American citizens polled who plan to vote in the 2012 presidential election believe parodies of Muhammad should be prosecuted criminally in the U.S., and one in eight say the offense is so serious violators should face the death penalty.

The poll also found 40 percent of Muslims in America believe they should not be judged by U.S. law and the Constitution, but by Shariah standards.

One in eight respondents said they think those Americans who criticize or parody Islam should face the death penalty, while another nine percent said they were unsure on the question,” he said." 40 Percent of US Muslim Voters Want Islamic Law 12 Percent Want Death for Blasphemers FrontPage Magazine

The Muslim immigrants were NOT "unvetted". There was MASSIVE vetting under Obama and long waiting periods. Cut the crap.

And btw, you're now gonna to make up for your Breitbart hilarity by citing Front Page Mag - David Horowitz' little cesspool of Islamophobia? That's funny!

• Overall, we rate FrontPage Magazine a Questionable source based on Extreme Right Bias, promotion of conspiracy theories regarding Islam as well as propaganda that only reports negatively on Islam. This source has also failed fact checks by IFCN fact checkers.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Here's an idea - Trumpublicans should waste more time on legislation to ban Sharia Law in this country.
Oh WAIT - It's already here!

This is far more accurate:

Democrats support Sharia, and this:

. According to Tawfik Hamid, in his book, “Inside Jihad,” it is imperative to ask if a prospective Muslim immigrant supports the following aspects of Sharia:

A) Killing of Apostates, those who decide to leave the religion

B) Beating of women, and stoning them to death for infractions

C) Calling Jews Pigs and Monkeys

D) Declaring war on non-Muslims either to convert them, or to have them pay a second-class citizen tax

E) Enslave and rape female war prisoners, as in Darfur

F) Fight and kill Jews as preparation for the end days

G) Kill gays

Let's not forget these aims of the Democrat Party....

"Immigration To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing thePresident to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart

"Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S."
Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S. - Breitbart

Remember when the Democrat Party was an American party?

Yer gonna cite BREITBART with regard to Muslim immigration?

Sorry Chic, but I lived in Boise ID for 20 years prior to moving to the beach in Oregon this year for semi-retirement. Boise was the fastest growing city in the country (2018 per Forbes).

Though a purple city and still fairly conservative, they are officially "immigrant friendly" and have taken in more Syrian refugees than LA and NYC combined.

https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article102000997.html

Of course, that came to somewhat of a screeching halt under the Mango Menace and his creepy lil sidekick Mr Miller.

But I can tell you this. Boise's Muslim immigrants have been model citizens and hard workers. There has been no attempt to install Sharia Law in local government. Please stop being so fearful of your own shadow.

Why would anyone try to advance the view that it is Republicans who want to flood the nation with illegal aliens and unvetted Muslims, raised in nations suited more to war than peace?

Why....other than the fact that you are a government school grad who has never tried to think for himself.


BTW.....
Nearly half of 600 Muslim-American citizens polled who plan to vote in the 2012 presidential election believe parodies of Muhammad should be prosecuted criminally in the U.S., and one in eight say the offense is so serious violators should face the death penalty.

The poll also found 40 percent of Muslims in America believe they should not be judged by U.S. law and the Constitution, but by Shariah standards.

One in eight respondents said they think those Americans who criticize or parody Islam should face the death penalty, while another nine percent said they were unsure on the question,” he said." 40 Percent of US Muslim Voters Want Islamic Law 12 Percent Want Death for Blasphemers FrontPage Magazine

The Muslim immigrants were NOT "unvetted". There was MASSIVE vetting under Obama and long waiting periods. Cut the crap.

And btw, you're now gonna to make up for your Breitbart hilarity by citing Front Page Mag - David Horowitz' little cesspool of Islamophobia? That's funny!

• Overall, we rate FrontPage Magazine a Questionable source based on Extreme Right Bias, promotion of conspiracy theories regarding Islam as well as propaganda that only reports negatively on Islam. This source has also failed fact checks by IFCN fact checkers.

That's simply one more of the lies that the uninformed swallow.



"(CNSNews.com) – John Bolton, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations,.... ... the U.S. can refuse to allow Syrian refugees entry “without in any way violating our humanitarian obligations.”


Bolton also dismissed White House Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes’ statement Sunday that the refugees are being vetted in Iraq before they are brought to the U.S.

“I don’t know who else believes this other than the White House,” Bolton said in response to Rhodes’ assertion that the U.S. has “very robust vetting procedures for those refugees.”


The U.N.’s 1951 Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, which was amended in 1967, defines a refugee as “someone who is unable or unwilling to return to their country of origin owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion.”

... the signers of the convention are not required to offer them asylum in their own countries.

“The refugee convention imposes on the country of first asylum an obligation to provide food, shelter, sanitation, and medicine in refugee camps” with the main goal of repatriating them back to their country of origin as soon as possible, ...."
Former Ambassador to UN: US Has ‘No Obligation’ to Accept Syrian Refugees



"...dismissed White House Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes’ statement Sunday that the refugees are being vetted..."




"....Succar, 57, who immigrated to the United States when he was 10, also noted that “Third World countries, particularly places like Syria, do not have the network of information the United States has.”

“In Syria, there’s no such thing. So when they tell you that [the refugees] are vetted, are you out of your mind?” he said.

Meanwhile, officials in Honduras said Wednesday that five Syrian nationals headed for the United States had been caught with fraudulent ID papers in the capital city of Tegucigalpa, Reuters reported."
http://nypost.com/2015/11/19/syrian-community-leader-isis-is-already-in-new-york-city/



"Rep. King To MSNBC’s Brzezinski: ‘You Are 1,000 Percent Wrong’ On Refugee Vetting Process


1. ....a heated debate over the viability and quality of the vetting process that would allow Syrian refugees into America.

2. ....King explained, “I’m extremely concerned because what the president is telling us is not true. We cannot vet the refugees from Syria.”

PETER KING: I’m extremely concerned because what the president is telling us is not true. We cannot vet the refugees from Syria. There are no databases to work against. There are no government records. And when I talk to people involved in the vetting, they have no confidence at all in the people that are being allowed in. There’s no way. People talk about thorough vetting, there is no vetting as a practical matter. That is the reality.

MIKA BRZEZINSKI: Hold on a second. There is vetting.

KING: There is not. Mika —

BRZEZINSKI: “There are face-to-face interviews, there’s health screenings. Often it takes two years for a family to get here.

KING: Mika, you’re entirely wrong. You are wrong, you are wrong.

BRZEZINSKI: Actually, sir, I think you’re wrong.

KING: I met with the people doing the interviews. I’m talking to the people involved in the highest levels of government. They tell us that they have no confidence at all. This is not proper vetting. I’m telling you that.

BRZEZINSKI: But the vetting is happening whether you like it or not.

KING: No, it is not a real vetting. You can’t vet if you have nothing to base it against. You are wrong, Mika. You are 1,000 percent wrong, W-R-O-N-G.

BRZEZINSKI: So meeting face-to-face and screening them and interviewing them and often making them wait months and years — that is not a vetting process?

KING: That is not vetting. That is not vetting. No, it is not. You cannot vet unless you have material to base it —

BRZEZINSKI: So should we say, ‘Syrians, stay out of America, you’re not welcome here?’

KING: Mika, we’re not saying Syrians. We’re saying these refugees. Unless we know who the refugees are, we cannot be allowing them in. My job is to protect Americans, not to feel good about myself, not to say that I’m doing something humanitarian. If Americans get killed because we are letting people in because they are not properly vetted — they cannot be properly vetted. How many times am I supposed to tell you this, Mika? You are wrong. They cannot, and it puts American lives at risk."
Rep. King To MSNBC’s Brzezinski: ‘You Are 1,000 Percent Wrong’ On Refugee Vetting Process [VIDEO]



We can tell with an IQ test that begins: "Do you agree that it is a peachy-keen idea to bring thousands of un-vetted members of a sect known for slaughter of innocent into our nation?
Yes or no?"

 

[PoliticalChic]

Here's an idea - Trumpublicans should waste more time on legislation to ban Sharia Law in this country.
Oh WAIT - It's already here!

This is far more accurate:

Democrats support Sharia, and this:

. According to Tawfik Hamid, in his book, “Inside Jihad,” it is imperative to ask if a prospective Muslim immigrant supports the following aspects of Sharia:

A) Killing of Apostates, those who decide to leave the religion

B) Beating of women, and stoning them to death for infractions

C) Calling Jews Pigs and Monkeys

D) Declaring war on non-Muslims either to convert them, or to have them pay a second-class citizen tax

E) Enslave and rape female war prisoners, as in Darfur

F) Fight and kill Jews as preparation for the end days

G) Kill gays

Let's not forget these aims of the Democrat Party....

"Immigration To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing thePresident to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart

"Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S."
Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S. - Breitbart

Remember when the Democrat Party was an American party?

Yer gonna cite BREITBART with regard to Muslim immigration?

Sorry Chic, but I lived in Boise ID for 20 years prior to moving to the beach in Oregon this year for semi-retirement. Boise was the fastest growing city in the country (2018 per Forbes).

Though a purple city and still fairly conservative, they are officially "immigrant friendly" and have taken in more Syrian refugees than LA and NYC combined.

https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article102000997.html

Of course, that came to somewhat of a screeching halt under the Mango Menace and his creepy lil sidekick Mr Miller.

But I can tell you this. Boise's Muslim immigrants have been model citizens and hard workers. There has been no attempt to install Sharia Law in local government. Please stop being so fearful of your own shadow.

Why would anyone try to advance the view that it is Republicans who want to flood the nation with illegal aliens and unvetted Muslims, raised in nations suited more to war than peace?

Why....other than the fact that you are a government school grad who has never tried to think for himself.


BTW.....
Nearly half of 600 Muslim-American citizens polled who plan to vote in the 2012 presidential election believe parodies of Muhammad should be prosecuted criminally in the U.S., and one in eight say the offense is so serious violators should face the death penalty.

The poll also found 40 percent of Muslims in America believe they should not be judged by U.S. law and the Constitution, but by Shariah standards.

One in eight respondents said they think those Americans who criticize or parody Islam should face the death penalty, while another nine percent said they were unsure on the question,” he said." 40 Percent of US Muslim Voters Want Islamic Law 12 Percent Want Death for Blasphemers FrontPage Magazine

The Muslim immigrants were NOT "unvetted". There was MASSIVE vetting under Obama and long waiting periods. Cut the crap.

And btw, you're now gonna to make up for your Breitbart hilarity by citing Front Page Mag - David Horowitz' little cesspool of Islamophobia? That's funny!

• Overall, we rate FrontPage Magazine a Questionable source based on Extreme Right Bias, promotion of conspiracy theories regarding Islam as well as propaganda that only reports negatively on Islam. This source has also failed fact checks by IFCN fact checkers.

You really should stop carping about the information when it is clearly the truth.


BTW....there is no such thing as 'Extreme Right Wing,' or Far Right.
I'd be happy to prove it.

There is only a Far Left.....and you have become a servant of it.

 

[DrLove]

Here's an idea - Trumpublicans should waste more time on legislation to ban Sharia Law in this country.
Oh WAIT - It's already here!

This is far more accurate:

Democrats support Sharia, and this:

. According to Tawfik Hamid, in his book, “Inside Jihad,” it is imperative to ask if a prospective Muslim immigrant supports the following aspects of Sharia:

A) Killing of Apostates, those who decide to leave the religion

B) Beating of women, and stoning them to death for infractions

C) Calling Jews Pigs and Monkeys

D) Declaring war on non-Muslims either to convert them, or to have them pay a second-class citizen tax

E) Enslave and rape female war prisoners, as in Darfur

F) Fight and kill Jews as preparation for the end days

G) Kill gays

Let's not forget these aims of the Democrat Party....

"Immigration To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing thePresident to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart

"Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S."
Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S. - Breitbart

Remember when the Democrat Party was an American party?

Yer gonna cite BREITBART with regard to Muslim immigration?

Sorry Chic, but I lived in Boise ID for 20 years prior to moving to the beach in Oregon this year for semi-retirement. Boise was the fastest growing city in the country (2018 per Forbes).

Though a purple city and still fairly conservative, they are officially "immigrant friendly" and have taken in more Syrian refugees than LA and NYC combined.

https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article102000997.html

Of course, that came to somewhat of a screeching halt under the Mango Menace and his creepy lil sidekick Mr Miller.

But I can tell you this. Boise's Muslim immigrants have been model citizens and hard workers. There has been no attempt to install Sharia Law in local government. Please stop being so fearful of your own shadow.

Why would anyone try to advance the view that it is Republicans who want to flood the nation with illegal aliens and unvetted Muslims, raised in nations suited more to war than peace?

Why....other than the fact that you are a government school grad who has never tried to think for himself.


BTW.....
Nearly half of 600 Muslim-American citizens polled who plan to vote in the 2012 presidential election believe parodies of Muhammad should be prosecuted criminally in the U.S., and one in eight say the offense is so serious violators should face the death penalty.

The poll also found 40 percent of Muslims in America believe they should not be judged by U.S. law and the Constitution, but by Shariah standards.

One in eight respondents said they think those Americans who criticize or parody Islam should face the death penalty, while another nine percent said they were unsure on the question,” he said." 40 Percent of US Muslim Voters Want Islamic Law 12 Percent Want Death for Blasphemers FrontPage Magazine

The Muslim immigrants were NOT "unvetted". There was MASSIVE vetting under Obama and long waiting periods. Cut the crap.

And btw, you're now gonna to make up for your Breitbart hilarity by citing Front Page Mag - David Horowitz' little cesspool of Islamophobia? That's funny!

• Overall, we rate FrontPage Magazine a Questionable source based on Extreme Right Bias, promotion of conspiracy theories regarding Islam as well as propaganda that only reports negatively on Islam. This source has also failed fact checks by IFCN fact checkers.

You really should stop carping about the information when it is clearly the truth.


BTW....there is no such thing as 'Extreme Right Wing,' or Far Right.
I'd be happy to prove it.

There is only a Far Left.....and you have become a servant of it.

There is no far/extreme right? That's hilarious (you should know that by citing Breitbart and FrontPageMag to support your claims - You most definitely qualify).

As for my being "far left" - Nope, don't support Bernie or Liz. Have a preference for center left candidates like Buttigieg and Klobuchar.

 

[PoliticalChic]

This is far more accurate:

Democrats support Sharia, and this:

. According to Tawfik Hamid, in his book, “Inside Jihad,” it is imperative to ask if a prospective Muslim immigrant supports the following aspects of Sharia:

A) Killing of Apostates, those who decide to leave the religion

B) Beating of women, and stoning them to death for infractions

C) Calling Jews Pigs and Monkeys

D) Declaring war on non-Muslims either to convert them, or to have them pay a second-class citizen tax

E) Enslave and rape female war prisoners, as in Darfur

F) Fight and kill Jews as preparation for the end days

G) Kill gays

Let's not forget these aims of the Democrat Party....

"Immigration To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing thePresident to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart

"Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S."
Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S. - Breitbart

Remember when the Democrat Party was an American party?

Yer gonna cite BREITBART with regard to Muslim immigration?

Sorry Chic, but I lived in Boise ID for 20 years prior to moving to the beach in Oregon this year for semi-retirement. Boise was the fastest growing city in the country (2018 per Forbes).

Though a purple city and still fairly conservative, they are officially "immigrant friendly" and have taken in more Syrian refugees than LA and NYC combined.

https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article102000997.html

Of course, that came to somewhat of a screeching halt under the Mango Menace and his creepy lil sidekick Mr Miller.

But I can tell you this. Boise's Muslim immigrants have been model citizens and hard workers. There has been no attempt to install Sharia Law in local government. Please stop being so fearful of your own shadow.

Why would anyone try to advance the view that it is Republicans who want to flood the nation with illegal aliens and unvetted Muslims, raised in nations suited more to war than peace?

Why....other than the fact that you are a government school grad who has never tried to think for himself.


BTW.....
Nearly half of 600 Muslim-American citizens polled who plan to vote in the 2012 presidential election believe parodies of Muhammad should be prosecuted criminally in the U.S., and one in eight say the offense is so serious violators should face the death penalty.

The poll also found 40 percent of Muslims in America believe they should not be judged by U.S. law and the Constitution, but by Shariah standards.

One in eight respondents said they think those Americans who criticize or parody Islam should face the death penalty, while another nine percent said they were unsure on the question,” he said." 40 Percent of US Muslim Voters Want Islamic Law 12 Percent Want Death for Blasphemers FrontPage Magazine

The Muslim immigrants were NOT "unvetted". There was MASSIVE vetting under Obama and long waiting periods. Cut the crap.

And btw, you're now gonna to make up for your Breitbart hilarity by citing Front Page Mag - David Horowitz' little cesspool of Islamophobia? That's funny!

• Overall, we rate FrontPage Magazine a Questionable source based on Extreme Right Bias, promotion of conspiracy theories regarding Islam as well as propaganda that only reports negatively on Islam. This source has also failed fact checks by IFCN fact checkers.

You really should stop carping about the information when it is clearly the truth.


BTW....there is no such thing as 'Extreme Right Wing,' or Far Right.
I'd be happy to prove it.

There is only a Far Left.....and you have become a servant of it.

There is no far/extreme right? That's hilarious (you should know that by citing Breitbart and FrontPageMag to support your claims - You most definitely qualify).

As for my being "far left" - Nope, don't support Bernie or Liz. Have a preference for center left candidates like Buttigieg and Klobuchar.

Then you are simply stupid: there is nothing wrong with the facts presented in those two publications.....do your own research.



Now....watch me force you to prove there is no "Far Right."


Although it is my second language....I am an expert in the English language.
As is always important when dealing with Leftists, Liberals.....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.

To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."



"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)



Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.




Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always menant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY


How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com




So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.




If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

Bet you can't.

 

[PoliticalChic]

This is far more accurate:

Democrats support Sharia, and this:

. According to Tawfik Hamid, in his book, “Inside Jihad,” it is imperative to ask if a prospective Muslim immigrant supports the following aspects of Sharia:

A) Killing of Apostates, those who decide to leave the religion

B) Beating of women, and stoning them to death for infractions

C) Calling Jews Pigs and Monkeys

D) Declaring war on non-Muslims either to convert them, or to have them pay a second-class citizen tax

E) Enslave and rape female war prisoners, as in Darfur

F) Fight and kill Jews as preparation for the end days

G) Kill gays

Let's not forget these aims of the Democrat Party....

"Immigration To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing thePresident to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart

"Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S."
Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S. - Breitbart

Remember when the Democrat Party was an American party?

Yer gonna cite BREITBART with regard to Muslim immigration?

Sorry Chic, but I lived in Boise ID for 20 years prior to moving to the beach in Oregon this year for semi-retirement. Boise was the fastest growing city in the country (2018 per Forbes).

Though a purple city and still fairly conservative, they are officially "immigrant friendly" and have taken in more Syrian refugees than LA and NYC combined.

https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article102000997.html

Of course, that came to somewhat of a screeching halt under the Mango Menace and his creepy lil sidekick Mr Miller.

But I can tell you this. Boise's Muslim immigrants have been model citizens and hard workers. There has been no attempt to install Sharia Law in local government. Please stop being so fearful of your own shadow.

Why would anyone try to advance the view that it is Republicans who want to flood the nation with illegal aliens and unvetted Muslims, raised in nations suited more to war than peace?

Why....other than the fact that you are a government school grad who has never tried to think for himself.


BTW.....
Nearly half of 600 Muslim-American citizens polled who plan to vote in the 2012 presidential election believe parodies of Muhammad should be prosecuted criminally in the U.S., and one in eight say the offense is so serious violators should face the death penalty.

The poll also found 40 percent of Muslims in America believe they should not be judged by U.S. law and the Constitution, but by Shariah standards.

One in eight respondents said they think those Americans who criticize or parody Islam should face the death penalty, while another nine percent said they were unsure on the question,” he said." 40 Percent of US Muslim Voters Want Islamic Law 12 Percent Want Death for Blasphemers FrontPage Magazine

The Muslim immigrants were NOT "unvetted". There was MASSIVE vetting under Obama and long waiting periods. Cut the crap.

And btw, you're now gonna to make up for your Breitbart hilarity by citing Front Page Mag - David Horowitz' little cesspool of Islamophobia? That's funny!

• Overall, we rate FrontPage Magazine a Questionable source based on Extreme Right Bias, promotion of conspiracy theories regarding Islam as well as propaganda that only reports negatively on Islam. This source has also failed fact checks by IFCN fact checkers.

You really should stop carping about the information when it is clearly the truth.


BTW....there is no such thing as 'Extreme Right Wing,' or Far Right.
I'd be happy to prove it.

There is only a Far Left.....and you have become a servant of it.

There is no far/extreme right? That's hilarious (you should know that by citing Breitbart and FrontPageMag to support your claims - You most definitely qualify).

As for my being "far left" - Nope, don't support Bernie or Liz. Have a preference for center left candidates like Buttigieg and Klobuchar.

"You most definitely qualify)."...as Far Right.

Excellent....let's take me as an example.

To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


....see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing, ....me.


Bet you can't.

 

[mudwhistle]

Iran has nukes ... get over it ... what they want are Xboxes and Chevy Volts ... the crap they get from China is as bad as the stuff made in ... er ... China ... opps ...

Wife beating is common to many cultures ... India has the problem of 8-year-old girls bleeding to death on their wedding night ... I'm old enough to remember when a man's wife was his property, and beating her to death was his own affair ... Christians demand their women remain silent in the Church and obey her husband in all ways ... or get beat ...

Hit a man hard enough, you'll break your hand ... but women are soft and pliable ... a man can just wail on her and not even break a sweat ...

Glok model 30, in your purse ... just one slug on target and he'll quit beating you ... practice on the range by aiming at the crotch ... tape up the best patterns in the front room ... "look honey, I'm getting better at shooting the balls off a man" ...

Christians stopped doing that over a hundred years ago.

 

[PoliticalChic]

This is far more accurate:

Democrats support Sharia, and this:

. According to Tawfik Hamid, in his book, “Inside Jihad,” it is imperative to ask if a prospective Muslim immigrant supports the following aspects of Sharia:

A) Killing of Apostates, those who decide to leave the religion

B) Beating of women, and stoning them to death for infractions

C) Calling Jews Pigs and Monkeys

D) Declaring war on non-Muslims either to convert them, or to have them pay a second-class citizen tax

E) Enslave and rape female war prisoners, as in Darfur

F) Fight and kill Jews as preparation for the end days

G) Kill gays

Let's not forget these aims of the Democrat Party....

"Immigration To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing thePresident to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart

"Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S."
Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S. - Breitbart

Remember when the Democrat Party was an American party?

Yer gonna cite BREITBART with regard to Muslim immigration?

Sorry Chic, but I lived in Boise ID for 20 years prior to moving to the beach in Oregon this year for semi-retirement. Boise was the fastest growing city in the country (2018 per Forbes).

Though a purple city and still fairly conservative, they are officially "immigrant friendly" and have taken in more Syrian refugees than LA and NYC combined.

https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article102000997.html

Of course, that came to somewhat of a screeching halt under the Mango Menace and his creepy lil sidekick Mr Miller.

But I can tell you this. Boise's Muslim immigrants have been model citizens and hard workers. There has been no attempt to install Sharia Law in local government. Please stop being so fearful of your own shadow.

Why would anyone try to advance the view that it is Republicans who want to flood the nation with illegal aliens and unvetted Muslims, raised in nations suited more to war than peace?

Why....other than the fact that you are a government school grad who has never tried to think for himself.


BTW.....
Nearly half of 600 Muslim-American citizens polled who plan to vote in the 2012 presidential election believe parodies of Muhammad should be prosecuted criminally in the U.S., and one in eight say the offense is so serious violators should face the death penalty.

The poll also found 40 percent of Muslims in America believe they should not be judged by U.S. law and the Constitution, but by Shariah standards.

One in eight respondents said they think those Americans who criticize or parody Islam should face the death penalty, while another nine percent said they were unsure on the question,” he said." 40 Percent of US Muslim Voters Want Islamic Law 12 Percent Want Death for Blasphemers FrontPage Magazine

The Muslim immigrants were NOT "unvetted". There was MASSIVE vetting under Obama and long waiting periods. Cut the crap.

And btw, you're now gonna to make up for your Breitbart hilarity by citing Front Page Mag - David Horowitz' little cesspool of Islamophobia? That's funny!

• Overall, we rate FrontPage Magazine a Questionable source based on Extreme Right Bias, promotion of conspiracy theories regarding Islam as well as propaganda that only reports negatively on Islam. This source has also failed fact checks by IFCN fact checkers.

You really should stop carping about the information when it is clearly the truth.


BTW....there is no such thing as 'Extreme Right Wing,' or Far Right.
I'd be happy to prove it.

There is only a Far Left.....and you have become a servant of it.

There is no far/extreme right? That's hilarious (you should know that by citing Breitbart and FrontPageMag to support your claims - You most definitely qualify).

As for my being "far left" - Nope, don't support Bernie or Liz. Have a preference for center left candidates like Buttigieg and Klobuchar.

"As for my being "far left" - Nope, don't support Bernie or Liz. Have a preference for center left candidates like Buttigieg and Klobuchar."


Really?

You saw the Democrat Debates......where they promised this:


1. America would fall back to this:
“Team Obama: Sorry, America, the ‘new normal’ may be here to stay

The good times may be over for good. In a speech to the Economic Club of New York yesterday, US Treasury Secretary Jack Lew said the US GDP growth rate, adjusted for inflation, is now projected to run a little above 2% a year.”
Team Obama: Sorry, America, the 'new normal' may be here to stay - AEI


2. The hard working American taxpayer would pay for illegal alien's healthcare



3. There'd be no penalty for sneaking over the border.....no sovereignty.

4. The world's worst state sponsor of terrorism would have nuclear weapons.

5. Infanticide, post-birth abortion, would be legalized

6. Taxes would be increased and tax cuts reversed

7. Sharia would become de rigueur

8. Free speech would be outlawed as 'hate speech.

9. Jewish persons would have to find shelter elsewhere

10. We could look forward to the end of private health insurance, reparations for slavery and drug dealers, financial security for those who ‘don’t care to work,’ abortion rights for 'transwomen (men), and packing the Supreme Court.

11. The abolition of prisons so that convicted criminals would be free to prey on innocent citizens. ."AOC Wants to Abolish Prisons

...saying that lawmakers needed to explore the mass release of America's prison population.



Oh....and this....

12. Abortion rights for men


13. Special laws that favor transgender illegal aliens


14. “All the Democratic presidential candidates have endorsed the Equality Act, which would render it illegal to use the wrong pronoun in the workplace.” Not Just Brexit

The Equality Act

“It would penalize Americans who don’t affirm new sexual norms or gender ideology. It would compel speech. It could lead to more parents losing custody of their children.”
7 Reasons Why the Equality Act Is Anything But


This is your party, sucker??????

 

[PoliticalChic]

Iran has nukes ... get over it ... what they want are Xboxes and Chevy Volts ... the crap they get from China is as bad as the stuff made in ... er ... China ... opps ...

Wife beating is common to many cultures ... India has the problem of 8-year-old girls bleeding to death on their wedding night ... I'm old enough to remember when a man's wife was his property, and beating her to death was his own affair ... Christians demand their women remain silent in the Church and obey her husband in all ways ... or get beat ...

Hit a man hard enough, you'll break your hand ... but women are soft and pliable ... a man can just wail on her and not even break a sweat ...

Glok model 30, in your purse ... just one slug on target and he'll quit beating you ... practice on the range by aiming at the crotch ... tape up the best patterns in the front room ... "look honey, I'm getting better at shooting the balls off a man" ...

Christians stopped doing that over a hundred years ago.

Where do you find wife-beating as part of the Judeo-Christian culture?