This Is What Happened At The Pentagon On 9/11

[DiveCon]

so who is it you have that supports the 9/11 commission report other than fringe groups like popular mechanics and their minions ??

taking quotes out of context does not help you

 

[eots]

so who is it you have that supports the 9/11 commission report other than fringe groups like popular mechanics and their minions ??

taking quotes out of context does not help you

pretending things are taken out of context just helps to prove the weakness of your argument...so please do.. put them context

 

[DiveCon]

so who is it you have that supports the 9/11 commission report other than fringe groups like popular mechanics and their minions ??

taking quotes out of context does not help you

pretending things are taken out of context just helps to prove the weakness of your argument...so please do.. put them context

no, you put them in context

 

[candycorn]

so who is it you have that supports the 9/11 commission report other than fringe groups like popular mechanics and their minions ??

Just played you a podcast of the Commission Chairman supporting his commission. You didn't listen to it; did you? Typical "truther" LOL.

As for the book that Kean and Hamilton are writing or wrote, what, pray tell is the title? The link was removed for "violations". Typical "truther" LOL.

Anyway until you give me something else to contradict the 9/11 Commission report or point to one major fact that is wrong in the text, me and the rest of the universe will believe it before we believe you just because you whine 24/7. Typical "truther" LOL.

 

[eots]

so who is it you have that supports the 9/11 commission report other than fringe groups like popular mechanics and their minions ??

Just played you a podcast of the Commission Chairman supporting his commission. You didn't listen to it; did you? Typical "truther" LOL.

As for the book that Kean and Hamilton are writing or wrote, what, pray tell is the title? The link was removed for "violations". Typical "truther" LOL.

Anyway until you give me something else to contradict the 9/11 Commission report or point to one major fact that is wrong in the text, me and the rest of the universe will believe it before we believe you just because you whine 24/7. Typical "truther" LOL.

Lou Dobbs CNN News video.
New book by 9/11 commission co-chairman Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton
Indicate lies by the FAA, NORAD and the Pentagon


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shocking new book by 9/11 commission co-chairman Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton
says Americans still don't know the whole truth about what happened that day.

"Fog of war could explain why some people were confused on the day of 9/11,
but it could not explain why all the after-action reports accident investigation and public testimony
by FAA and NORAD officials advanced an account of 9/11 that was untrue."

The original time line of flight 93
The governments time line about flight 77,
and details about fighter jets scrambled to intercept it.
The book also alleges government officials went forthcoming
with the investigation,
and it took interviews and subpoenas to shake loose valuable information.
A pentagon audit last year found...

"DOD did not accurately report to the 9/11 commission on the response to the September 11 hijackings."


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UrI2uV_PYw]YouTube - Lou Dobbs calls for a new investigation of 9/11![/ame]

 

[DiveCon]

so who is it you have that supports the 9/11 commission report other than fringe groups like popular mechanics and their minions ??

Just played you a podcast of the Commission Chairman supporting his commission. You didn't listen to it; did you? Typical "truther" LOL.

As for the book that Kean and Hamilton are writing or wrote, what, pray tell is the title? The link was removed for "violations". Typical "truther" LOL.

Anyway until you give me something else to contradict the 9/11 Commission report or point to one major fact that is wrong in the text, me and the rest of the universe will believe it before we believe you just because you whine 24/7. Typical "truther" LOL.

Lou Dobbs CNN News video.
New book by 9/11 commission co-chairman Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton
Indicate lies by the FAA, NORAD and the Pentagon


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shocking new book by 9/11 commission co-chairman Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton
says Americans still don't know the whole truth about what happened that day.

"Fog of war could explain why some people were confused on the day of 9/11,
but it could not explain why all the after-action reports accident investigation and public testimony
by FAA and NORAD officials advanced an account of 9/11 that was untrue."

The original time line of flight 93
The governments time line about flight 77,
and details about fighter jets scrambled to intercept it.
The book also alleges government officials went forthcoming
with the investigation,
and it took interviews and subpoenas to shake loose valuable information.
A pentagon audit last year found...

"DOD did not accurately report to the 9/11 commission on the response to the September 11 hijackings."


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UrI2uV_PYw]YouTube - Lou Dobbs calls for a new investigation of 9/11![/ame]

and not one bit of that screams out "INSIDE JOB"

 

[eots]

Sep-11-2009 23:46
The 9/11 Commission Rejects own Report as Based on Government Lies
Gordon Duff Salem-News.com
How long have we watered the Tree of Deceit with the blood of patriots?


John Farmer’s book: “The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America’s Defense on 9/11″

(CINCINNATI, Ohio) - In John Farmer’s book: “The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America’s Defense on 9/11″, the author builds the inescapably convincing case that the official version... is almost entirely untrue...

The 9/11 Commission now tells us that the official version of 9/11 was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely untrue. The details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission.

Farmer, Dean of Rutger Universities' School of Law and former Attorney General of New Jersey, was responsible for drafting the original flawed 9/11 report.

Does Farmer have cooperation and agreement from other members of the Commission? Yes. Did they say Bush ordered 9/11? No. Do they say that the 9/11 Commission was lied to by the FBI, CIA, Whitehouse and NORAD? Yes. Is there full documentary proof of this? Yes.

Farmer states...“at some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened... I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The [Norad air defense] tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years. This is not spin.”


The 9/11 Commission Rejects own Report as Based on Government Lies - Salem-News.Com

 

[eots]

Just played you a podcast of the Commission Chairman supporting his commission. You didn't listen to it; did you? Typical "truther" LOL.

As for the book that Kean and Hamilton are writing or wrote, what, pray tell is the title? The link was removed for "violations". Typical "truther" LOL.

Anyway until you give me something else to contradict the 9/11 Commission report or point to one major fact that is wrong in the text, me and the rest of the universe will believe it before we believe you just because you whine 24/7. Typical "truther" LOL.

Lou Dobbs CNN News video.
New book by 9/11 commission co-chairman Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton
Indicate lies by the FAA, NORAD and the Pentagon


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shocking new book by 9/11 commission co-chairman Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton
says Americans still don't know the whole truth about what happened that day.

"Fog of war could explain why some people were confused on the day of 9/11,
but it could not explain why all the after-action reports accident investigation and public testimony
by FAA and NORAD officials advanced an account of 9/11 that was untrue."

The original time line of flight 93
The governments time line about flight 77,
and details about fighter jets scrambled to intercept it.
The book also alleges government officials went forthcoming
with the investigation,
and it took interviews and subpoenas to shake loose valuable information.
A pentagon audit last year found...

"DOD did not accurately report to the 9/11 commission on the response to the September 11 hijackings."


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UrI2uV_PYw]YouTube - Lou Dobbs calls for a new investigation of 9/11![/ame]

and not one bit of that screams out "INSIDE JOB"

not to a deaf man..but even a deaf man ..should hear the SCREAM OF COVER-UP

 

[DiveCon]

Lou Dobbs CNN News video.
New book by 9/11 commission co-chairman Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton
Indicate lies by the FAA, NORAD and the Pentagon


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shocking new book by 9/11 commission co-chairman Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton
says Americans still don't know the whole truth about what happened that day.

"Fog of war could explain why some people were confused on the day of 9/11,
but it could not explain why all the after-action reports accident investigation and public testimony
by FAA and NORAD officials advanced an account of 9/11 that was untrue."

The original time line of flight 93
The governments time line about flight 77,
and details about fighter jets scrambled to intercept it.
The book also alleges government officials went forthcoming
with the investigation,
and it took interviews and subpoenas to shake loose valuable information.
A pentagon audit last year found...

"DOD did not accurately report to the 9/11 commission on the response to the September 11 hijackings."


YouTube - Lou Dobbs calls for a new investigation of 9/11!

and not one bit of that screams out "INSIDE JOB"

not to a deaf man..but even a deaf man ..should hear the SCREAM OF COVER-UP

but the question is, what was covered up?
not that it was a terrorist attack like you fucking morons think
i dont doubt for a minute that there was political CYA done, i have stated that multiple times
but that still doesnt make it an inside job, neither MIHOP or LIHOP
it is that the mistakes made were covered up

sheeesh

 

[DiveCon]

Sep-11-2009 23:46
The 9/11 Commission Rejects own Report as Based on Government Lies
Gordon Duff Salem-News.com
How long have we watered the Tree of Deceit with the blood of patriots?


John Farmer’s book: “The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America’s Defense on 9/11″

(CINCINNATI, Ohio) - In John Farmer’s book: “The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America’s Defense on 9/11″, the author builds the inescapably convincing case that the official version... is almost entirely untrue...

The 9/11 Commission now tells us that the official version of 9/11 was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely untrue. The details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission.

Farmer, Dean of Rutger Universities' School of Law and former Attorney General of New Jersey, was responsible for drafting the original flawed 9/11 report.

Does Farmer have cooperation and agreement from other members of the Commission? Yes. Did they say Bush ordered 9/11? No. Do they say that the 9/11 Commission was lied to by the FBI, CIA, Whitehouse and NORAD? Yes. Is there full documentary proof of this? Yes.

Farmer states...“at some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened... I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The [Norad air defense] tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years. This is not spin.”


The 9/11 Commission Rejects own Report as Based on Government Lies - Salem-News.Com

all that is is a book report on some fucking nutters book
it proves NOTHING

 

[eots]

Sep-11-2009 23:46
The 9/11 Commission Rejects own Report as Based on Government Lies
Gordon Duff Salem-News.com
How long have we watered the Tree of Deceit with the blood of patriots?


John Farmer’s book: “The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America’s Defense on 9/11″

(CINCINNATI, Ohio) - In John Farmer’s book: “The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America’s Defense on 9/11″, the author builds the inescapably convincing case that the official version... is almost entirely untrue...

The 9/11 Commission now tells us that the official version of 9/11 was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely untrue. The details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission.

Farmer, Dean of Rutger Universities' School of Law and former Attorney General of New Jersey, was responsible for drafting the original flawed 9/11 report.

Does Farmer have cooperation and agreement from other members of the Commission? Yes. Did they say Bush ordered 9/11? No. Do they say that the 9/11 Commission was lied to by the FBI, CIA, Whitehouse and NORAD? Yes. Is there full documentary proof of this? Yes.

Farmer states...“at some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened... I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The [Norad air defense] tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years. This is not spin.”


The 9/11 Commission Rejects own Report as Based on Government Lies - Salem-News.Com

all that is is a book report on some fucking nutters book
it proves NOTHING

truther nutters that were on the 9/11 commision...lol

 

[candycorn]

Sep-11-2009 23:46
The 9/11 Commission Rejects own Report as Based on Government Lies
Gordon Duff Salem-News.com
How long have we watered the Tree of Deceit with the blood of patriots?


John Farmer’s book: “The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America’s Defense on 9/11″

(CINCINNATI, Ohio) - In John Farmer’s book: “The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America’s Defense on 9/11″, the author builds the inescapably convincing case that the official version... is almost entirely untrue...

The 9/11 Commission now tells us that the official version of 9/11 was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely untrue. The details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission.

Farmer, Dean of Rutger Universities' School of Law and former Attorney General of New Jersey, was responsible for drafting the original flawed 9/11 report.

Does Farmer have cooperation and agreement from other members of the Commission? Yes. Did they say Bush ordered 9/11? No. Do they say that the 9/11 Commission was lied to by the FBI, CIA, Whitehouse and NORAD? Yes. Is there full documentary proof of this? Yes.

Farmer states...“at some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened... I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The [Norad air defense] tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years. This is not spin.”


The 9/11 Commission Rejects own Report as Based on Government Lies - Salem-News.Com

all that is is a book report on some fucking nutters book
it proves NOTHING

truther nutters that were on the 9/11 commision...lol

Oh, that 4 year old book? You're hanging your hat on that? Okay...the timeline was off. And that means what....that the time line was off. Gee. As stated, not one major inaccuracy is in the text of the Commission report.

And what did the CNN report say about subpoenas? They had the power apparently. You stated they didn't or implied they didn't. Were you not being truthful! I demand an investigation. LOL

 

[Terral]

Hi Candy:

Oh, that 4 year old book? You're hanging your hat on that?

Just when you think that NOBODY can be this STUPID (#8), then we see nonsense like this. I invite Ms. Candy to start her own Topic proving that AA77 crashed ANYWHERE. Coming to my Topic to whine and bitch and complain is not hanging your silly hat anywhere.

Okay...the timeline was off. And that means what....that the time line was off. Gee.

Every murder investigation begins with an accurate timeline of events! My Penagon Timeline is here. Go right ahead and bump my Pentagon Timeline Topic and try to point out a single error. :0) The Offical Govt Timelines (Govt/CNN link) say many different things (9:43 AM crash), which means that somebody is definitely LYING. The FAA Timeline says the aircraft crashed into the west side of the Pentagon at 9:32 AM (link), but the corrupt 911CR says that happened at 9:37:46 (PDF 27); with the ACAAR saying 9:38 AM (PDF 200). However, the evidence says the First Explosion at the Pentagon took place at exactly 9:31:39 AM (my 9:31 Topic), which says the FAA Timeline is 'correct.'

As stated, not one major inaccuracy is in the text of the Commission report.

Statements like this say CandyCorn is full of crap. This guy does NOT know enough about this 9/11 Pentagon Case to even carry on a good conversation, which is the reason that he/she has no Topics started to make a 911Truth Case for ANYTHING. The 911CR has been keyword sanitized to exclude the word 'explosions,' just like the corrupt ACAAR. We are looking at about 800 pages of LIES in Official Govt Testimony, because the DoD/FBI/CIA/NSA and their subordinate agencies are key players in this 9/11 Inside Job 'and' the Cover-up Operation. Both the 911CR 'and' the corrupt ACAAR use the singular term "explosion" exactly six (6) times, because both documents were keyword sanitized by the same corrupt Govt Agencies. The errant ACAAR omits the times of 9:31 and 9:32 to hide the fact that the Pentagon was deliberately struck by a DoD Raytheon Missile at exactly 9:31:39 AM. And then, the 911CR does not even make mention of WTC-7 even one time, but Ms. Candy says there is not one major (heh) inconsistency with the corrupt 911 Commission Report. BTW, this nonsense right here is reason #10 that the USA 'is' worthy to be wiped off the face of the earth (my Topic), because Americans 'are' really this STUPID . . .

This I can say with 100 percent certainty: I know more about all of these corrupt Govt reports and their contents than all of my debating opponents combined BY FAR. Ms. Candy cuckoo wants to believe a real 100-Ton Jetliner crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11 at 9:38 AM, because Bush and Rove and Cheney and Rumsfeld say so . . .

And what did the CNN report say about subpoenas? They had the power apparently. You stated they didn't or implied they didn't. Were you not being truthful! I demand an investigation. LOL

Yeah. Keep right on laughing. Here is what the Chief CNN Pentagon Correspondent said on 9/11, while standing right in front of the Pentagon:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dm_cnFoMHjA"]Candy Should Be Embarrassed, But That Requires A Brain[/ame]

GL,

Terral

 

[DiveCon]

Hi Candy:

Oh, that 4 year old book? You're hanging your hat on that?

Just when you think that NOBODY can be this STUPID (#8), then we see nonsense like this. I invite Ms. Candy to start her own Topic proving that AA77 crashed ANYWHERE. Coming to my Topic to whine and bitch and complain is not hanging your silly hat anywhere.

Okay...the timeline was off. And that means what....that the time line was off. Gee.

Every murder investigation begins with an accurate timeline of events! My Penagon Timeline is here. Go right ahead and bump my Pentagon Timeline Topic and try to point out a single error. :0) The Offical Govt Timelines (Govt/CNN link) say many different things (9:43 AM crash), which means that somebody is definitely LYING. The FAA Timeline says the aircraft crashed into the west side of the Pentagon at 9:32 AM (link), but the corrupt 911CR says that happened at 9:37:46 (PDF 27); with the ACAAR saying 9:38 AM (PDF 200). However, the evidence says the First Explosion at the Pentagon took place at exactly 9:31:39 AM (my 9:31 Topic), which says the FAA Timeline is 'correct.'

As stated, not one major inaccuracy is in the text of the Commission report.

Statements like this say CandyCorn is full of crap. This guy does NOT know enough about this 9/11 Pentagon Case to even carry on a good conversation, which is the reason that he/she has no Topics started to make a 911Truth Case for ANYTHING. The 911CR has been keyword sanitized to exclude the word 'explosions,' just like the corrupt ACAAR. We are looking at about 800 pages of LIES in Official Govt Testimony, because the DoD/FBI/CIA/NSA and their subordinate agencies are key players in this 9/11 Inside Job 'and' the Cover-up Operation. Both the 911CR 'and' the corrupt ACAAR use the singular term "explosion" exactly six (6) times, because both documents were keyword sanitized by the same corrupt Govt Agencies. The errant ACAAR omits the times of 9:31 and 9:32 to hide the fact that the Pentagon was deliberately struck by a DoD Raytheon Missile at exactly 9:31:39 AM. And then, the 911CR does not even make mention of WTC-7 even one time, but Ms. Candy says there is not one major (heh) inconsistency with the corrupt 911 Commission Report. BTW, this nonsense right here is reason #10 that the USA 'is' worthy to be wiped off the face of the earth (my Topic), because Americans 'are' really this STUPID . . .

This I can say with 100 percent certainty: I know more about all of these corrupt Govt reports and their contents than all of my debating opponents combined BY FAR. Ms. Candy cuckoo wants to believe a real 100-Ton Jetliner crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11 at 9:38 AM, because Bush and Rove and Cheney and Rumsfeld say so . . .

And what did the CNN report say about subpoenas? They had the power apparently. You stated they didn't or implied they didn't. Were you not being truthful! I demand an investigation. LOL

Yeah. Keep right on laughing. Here is what the Chief CNN Pentagon Correspondent said on 9/11, while standing right in front of the Pentagon:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dm_cnFoMHjA"]Candy Should Be Embarrassed, But That Requires A Brain[/ame]

GL,

Terral

wow, more proof the troofers dont give a rats ass about the truth

 

[eots]

all that is is a book report on some fucking nutters book
it proves NOTHING

truther nutters that were on the 9/11 commision...lol

Oh, that 4 year old book? You're hanging your hat on that? Okay...the timeline was off. And that means what....that the time line was off. Gee. As stated, not one major inaccuracy is in the text of the Commission report.

And what did the CNN report say about subpoenas? They had the power apparently. You stated they didn't or implied they didn't. Were you not being truthful! I demand an investigation. LOL

you left out the part about intercept and prior knowledge ..your answer just proves how disingenuous you really are

 

[candycorn]

truther nutters that were on the 9/11 commision...lol

Oh, that 4 year old book? You're hanging your hat on that? Okay...the timeline was off. And that means what....that the time line was off. Gee. As stated, not one major inaccuracy is in the text of the Commission report.

And what did the CNN report say about subpoenas? They had the power apparently. You stated they didn't or implied they didn't. Were you not being truthful! I demand an investigation. LOL

you left out the part about intercept and prior knowledge ..your answer just proves how disingenuous you really are

Prior knowledge...I don't recall hearing that. What was said about it. As for intercepts, hell it took a long time to find Payne Stewart's plane that wasn't hijacked. Somehow,they were supposed to find one jet in the Northeastern US and shoot it down?

 

[eots]

wow who has more credibility these patriots...or...candycornhole...hmmmmm



Capt. Daniel Davis, U.S. Army – Former U.S. Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director. Decorated with the Bronze Star and the Soldiers Medal for bravery under fire and the Purple Heart for injuries sustained in Viet Nam. Also served in the Army Air Defense Command as Nike Missile BatteryControl Officer for the Chicago-Milwaukee Defense Area. Founder and former CEO of Turbine Technology Services Corp., a turbine (jet engine) services and maintenance company (15 years). Former Senior Manager at General Electric Turbine (jet) Engine Division (15 years). Private pilot.

Statement to this website 3/23/07: "As a former General Electric Turbine engineering specialist and manager and then CEO of a turbine engineering company, I can guarantee that none of the high tech, high temperature alloy engines on any of the four planes that crashed on 9/11 would be completely destroyed, burned, shattered or melted in any crash or fire. Wrecked, yes, but not destroyed. Where are all of those engines, particularly at the Pentagon? If jet powered aircraft crashed on 9/11, those engines, plus wings and tail assembly, would be there.

Additionally, in my experience as an officer in NORAD as a Tactical Director for the Chicago-Milwaukee Air Defense and as a current private pilot, there is no way that an aircraft on instrument flight plans (all commercial flights are IFR) would not be intercepted when they deviate from their flight plan, turn off their transponders, or stop communication with Air Traffic Control. No way! With very bad luck, perhaps one could slip by, but no there's no way all four of them could!

Finally, going over the hill and highway and crashing into the Pentagon right at the wall/ground interface is nearly impossible for even a small slow single engine airplane and no way for a 757. Maybe the best pilot in the world could accomplish that but not these unskilled "terrorists".

Attempts to obscure facts by calling them a "Conspiracy Theory" does not change the truth. It seems, "Something is rotten in the State."


.........................................................................................................................................................

t. Col. Guy S. Razer, MS Aeronautical Science, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Retired U.S. Air Force command fighter pilot. Former instructor; U.S. Air Force Fighter Weapons School and NATO’s Tactical Leadership Program. As an Air Force weapons effects expert was responsible for wartime tasking of most appropriate aircraft/munition for target destruction to include steel and concrete superstructures. Former aeronautical structures flight test engineer with McDonnell Douglas, working on advanced DC-9 autopilot systems and DC-10 flight envelope expansion stress and flutter analysis. Tactical aircraft flown: General Dynamics F-111 Aardvark fighter/bomber, McDonnell Douglas F-15E Strike Eagle, General Dynamics / Lockheed Martin F-16 Fighting Falcon, McDonnell Douglas F-18 Hornet, Boeing B-1 Bomber, MiG-29 (Russian fighter), and Su-22 (Russian fighter/bomber). 3,000+ fighter hours. Combat time over Iraq. 20-year Air Force career.


Statement to this website 3/25/07: "After 4+ years of research since retirement in 2002, I am 100% convinced that the attacks of September 11, 2001 were planned, organized, and committed by treasonous perpetrators that have infiltrated the highest levels of our government. It is now time to take our country back.

........................................................................................................................................
Col. George Nelson, MBA, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former U.S. Air Force aircraft accident investigator and airplane parts authority. Graduate, U.S. Air Force War College. 34-year Air Force career.

Licensed commercial pilot. Licensed airframe and powerplant mechanic.
Essay: "In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. ...

The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. …

With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged. …

As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country's history."


.........................................................................................................................................................
Lt. Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Director of Advanced Space Programs Development under Presidents Ford and Carter. U.S. Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. (PhD in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, Cal Tech). Former Head of the Department of Aeronautical Engineering and Assistant Dean at the U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology. 22-year Air Force career. Also taught Mathematics and English at the University of Southern California, the University of Maryland, and Phillips University.
Member: Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth Association Statement:

"Scholars and professionals with various kinds of expertise---including architects, engineers, firefighters, intelligence officers, lawyers, medical professionals, military officers, philosophers, religious leaders, physical scientists, and pilots---have spoken out about radical discrepancies between the official account of the 9/11 attacks and what they, as independent researchers, have learned.

They have established beyond any reasonable doubt that the official account of 9/11 is false and that, therefore, the official “investigations” have really been cover-up operations.

Thus far, however, there has been no response from political leaders in Washington or, for that matter, in other capitals around the world. Our organization, Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth, has been formed to help bring about such a response.

We believe that the truth about 9/11 needs to be exposed now---not in 50 years as a footnote in the history books---so the policies that have been based on the Bush-Cheney administration’s interpretation of the 9/11 attacks can be changed.

We are, therefore, calling for a new, independent investigation of 9/11 that takes account of evidence that has been documented by independent researchers but thus far ignored by governments and the mainstream media."


Video 9/11/04: "A lot of these pieces of information, taken together, prove that the official story, the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash. It’s impossible. … There’s a second group of facts having to do with the cover up. … Taken together these things prove that high levels of our government don’t want us to know what happened and who’s responsible.…

Who gained from 9/11? Who covered up crucial information about 9/11? And who put out the patently false stories about 9/11 in the first place? When you take those three things together, I think the case is pretty clear that it’s highly placed individuals in the administration with all roads passing through Dick Cheney.

I think the very kindest thing that we can say about George W. Bush and all the people in the U.S. Government that have been involved in this massive cover-up, the very kindest thing we can say is that they were aware of impending attacks and let them happen. Now some people will say that’s much too kind, however even that is high treason and conspiracy to commit murder." http://video.go

Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report

 

[DiveCon]

they he goes again, the C&P king

 

[eots]

hmmmmm...diveconman or these gentlemen..scholars and .....patriots ....hmmmm

http://patriotsquestion911.com/

 

[DiveCon]

hmmmmm...diveconman or these gentlemen..scholars and .....patriots ....hmmmm

Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report

ok id-eots, prove who those people are and that those are actually teir words
i've asked you before but you have NEVER done so
you just make that strawman that no one could ever put anything fake on the internet
Home | The Onion - America's Finest News Source