To all you calling BS on the Trump indictment…

Maybe no troops, owait, 13 troops, due to Biden's ego. :(

Maybe not left behind, but died there just the same so Biden could has a photo-op moment. :eusa_hand:


"
"The government of Canada recognizes that there are a number of people in Afghanistan, including Canadian citizens, permanent residents, their families, and applicants under programs for Afghans," said the notice sent to all on the government's list, a copy of which was obtained by CBC News."

"


The Trump family has a tradition of leaving things people and nations behind
 
Not true in any way. They are individual counts.
Individual transactions with individual concerns. The only unifying idea is that they were all done as part of an election strategy which is the easiest thing to prove.
If they have no underlying crime you got nuttin’, Simp.
Yep. No crimes here folks. Nothing to see.
Everyone just throwing their careers on the Trump pire for all of history to observe.
:rolleyes:
 
Not true in any way. They are individual counts.
Individual transactions with individual concerns. The only unifying idea is that they were all done as part of an election strategy which is the easiest thing to prove.
They all surround the same thing. The DA is also using the same justification to turn the misdemeanor charges to felonies. If Trumps lawyers can kick that leg out from under Bragg's seat, the entire case falls on its ass right along with him.

And no proving it was done as part of an election strategy is not the easiest thing to prove. It will likely be the hardest thing to establish. Proving what is was in someone's mind is never easy. Harder when that person does things by the seat of their pants like Trump does.
 
They all surround the same thing. The DA is also using the same justification to turn the misdemeanor charges to felonies. If Trumps lawyers can kick that leg out from under Bragg's seat, the entire case falls on its ass right along with him.

And no proving it was done as part of an election strategy is not the easiest thing to prove. It will likely be the hardest thing to establish. Proving what is was in someone's mind is never easy. Harder when that person does things by the seat of their pants like Trump does.
It doesn’t as each count has its own evidence.
The best Trump can hope for is having the charges reduced.
 
It doesn’t as each count has its own evidence.
The best Trump can hope for is having the charges reduced.
Um isn’t the premise of the case that he did all these things as part of his campaign so using his personal money was a violation of the Fed Election laws and the false business recoding was an attempt to cover it up? prove it wasn’t a violation of the Fed election code or dont prove that Trump did these things as part of his campaign and youre left with a bunch of misdemeanors whose statute of limitations have run out.
 
IDK. I know Cohen was convicted in federal court and went to federal prison for his participation in the same event.
For acting at the request of and for the direct benefit of “ individual1”. AKA, DJT.

What are you talking about?
if you believe it was the same event, you better find out why he went to prison; it means no case at all. :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
 
How do you know it’s bs?!

The dumbass DA doesn't cite any laws being violated!

Secondly Trump was not in control of his empire during the Presidency as he had signed off all operation controls the day before he was sworn in as President:

The Trump Indictment Is Even More Silly Than Anyone Imagined….

April 4, 2023 | Sundance |

Excerpt:

The indictment of Donald J. Trump IS HERE and the “statement of facts” IS HERE. The situation, as it is represented within the text, is even more laughable than we could have imagined. It is no wonder why the FEC, DOJ and Mueller Teams took a pass on the allegations. The entire legal construct collapses on its face.

LINK

bolding mine

:oops8:

The Judge should dismiss this empty Indictment as NO statute violations are listed in it.

Really are you leftists being that easily snookered by an empty Indictment?
 
Last edited:
They all surround the same thing. The DA is also using the same justification to turn the misdemeanor charges to felonies. If Trumps lawyers can kick that leg out from under Bragg's seat, the entire case falls on its ass right along with him.

And no proving it was done as part of an election strategy is not the easiest thing to prove. It will likely be the hardest thing to establish. Proving what is was in someone's mind is never easy. Harder when that person does things by the seat of their pants like Trump does.

The Indictment is dead on arrival since no statute violations are cited thus no crime to prosecute.
 
The dumbass DA doesn't cite any laws being violated!

Secondly Trump was not in control of his empire during the Presidency as he had signed off all operation controls the day before he was sworn in as President
Wow… this is the most uninformed post I’ve read today.

You obviously didn’t read the charges as each one cites the law that was violated. Each statute is named.

Secondly, these charges apply to actions taken during his campaign. Before he was president.

The fact you didn’t know these things show how utterly ignorant you are. Study up before you engage
 
Wow… this is the most uninformed post I’ve read today.

You obviously didn’t read the charges as each one cites the law that was violated. Each statute is named.

Secondly, these charges apply to actions taken during his campaign. Before he was president.

The fact you didn’t know these things show how utterly ignorant you are. Study up before you engage
After looking at the indictment, I think it's just another no-win situation.

We (America) need to go after lawbreakers, especially those who think they're above the law. At the same time, though, this is a weak first indictment to bring. If there were already two or three others floating around, it would have been fine.

In this particular fucking ugly context, cases have to be very big and very clear. Like seditious conspiracy (the Insurrection) or blatant election tampering (the Georgia phone calls). Then the rest can come later. This one is too easy to call political or personal.

Bragg may end up looking like he was reaching. I say "may", since my crystal ball is in for repairs. As usual.
 
The dumbass DA doesn't cite any laws being violated!

Secondly Trump was not in control of his empire during the Presidency as he had signed off all operation controls the day before he was sworn in as President:

The Trump Indictment Is Even More Silly Than Anyone Imagined….

April 4, 2023 | Sundance |

Excerpt:

The indictment of Donald J. Trump IS HERE and the “statement of facts” IS HERE. The situation, as it is represented within the text, is even more laughable than we could have imagined. It is no wonder why the FEC, DOJ and Mueller Teams took a pass on the allegations. The entire legal construct collapses on its face.

LINK

bolding mine

:oops8:

The Judge should dismiss this empty Indictment as NO statute violations are listed in it.

Really are you leftists being that easily snookered by an empty Indictment?
Bizarre post
 
Yep. No crimes here folks. Nothing to see.
Everyone just throwing their careers on the Trump pire for all of history to observe.
:rolleyes:
I'm not a big fan of this indictment, but:

Their argument HAS to be "there's nothing there, no crimes, at all, period", because they don't want to have to answer the question, "is he above the law?"
 

Forum List

Back
Top