/—-/ OK I’ll start the conversation: A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Your response?Well laws do work to some degree to help crime. We aren't living in the wild west anymore nor are we living in Central Africa or areas in the middle east that are basically run by gangs, thugs and violent corruption. So with that said we know that the rule of law is conducive to a civilized and safe society. There is no universal system that will work everywhere so the needs of each city and society need to be analyzed so the best laws, and enforcement policies are put in place.Just don't see how laws stop people who ignore them.Depends on the risk/reward, but definitely not as often as most. why?How often do criminals obey laws?I imagine that the top 10 cities, crimewise, have some of the toughest gunlaws because they are the top 10 cities, crimewise...I did not say that guns were responsible for low crime rates. I said they were not responsible for HIGH crime rates. But you might want to ask yourself why the top ten cities, crimewise, have some of the toughest gunlaws.
Not saying don't look for answers but if more laws equates to less crime, I could never explain Chicago or LA gang violence.
There will never be a solution that gets rid of all violence or all gun violence or all mass shootings, but there are things that can be done to limit the consistency and the damage that is done. We need to be able to have a conversation about the realistic middle ground and not about the extreme absolutes.