MagicMike
Platinum Member
Because there was nothing that rose to indictment level.Clinton was never indicted by Republicans.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because there was nothing that rose to indictment level.Clinton was never indicted by Republicans.
Hide and watch then.Now that I see what the charges are, I don't see where Bragg has a case against Trump.
Hide and watch then.
You will learn something.
Damn you're stupid.Nothings been “exposed” you haven’t even attempted to expose. You just doing hot air and insults because you can’t hang in a straight debate. Go play outside while the adults talk. You’re wasting space
It's the same "crime" committed by many others who just had to pay a fine.
I did read it. I found the doorman's story funny. We should see it very soon on the SNL sketches very soon. The rest is meh.What are you talking about?
Try looking at the context. It's all laid out.
Thanks for the decent link.![]()
DNC, Clinton campaign agree to Steele dossier funding fine
Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee have agreed to pay $113,000 to settle a Federal Election Commission investigation.apnews.com
please. The Trump GOP has left so many behind, it's unregoniazble. The Cancel Culture of the Cult-of-personality surrounding Trump/MAGA is what the enemies of the USA celebrate.
Maybe no troops, owait, 13 troops, due to Biden's ego.Oh please. Biden left no troops behind.
and Trump tarted the thing that ended up the shit show in Afghanistan. Trump's deals with the Taliban.
US general says Afghanistan collapse rooted in Trump-Taliban deal
Head of US Central Command says collapse of the Afghan government can be traced to US troop withdrawal deal.
![]()
US general says Afghanistan collapse rooted in Trump-Taliban deal
Top general says collapse of the Afghan government can be traced to US troop withdrawal deal.www.aljazeera.com
Thanks for the decent link.
Here is the biggest takeaway from it.
"The Clinton campaign and DNC had argued that the payments had been described accurately, but agreed, according to the documents, to settle without conceding to avoid further legal costs.
The Clinton campaign agreed to a civil penalty of $8,000 and the DNC $105,000, according to a pair of conciliatory agreements that were attached to the letter sent to the Coolidge Reagan Foundation."
Notice the word "civil"....as opposed to "felony?"
That is where your weak attempt at whataboutism falls appart here.
Trump's crimes rise to the level of felony because there are multiple layers of crimes committed to conceal otger crimes.
Similair to tge obstruction of justice felony he is soon going to be charged with in his mishandling of classified documents case.
When that comes out you MAGAt Trumptards will no doubt be nattering about "b-b-but what about Joe Biden's classified docs in the garage by his Corvette?"
Not the same thing though.
Biden hasn't obstructed justice in the matter.
Trump has.
Maybe no troops, owait, 13 troops, due to Biden's ego.
Maybe not left behind, but died there just the same so Biden could has a photo-op moment.
"![]()
Here's what we know about the 13 U.S. service members killed in Kabul airport attack
The suicide bombing also left 18 U.S. service members and scores of Afghans wounded.www.cbsnews.com
"The government of Canada recognizes that there are a number of people in Afghanistan, including Canadian citizens, permanent residents, their families, and applicants under programs for Afghans," said the notice sent to all on the government's list, a copy of which was obtained by CBC News."
"
What's he being charged with?How do you know it’s bs?!
????"Since he is not prosecuting many cases......"
OK, so?It's the same "crime" committed by many others who just had to pay a fine.
he's charged with a felony is because he falsified business records in order to “cover up crimes.” What crimes did he cover up?
Okay, Lavrentiy.????
How many cases is his office prosecuting?
How does that compare to prior years?
Is there a scale, or a comparative you wish to offer the forum?
It would help the forum put your assertion into a context.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
OK, so?
But if a crime has been committed and there is compelling evidence that the prosecutors feel is sufficient enough to convince a jury.....well, shouldn't he be prosecuted for this 'crime'? No man is above the law, right?
And if he is found guilty.....then fine him or jail him as per the precedents an the law.
IMHO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Patience, Grasshopper.
I don't believe the prosecutor need lay out his entire case at this early stage. The office's indictments laid down the marker, they informed the defendant, they give notice of some of what they feel can be proved to a jury or a judge. Let the cake bake.
Which didn’t meet the standards required to continue. Meaning: no substance. As in ; nothing to substantiate. IOW ,bullshit.due to procedural conflicts.