Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To be exact, the charge wasn't perjury.The two impeachment charges against him were lying under oath to a federal grand jury (i.e. perjury) and obstruction of justice. These are easily verifiable facts. Why are Democrats so willfully ignorant? You people really think he was charged with getting a blowjob. Tells me that you get all your political information from late night comedians.
Well so far Comer in congress hasn't been able to substantiate anything actually done by Joe Biden. And half his witnesses actually provided exculpatory evidence. Such as Devon Archer, who in his 20 phone calls, never heard Biden discuss business with his son Hunter.I look forward to the evidence proving these being presented under oath and with cross examination
Ok, well let’s see how this plays out. That’s why it’s called an inquiry…Tax returns with money Joe can't account for would be nice.
An actual witness who can testify under oath that Joe did anything other than say "Hi" to his son during a business meeting.
An actual benefit that ANY of Hunter's customers got from the Vice President (who actually has no official power other than presiding over the senate and waiting for the president to die.)
Any of those would be nice.
Is there any evidence that would be acceptable to you?
Stay tuned, Dante, stay tuned.really?
They already have. No ties to Joe Biden
the end
Yup, you don't plead out if you're innocent.He took a plea deal.
Do you know what that is, or must I explain it?
Hmmm, I did call it.On his Arkansas law license? That's not a prosecution for perjury.
Bill Clinton was never prosecuted for perjury.
So, you think Biden is as pure as the driven snow? Really?
any wrong-doing by Joe Biden.
It was germane to the case.To be exact, the charge wasn't perjury.
William Jefferson Clinton willfully provided perjurious,
false and misleading testimony to the grand jury
Perjury requires the answers be germane to the case.
Hunter Biden is a private citizen.I agree. That’s why investigation into the activities of the Biden Crime Family are important.
Yeah, it's not like we have any important problems to worry about... oh, wait.Ok, well let’s see how this plays out. That’s why it’s called an inquiry…
The "nO eViDEnCe!" crowd can ignore this.
Abuse of power, obstruction and corruption.
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy announced the House is launching an impeachment inquiry of President Joe Biden, citing at least six separate allegations that led to the decision.
First, he cited the House Oversight Committee’s findings that Biden “did lie to the American people about his own knowledge of his family’s foreign business dealings.”
Second, McCarthy also cited bank records that show “nearly $20 million in payments were directed to the Biden family members and associates through various shell companies.”
Third, McCarthy also said the Treasury Department has “more than 150 transactions involving the Biden family and other business associates that were flagged as suspicious activity by U.S. banks.”
Fourth, McCarthy cited an FBI informant who alleged that the president and his son both received bribes of $5 million each.
Fifth, McCarthy cited Biden using “his official office to coordinate with Hunter Biden’s business partners about Hunter’s role in Burisma Ukrainian energy company,” referring to recent revelations from Hunter Biden’s laptop that then-Vice President Biden used private or alias accounts to send government information to Hunter.
Finally, McCarthy said — likely in reference to the Justice Department’s handling of its investigation of Hunter Biden, “Despite the serious allegations, it appears that the president’s family has been offered special treatment by Biden’s own administration — treatment that [they] not otherwise would have received if they were not related to the President.”
McCarthy Lays Out Evidence in Decision to Launch Biden Impeachment Inquiry
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy announced the House is launching an impeachment inquiry of President Joe Biden, citing at least six allegations.www.breitbart.com
Bill Clinton was never prosecuted for perjury. FACTYou don't make a plea deal if you aren't being prosecuted.
You said he was never prosecuted for perjury.
You are wrong.
In fact the NY Judge assessed him with a heavy fine for lying under oath. That's what perjury is if you don't know.
Clinton Fined $90,686 for Lying in Paula Jones Case
The federal judge who found President Clinton in contempt of court last April levied a penalty of $90,686 against him Thursday, making him the first chief executive ever assessed such a payment.www.latimes.com
I posted my credible link that says he was. Post your link that says he wasn't. Then we can discuss fact.Bill Clinton was never prosecuted for perjury. FACT
try and find a credible link that says Bill Clinton was prosecuted for a perjury. You won't find one. Because you people swallow shit other people make up
three factual quotes:This issue has been settled long ago, bubba.
Bill paid a fine and lost his license.
The prosecutor dropped the case because of the agreement, but Bill Clinton admitted that he lied in front of a Grand Jury....and that's why they impeached him.
You posted a credible link claiming Bill Clinton was prosecuted for perjury? In what universe?I posted my credible link that says he was. Post your link that says he wasn't. Then we can discuss fact.
per·ju·ry
NOUN
LAW
- the offense of willfully telling an untruth in a court after having taken an oath or affirmation:
In this one in response to your post. Now again post your credible source saying Clinton was never prosecuted for perjury.You posted a credible link claiming Bill Clinton was prosecuted for perjury? In what universe?
FoxfyreFoxfyre
claimed
"A New York Judge, SCOTUS, and the Arkansas Bar all disagree with you." regarding me stating Bill Clinton was never prosecuted for perjury.
you/Mud said "He took a plea deal to avoid being found guilty of perjury."
It was to avoid any future prosecutions, where in a court of law a defendant has the presumption of innocence. If it were about being guilty the court should've taken the case.
perjury as a legal term. not lying as the public sees it.
you are misrepresenting facts:
On his last day in office, Clinton agreed to accept a five-year suspension of his Arkansas law license.
In exchange, Clinton will receive immunity from further prosecution and avoids a possible indictment on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice after he leaves office.
Clinton acknowledged he knowingly gave false answers to questions about Lewinsky when he was deposed in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case. Clinton said today’s agreement brings “complete closure” to the matter.
“I tried to walk a fine line between acting lawfully and testifying falsely, but I now recognize that I did not fully accomplish that goal and that certain of my responses to questions about Ms. Lewinsky were false,” Clinton said in a written statement read by Press Secretary Jake Siewert.
Link/Cite the court, the prosecutor, and the judge involving your imaginary prosecution of Bill Clinton for perjury.In this one in response to your post. Now again post your credible source saying Clinton was never prosecuted for perjury.
I did. But here's another source. Are you deliberately continuing to demand sources from me while you have no intention of supporting your own argument?Link/Cite the court, the prosecutor, and the judge involving your imaginary prosecution of Bill Clinton for perjury.
teachingamericanhistory.org
