Trouble For Ted Cruz: Here's Why He Doesn't Meet The Natural Born Citizen Requirement

[Steve_McGarrett]

Because, Steve, your analysis of the law is wrong: period.

How so? Explain in precise detail.........or can you?

 

[Statistikhengst]

If Schewitzer runs and takes on Hillary's history then the contest will quickly become:

Schewitzer Meets Foster!

The lady's got "people" to take care of picayune details like those.

So, are you accusing Hillary Clinton of having murdered Vince Foster?

Stop acting like a coward; speak up like a real man and tell us what you really mean.

I'm she has a good alibi for that sad night.

More like what got Thomas Becket. He of ""Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest? fame. Royalty, as you should know, need only to vaguely express a desire and their worshipful followers spin into action.

By they way, how did you like the landscaping in Rock Creek Park? Or was it too dark to properly enjoy?

You still did not answer the question. Are you accusing Hillary Rodham Clinton of having murdered Vince Foster?

A simple yes/no will do.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

Here is why Ted doesn't meet the qualifications of Article 2 Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution to be eligible for President. Cruz did not inherit citizenship from his mother, he is a U.S. citizen because at birth he fulfilled the requirements established by Congress.

Prior to May 24, 1934 the uniform Rule of Naturalization did not allow a person to acquire U.S. citizenship at birth if they were born outside the U.S. to a citizen mother and a non citizen father; during that time, persons born outside of the U.S. could only acquire citizenship at birth if their father was a citizen of the U.S. but not to a father who had never resided in the United States.

Ted Cruz was born in Canada after the 1934 date to a U.S. citizen mother and a non U.S. citizen father, he acquired citizenship at birth under the uniform Rule of Naturalization that was in effect at the time of his birth.

Ted Cruz cannot be a “natural born Citizen” if a person born prior to May 24, 1934 with the same birth circumstances was not even a “citizen of the United States”.

The Constitution gives Congress the Power to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, it does not give Congress the Power over who is a "natural born Citizen. A "natural born Citizen" today is the same as who a "natural born Citizen" was when the term was inserted into the Constitution, it can only be changed by Constitutional Amendment.

Ted Cruz is not a "natural born Citizen"; if he were, then persons born prior to the 1934 date would also of been. Because, Congress does not have Power over who is a "natural born Citizen" they only have the Power to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization and the Rule they established prior to the 1934 date only allowed persons born abroad to a U.S. citizen father to acquire citizenship at birth as long as their father had been a resident of the U.S.

Therefore Ted Cruz is not a "natural born Citizen".

A citizen AT BIRTH, as the law since at least 1934 defines it, is a natural born citizen, you racist dolt.

Since Cruz was born AFTER 1934, to an American mom, he was a citizen AT BIRTH.

He did not have to get "naturalized" since citizens at birth are already -- well -- you know -- "citizens."

Since he did not have to get "naturalized," he was a natural born citizen.

Why you are having trouble with this incredibly easy notion is difficult to fathom. But you are a known racist, so that might hold a clue, since there is no such thing as an intelligent racist.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Here is why Ted doesn't meet the qualifications of Article 2 Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution to be eligible for President. Cruz did not inherit citizenship from his mother, he is a U.S. citizen because at birth he fulfilled the requirements established by Congress.

Prior to May 24, 1934 the uniform Rule of Naturalization did not allow a person to acquire U.S. citizenship at birth if they were born outside the U.S. to a citizen mother and a non citizen father; during that time, persons born outside of the U.S. could only acquire citizenship at birth if their father was a citizen of the U.S. but not to a father who had never resided in the United States.

Ted Cruz was born in Canada after the 1934 date to a U.S. citizen mother and a non U.S. citizen father, he acquired citizenship at birth under the uniform Rule of Naturalization that was in effect at the time of his birth.

Ted Cruz cannot be a “natural born Citizen” if a person born prior to May 24, 1934 with the same birth circumstances was not even a “citizen of the United States”.

The Constitution gives Congress the Power to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, it does not give Congress the Power over who is a "natural born Citizen. A "natural born Citizen" today is the same as who a "natural born Citizen" was when the term was inserted into the Constitution, it can only be changed by Constitutional Amendment.

Ted Cruz is not a "natural born Citizen"; if he were, then persons born prior to the 1934 date would also of been. Because, Congress does not have Power over who is a "natural born Citizen" they only have the Power to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization and the Rule they established prior to the 1934 date only allowed persons born abroad to a U.S. citizen father to acquire citizenship at birth as long as their father had been a resident of the U.S.

Therefore Ted Cruz is not a "natural born Citizen".

A citizen AT BIRTH, as the law since at least 1934 defines it, is a natural born citizen, you racist dolt.

Since Cruz was born AFTER 1934, to an American mom, he was a citizen AT BIRTH.

He did not have to get "naturalized" since citizens at birth are already -- well -- you know -- "citizens."

Since he did not have to get "naturalized," he was a natural born citizen.

Why you are having trouble with this incredibly easy notion is difficult to fathom. But you are a known racist, so that might hold a clue, since there is no such thing as an intelligent racist.

Spot-on.

 

[HenryBHough]

Libs, ashamed of their failure to vet their candidate, try to turn it against others.

Distraction.

They think they're good at it.

Almost as good as they are at restoring employment.

But not quite.

 

[jillian]

Libs, ashamed of their failure to vet their candidate, try to turn it against others.

Distraction.

They think they're good at it.

Almost as good as they are at restoring employment.

But not quite.

what are you blathering about?

 

[HenryBHough]

Please do not blame others for your limited reading comprehension skills.

It just makes you look (more) emotionally crippled.

 

[whitehall]

It's not "trouble for Senator Ted Cruz" unless he runs for president. Most people aren't aware that John McCain wasn't born in the USA when he ran for president. He was born in the Canal Zone (Panama Canal) when his father was in the Navy.

 

[Dot Com]

I bet ice hockey is (secretly) Rafaels favorite sport & he loves his pancakes w/ maple syrup. IOW's he's a foreigner.

 

[Unkotare]

You gotta love numbskulls on the internet who seem to have seriously convinced themselves that they 'uncovered' some meaningful interpretation of the Constitution that centuries of examination by real scholars has not. Too funny.

 

[bendog]

He's Canadian? I thought he was a Mexican?

 

[IlarMeilyr]

He's Canadian? I thought he was a Mexican?

Split down the middle.

He's American.

 

[HenryBHough]

So, are you accusing Hillary Clinton of having murdered Vince Foster?

Stop acting like a coward; speak up like a real man and tell us what you really mean.

I'm she has a good alibi for that sad night.

More like what got Thomas Becket. He of ""Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest? fame. Royalty, as you should know, need only to vaguely express a desire and their worshipful followers spin into action.

By they way, how did you like the landscaping in Rock Creek Park? Or was it too dark to properly enjoy?

You still did not answer the question. Are you accusing Hillary Rodham Clinton of having murdered Vince Foster?

A simple yes/no will do.

Asked and answered. Please do not waste our time lamenting your lack of reading comprehension skills here. Frankly, we don't give a damn.

 

[Statistikhengst]

I'm she has a good alibi for that sad night.

More like what got Thomas Becket. He of ""Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest? fame. Royalty, as you should know, need only to vaguely express a desire and their worshipful followers spin into action.

By they way, how did you like the landscaping in Rock Creek Park? Or was it too dark to properly enjoy?

You still did not answer the question. Are you accusing Hillary Rodham Clinton of having murdered Vince Foster?

A simple yes/no will do.

Asked and answered. Please do not waste our time lamenting your lack of reading comprehension skills here. Frankly, we don't give a damn.

No, you didn't. You answered as a coward would, afraid to say what is really on his mind.

 

[HenryBHough]

No, you didn't. You answered as a coward would, afraid to say what is really on his mind.

Project much?

 

[Unkotare]

No, you didn't. You answered as a coward would, afraid to say what is really on his mind.

But you know what's "really on his mind"? What are you, the Amazing fucking Kreskin?

 

[birddog]

Too bad nobody knows where the hell Obama was born.

Honolulu, Hawaii, August 1961.

Case closed.

Not true! No REAL proof !

 

[birddog]

Here is why Ted doesn't meet the qualifications of Article 2 Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution to be eligible for President. Cruz did not inherit citizenship from his mother, he is a U.S. citizen because at birth he fulfilled the requirements established by Congress.

Prior to May 24, 1934 the uniform Rule of Naturalization did not allow a person to acquire U.S. citizenship at birth if they were born outside the U.S. to a citizen mother and a non citizen father; during that time, persons born outside of the U.S. could only acquire citizenship at birth if their father was a citizen of the U.S. but not to a father who had never resided in the United States.

Ted Cruz was born in Canada after the 1934 date to a U.S. citizen mother and a non U.S. citizen father, he acquired citizenship at birth under the uniform Rule of Naturalization that was in effect at the time of his birth.

Ted Cruz cannot be a “natural born Citizen” if a person born prior to May 24, 1934 with the same birth circumstances was not even a “citizen of the United States”.

The Constitution gives Congress the Power to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, it does not give Congress the Power over who is a "natural born Citizen. A "natural born Citizen" today is the same as who a "natural born Citizen" was when the term was inserted into the Constitution, it can only be changed by Constitutional Amendment.

Ted Cruz is not a "natural born Citizen"; if he were, then persons born prior to the 1934 date would also of been. Because, Congress does not have Power over who is a "natural born Citizen" they only have the Power to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization and the Rule they established prior to the 1934 date only allowed persons born abroad to a U.S. citizen father to acquire citizenship at birth as long as their father had been a resident of the U.S.

Therefore Ted Cruz is not a "natural born Citizen".

A citizen AT BIRTH, as the law since at least 1934 defines it, is a natural born citizen, you racist dolt.

Since Cruz was born AFTER 1934, to an American mom, he was a citizen AT BIRTH.

He did not have to get "naturalized" since citizens at birth are already -- well -- you know -- "citizens."

Since he did not have to get "naturalized," he was a natural born citizen.

Why you are having trouble with this incredibly easy notion is difficult to fathom. But you are a known racist, so that might hold a clue, since there is no such thing as an intelligent racist.

I agree, plus Cruz's mother met the residency requirement at that time, although Obama's mother did not if he was born in Kenya.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Romney/Paul in 16. Print this out and stick it on your fridge door.
Romney/Paul win by twenty.
By the time 16 rolls around the country will be so financially fucked up by Bobo and his Socialist theology the voters will be pleading for a 'bank manager' instead of a social worker to put the country back on it's financial feet.
'Hill's' will have totally forgot Bobo's name AND his Socialist agenda.
Matter of fact there won't be enough room between Romney's and 'Hill's' politics to slide a rolling paper between.
The back room Progressives have already drafted 'Hill's' speeches to the S. Baptists sprinkled with ebonics promising them that even though she might sound 'pro-business' and pro-Maker' on TV talking to the 'Makers' she really secretly means to make sure "you-all still get your free shit".

Why ebonics?

You are aware that the vast, vast, vast majority of Southern Baptists are WHITE, right?

Rather than southern baptists, she was speaking in Ebonics to the United Methodists for which she was roundly criticized and ridiculed. There are you tube videos of it which will likely be scrubbed before long.

 

[hjmick]

Here is why Ted doesn't meet the qualifications of Article 2 Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution to be eligible for President. Cruz did not inherit citizenship from his mother, he is a U.S. citizen because at birth he fulfilled the requirements established by Congress.

Prior to May 24, 1934 the uniform Rule of Naturalization did not allow a person to acquire U.S. citizenship at birth if they were born outside the U.S. to a citizen mother and a non citizen father; during that time, persons born outside of the U.S. could only acquire citizenship at birth if their father was a citizen of the U.S. but not to a father who had never resided in the United States.

Ted Cruz was born in Canada after the 1934 date to a U.S. citizen mother and a non U.S. citizen father, he acquired citizenship at birth under the uniform Rule of Naturalization that was in effect at the time of his birth.

Ted Cruz cannot be a “natural born Citizen” if a person born prior to May 24, 1934 with the same birth circumstances was not even a “citizen of the United States”.

The Constitution gives Congress the Power to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, it does not give Congress the Power over who is a "natural born Citizen. A "natural born Citizen" today is the same as who a "natural born Citizen" was when the term was inserted into the Constitution, it can only be changed by Constitutional Amendment.

Ted Cruz is not a "natural born Citizen"; if he were, then persons born prior to the 1934 date would also of been. Because, Congress does not have Power over who is a "natural born Citizen" they only have the Power to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization and the Rule they established prior to the 1934 date only allowed persons born abroad to a U.S. citizen father to acquire citizenship at birth as long as their father had been a resident of the U.S.

Therefore Ted Cruz is not a "natural born Citizen".

Yeah, we get it. You don't like people who are not White. Fascinating...