Tomorrow Trump will be tested....

[Redfish]

The evidence is that Russia may have tried to influence the election. Not that they had any success.

Yes........the above is ALSO the "defense" of anyone who attempts murder but fails to kill someone........."But, but, judge, I am innocent because I failed to kill...." LOL

wasn't that the Hillary/comey defense? "she didn't intend to violate the law" "she was too stupid to realize she was breaking the law"

 

[Eaglewings]

that Russian hackers interfered in our election
Do you mean russians or the russian state?

You judge.....

Russia hired 1,000 people to create anti-Clinton 'fake news' in key US ...

Russian internet trolls were being hired to pose as pro-Trump ...

These guys will never admit they were wrong about not excepting Russia hacked into our systems., because Trump won't..
Except Trump still manages to blame Obama for not doing anything,yet he did..What a manipulating freak.

As i have told you a thousand times, I just want EVIDENCE.
What is REALLY sad is how some people accept nothing more than words from people that lie to us EVERY DAY. THAT says alot...

US Government Report PDF

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

Recent US Elections ICA 2017-01D 6 January 2017 Key Judgments Russian efforts to influence the 2016 US presidential election represent the most recent expression of Moscow’s longstanding desire to undermine the US-led liberal democratic order, but these activities demonstrated a significant escalation in directness, level of activity, and scope of effort compared to previous operations. We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these judgments.  We also assess Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him. All three agencies agree with this judgment. CIA and FBI have high confidence in this judgment; NSA has moderate confidence.  Moscow’s approach evolved over the course of the campaign based on Russia’s understanding of the electoral prospects of the two main candidates. When it appeared to Moscow that Secretary Clinton was likely to win the election, the Russian influence campaign began to focus more on undermining her future presidency.  Further information has come to light since Election Day that, when combined with Russian behavior since early November 2016, increases our confidence in our assessments of Russian motivations and goals. Moscow’s influence campaign followed a Russian messaging strategy that blends covert intelligence operations—such as cyber activity—with overt efforts by Russian Government agencies, state-funded media, third-party intermediaries, and paid social media users or “trolls.” Russia, like its Soviet predecessor, has a history of conducting covert influence campaigns focused on US presidential elections that have used intelligence officers and agents and press placements to disparage candidates perceived as hostile to the Kremlin.  Russia’s intelligence services conducted cyber operations against targets associated with the 2016 US presidential election, including targets associated with both major US political parties.  We assess with high confidence that Russian military intelligence (General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate or GRU) used the Guccifer 2.0 persona and DCLeaks.com to release US victim data

That isnt evidence. That is WORDS

Words from the FBI and CIA...oh my gosh it is a government report..but whatever Harley I give up

 

[TNHarley]

No evidence the russian state did this, but there was enough rhetoric to ignore how shitty the DNC is.
None on the left consider the CIA leaks a few months ago..
Nope, its the RUSSIAN STATE because professional liars SAID SO
Idiots

 

[peach174]

And the US used tens of thousands of employees to try to throw the Israelis election. So what's your point?

Well, my point?........Just a simple "thank you" for you agreeing that Russia DID interfere with our election......Your allegation that we did the same in israel does nothing to refute Russian interference....

No, they tried to but did not succeed. Big difference in the word did and tried.
Our virus and malware worked.
But we definitely need better cyber programs of protection.
We don't want voting online like some in this nation want. That is the ultimate height of stupidity.

 

[Weatherman2020]

that Russian hackers interfered in our election
Do you mean russians or the russian state?

You judge.....

Russia hired 1,000 people to create anti-Clinton 'fake news' in key US ...

Russian internet trolls were being hired to pose as pro-Trump ...

These guys will never admit they were wrong about not excepting Russia hacked into our systems., because Trump won't..
Except Trump still manages to blame Obama for not doing anything,yet he did..What a manipulating freak.

As i have told you a thousand times, I just want EVIDENCE.
What is REALLY sad is how some people accept nothing more than words from people that lie to us EVERY DAY. THAT says alot...

US Government Report PDF

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

Recent US Elections ICA 2017-01D 6 January 2017 Key Judgments Russian efforts to influence the 2016 US presidential election represent the most recent expression of Moscow’s longstanding desire to undermine the US-led liberal democratic order, but these activities demonstrated a significant escalation in directness, level of activity, and scope of effort compared to previous operations. We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these judgments.  We also assess Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him. All three agencies agree with this judgment. CIA and FBI have high confidence in this judgment; NSA has moderate confidence.  Moscow’s approach evolved over the course of the campaign based on Russia’s understanding of the electoral prospects of the two main candidates. When it appeared to Moscow that Secretary Clinton was likely to win the election, the Russian influence campaign began to focus more on undermining her future presidency.  Further information has come to light since Election Day that, when combined with Russian behavior since early November 2016, increases our confidence in our assessments of Russian motivations and goals. Moscow’s influence campaign followed a Russian messaging strategy that blends covert intelligence operations—such as cyber activity—with overt efforts by Russian Government agencies, state-funded media, third-party intermediaries, and paid social media users or “trolls.” Russia, like its Soviet predecessor, has a history of conducting covert influence campaigns focused on US presidential elections that have used intelligence officers and agents and press placements to disparage candidates perceived as hostile to the Kremlin.  Russia’s intelligence services conducted cyber operations against targets associated with the 2016 US presidential election, including targets associated with both major US political parties.  We assess with high confidence that Russian military intelligence (General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate or GRU) used the Guccifer 2.0 persona and DCLeaks.com to release US victim data

Russia, like its Soviet predecessor, has a history of conducting covert influence campaigns focused on US presidential elections

So the same thing happens every election. Thanks

 

[Fenton Lum]

He just said yesterday no one knows for sure. It could have been several states.

Flip-flopping much....????

Trump Admits Russia Interfered In The Presidential Election And ...

Trump appears to admit Russia interfered in the US election

i guess, idk. Maybe he was just listening to those 17 intel agencies?

yes, yes.......our intelligence agencies "lied"..........our allies' intelligence agencies ALSO lied........The only real truth comes out of Putin's denials.......LOL

How did iraq work out, dumbfuck?

We annexed another failed state didn't we, god bless the petro dollar.

 

[TNHarley]

You judge.....

Russia hired 1,000 people to create anti-Clinton 'fake news' in key US ...

Russian internet trolls were being hired to pose as pro-Trump ...

These guys will never admit they were wrong about not excepting Russia hacked into our systems., because Trump won't..
Except Trump still manages to blame Obama for not doing anything,yet he did..What a manipulating freak.

As i have told you a thousand times, I just want EVIDENCE.
What is REALLY sad is how some people accept nothing more than words from people that lie to us EVERY DAY. THAT says alot...

US Government Report PDF

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

Recent US Elections ICA 2017-01D 6 January 2017 Key Judgments Russian efforts to influence the 2016 US presidential election represent the most recent expression of Moscow’s longstanding desire to undermine the US-led liberal democratic order, but these activities demonstrated a significant escalation in directness, level of activity, and scope of effort compared to previous operations. We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these judgments.  We also assess Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him. All three agencies agree with this judgment. CIA and FBI have high confidence in this judgment; NSA has moderate confidence.  Moscow’s approach evolved over the course of the campaign based on Russia’s understanding of the electoral prospects of the two main candidates. When it appeared to Moscow that Secretary Clinton was likely to win the election, the Russian influence campaign began to focus more on undermining her future presidency.  Further information has come to light since Election Day that, when combined with Russian behavior since early November 2016, increases our confidence in our assessments of Russian motivations and goals. Moscow’s influence campaign followed a Russian messaging strategy that blends covert intelligence operations—such as cyber activity—with overt efforts by Russian Government agencies, state-funded media, third-party intermediaries, and paid social media users or “trolls.” Russia, like its Soviet predecessor, has a history of conducting covert influence campaigns focused on US presidential elections that have used intelligence officers and agents and press placements to disparage candidates perceived as hostile to the Kremlin.  Russia’s intelligence services conducted cyber operations against targets associated with the 2016 US presidential election, including targets associated with both major US political parties.  We assess with high confidence that Russian military intelligence (General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate or GRU) used the Guccifer 2.0 persona and DCLeaks.com to release US victim data

That isnt evidence. That is WORDS

Words from the FBI and CIA...oh my gosh it is a government report..but whatever Harley I give up

Would you like me to post govt reports of WMDs in Iraq?

 

[nat4900]

How did iraq work out, dumbfuck?

Fantastic.....just ask Cheney and Rumsfeld and their side-kick GWB.....

Iraqis are still busy picking up those flowers and candy cast on our "liberating" troops....as promised by Dick-face.

 

[Avatar4321]

As i have told you a thousand times, I just want EVIDENCE.
What is REALLY sad is how some people accept nothing more than words from people that lie to us EVERY DAY. THAT says alot.

Go back to sleep........the evidence is coming......Patience......LOL

So which is it? Is the evidence coming or is it undebateable because its been clearly proven?

 

[Weatherman2020]

No evidence the russian state did this, but there was enough rhetoric to ignore how shitty the DNC is.
None on the left consider the CIA leaks a few months ago..
Nope, its the RUSSIAN STATE because professional liars SAID SO
Idiots

They are just pissed the American people learned the truth about Hillary.

 

[MisterBeale]

that Russian hackers interfered in our election
Do you mean russians or the russian state?

You judge.....

Russia hired 1,000 people to create anti-Clinton 'fake news' in key US ...

Russian internet trolls were being hired to pose as pro-Trump ...

These guys will never admit they were wrong about not excepting Russia hacked into our systems., because Trump won't..
Except Trump still manages to blame Obama for not doing anything,yet he did..What a manipulating freak.

As i have told you a thousand times, I just want EVIDENCE.
What is REALLY sad is how some people accept nothing more than words from people that lie to us EVERY DAY. THAT says alot...

US Government Report PDF

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

Recent US Elections ICA 2017-01D 6 January 2017 Key Judgments Russian efforts to influence the 2016 US presidential election represent the most recent expression of Moscow’s longstanding desire to undermine the US-led liberal democratic order, but these activities demonstrated a significant escalation in directness, level of activity, and scope of effort compared to previous operations. We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these judgments.  We also assess Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him. All three agencies agree with this judgment. CIA and FBI have high confidence in this judgment; NSA has moderate confidence.  Moscow’s approach evolved over the course of the campaign based on Russia’s understanding of the electoral prospects of the two main candidates. When it appeared to Moscow that Secretary Clinton was likely to win the election, the Russian influence campaign began to focus more on undermining her future presidency.  Further information has come to light since Election Day that, when combined with Russian behavior since early November 2016, increases our confidence in our assessments of Russian motivations and goals. Moscow’s influence campaign followed a Russian messaging strategy that blends covert intelligence operations—such as cyber activity—with overt efforts by Russian Government agencies, state-funded media, third-party intermediaries, and paid social media users or “trolls.” Russia, like its Soviet predecessor, has a history of conducting covert influence campaigns focused on US presidential elections that have used intelligence officers and agents and press placements to disparage candidates perceived as hostile to the Kremlin.  Russia’s intelligence services conducted cyber operations against targets associated with the 2016 US presidential election, including targets associated with both major US political parties.  We assess with high confidence that Russian military intelligence (General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate or GRU) used the Guccifer 2.0 persona and DCLeaks.com to release US victim data

And?

What do you want to do, shut down the first amendment? I don't see anything in there that links that to the current administration.

 

[MisterBeale]

No evidence the russian state did this, but there was enough rhetoric to ignore how shitty the DNC is.
None on the left consider the CIA leaks a few months ago..
Nope, its the RUSSIAN STATE because professional liars SAID SO
Idiots

BINGO. These are the same folks that wanted to see Hillary in charge.

 

[nat4900]

First, there is absolutely no proof that the Russians did anything to change one vote in our election. If you think that exposing the corruption of Hillary, the DNC, and the media (done by wikilieaks, not Russia) affected the election, then that is good for America.

Secondly, there is no reason why we cannot have mutually beneficial relations with Russia, why do you libs want war with Russia?

Well, Mr.Tuna.......NO ONE is stating that one vote was actually altered by the Russian.........only you morons hide behind that stupid scenario......

What folks with more than your half brain are stating that the Russian PROPAGANDA did impact on the elections.......

How else would one explain why stupid people in some states voted AGAINST their own best interests and opted for an orange clown because they hated Clinton so much???

 

[nat4900]

maybe because they report the truth.

true...........Russian media is RENOWNED for telling the truth............
(what an asshole..........LOL)

 

[nat4900]

That isnt evidence. That is WORDS

true.......Is Whitewater and Benghazi also nouns (words)????

 

[MisterBeale]

First, there is absolutely no proof that the Russians did anything to change one vote in our election. If you think that exposing the corruption of Hillary, the DNC, and the media (done by wikilieaks, not Russia) affected the election, then that is good for America.

Secondly, there is no reason why we cannot have mutually beneficial relations with Russia, why do you libs want war with Russia?

Well, Mr.Tuna.......NO ONE is stating that one vote was actually altered by the Russian.........only you morons hide behind that stupid scenario......

What folks with more than your half brain are stating that the Russian PROPAGANDA did impact on the elections.......

How else would one explain why stupid people in some states voted AGAINST their own best interests and opted for an orange clown because they hated Clinton so much???

. . . and CFR propaganda had an impact on elections as well.

The questions were given to Donna Brazil by CNN to give to Hillary Clinton, how on earth can you condone such blatant corruption?

 

[Redfish]

First, there is absolutely no proof that the Russians did anything to change one vote in our election. If you think that exposing the corruption of Hillary, the DNC, and the media (done by wikilieaks, not Russia) affected the election, then that is good for America.

Secondly, there is no reason why we cannot have mutually beneficial relations with Russia, why do you libs want war with Russia?

Well, Mr.Tuna.......NO ONE is stating that one vote was actually altered by the Russian.........only you morons hide behind that stupid scenario......

What folks with more than your half brain are stating that the Russian PROPAGANDA did impact on the elections.......

How else would one explain why stupid people in some states voted AGAINST their own best interests and opted for an orange clown because they hated Clinton so much???

reporting the proven corruption and collusion of the Hillary campaign, the DNC, and the media is not propaganda, it is truth.

the people voted for a return to constitutional government and a US government that puts this country first.

But answer this: why would the Russians want a strong American president over one that they had evidence to blackmail?

 

[Redfish]

That isnt evidence. That is WORDS

true.......Is Whitewater and Benghazi also nouns (words)????

no those were crimes that were never prosecuted.

 

[TNHarley]

How did iraq work out, dumbfuck?

Fantastic.....just ask Cheney and Rumsfeld and their side-kick GWB.....

Iraqis are still busy picking up those flowers and candy cast on our "liberating" troops....as promised by Dick-face.

Yea, hack it up. When facts are thrown in the face of a political hack, that is all they have.
Dumbass

 

[MisterBeale]

I'm beginning to think that Nat is here just to troll and increase forum views, nobody can be in this much in denial and this incredibly dumb.