Tim Walz's Stolen Valor Gets Worse, Posed as Afghanistan War Veteran

munkle

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2012
4,768
7,984
1,930
This is like having been in the Army in 1968 and never gotten farther than San Diego during Vietnam, and calling yourself a Vietnam Veteran. 100% Stolen Valor.





"A bombshell revelation has surfaced this week that could mark the end of Tim Walz’s political career. A photo, recently unearthed, shows Walz holding a protest sign reading “Enduring Freedom Veterans for Kerry” during a 2004 anti-George Bush rally in Mankato, Minnesota.

The photograph, taken by Michael B. Brodkorb, was captured on August 4, 2004, as Walz protested outside a campaign rally for President Bush in Mankato, Minnesota.

Tim Walz has consistently portrayed himself as “a veteran of Operation Enduring Freedom,” the U.S. military operation in Afghanistan initiated after the September 11 attacks."


According to Free Beacon, it has come to light that Walz never deployed to Afghanistan, nor did he engage in any combat operations during his military career. His service was primarily in Italy, where he supported NATO forces but did not see action in the Middle East.

A video from 2009 recently resurfaced, showing Iraq War veteran David Thul confronting Walz’s aides at his Mankato office regarding these claims. Thul, armed with knowledge and evidence, filmed the encounter and pointed out that Walz’s assertions could be interpreted as violations of the Stolen Valor Act.

During this confrontation, Thul informed Walz’s aides that such misrepresentations could lead to jail time.

Thul presented evidence indicating that while Walz served in a supportive role, he did not serve in Afghanistan or engage in any combat actions. One aide admitted she was “not aware” of Walz serving in Afghanistan.


Thul went on to present the 2004 photo of Walz, holding a sign that says “Enduring Freedom Veterans for Kerry,” to another aide, who acknowledged that constituents could get the false impression that Walz served in Afghanistan."
 
Last edited:
This is like having been in the Army and never gotten farther than San Diego during Vietnam, and calling yourself a Vietnam Veteran. 100% Stolen Valor.





"A bombshell revelation has surfaced this week that could mark the end of Tim Walz’s political career. A photo, recently unearthed, shows Walz holding a protest sign reading “Enduring Freedom Veterans for Kerry” during a 2004 anti-George Bush rally in Mankato, Minnesota.

The photograph, taken by Michael B. Brodkorb, was captured on August 4, 2004, as Walz protested outside a campaign rally for President Bush in Mankato, Minnesota.

Tim Walz has consistently portrayed himself as “a veteran of Operation Enduring Freedom,” the U.S. military operation in Afghanistan initiated after the September 11 attacks."


According to Free Beacon, it has come to light that Walz never deployed to Afghanistan, nor did he engage in any combat operations during his military career. His service was primarily in Italy, where he supported NATO forces but did not see action in the Middle East.

A video from 2009 recently resurfaced, showing Iraq War veteran David Thul confronting Walz’s aides at his Mankato office regarding these claims. Thul, armed with knowledge and evidence, filmed the encounter and pointed out that Walz’s assertions could be interpreted as violations of the Stolen Valor Act.

During this confrontation, Thul informed Walz’s aides that such misrepresentations could lead to jail time.

Thul presented evidence indicating that while Walz served in a supportive role, he did not serve in Afghanistan or engage in any combat actions. One aide admitted she was “not aware” of Walz serving in Afghanistan.


Thul went on to present the 2004 photo of Walz, holding a sign that says “Enduring Freedom Veterans for Kerry,” to another aide, who acknowledged that constituents could get the false impression that Walz served in Afghanistan."

Keep..trying...:)
Hint....you've already lost.
 
This is like having been in the Army in 1968 and never gotten farther than San Diego during Vietnam, and calling yourself a Vietnam Veteran. 100% Stolen Valor.





"A bombshell revelation has surfaced this week that could mark the end of Tim Walz’s political career. A photo, recently unearthed, shows Walz holding a protest sign reading “Enduring Freedom Veterans for Kerry” during a 2004 anti-George Bush rally in Mankato, Minnesota.

The photograph, taken by Michael B. Brodkorb, was captured on August 4, 2004, as Walz protested outside a campaign rally for President Bush in Mankato, Minnesota.

Tim Walz has consistently portrayed himself as “a veteran of Operation Enduring Freedom,” the U.S. military operation in Afghanistan initiated after the September 11 attacks."


According to Free Beacon, it has come to light that Walz never deployed to Afghanistan, nor did he engage in any combat operations during his military career. His service was primarily in Italy, where he supported NATO forces but did not see action in the Middle East.

A video from 2009 recently resurfaced, showing Iraq War veteran David Thul confronting Walz’s aides at his Mankato office regarding these claims. Thul, armed with knowledge and evidence, filmed the encounter and pointed out that Walz’s assertions could be interpreted as violations of the Stolen Valor Act.

During this confrontation, Thul informed Walz’s aides that such misrepresentations could lead to jail time.

Thul presented evidence indicating that while Walz served in a supportive role, he did not serve in Afghanistan or engage in any combat actions. One aide admitted she was “not aware” of Walz serving in Afghanistan.


Thul went on to present the 2004 photo of Walz, holding a sign that says “Enduring Freedom Veterans for Kerry,” to another aide, who acknowledged that constituents could get the false impression that Walz served in Afghanistan."


Yeah, keep on believing that, low-IQ rube LOL
 
ecc7d0174bd2c27f227fb91549f724db_768x0.png
 
The National Guard is, by definition, a military operation whose entire existence is founded on READINESS to serve when called upon. That is what they are paid for, not spending their weekends and a couple weeks in the summer playing war games.

To be drawing an NG check for 24 years, then declining to serve when called up is worse than never having served in uniform at all. You have taken hundreds of thousands of dollars from the taxpayers for exactly NOTHING.
 
In all fairness it's legitimate for a Veteran who spent his time in a stateside post or a shipyard or a supply depot in the U.S. during WW2 to claim WW2 Veteran benefits. Likewise any Veteran who served honorably during Korea and Vietnam and modern military incursions are legitimate Veterans of that era. Personally if I was a fifty something sergeant in the Guard, I would retire rather than be deployed to Iraq.
 
In all fairness it's legitimate for a Veteran who spent his time in a stateside post or a shipyard or a supply depot in the U.S. during WW2 to claim WW2 Veteran benefits. Likewise any Veteran who served honorably during Korea and Vietnam and modern military incursions are legitimate Veterans of that era. Personally if I was a fifty something sergeant in the Guard, I would retire rather than be deployed to Iraq.
Accepting that at face value, do you also think it's legit to claim you had a higher rank than you did, and claim that you "carried a weapon in war" when you didn't?
 
Accepting that at face value, do you also think it's legit to claim you had a higher rank than you did, and claim that you "carried a weapon in war" when you didn't?
What Veteran hasn't "carried a weapon in war" or was it a "weapon of war"? Was he a sergeant major or a command sergeant major? It's a word spin game. Don't get me wrong, I'm no fan of socialist tampon Tim but attacking him this way doesn't seem like a smart move.
 
What Veteran hasn't "carried a weapon in war" or was it a "weapon of war"? Was he a sergeant major or a command sergeant major? It's a word spin game. Don't get me wrong, I'm no fan of socialist tampon Tim but attacking him this way doesn't seem like a smart move.
He was not a CSM, as he claimed...He didn't carry "a weapon in war", as he claimed...He didn't correct the record when C-SPAN described him as serving in Afghanistan,

When is exposing the truth about a serial liar not a smart move?
 

Forum List

Back
Top