Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Evidence to the contrary notwithstanding.It’s not a matter of being over or under myself. It’s just a matter of fact. Anybody wants to engage in an objective conversation with me I am more than willing and able.
Hillary wasn’t prosecuted precisely because of what you said, a determination on the degree of the crime. Mainly, was there criminal intent or not. People with top-secret clearance break these rules all the time. Sometimes they get a slap on the wrist sometimes they get a criminal prosecution. It’s determined on a case by case basis. Trumps DOJ determined that it was not severe enough to warrant a prosecution. That’s just facts.You said whether it was criminal was up to the DOJ. That's not accurate. Whether to prosecute is up to the DOJ. What she did was criminal.
That's why there are degrees of crimes. What Hilary did was a much graver offense than driving a little over the speed limit. She operated an unsecure email server where she conducted Dept of State business on. Sec State is a serious office. It not like the Sec of interior, or the Sec of transportation. She did so to avoid FOIA requests, because she knew she was going to run for President. All the other reasons they gave were bull shit. You know that and so does everyone else. It wasnt about them not having the device she was used to, whatever device she wanted they would have gotten and set it up however she liked. She was the fucking Sec of State for crying out loud. And because she did that, unknown amounts of classified information were exposed. And it wasnt exposed like Trump and Biden exposed classified. There's a huge difference in documents being in someone's garage or their home and them being on an unsecure server that's connected to the internet. A server that was associated with the Sec of State's email address. Any adversary who wanted to access that server would have been able to at least know where it was on the network.
And they didnt prosecute her precisely because of who she was. Had you or I pulled some shit like she did we'd still be in jail.
That's an objective take on the Hillary BS.
Thank you for the questions. I’ll give them a direct answer. I’m not objecting because I haven’t seen the evidence behind the accusations. Also, it will all get bore out in court, if the evidence this week, the case will get tossed or truffle you found not guilty. That’s our court system works. And I still have faith in it. I don’t think the prosecution is purely political. There has to be substance behind what’s going on. Do you think Trump is completely innocent of everything he’s accused of ?Evidence to the contrary notwithstanding.
I have a good question for you and your liberal ilk.
Why aren’t you objecting to the fantasy based indictment which Bragg extracted from that GJ? You do realize that this prosecution is purely political, don’t you.?
Ok. Two good questions.
Underlying what?What is the underlying crime, Simp?
She wasnt prosecuted because her name was Hillary Clinton. Had you done the exact same thing she did you'd have found yourself in jail. Right wrong or indifferent that's just real.Hillary wasn’t prosecuted precisely because of what you said, a determination on the degree of the crime. Mainly, was there criminal intent or not. People with top-secret clearance break these rules all the time. Sometimes they get a slap on the wrist sometimes they get a criminal prosecution. It’s determined on a case by case basis. Trumps DOJ determined that it was not severe enough to warrant a prosecution. That’s just facts.
That’s some stuff to unpack.Thank you for the questions. I’ll give them a direct answer. I’m not objecting because I haven’t seen the evidence behind the accusations. Also, it will all get bore out in court, if the evidence this week, the case will get tossed or truffle you found not guilty. That’s our court system works. And I still have faith in it. I don’t think the prosecution is purely political. There has to be substance behind what’s going on. Do you think Trump is completely innocent of everything he’s accused of ?
The Trump cult have their panties in a wad over their dear leaders indictment.
Cults
View attachment 771343
GoodTherapy
https://www.goodtherapy.org › ... › PsychPedia
Members who wish to break free of a cult often have difficulty doing so ... Cults tend to be led by a charismatic and compelling leader who demands loyalty.
Jake, don’t be obtuse. The indictment charges a felony 34 times for different dates and different book entries, etc). The felony has to be premised on a false filing on a business record PLUS it has to have been done with the intent to hide an underlying crime.Underlying what?
The crux of this entire thing is the payoff to the porn star that the DA is claiming was an illegal attempt to sway the election illegally. There is absolutely nothing that indicates this was anything but a commonplace NDA with a settlement that happens literally every day in the USA.Thank you for the questions. I’ll give them a direct answer. I’m not objecting because I haven’t seen the evidence behind the accusations. Also, it will all get bore out in court, if the evidence this week, the case will get tossed or truffle you found not guilty. That’s our court system works. And I still have faith in it. I don’t think the prosecution is purely political. There has to be substance behind what’s going on. Do you think Trump is completely innocent of everything he’s accused of ?
Didnt Ivanka Trump and Jared get caught with classified material been sent over the personal email accounts?She wasnt prosecuted because her name was Hillary Clinton. Had you done the exact same thing she did you'd have found yourself in jail. Right wrong or indifferent that's just real.
Well, like with all Americans, I believe our judicial system is innocent until proven guilty. So if they do some thing that is inappropriate, they can be held to account. Until then, I assume it is operating as it should.That’s some stuff to unpack.
I believe you are commenting more on how the judicial system is supposed to work than about how it does work. Our legal system is great when it works properly. It kinda sucks otherwise.
I don’t buy a singles thing in Bragg’s fantasy indictment.
Did they?Didnt Ivanka Trump and Jared get caught with classified material been sent over the personal email accounts?
Wrong, it's not up to the DOJ. You think the law is whatever the AG or the FBI director says it is?Sure, but whether it was criminal or not is up the the DOJ and Trumps team didn’t decide to go after it.
How am I not being objective?
no, All Americans don't believe thatWell, like with all Americans, I believe our judicial system is innocent until proven guilty.
Bad assumption.So if they do some thing that is inappropriate, they can be held to account. Until then, I assume it is operating as it should.
No.Did they?
Didnt Ivanka Trump and Jared get caught with classified material been sent over the personal email accounts?
www.bbc.com
The law specifically states that criminal intent isn't required to prosecute. You only proved that you are a corrupt douchebag,Hillary wasn’t prosecuted precisely because of what you said, a determination on the degree of the crime. Mainly, was there criminal intent or not. People with top-secret clearance break these rules all the time. Sometimes they get a slap on the wrist sometimes they get a criminal prosecution. It’s determined on a case by case basis. Trumps DOJ determined that it was not severe enough to warrant a prosecution. That’s just facts.
Didnt Ivanka Trump and Jared get caught with classified material been sent over the personal email accounts?
You’re allowed to believe whatever you wish. But I’ve seen differently.Well, like with all Americans, I believe our judicial system is innocent until proven guilty. So if they do some thing that is inappropriate, they can be held to account. Until then, I assume it is operating as it should.
It’s cute that you think you know better than the NY DA.Jake, don’t be obtuse. The indictment charges a felony 34 times for different dates and different book entries, etc). The felony has to be premised on a false filing on a business record PLUS it has to have been done with the intent to hide an underlying crime.
Without that “plus,” it’s just a misdemeanor. And the statute of limitations for a misdemeanor has already run out.
