People here are very sensitive about labels. I'm just tellin ya how I've heard it being used. Warren. Sanders. The Alt Right of the Left, so to speak. It is not flung around so much as Alt Right, but it's accumulating a new connotation.PBS uses the word to describe left of left. Like Sanders. Not a judgment, but I've noticed them using Prog that way.It seems there are way less Progs than there were before the election and even since the spring.
What is your political ideology that you lean, in general.
In general, of course many have crossover issues.
What the hell is a "Prog" anyway? Far as I know that was a century ago.
I keep asking for that definition on this board from those who use it, and I have yet to get one. Other than the roughly 1890-1920 one I already know.
Pretty hard to take a position here if said positions can't be defined.
I don't see that as a sufficient equation. As in quantifiable.
A "Progressive" as used a century ago meant part of a movement calling for accountable government, opposing entrenched corruption and dealing with the turbulence of the rapid industrialization/urbanization/immigration of that time, all of which were forefront issues.
I don't think anyone can argue that the political dynamics of 2017 are the same as those of 1917. One glaring contemporary contrast is the Lost Cause movement --- vibrant and erecting statues the same statues then that are under serious review now. So applying the same term to two different eras' sociopolitical environments is automatically problematic.
Then there's the distinction between "a Progressive" (capital P, the noun) and ""progressive" (small P, the adjective). The former was a proponent of the movement of a century ago, the latter is a generic adjective applied to anything at any time. Meaning a state of "progress". Not sure who doesn't value "progress" --- a Luddite?
I think that's why I've never gotten a definition. Doesn't mean anything.
Yes I understand that. And I've seen it used here, and I've seen some quote, for example Hillary Clinton using the label on themselves.
But none of that defines what it IS.
People self-labeling means less than nothing. A politician will self-label as "patriotic", "concerned", "proud", "monitoring", "pro-this", "pro-that", "anti-this", "anti-that", "on your side" and perpetually "pro-America". That's all emotional bullshit without a quantification. "Progressive" (the adjective) merely means a state of progress. Unless we jump in a time machine and toss it into Reverse--- everything that happens is "progress".
Last edited: