Liability
Locked Account.
No, the subpoena was for the santa barbara state superior court case 220298. The family law case is 209449. The subpoena was in 1998.
READ agent.
Misprision of felony is what it is whenever it is. Do you cuss like Dick Cheney?
And Agent CriscoFEARa, your subpoena for records of non-existent "crimes" from the mid to late 1800's still has exactly ZERO legal relevance to nay of your insane court claims today.
It has no bearing on your unwillingness to be a man and provide for your own children.
It has no bearing on your insane delusion that we bin hypmotized.
And it has no bearing on anything to do with the topic of this retarded thread of yours.
Try again, agent CriscoFEARa: tell us ALL about how insanity was a CRIME in California in the mid to late 1800's
![eusa_liar :eusa_liar: :eusa_liar:](/styles/smilies/eusa_liar.gif)
![cuckoo :cuckoo: :cuckoo:](/styles/smilies/cuckoo.gif)
![eusa_liar :eusa_liar: :eusa_liar:](/styles/smilies/eusa_liar.gif)
![cuckoo :cuckoo: :cuckoo:](/styles/smilies/cuckoo.gif)
I'll give you a HINT. One free hint, asshole. The 1870's came long AFTER McNaughten. <-- That's the case that more or less crafted the insanity DEFENSE in Jolly Olde England.
Ok. I'll relent a bit. TWO hints for you free of charge (I'm in a sharing mood, you dipshit): You have NEVER provided ANY credible evidence that the core of the Twin Towers were constructed above ground level with concrete. When you show images of STEEL, you imbecile, it makes your claim that we are seeing "concrete" only that much more laughable.