Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Obama went to congress before taking out OBL... Trump bypassed that process because he said there was an imminent attack. The move is justified if there was an attack about to happen, if not then he should have brought it to congressI didn’t say anything about exposing sources and methods... of course those should be protectedAfter watching the public reaction to Soleimani’s murder followed by vows of revenge by Iran, we are apparently on the brink of war. At this point it seems obvious that we need to go public with the intel we have showing the imminent attack that was being planned against Americans.
This intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?
NO! I don't agree, there's no reason to expose our sources and methods just to satisfy you commies. Soleimani has been a know treat and terrorist leader for a couple of decades. He had the blood of countless people on his hands. Trump got a shot and he took it, deal with it. BTW, he wasn't murdered, that's commie propaganda, he was a terrorist enemy combatant that was justifiably taken out. That's not murder.
.
What do you not understand that Soleimani has been a leading terrorist for more that two decades. He's provided money and arms to the Hamas faction that attacked our embassy, do you think he was in Baghdad to have tea with the Hamas commander that went to Ala with him? Now you question whether he was a clear and present danger, when he's been one for at least two decades. Give me a fucking break. Did ask similar stupid questions when maobama took out OBL?
.
Obama went to congress before taking out OBL... Trump bypassed that process because he said there was an imminent attack. The move is justified if there was an attack about to happen, if not then he should have brought it to congressI didn’t say anything about exposing sources and methods... of course those should be protectedAfter watching the public reaction to Soleimani’s murder followed by vows of revenge by Iran, we are apparently on the brink of war. At this point it seems obvious that we need to go public with the intel we have showing the imminent attack that was being planned against Americans.
This intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?
NO! I don't agree, there's no reason to expose our sources and methods just to satisfy you commies. Soleimani has been a know treat and terrorist leader for a couple of decades. He had the blood of countless people on his hands. Trump got a shot and he took it, deal with it. BTW, he wasn't murdered, that's commie propaganda, he was a terrorist enemy combatant that was justifiably taken out. That's not murder.
.
What do you not understand that Soleimani has been a leading terrorist for more that two decades. He's provided money and arms to the Hamas faction that attacked our embassy, do you think he was in Baghdad to have tea with the Hamas commander that went to Ala with him? Now you question whether he was a clear and present danger, when he's been one for at least two decades. Give me a fucking break. Did ask similar stupid questions when maobama took out OBL?
.
He actually was the head of Hezbollah. The quds commander was appointed by him. All under IRGC control,I didn’t say anything about exposing sources and methods... of course those should be protectedAfter watching the public reaction to Soleimani’s murder followed by vows of revenge by Iran, we are apparently on the brink of war. At this point it seems obvious that we need to go public with the intel we have showing the imminent attack that was being planned against Americans.
This intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?
NO! I don't agree, there's no reason to expose our sources and methods just to satisfy you commies. Soleimani has been a know treat and terrorist leader for a couple of decades. He had the blood of countless people on his hands. Trump got a shot and he took it, deal with it. BTW, he wasn't murdered, that's commie propaganda, he was a terrorist enemy combatant that was justifiably taken out. That's not murder.
.
What do you not understand that Soleimani has been a leading terrorist for more that two decades. He's provided money and arms to the Hamas faction that attacked our embassy, do you think he was in Baghdad to have tea with the Hamas commander that went to Ala with him? Now you question whether he was a clear and present danger, when he's been one for at least two decades. Give me a fucking break. Did ask similar stupid questions when maobama took out OBL?
.
Do you think he went to Congress before taking out the 16 yr old US citizen with a drone, that was at a BBQ?Obama went to congress before taking out OBL... Trump bypassed that process because he said there was an imminent attack. The move is justified if there was an attack about to happen, if not then he should have brought it to congressI didn’t say anything about exposing sources and methods... of course those should be protectedAfter watching the public reaction to Soleimani’s murder followed by vows of revenge by Iran, we are apparently on the brink of war. At this point it seems obvious that we need to go public with the intel we have showing the imminent attack that was being planned against Americans.
This intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?
NO! I don't agree, there's no reason to expose our sources and methods just to satisfy you commies. Soleimani has been a know treat and terrorist leader for a couple of decades. He had the blood of countless people on his hands. Trump got a shot and he took it, deal with it. BTW, he wasn't murdered, that's commie propaganda, he was a terrorist enemy combatant that was justifiably taken out. That's not murder.
.
What do you not understand that Soleimani has been a leading terrorist for more that two decades. He's provided money and arms to the Hamas faction that attacked our embassy, do you think he was in Baghdad to have tea with the Hamas commander that went to Ala with him? Now you question whether he was a clear and present danger, when he's been one for at least two decades. Give me a fucking break. Did ask similar stupid questions when maobama took out OBL?
.
That is fucking hilarious. I’m gonna have to remember that oneObama went to congress before taking out OBL... Trump bypassed that process because he said there was an imminent attack. The move is justified if there was an attack about to happen, if not then he should have brought it to congressI didn’t say anything about exposing sources and methods... of course those should be protectedAfter watching the public reaction to Soleimani’s murder followed by vows of revenge by Iran, we are apparently on the brink of war. At this point it seems obvious that we need to go public with the intel we have showing the imminent attack that was being planned against Americans.
This intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?
NO! I don't agree, there's no reason to expose our sources and methods just to satisfy you commies. Soleimani has been a know treat and terrorist leader for a couple of decades. He had the blood of countless people on his hands. Trump got a shot and he took it, deal with it. BTW, he wasn't murdered, that's commie propaganda, he was a terrorist enemy combatant that was justifiably taken out. That's not murder.
.
What do you not understand that Soleimani has been a leading terrorist for more that two decades. He's provided money and arms to the Hamas faction that attacked our embassy, do you think he was in Baghdad to have tea with the Hamas commander that went to Ala with him? Now you question whether he was a clear and present danger, when he's been one for at least two decades. Give me a fucking break. Did ask similar stupid questions when maobama took out OBL?
.
President Trump did discuss with Sen. Graham in advance, as well Mr. Kushner. The problem with bringing it to Chuck and Nancy and giving them the heads up, he might well have given a call to Soleimani himself.
The possibility of a leak was definitely there, so the President thought it was a smart idea to keep the information away from people that only wish him ill.
That sure as hell can't be MBS or Trump's lips would be up his butt
.After watching the public reaction to Soleimani’s murder followed by vows of revenge by Iran, we are apparently on the brink of war. At this point it seems obvious that we need to go public with the intel we have showing the imminent attack that was being planned against Americans.
This intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?
Is that right? Which administration declared war with Iran and when did they do it?Explain to me how we are not actively at war with Iran already?
The news has been all over how Iran has so much power in an asymmetrical war. The fact is that Iran has been using that power to target and attack the US for years now. They have been in an active war with the US for a long damn time.
He actually was the head of Hezbollah. The quds commander was appointed by him. All under IRGC control,I didn’t say anything about exposing sources and methods... of course those should be protectedAfter watching the public reaction to Soleimani’s murder followed by vows of revenge by Iran, we are apparently on the brink of war. At this point it seems obvious that we need to go public with the intel we have showing the imminent attack that was being planned against Americans.
This intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?
NO! I don't agree, there's no reason to expose our sources and methods just to satisfy you commies. Soleimani has been a know treat and terrorist leader for a couple of decades. He had the blood of countless people on his hands. Trump got a shot and he took it, deal with it. BTW, he wasn't murdered, that's commie propaganda, he was a terrorist enemy combatant that was justifiably taken out. That's not murder.
.
What do you not understand that Soleimani has been a leading terrorist for more that two decades. He's provided money and arms to the Hamas faction that attacked our embassy, do you think he was in Baghdad to have tea with the Hamas commander that went to Ala with him? Now you question whether he was a clear and present danger, when he's been one for at least two decades. Give me a fucking break. Did ask similar stupid questions when maobama took out OBL?
.
From wiki-
Hezbollah was founded in the early 1980s as part of an Iranian effort to aggregate a variety of militant Lebanese Shia groups into a unified organization.
Sorry. Soleimani.He actually was the head of Hezbollah. The quds commander was appointed by him. All under IRGC control,I didn’t say anything about exposing sources and methods... of course those should be protectedAfter watching the public reaction to Soleimani’s murder followed by vows of revenge by Iran, we are apparently on the brink of war. At this point it seems obvious that we need to go public with the intel we have showing the imminent attack that was being planned against Americans.
This intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?
NO! I don't agree, there's no reason to expose our sources and methods just to satisfy you commies. Soleimani has been a know treat and terrorist leader for a couple of decades. He had the blood of countless people on his hands. Trump got a shot and he took it, deal with it. BTW, he wasn't murdered, that's commie propaganda, he was a terrorist enemy combatant that was justifiably taken out. That's not murder.
.
What do you not understand that Soleimani has been a leading terrorist for more that two decades. He's provided money and arms to the Hamas faction that attacked our embassy, do you think he was in Baghdad to have tea with the Hamas commander that went to Ala with him? Now you question whether he was a clear and present danger, when he's been one for at least two decades. Give me a fucking break. Did ask similar stupid questions when maobama took out OBL?
.
From wiki-
Hezbollah was founded in the early 1980s as part of an Iranian effort to aggregate a variety of militant Lebanese Shia groups into a unified organization.
I mentioned 3 individuals in my post, who is "he"?
.
Shit coming from Trump & the White House doesn't count.After watching the public reaction to Soleimani’s murder followed by vows of revenge by Iran, we are apparently on the brink of war. At this point it seems obvious that we need to go public with the intel we have showing the imminent attack that was being planned against Americans.
This intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?
If Trump was not such a lying fuck, he could believe him.After watching the public reaction to Soleimani’s murder followed by vows of revenge by Iran, we are apparently on the brink of war. At this point it seems obvious that we need to go public with the intel we have showing the imminent attack that was being planned against Americans.
This intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?
It don’t make a lot of sense but it the reasoning the admin is going with which is why I think the intel needs to be made publicThe imminent attack excuse does not make sense. This man was a general in charge of a large international operation. Killing him does practically nothing to stop any ongoing operation that we can assume was handled through whatever command structure that exists. They are lying. Someone else will be promoted to his position and Iran has a new martyr to rally around. You can't kill martyrs.
NOPE
There’s lots of “intelligence” the public should never be privy to. If filthy LefTards will feel fucked off by the Trump admin for not sharing this bit of intel my bet is he won’t release it.
Fuck you. Trump does not think he needs to follow protocol.Obama went to congress before taking out OBL... Trump bypassed that process because he said there was an imminent attack. The move is justified if there was an attack about to happen, if not then he should have brought it to congressI didn’t say anything about exposing sources and methods... of course those should be protectedAfter watching the public reaction to Soleimani’s murder followed by vows of revenge by Iran, we are apparently on the brink of war. At this point it seems obvious that we need to go public with the intel we have showing the imminent attack that was being planned against Americans.
This intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?
NO! I don't agree, there's no reason to expose our sources and methods just to satisfy you commies. Soleimani has been a know treat and terrorist leader for a couple of decades. He had the blood of countless people on his hands. Trump got a shot and he took it, deal with it. BTW, he wasn't murdered, that's commie propaganda, he was a terrorist enemy combatant that was justifiably taken out. That's not murder.
.
What do you not understand that Soleimani has been a leading terrorist for more that two decades. He's provided money and arms to the Hamas faction that attacked our embassy, do you think he was in Baghdad to have tea with the Hamas commander that went to Ala with him? Now you question whether he was a clear and present danger, when he's been one for at least two decades. Give me a fucking break. Did ask similar stupid questions when maobama took out OBL?
.
President Trump did discuss with Sen. Graham in advance, as well Mr. Kushner. The problem with bringing it to Chuck and Nancy and giving them the heads up, he might well have given a call to Soleimani himself.
The possibility of a leak was definitely there, so the President thought it was a smart idea to keep the information away from people that only wish him ill.
Don’t think so... was he targeting the 16 year old? Did the attack pose a threat of starting a war with a different country?Do you think he went to Congress before taking out the 16 yr old US citizen with a drone, that was at a BBQ?Obama went to congress before taking out OBL... Trump bypassed that process because he said there was an imminent attack. The move is justified if there was an attack about to happen, if not then he should have brought it to congressI didn’t say anything about exposing sources and methods... of course those should be protectedAfter watching the public reaction to Soleimani’s murder followed by vows of revenge by Iran, we are apparently on the brink of war. At this point it seems obvious that we need to go public with the intel we have showing the imminent attack that was being planned against Americans.
This intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?
NO! I don't agree, there's no reason to expose our sources and methods just to satisfy you commies. Soleimani has been a know treat and terrorist leader for a couple of decades. He had the blood of countless people on his hands. Trump got a shot and he took it, deal with it. BTW, he wasn't murdered, that's commie propaganda, he was a terrorist enemy combatant that was justifiably taken out. That's not murder.
.
What do you not understand that Soleimani has been a leading terrorist for more that two decades. He's provided money and arms to the Hamas faction that attacked our embassy, do you think he was in Baghdad to have tea with the Hamas commander that went to Ala with him? Now you question whether he was a clear and present danger, when he's been one for at least two decades. Give me a fucking break. Did ask similar stupid questions when maobama took out OBL?
.
Sorry. Soleimani.He actually was the head of Hezbollah. The quds commander was appointed by him. All under IRGC control,I didn’t say anything about exposing sources and methods... of course those should be protectedNO! I don't agree, there's no reason to expose our sources and methods just to satisfy you commies. Soleimani has been a know treat and terrorist leader for a couple of decades. He had the blood of countless people on his hands. Trump got a shot and he took it, deal with it. BTW, he wasn't murdered, that's commie propaganda, he was a terrorist enemy combatant that was justifiably taken out. That's not murder.
.
What do you not understand that Soleimani has been a leading terrorist for more that two decades. He's provided money and arms to the Hamas faction that attacked our embassy, do you think he was in Baghdad to have tea with the Hamas commander that went to Ala with him? Now you question whether he was a clear and present danger, when he's been one for at least two decades. Give me a fucking break. Did ask similar stupid questions when maobama took out OBL?
.
From wiki-
Hezbollah was founded in the early 1980s as part of an Iranian effort to aggregate a variety of militant Lebanese Shia groups into a unified organization.
I mentioned 3 individuals in my post, who is "he"?
.
Hezbollah Losing Its Luster Under SoleimaniSorry. Soleimani.He actually was the head of Hezbollah. The quds commander was appointed by him. All under IRGC control,I didn’t say anything about exposing sources and methods... of course those should be protected
What do you not understand that Soleimani has been a leading terrorist for more that two decades. He's provided money and arms to the Hamas faction that attacked our embassy, do you think he was in Baghdad to have tea with the Hamas commander that went to Ala with him? Now you question whether he was a clear and present danger, when he's been one for at least two decades. Give me a fucking break. Did ask similar stupid questions when maobama took out OBL?
.
From wiki-
Hezbollah was founded in the early 1980s as part of an Iranian effort to aggregate a variety of militant Lebanese Shia groups into a unified organization.
I mentioned 3 individuals in my post, who is "he"?
.
Soleimani was the Cuds commander, he didn't answer to the Iran military chain of command, he only answered to the supreme leader. He may have had a hand in organizing Hezbollah, I don't think he directly command them.
.
When was the last time that you saw a sitting President lose an election in the middle of a war?...Oh I think if a war results from trumps mishandling of this then there is no way he wins re-election
How many of those killed were Americans?...How many people have Putin and Assad killed?...
