Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
IDK. I know Cohen was convicted in federal court and went to federal prison for his participation in the same event.are we still talking about the hush money, my god, do we have a letter saying it is not hush money?
They don’t do nuance. Only headlines.What are you talking about?
Try looking at the context. It's all laid out.
34 felony counts.Well so much for it being much of anything other than what everyone was figuring. 34 counts of falsifying business records....
So weak.Not seeing much celebration from the demented LEFT over their "victory" today.
It's funny how they cite "optics" like denying protection for the Capitol on J/6.....
But, what happened today shatters the "optics" of a functioning Judicial System; the "optics" of such they are oblivious to.
This INJUSTICE is HISTORIC.
I'll quote Peter Gabriel.
"This time, you've gone too far.
This Time, you've gone too far.
This time you've gone too far."
Alvin Bragg's "novel legal theory" should get him disbarred, and charged with election interference.
What a Clown Show!
List the underlying crime, Simp.34 felony counts.
What are the odds that he escapes them all?
This is only indictment one.
If they have no underlying crime you got nuttin’, Simp.So weak.
Everyone understands the weight of 34 felony counts.
Why don’t you?
They are all the same alleged crime, basically. Signing multiple checks marked "retainer" and similar.34 felony counts.
What are the odds that he escapes them all?
Excellent! Now I can have an objective talk with all who withheld their judgments. All those who have been calling it BS prior to seeing it can’t be taken seriouslyIt's 34 counts of falsifying business records. The indictment is online now.
Those capable of reason are already convinced.Prove it
Nope.Of course it was. Again, roughly half the cases were tossed due to lack of evidence or lack of merit.
Whatever. I kind of doubt how “objective“ the discussion will be.Excellent! Now I can have an objective talk with all who withheld their judgments. All those who have been calling it BS prior to seeing it can’t be taken seriously
Nope.Which didn’t meet the standards required to continue. Meaning: no substance. As in ; nothing to substantiate. IOW ,bullshit.
The problem being they surround the same thing. If you knock one down they likely all fall.34 felony counts.
What are the odds that he escapes them all?
This is only indictment one.
Damn you're stupid.
The only thing that matters is leftards are stupid.
Stupid people voting for stupid people.
Don't like it? Don't be it.
Like a 34x felonDon't like it? Don't be it.
He’s a very accomplished doorman.I did read it. I found the doorman's story funny. We should see it very soon on the SNL sketches very soon. The rest is meh.
????
How many cases is his office prosecuting?
How does that compare to prior years?
Is there a scale, or a comparative you wish to offer the forum?
It would help the forum put your assertion into a context.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
OK, so?
But if a crime has been committed and there is compelling evidence that the prosecutors feel is sufficient enough to convince a jury.....well, shouldn't he be prosecuted for this 'crime'? No man is above the law, right?
And if he is found guilty.....then fine him or jail him as per the precedents an the law.
IMHO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Patience, Grasshopper.
I don't believe the prosecutor need lay out his entire case at this early stage. The office's indictments laid down the marker, they informed the defendant, they give notice of some of what they feel can be proved to a jury or a judge. Let the cake bake.
Indeed.Let the cake bake.
really?I did read it. I found the doorman's story funny. We should see it very soon on the SNL sketches very soon. The rest is meh.
tyThanks for the decent link.
Here is the biggest takeaway from it.
"The Clinton campaign and DNC had argued that the payments had been described accurately, but agreed, according to the documents, to settle without conceding to avoid further legal costs.
The Clinton campaign agreed to a civil penalty of $8,000 and the DNC $105,000, according to a pair of conciliatory agreements that were attached to the letter sent to the Coolidge Reagan Foundation."
Notice the word "civil"....as opposed to "felony?"
That is where your weak attempt at whataboutism falls appart here.
Trump's crimes rise to the level of felony because there are multiple layers of crimes committed to conceal otger crimes.
Similair to tge obstruction of justice felony he is soon going to be charged with in his mishandling of classified documents case.
When that comes out you MAGAt Trumptards will no doubt be nattering about "b-b-but what about Joe Biden's classified docs in the garage by his Corvette?"
Not the same thing though.
Biden hasn't obstructed justice in the matter.
Trump has.
Not true in any way. They are individual counts.The problem being they surround the same thing. If you knock one down they likely all fall.
And if you don’t get a conviction it only strengthens his position.
