This is no witch hunt and there are no spies

[S.J.]

They have nothing to debate. Attack the messenger.

Except the fact that your FBI criminal buddies denied putting spies in the Trump campaign and have now been proven to have lied.

That is a lie by you. No such evidence exists. You are propping up a manufactured "nothing burger" with your own lies. Had you not been lying, you would have presented proof instead of false claims. At the end of the day, propping up Trump's national conversation with his own buzz words, that have been proven to be nothing more than lies, will have to give way to the truth, the evidence, and the rule of law.

Um, maybe you should go back and read the posts in this thread again. Here's a hint: Start on page one.

 

[WTP]

When you open an investigation under the auspices of RUSSIAN COLLUSION and then go after private citizens trying to dig up any dirt you can, what else do you call it? Do you have something more PC than "witch hunt"? That is a perfectly accurate name for Mueller's folly.

That folly has around twenty something people in trouble, with more to come in the coming weeks. All those private citizens had Russians surrounding them before and after the campaign. Digging up dirt on them, hasn't exactly been the hardest thing to find, when you consider the number of players involved.

 

[WTP]

They have nothing to debate. Attack the messenger.

Except the fact that your FBI criminal buddies denied putting spies in the Trump campaign and have now been proven to have lied.

That is a lie by you. No such evidence exists. You are propping up a manufactured "nothing burger" with your own lies. Had you not been lying, you would have presented proof instead of false claims. At the end of the day, propping up Trump's national conversation with his own buzz words, that have been proven to be nothing more than lies, will have to give way to the truth, the evidence, and the rule of law.

Um, maybe you should go back and read the posts in this thread again. Here's a hint: Start on page one.

Sonny, I don't need to go back to any page. No evidence has been presented that there were spies. None! Get over it, and yourself. The Thursday meeting was a "nothing burger".

 

[S.J.]

They have nothing to debate. Attack the messenger.

Except the fact that your FBI criminal buddies denied putting spies in the Trump campaign and have now been proven to have lied.

That is a lie by you. No such evidence exists. You are propping up a manufactured "nothing burger" with your own lies. Had you not been lying, you would have presented proof instead of false claims. At the end of the day, propping up Trump's national conversation with his own buzz words, that have been proven to be nothing more than lies, will have to give way to the truth, the evidence, and the rule of law.

Um, maybe you should go back and read the posts in this thread again. Here's a hint: Start on page one.

Sonny, I don't need to go back to any page. No evidence has been presented that there were spies. None! Get over it, and yourself. The Thursday meeting was a "nothing burger".

Except the evidence in post #2...Sonny.

 

[WTP]

Collusion is not conspiracy. Conspiracy is conspiracy. Conspiracy to do what? Collude? You can't have conspiracy to commit a non crime. No such thing exists.

Your lack of the basic understanding of the legal system is hilarious.

And "conspiracy" will be the charge. They won't use the word "collusion" in their indictment of Trump. They will use the word "conspiracy to defraud the U.S. and its election process".

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

‘There's a tendency to write this latest Trump claim off as Trump being Trump. He has proven time and again that he is willing to stray from established facts in pursuit of a narrative that is more favorable to him -- from the size of his inauguration crowds to the idea that Obama ordered a wiretap on him during the last presidential campaign.

But the fact that this is what Trump does shouldn't distract us from the allegations here: Donald Trump is saying his predecessor as president used the leading law enforcement entity in the country to spy on him because Obama/the "deep state" didn't want someone as unconventional as Trump to be president.

To be clear: There is zero public evidence that Trump's claims are anywhere close to the truth.’

Don't miss what Donald Trump is doing with his 'spy' allegations - CNNPolitics

Straying from established facts is called lying.

ok, u r lying

 

[airplanemechanic]

Collusion is not conspiracy. Conspiracy is conspiracy. Conspiracy to do what? Collude? You can't have conspiracy to commit a non crime. No such thing exists.

Your lack of the basic understanding of the legal system is hilarious.

And "conspiracy" will be the charge. They won't use the word "collusion" in their indictment of Trump. They will use the word "conspiracy to defraud the U.S. and its election process".

With what evidence??? It's been over a year!!

 

[S.J.]

Collusion is not conspiracy. Conspiracy is conspiracy. Conspiracy to do what? Collude? You can't have conspiracy to commit a non crime. No such thing exists.

Your lack of the basic understanding of the legal system is hilarious.

And "conspiracy" will be the charge. They won't use the word "collusion" in their indictment of Trump. They will use the word "conspiracy to defraud the U.S. and its election process".

You can't indict a sitting president you fucking idiot.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

‘There's a tendency to write this latest Trump claim off as Trump being Trump. He has proven time and again that he is willing to stray from established facts in pursuit of a narrative that is more favorable to him -- from the size of his inauguration crowds to the idea that Obama ordered a wiretap on him during the last presidential campaign.

But the fact that this is what Trump does shouldn't distract us from the allegations here: Donald Trump is saying his predecessor as president used the leading law enforcement entity in the country to spy on him because Obama/the "deep state" didn't want someone as unconventional as Trump to be president.

To be clear: There is zero public evidence that Trump's claims are anywhere close to the truth.’

Don't miss what Donald Trump is doing with his 'spy' allegations - CNNPolitics

Straying from established facts is called lying.

The big LIE is that Trump colluded with the Russians.
Democrats are big fat LIARS.
You Democrat Cultist need a reality check.
CNN is 24/7 left wing lies.

 

[WTP]

They have nothing to debate. Attack the messenger.

Except the fact that your FBI criminal buddies denied putting spies in the Trump campaign and have now been proven to have lied.

That is a lie by you. No such evidence exists. You are propping up a manufactured "nothing burger" with your own lies. Had you not been lying, you would have presented proof instead of false claims. At the end of the day, propping up Trump's national conversation with his own buzz words, that have been proven to be nothing more than lies, will have to give way to the truth, the evidence, and the rule of law.

Um, maybe you should go back and read the posts in this thread again. Here's a hint: Start on page one.

Sonny, I don't need to go back to any page. No evidence has been presented that there were spies. None! Get over it, and yourself. The Thursday meeting was a "nothing burger".

Except the evidence in post #2...Sonny.

I've seen desperation before, but damn boss, you're a special kind of desperate.

First off, that planted nonsense never has Clapper saying anything about the government planting a spy. Clapper said that there was an informant used to spy on Russia not the Trump campaign. Boss, are you so deaf that you didn't hear and see Clapper say that? You folks are either some more kind of special stupid, or serial liars? Maybe it's both?

 

[WTP]

‘There's a tendency to write this latest Trump claim off as Trump being Trump. He has proven time and again that he is willing to stray from established facts in pursuit of a narrative that is more favorable to him -- from the size of his inauguration crowds to the idea that Obama ordered a wiretap on him during the last presidential campaign.

But the fact that this is what Trump does shouldn't distract us from the allegations here: Donald Trump is saying his predecessor as president used the leading law enforcement entity in the country to spy on him because Obama/the "deep state" didn't want someone as unconventional as Trump to be president.

To be clear: There is zero public evidence that Trump's claims are anywhere close to the truth.’

Don't miss what Donald Trump is doing with his 'spy' allegations - CNNPolitics

Straying from established facts is called lying.

The big LIE is that Trump colluded with the Russians.
Democrats are big fat LIARS.
You Democrat Cultist need a reality check.
CNN is 24/7 left wing lies.

You aren't debating anything, because of a total lack of debatable facts or evidence from your corner. You should be ashamed and embarrassed by your lies.

 

[airplanemechanic]

A president can be indicted, but Trump won't be.

 

[WTP]

A president can be indicted, but Trump won't be.

Why? Because he's above the law?

 

[S.J.]

A president can be indicted, but Trump won't be.

Not a sitting president. There are only 3 ways he can leave office. Resignation, impeachment, or death.

 

[airplanemechanic]

No because he's innocent. If an investigation has turned up nothing for over a year, it's done.

Hillary lost, suck it up, move on.

 

[WTP]

Except the fact that your FBI criminal buddies denied putting spies in the Trump campaign and have now been proven to have lied.

That is a lie by you. No such evidence exists. You are propping up a manufactured "nothing burger" with your own lies. Had you not been lying, you would have presented proof instead of false claims. At the end of the day, propping up Trump's national conversation with his own buzz words, that have been proven to be nothing more than lies, will have to give way to the truth, the evidence, and the rule of law.

Um, maybe you should go back and read the posts in this thread again. Here's a hint: Start on page one.

Sonny, I don't need to go back to any page. No evidence has been presented that there were spies. None! Get over it, and yourself. The Thursday meeting was a "nothing burger".

Except the evidence in post #2...Sonny.

I've seen desperation before, but damn boss, you're a special kind of desperate.

First off, that planted nonsense never has Clapper saying anything about the government planting a spy. Clapper said that there was an informant used to spy on Russia not the Trump campaign. Boss, are you so deaf that you didn't hear and see Clapper say that? You folks are either some more kind of special stupid, or serial liars? Maybe it's both?

Thanks, you proved I was right with your funny face surrender.

 

[airplanemechanic]

A president can be indicted, but Trump won't be.

Not a sitting president. There are only 3 ways he can leave office. Resignation, impeachment, or death.

Not true my friend.

Donald Trump should not assume he's above the law. A sitting president can be indicted.

{{meta.pageTitle}} <-------a link to the supreme court ruling stating that a president can be indicted.

The surpreme court has ruled that a sitting president enjoys no special immunity to indictment. There is no explicit declaration in the text of our Constitution that provides immunity to the president while in office for crimes that he or she commits.

 

[S.J.]

That is a lie by you. No such evidence exists. You are propping up a manufactured "nothing burger" with your own lies. Had you not been lying, you would have presented proof instead of false claims. At the end of the day, propping up Trump's national conversation with his own buzz words, that have been proven to be nothing more than lies, will have to give way to the truth, the evidence, and the rule of law.

Um, maybe you should go back and read the posts in this thread again. Here's a hint: Start on page one.

Sonny, I don't need to go back to any page. No evidence has been presented that there were spies. None! Get over it, and yourself. The Thursday meeting was a "nothing burger".

Except the evidence in post #2...Sonny.

I've seen desperation before, but damn boss, you're a special kind of desperate.

First off, that planted nonsense never has Clapper saying anything about the government planting a spy. Clapper said that there was an informant used to spy on Russia not the Trump campaign. Boss, are you so deaf that you didn't hear and see Clapper say that? You folks are either some more kind of special stupid, or serial liars? Maybe it's both?

Thanks, you proved I was right with your funny face surrender.

The video is there for everyone to see, moron. You're in serious denial.

 

[WTP]

No because he's innocent. If an investigation has turned up nothing for over a year, it's done.

Hillary lost, suck it up, move on.

Except the investigation has already gathered up twenty plus people with various charges, who are directly and indirectly tied to Trump, with more on the way. And they have already proven obstruction and conspiracy to defraud the U.S.

Boss, you can holler until the cows come home about "nothing there", and it won't change reality.

When the Sheep finally realize all the grass has been eaten, they'll simply follow Trump off the cliff.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

‘There's a tendency to write this latest Trump claim off as Trump being Trump. He has proven time and again that he is willing to stray from established facts in pursuit of a narrative that is more favorable to him -- from the size of his inauguration crowds to the idea that Obama ordered a wiretap on him during the last presidential campaign.

But the fact that this is what Trump does shouldn't distract us from the allegations here: Donald Trump is saying his predecessor as president used the leading law enforcement entity in the country to spy on him because Obama/the "deep state" didn't want someone as unconventional as Trump to be president.

To be clear: There is zero public evidence that Trump's claims are anywhere close to the truth.’

Don't miss what Donald Trump is doing with his 'spy' allegations - CNNPolitics

Straying from established facts is called lying.

The big LIE is that Trump colluded with the Russians.
Democrats are big fat LIARS.
You Democrat Cultist need a reality check.
CNN is 24/7 left wing lies.

You aren't debating anything, because of a total lack of debatable facts or evidence from your corner. You should be ashamed and embarrassed by your lies.

Got Collusion ?