Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
'The Right'? Which party just watered down a bill to protect their anti-Semitic party member because they did not want to mention / call out that party member in public for her Hate Speech?Hate speech facilitates violence, such as the hate and bigotry you and others on the right express towards Muslims.
Muzzie scum sure do create a lot of hate speech.Wrong.Mass Shooting At 2 New Zealand Mosques Leaves At Least 49 People Dead | HuffPost
It's allover this board and it's all over this country and people are getting KILLED because of it.
This has to stop.
How long before another white Nationalist kills a bunch of immigrants or Muslims or whatever the target is this month?
We've already had them target a Jewish Synagogue and a black church.
STOP people. Stop the hate speech.
NOW
Speech is not violence. Please name one mostly Moslem country that is not a humanitarian, economic or military disaster. You cannot. Maybe the real problem is staring people in the face and they cannot face it? Possible?
Hate speech facilitates violence, such as the hate and bigotry you and others on the right express towards Muslims.
..
Another straw man. I didn't say I "have a problem with someone wanting to curb the hate speech".RIght, buddy. I don't care about your list. Let's talk about your beef with the OP. Why do you have a problem with someone wanting to curb the hate speech? Like you know, calling for murder.
You don't even realize how well you're illustrating my point, do you?
.
This was your reply:
Hate speech is fueling this from BOTH ends.
Stop screaming ISLAMOPHOBE, stop ATTACKING any time anyone dares to point out problems in that religion.
Part of this is frustration over that kind of deflection. It gives the crazies fuel. It gives talk radio fuel. IT JUST MAKES THINGS EVEN WORSE.
It blows my mind that something this obvious doesn't occur to you.
You seemed to have missed the OPs point, or at least perverted it. Instead of actually having a dialogue with the OP, perhaps asking to define what hate speech was you went ahead and told him to stop attacking others who are critical of hate speech because of course....both sides. Fucking idiot, it's not both sides calling for the death, murder or denouncing an entire race or religion as being inherently less than others. Because you can't get your own bothsiderism argument out of your head
And, of all days you do this today? .
RW USMB NUTBAG: Nuke Mecca! I agree with the shooter! We must exterminate all Muslims.
LW USMB NORMAL: That is hate speech. I condemn your calling for violence. You should not call for the death of
all Muslims for the horrendous acts of a few. That is basically Islamophobia.
Mac1958: This REGRESSIVE LEFTY is attacking someone who is simply pointing out flaws in Islam!! This is how
REGRESSIVES cause more violence!
Lone Laughter:
Christian's deserve it and caused all the chaos in the world... Praise Allah...
If you are going to troll at least be funny!
You would have nothing if not for dishonesty.
Conservaitves are proud of what happened today. Stop trying to talk to them and instead work to defeat them.Mass Shooting At 2 New Zealand Mosques Leaves At Least 49 People Dead | HuffPost
It's allover this board and it's all over this country and people are getting KILLED because of it.
This has to stop.
How long before another white Nationalist kills a bunch of immigrants or Muslims or whatever the target is this month?
We've already had them target a Jewish Synagogue and a black church.
STOP people. Stop the hate speech.
NOW
Well, I don't think that's really the correct criticism of Bruce's post (or Mac's entire angle). NOTHING in the op excused calls from radical islam to attack "new York, boston and Orlando."Personally Lesh along with you cause more hate with your finger pointing to one side while excusing the otherTo me, Lesh started a thread that has a pretty clear message. Your post on tactics to deflect and minimize problems, used by both sides, is accurate, but not on point. So I asked you to say where you stand on the issue and all I get back is more criticism of partisan games but not an answer to the question.Here we go again. You just "liked" a post of mine that clearly pointed out what BOTH ends do, and then you try that.But do you? Do you hear what Lesh said or is it just another opportunity to do your fence sitting, Mac?This is what happens after every attack on Muslims. Deflect. Minimize. Change the subject.
And then when Muslims attack, the Left deflects by comparing jihadists to Christians ("The Crusades!"), offering only the most pedestrian of criticisms of Islam.
Deflect. Minimize. Change the subject. Opposite sides of the same coin.
And neither end "sees" it.
.
I don't need to belong to a tribe. If you do, that's not my problem.
.
If you don't want to answer it, fine.
Actually Old Lady Mac is not sitting on the fence but what it is you want Mac to either agree or disagree with you.
Here is the simple fact Lesh message came out when a radical attacked a Mosque while staying silent when radicals blew up New York, Boston and shot up Orlando.
If you want it to be fair and honest both sides should think long and hard why they hate each other and why those like Mac sit on the fence.
Personally Lesh along with you cause more hate with your finger pointing to one side while excusing the other while pretending you are pointing your finger at all sides.
So do you agree both sides are wrong or will you do a but when you answer?
How else do we condemn the hate which is generalized to an entire group of people based on their religion? Should we ignore it so that no one on the right gets upset? What do we do, Bruce? You tell me.
Says the one that preaches hate towards Christians-
Most black Christians are “left”.
But, they aren’t real Christians. Ask a nutbag.
..
Another straw man. I didn't say I "have a problem with someone wanting to curb the hate speech".
You don't even realize how well you're illustrating my point, do you?
.
This was your reply:
Hate speech is fueling this from BOTH ends.
Stop screaming ISLAMOPHOBE, stop ATTACKING any time anyone dares to point out problems in that religion.
Part of this is frustration over that kind of deflection. It gives the crazies fuel. It gives talk radio fuel. IT JUST MAKES THINGS EVEN WORSE.
It blows my mind that something this obvious doesn't occur to you.
You seemed to have missed the OPs point, or at least perverted it. Instead of actually having a dialogue with the OP, perhaps asking to define what hate speech was you went ahead and told him to stop attacking others who are critical of hate speech because of course....both sides. Fucking idiot, it's not both sides calling for the death, murder or denouncing an entire race or religion as being inherently less than others. Because you can't get your own bothsiderism argument out of your head
And, of all days you do this today? .
RW USMB NUTBAG: Nuke Mecca! I agree with the shooter! We must exterminate all Muslims.
LW USMB NORMAL: That is hate speech. I condemn your calling for violence. You should not call for the death of
all Muslims for the horrendous acts of a few. That is basically Islamophobia.
Mac1958: This REGRESSIVE LEFTY is attacking someone who is simply pointing out flaws in Islam!! This is how
REGRESSIVES cause more violence!
Lone Laughter:
Christian's deserve it and caused all the chaos in the world... Praise Allah...
If you are going to troll at least be funny!
You would have nothing if not for dishonesty.
After this tragedy the 1st thing the new Socialist Princess does is attack people of faith and prayer....and she gets blasted by people across the spectrum of all faiths - to include Muslims - and you lie your ass off and try to claim Conservatives are the ones engaging in 'hate speech'.Conservaitves are proud of what happened today. Stop trying to talk to them and instead work to defeat them.
Do you have to group everyone on the right doing it?Personally Lesh along with you cause more hate with your finger pointing to one side while excusing the otherTo me, Lesh started a thread that has a pretty clear message. Your post on tactics to deflect and minimize problems, used by both sides, is accurate, but not on point. So I asked you to say where you stand on the issue and all I get back is more criticism of partisan games but not an answer to the question.Here we go again. You just "liked" a post of mine that clearly pointed out what BOTH ends do, and then you try that.But do you? Do you hear what Lesh said or is it just another opportunity to do your fence sitting, Mac?
I don't need to belong to a tribe. If you do, that's not my problem.
.
If you don't want to answer it, fine.
Actually Old Lady Mac is not sitting on the fence but what it is you want Mac to either agree or disagree with you.
Here is the simple fact Lesh message came out when a radical attacked a Mosque while staying silent when radicals blew up New York, Boston and shot up Orlando.
If you want it to be fair and honest both sides should think long and hard why they hate each other and why those like Mac sit on the fence.
Personally Lesh along with you cause more hate with your finger pointing to one side while excusing the other while pretending you are pointing your finger at all sides.
So do you agree both sides are wrong or will you do a but when you answer?
How else do we condemn the hate which is generalized to an entire group of people based on their religion? Should we ignore it so that no one on the right gets upset? What do we do, Bruce? You tell me.
Do you have to group everyone on the right doing it?
That is what you and Lesh do while complaining the right is bad for acting like you.
Let face the reality not all of Islam is radical... The Kurds are pretty decent people along with Persians but the fact is Saudi and their kissing cousins are usually radical.
Now should I be told I am spreading hate?
I have more respect for people being honest when commenting about Muslims and Christians but Lesh is not being honest at all.
As I wrote Lesh is now wanting people to be calm because a Mosque was attacked in Kiwi land but where was he when Muslims were attacking us?
Where was his thread Muslims should not spread so much hate?
They are not minorities in the religious world...
Mass Shooting At 2 New Zealand Mosques Leaves At Least 49 People Dead | HuffPost
It's allover this board and it's all over this country and people are getting KILLED because of it.
This has to stop.
How long before another white Nationalist kills a bunch of immigrants or Muslims or whatever the target is this month?
We've already had them target a Jewish Synagogue and a black church.
STOP people. Stop the hate speech.
NOW
Happily! From post 5:Fuck you. This is looong over due. May many more be yet to come. Drive these sand devil pieces of shit back to the desert where they belong.Mass Shooting At 2 New Zealand Mosques Leaves At Least 49 People Dead | HuffPost
It's allover this board and it's all over this country and people are getting KILLED because of it.
This has to stop.
How long before another white Nationalist kills a bunch of immigrants or Muslims or whatever the target is this month?
We've already had them target a Jewish Synagogue and a black church.
STOP people. Stop the hate speech.
NOW
Hey Mac1958, comment?
"It gives the crazies fuel. It gives talk radio fuel."
See? Both of you keep illustrating my point.
.
..
Another straw man. I didn't say I "have a problem with someone wanting to curb the hate speech".RIght, buddy. I don't care about your list. Let's talk about your beef with the OP. Why do you have a problem with someone wanting to curb the hate speech? Like you know, calling for murder.
You don't even realize how well you're illustrating my point, do you?
.
This was your reply:
Hate speech is fueling this from BOTH ends.
Stop screaming ISLAMOPHOBE, stop ATTACKING any time anyone dares to point out problems in that religion.
Part of this is frustration over that kind of deflection. It gives the crazies fuel. It gives talk radio fuel. IT JUST MAKES THINGS EVEN WORSE.
It blows my mind that something this obvious doesn't occur to you.
You seemed to have missed the OPs point, or at least perverted it. Instead of actually having a dialogue with the OP, perhaps asking to define what hate speech was you went ahead and told him to stop attacking others who are critical of hate speech because of course....both sides. Fucking idiot, it's not both sides calling for the death, murder or denouncing an entire race or religion as being inherently less than others. Because you can't get your own bothsiderism argument out of your head
And, of all days you do this today? .
RW USMB NUTBAG: Nuke Mecca! I agree with the shooter! We must exterminate all Muslims.
LW USMB NORMAL: That is hate speech. I condemn your calling for violence. You should not call for the death of
all Muslims for the horrendous acts of a few. That is basically Islamophobia.
Mac1958: This REGRESSIVE LEFTY is attacking someone who is simply pointing out flaws in Islam!! This is how
REGRESSIVES cause more violence!
Lone Laughter:
Christian's deserve it and caused all the chaos in the world... Praise Allah...
If you are going to troll at least be funny!
You would have nothing if not for dishonesty.
It is long but this morning I read the New Zealand shooter's manifesto. I pretty much agree with him.
Weak minded White Guilt pussy Liberals are allowing third world shitheads to over run western culture and we are being destroyed because of it.
Fuck diversity.
Well, I don't think that's really the correct criticism of Bruce's post (or Mac's entire angle). NOTHING in the op excused calls from radical islam to attack "new York, boston and Orlando." However, there are no calls from Muslims inside the US (or NZ that I know of) to attack anywhere in the US or NZ.
This thread could go on forever, and the only ones who would even suggest such a thing would be dumbass snowflakes attempting to vilify Conservatives with this kind of BS accusation.How much longer in this thread until I find a post by someone who outright claims he wishes he could shoot muslims in cold blood? Page 3? Page 4?
But do you? Do you hear what Lesh said or is it just another opportunity to do your fence sitting, Mac?This is what happens after every attack on Muslims. Deflect. Minimize. Change the subject.Sure looks like they are...and NONE of you are condemning this horror.You really are retarded kid. Nobody "applauds" any of this.
And then when Muslims attack, the Left deflects by comparing jihadists to Christians ("The Crusades!"), offering only the most pedestrian of criticisms of Islam.
Deflect. Minimize. Change the subject. Opposite sides of the same coin.
And neither end "sees" it.
.
Do you have to group everyone on the right doing it?Personally Lesh along with you cause more hate with your finger pointing to one side while excusing the otherTo me, Lesh started a thread that has a pretty clear message. Your post on tactics to deflect and minimize problems, used by both sides, is accurate, but not on point. So I asked you to say where you stand on the issue and all I get back is more criticism of partisan games but not an answer to the question.Here we go again. You just "liked" a post of mine that clearly pointed out what BOTH ends do, and then you try that.
I don't need to belong to a tribe. If you do, that's not my problem.
.
If you don't want to answer it, fine.
Actually Old Lady Mac is not sitting on the fence but what it is you want Mac to either agree or disagree with you.
Here is the simple fact Lesh message came out when a radical attacked a Mosque while staying silent when radicals blew up New York, Boston and shot up Orlando.
If you want it to be fair and honest both sides should think long and hard why they hate each other and why those like Mac sit on the fence.
Personally Lesh along with you cause more hate with your finger pointing to one side while excusing the other while pretending you are pointing your finger at all sides.
So do you agree both sides are wrong or will you do a but when you answer?
How else do we condemn the hate which is generalized to an entire group of people based on their religion? Should we ignore it so that no one on the right gets upset? What do we do, Bruce? You tell me.
Do you have to group everyone on the right doing it?
That is what you and Lesh do while complaining the right is bad for acting like you.
Let face the reality not all of Islam is radical... The Kurds are pretty decent people along with Persians but the fact is Saudi and their kissing cousins are usually radical.
Now should I be told I am spreading hate?
I have more respect for people being honest when commenting about Muslims and Christians but Lesh is not being honest at all.
As I wrote Lesh is now wanting people to be calm because a Mosque was attacked in Kiwi land but where was he when Muslims were attacking us?
Where was his thread Muslims should not spread so much hate?
They are not minorities in the religious world...
Where did I do that? Or did you just hear that, put on a shoe that maybe doesn't fit?
Lesh is now wanting people to be calm because a Mosque was attacked in Kiwi land but where was he when Muslims were attacking us?
I don't know what you expect from me when there is a terrorist attack like San Bernadino, or Pulse? I was glad the terrorists were dead and I'm sure I said so somewhere or other. I didn't immediately slam every other Muslim in the world because of them. Is that what I have to do to make you happy?
This thread could go on forever, and the only ones who would even suggest such a thing would be dumbass snowflakes attempting to vilify Conservatives with this kind of BS accusation.How much longer in this thread until I find a post by someone who outright claims he wishes he could shoot muslims in cold blood? Page 3? Page 4?
And there ya go again.Happily! From post 5:Fuck you. This is looong over due. May many more be yet to come. Drive these sand devil pieces of shit back to the desert where they belong.Mass Shooting At 2 New Zealand Mosques Leaves At Least 49 People Dead | HuffPost
It's allover this board and it's all over this country and people are getting KILLED because of it.
This has to stop.
How long before another white Nationalist kills a bunch of immigrants or Muslims or whatever the target is this month?
We've already had them target a Jewish Synagogue and a black church.
STOP people. Stop the hate speech.
NOW
Hey Mac1958, comment?
"It gives the crazies fuel. It gives talk radio fuel."
See? Both of you keep illustrating my point.
.
It appears to give you fuel.
But that's an interesting response. The wingnut says this is long over due, I ask you your opinion and your response is "it gives the crazies fuel on both sides" (paraphrasing).
How intellectually dishonest do you have to be to still call both sides the same? You literally treated both 'equally' there. Nice job, way to disprove your own reason for being on this board.
I would rather see things improve than have wingers making them even worse by pointing the finger and refusing hold their tribe accountable.
I'm fine with being in the minority here on that.
.
What is my tribe? I denounce extremism from Islamic nutbags, but stand in strong defense of peaceful Muslims. name my tribe.
Name one "peaceful" mostly Islamic country please.
Why? That has nothing to do with what I have said.
Do you know any Muslims personally?
Yes. Several. All in arranged marriages, all treat women as 2nd class citizens. Cool with me as I am man but if I were a woman they would not converse with me. And it has to do with everything. Every place where your "peaceful" Moslems are the majority is a major disaster area in terms of humanitarian values. How do you explain that?
You know several Muslims in America who are violent extremists?
