Transgender skins a precious kitten, then puts it in blender and then murders a Stranger

What is your problem with discussing sickos who do this?

What is your problem with acknowledging “trans” in general as the sickos that they very obviously are?

Fucked-up minds, fucked-up souls, lead to fucked-up behavior, and that is what we are seeing here.

And you never stray from taking the side of fucked-up freaks, against the side of human beings, or even of cats.

You're almost as fucked-up yourself, as the worst of them.
 
Here is what is telling.

Normal people would read an article on this and be horrified at the abject cruelty of what was done to the poor kitten….not to mention they also murdered someone.


Normal people read articles with titles like this:

Cat killer Scarlet Blake jailed for Netflix show-inspired murder​


Abnormal people see TRANSGENDER

Cat killer Scarlet Blake jailed for Netflix show-inspired murder

I agree that straight people are also capable of acts of violence

The liberal Drive America Insane Project affects everyone
 
psychopathic murders is not just done by trans genders
The Butcher of Plainfield, Gein collected women’s bodies through grave-robbing and murder from around 1945 to 1957, when he was finally caught. He used the women’s remains to decorate his isolated Wisconsin farm and to make various items of clothing. Gein passed away in 1984 in a mental institution.

The list goes on and they are not known transgender

It's funny that the very first example you use to try to argue against the obvious facts of how fucked-up one has to be to be a tranny, is someone whose particular form of mental fucked-uppedness, almost certainly would have manifested as mainstream trannyism if he were alive and free today.

Ed Gein was probably the greatest prototype of a tranny psychopath; so much so that he was the model for several such fictional characters in movies. He's actually only known to have committed two murders; being mostly satisfied with robbing the graves of dead women to get the parts that he wanted.
 
They seem to have the same mental issues as non-trans people so what is your point?

No, they do not.

By definition, one who is not confused about the difference between male and female, and what sex he is, is not confused about the difference between male and female, and what sex he is.

You're trying to argue, in a circle, that someone who doe snot have a particular form of severe mental illness has the same mental issues as someone who does. That's absurd and self-contradictory on its face; an extraordinarily stupid argument even with regard to the very low bar that you normally set.
 
It's funny that the very first example you use to try to argue against the obvious facts of how fucked-up one has to be to be a tranny, is someone whose particular form of mental fucked-uppedness, almost certainly would have manifested as mainstream trannyism if he were alive and free today.

Ed Gein was probably the greatest prototype of a tranny psychopath; so much so that he was the model for several such fictional characters in movies. He's actually only known to have committed two murders; being mostly satisfied with robbing the graves of dead women to get the parts that he wanted.
Two problems with that: Gein wasn’t transgender, that was Hollywood, and cross-dressers are not the same as transgender people.

Conveniently for Hollywood, Gein has supplied a vindication for the origins of Norman Bates, as well as all subsequent portrayals of transgender killers. The association between Bates’ cross-dressing and psychosis can consequently be defended by a reminder that there was in fact a real life, cross-dressing, serial killer. Yet, this assertion glosses over the surface of transphobia, which did and still does, influence media and cultural representations. News media saw the potential in the Gein story, embellishing details and adding the transvestite myth. Sullivan has pointed out that there is in fact no conclusive evidence to suggest that Gein was ever anything more than a heterosexual, psychotic, schizophrenic man, fixated with his Mother, driven to kill and steal female body parts not because he wanted to be a woman, but because he wanted to find a substitute for his Mother.[10]With this considered, the spectator of the film must ask themselves why the cross-dressing aspect of Bates’ character is the most vital aspect of the plot? If not influenced by reality then surely the transgender component of the murderous character is based on a ubiquitous public fear of gender-transgression? Joelle Ryan states that “the linkage is not based on empirical fact or even a faithful translation of Gein’s life and tragic misdeeds, but on bias, prejudice and cultural indoctrination.”[11] The temperament of the 1950s conformist era would certainly corroborate this claim. Freudian concepts of the nuclear family reinforced boundaries of gender normalcy, rendering all deviants of this traditional model as ‘other.’
 
Lots of heterosexual cisgendered serial killers have done similar things so if you can't blame that on transgenderism what do you blame it on?
 
No, they do not.

By definition, one who is not confused about the difference between male and female, and what sex he is, is not confused about the difference between male and female, and what sex he is.

Which has what to do with violent behavior?

You're trying to argue, in a circle, that someone who doe snot have a particular form of severe mental illness has the same mental issues as someone who does.

No. There are biological differences in the brains of transgender people that could account for differences. Whether it is a mental illness in itself is currently debatable. The other thing is “mental illness” is not one disease but many different diseases. A transgender person can have depression, anxiety, schitzophrenia, psychopathy….and so can a non-transgender person. It has nothing to do with whether or not they are transgender.

That's absurd and self-contradictory on its face; an extraordinarily stupid argument even with regard to the very low bar that you normally set.
:rolleyes:
 
What is your problem with acknowledging “trans” in general as the sickos that they very obviously are?

Fucked-up minds, fucked-up souls, lead to fucked-up behavior, and that is what we are seeing here.

And you never stray from taking the side of fucked-up freaks, against the side of human beings, or even of cats.

You're almost as fucked-up yourself, as the worst of them.
:rolleyes:
 
Two problems with that: Gein wasn’t transgender, that was Hollywood, and cross-dressers are not the same as transgender people.

It is absolutely clear that he had some form of mental illness that was very similar to transgenderism. What differences existed between him and a modern tranny are more likely the result of a different environment pushing that mental illness in different directions; than it being a different mental illness.
 
Lots of heterosexual cisgendered serial killers have done similar things so if you can't blame that on transgenderism what do you blame it on?

There are many different ways for a nominally-human mind to be fucked up, leading to fucked-up behavior. “Transgenderism” is one of them. I don't think that anyone claims that it is the only one.
 
No, but it remains no less true that fucked-up minds lead to fucked-up behavior. Not always violent, but never good.

And you have to be pretty badly fucked in the head to be “trans”, or even to think that there is anything normal or healthy about it.
You know I grew up on the streets among the marginalized population and trans people were always around but no one ever thought anything about them except that they were kind of weird. I certainly never saw a propensity for violence that was pervasive as some people seem to think. In fact in my experience trans people were far more likely to be the victims of violence than the perpetrators.
 

Forum List

Back
Top