Trump admin prosecutes woman for laughing


Still pushing your Fake News ay? They were prosecuted for breaking the law. They willingly disrupted the proceedings. They were warned, yet still continued to disrupt. And the disruption wasn't just about a few laughs. That's just Fake News distortion and spin. And they weren't prosecuted by the Trump Administration either. There's nothing unique about this prosecution. Y'all are just desperate to push your 'I hate Trump' B.S. Case Closed. Movin on...
Of course she was prosecuted for breaking the law... for being disruptive.... by laughing.

It's being reported all over the news as I demonstrated. You're insane to think that's fake news.

the 'opinion' that she was arrested and convicted only for laughing is fake news.

Dont' any of your links point that out?
Now you're lying. The news is reporting she was convicted on two charges, only one being related to her laughing out loud. This is not fake news.

Did you even read my post?

"the 'opinion' that she was arrested and convicted 'only' for laughing is fake news."

Your own post claims she was convicted on two charges.

Have another cup of coffee, wake up
 
Last edited:
They are not going to spend any time in "the Big House." They will receive a small fine and move on.

Maybe, maybe not? Gotta admit though, it would be hilarious seeing them marched off to the Big House. I'd laugh my ass off. Their behavior was very immature and disrespectful. And they got called out for it. They probably won't be laughing so much when those cell doors slam shut. But i will be. :lol:
 

Still pushing your Fake News ay? They were prosecuted for breaking the law. They willingly disrupted the proceedings. They were warned, yet still continued to disrupt. And the disruption wasn't just about a few laughs. That's just Fake News distortion and spin. And they weren't prosecuted by the Trump Administration either. There's nothing unique about this prosecution. Y'all are just desperate to push your 'I hate Trump' B.S. Case Closed. Movin on...
Of course she was prosecuted for breaking the law... for being disruptive.... by laughing.

It's being reported all over the news as I demonstrated. You're insane to think that's fake news.

the 'opinion' that she was arrested and convicted only for laughing is fake news.

Dont' any of your links point that out?
Now you're lying. The news is reporting she was convicted on two charges, only one being related to her laughing out loud. This is not fake news.

Did you even read my post?

"the 'opinion' that she was arrested and convicted 'only' for laughing is fake news."

Your own post claims she was convicted on two charges.

Have another cup of coffee, wake up
Opinions aren't news. Who's reporting she was arrested only for laughing?
 
Still pushing your Fake News ay? They were prosecuted for breaking the law. They willingly disrupted the proceedings. They were warned, yet still continued to disrupt. And the disruption wasn't just about a few laughs. That's just Fake News distortion and spin. And they weren't prosecuted by the Trump Administration either. There's nothing unique about this prosecution. Y'all are just desperate to push your 'I hate Trump' B.S. Case Closed. Movin on...
Of course she was prosecuted for breaking the law... for being disruptive.... by laughing.

It's being reported all over the news as I demonstrated. You're insane to think that's fake news.

the 'opinion' that she was arrested and convicted only for laughing is fake news.

Dont' any of your links point that out?
Now you're lying. The news is reporting she was convicted on two charges, only one being related to her laughing out loud. This is not fake news.

Did you even read my post?

"the 'opinion' that she was arrested and convicted 'only' for laughing is fake news."

Your own post claims she was convicted on two charges.

Have another cup of coffee, wake up
Opinions aren't news. Who's reporting she was arrested only for laughing?
The OP
 
Everyone knows the 'Rule' regarding WOMEN laughing when men are involved:

Women:
You can LAUGH.
You can POINT.
But you CAN'T laugh AND point.

upload_2017-5-4_10-3-54.jpeg
 
Of course she was prosecuted for breaking the law... for being disruptive.... by laughing.

It's being reported all over the news as I demonstrated. You're insane to think that's fake news.

the 'opinion' that she was arrested and convicted only for laughing is fake news.

Dont' any of your links point that out?
Now you're lying. The news is reporting she was convicted on two charges, only one being related to her laughing out loud. This is not fake news.

Did you even read my post?

"the 'opinion' that she was arrested and convicted 'only' for laughing is fake news."

Your own post claims she was convicted on two charges.

Have another cup of coffee, wake up
Opinions aren't news. Who's reporting she was arrested only for laughing?
The OP
The OP linked an article which included...

Fairooz was seated in the back of the room, and her laugh did not interrupt Shelby’s introductory speech. But, according to the government, the laugh amounted to willful “disorderly and disruptive conduct” intended to “impede, disrupt, and disturb the orderly conduct” of congressional proceedings. The government also charged her with a separate misdemeanor for allegedly parading, demonstrating or picketing within a Capitol, evidently for her actions after she was being escorted from the room.

What's fake about that?
 
the 'opinion' that she was arrested and convicted only for laughing is fake news.

Dont' any of your links point that out?
Now you're lying. The news is reporting she was convicted on two charges, only one being related to her laughing out loud. This is not fake news.

Did you even read my post?

"the 'opinion' that she was arrested and convicted 'only' for laughing is fake news."

Your own post claims she was convicted on two charges.

Have another cup of coffee, wake up
Opinions aren't news. Who's reporting she was arrested only for laughing?
The OP
The OP linked an article which included...

Fairooz was seated in the back of the room, and her laugh did not interrupt Shelby’s introductory speech. But, according to the government, the laugh amounted to willful “disorderly and disruptive conduct” intended to “impede, disrupt, and disturb the orderly conduct” of congressional proceedings. The government also charged her with a separate misdemeanor for allegedly parading, demonstrating or picketing within a Capitol, evidently for her actions after she was being escorted from the room.

What's fake about that?

The OP

"Trump admin prosecutes woman for laughing"

fake
 
They are not going to spend any time in "the Big House." They will receive a small fine and move on.

Maybe, maybe not? Gotta admit though, it would be hilarious seeing them marched off to the Big House. I'd laugh my ass off. Their behavior was very immature and disrespectful. And they got called out for it. They probably won't be laughing so much when those cell doors slam shut. But i will be. :lol:
There will be no jail time, anymore than the yellers got at our town hall meeting in July 2009. They were put under a police bond by the magistrate. Something similar will happen.
 
They are not going to spend any time in "the Big House." They will receive a small fine and move on.

Maybe, maybe not? Gotta admit though, it would be hilarious seeing them marched off to the Big House. I'd laugh my ass off. Their behavior was very immature and disrespectful. And they got called out for it. They probably won't be laughing so much when those cell doors slam shut. But i will be. :lol:
There will be no jail time, anymore than the yellers got at our town hall meeting in July 2009. They were put under a police bond by the magistrate. Something similar will happen.

Uh, no. A Town Hall meeting is not a Congressional Proceeding. They could get jail time. But will they? I would lean towards thinking they won't. But if they did, i would laugh my ass off.
 
They are not going to spend any time in "the Big House." They will receive a small fine and move on.

Maybe, maybe not? Gotta admit though, it would be hilarious seeing them marched off to the Big House. I'd laugh my ass off. Their behavior was very immature and disrespectful. And they got called out for it. They probably won't be laughing so much when those cell doors slam shut. But i will be. :lol:
There will be no jail time, anymore than the yellers got at our town hall meeting in July 2009. They were put under a police bond by the magistrate. Something similar will happen.

Uh, no. A Town Hall meeting is not a Congressional Proceeding. They could get jail time. But will they? I would lean towards thinking they won't. But if they did, i would laugh my ass off.
Uh, yes. Disruption of a public meeting, whether in a country court house or in Congress, is a violation of the law.
 
Now you're lying. The news is reporting she was convicted on two charges, only one being related to her laughing out loud. This is not fake news.

Did you even read my post?

"the 'opinion' that she was arrested and convicted 'only' for laughing is fake news."

Your own post claims she was convicted on two charges.

Have another cup of coffee, wake up
Opinions aren't news. Who's reporting she was arrested only for laughing?
The OP
The OP linked an article which included...

Fairooz was seated in the back of the room, and her laugh did not interrupt Shelby’s introductory speech. But, according to the government, the laugh amounted to willful “disorderly and disruptive conduct” intended to “impede, disrupt, and disturb the orderly conduct” of congressional proceedings. The government also charged her with a separate misdemeanor for allegedly parading, demonstrating or picketing within a Capitol, evidently for her actions after she was being escorted from the room.

What's fake about that?

The OP

"Trump admin prosecutes woman for laughing"

fake
You're unhinged. That's not all that's in the OP. Also included is a link to the article describing the events I quoted in my last post.

Obviously, it's not fake news or you could have pointed it out.
 
Did you even read my post?

"the 'opinion' that she was arrested and convicted 'only' for laughing is fake news."

Your own post claims she was convicted on two charges.

Have another cup of coffee, wake up
Opinions aren't news. Who's reporting she was arrested only for laughing?
The OP
The OP linked an article which included...

Fairooz was seated in the back of the room, and her laugh did not interrupt Shelby’s introductory speech. But, according to the government, the laugh amounted to willful “disorderly and disruptive conduct” intended to “impede, disrupt, and disturb the orderly conduct” of congressional proceedings. The government also charged her with a separate misdemeanor for allegedly parading, demonstrating or picketing within a Capitol, evidently for her actions after she was being escorted from the room.

What's fake about that?

The OP

"Trump admin prosecutes woman for laughing"

fake
You're unhinged. That's not all that's in the OP. Also included is a link to the article describing the events I quoted in my last post.

Obviously, it's not fake news or you could have pointed it out.

I'm not the one unhinged.

I cut and pasted the OP

Not it's link.

Find a corner and lay down
 
Opinions aren't news. Who's reporting she was arrested only for laughing?
The OP
The OP linked an article which included...

Fairooz was seated in the back of the room, and her laugh did not interrupt Shelby’s introductory speech. But, according to the government, the laugh amounted to willful “disorderly and disruptive conduct” intended to “impede, disrupt, and disturb the orderly conduct” of congressional proceedings. The government also charged her with a separate misdemeanor for allegedly parading, demonstrating or picketing within a Capitol, evidently for her actions after she was being escorted from the room.

What's fake about that?

The OP

"Trump admin prosecutes woman for laughing"

fake
You're unhinged. That's not all that's in the OP. Also included is a link to the article describing the events I quoted in my last post.

Obviously, it's not fake news or you could have pointed it out.

I'm not the one unhinged.

I cut and pasted the OP

Not it's link.

Find a corner and lay down
Yeah, you are unhinged. You can't even tell the difference between an OP and a thread title (which is actually what you cut and pasted).
 
Republican snowflakes have made it illegal to laugh at them in public. The same with Mussolini, Pol Pot, Saddam Hussein, Kim Jong Un, Idi Amin.

"The one indisputable reality of dictatorship is that dissent, insult, and malevolent language do not go unpunished if it is allowed at all." - Ferdinand Marcos -

"The essence of tyranny is not iron law. It is capricious law.” - Christopher Hitchens -
 
Yet you folks are fine with this:

"Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, the Coptic Christian whose short video “The Innocence of Muslims” was initially faulted for sparking the Sept. 11, 2012 terror attack at U.S. diplomatic compounds in Libya, is now living in a homeless shelter run by First Southern Baptist Church in Buena Park, Calif. He has served time in prison, been shamed publicly by the Obama White House and threatened with death."
 
Republican snowflakes have made it illegal to laugh at them in public. The same with Mussolini, Pol Pot, Saddam Hussein, Kim Jong Un, Idi Amin.

"The one indisputable reality of dictatorship is that dissent, insult, and malevolent language do not go unpunished if it is allowed at all." - Ferdinand Marcos -

"The essence of tyranny is not iron law. It is capricious law.” - Christopher Hitchens -

Republican snowflakes have made it illegal to laugh at them in public.

Wrong! You can laugh at them in public all you like.
There is no law against it.
 
Yet you folks are fine with this:

"Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, the Coptic Christian whose short video “The Innocence of Muslims” was initially faulted for sparking the Sept. 11, 2012 terror attack at U.S. diplomatic compounds in Libya, is now living in a homeless shelter run by First Southern Baptist Church in Buena Park, Calif. He has served time in prison, been shamed publicly by the Obama White House and threatened with death."
LOL

Umm, yeah ... let's equate making a video that spurred riots which led to multiple deaths in multiple countries -- with laughing out loud at the irony that Sessions' had an “extensive record of treating all Americans equally under the law.”

:eusa_doh:
 
They are not going to spend any time in "the Big House." They will receive a small fine and move on.

Maybe, maybe not? Gotta admit though, it would be hilarious seeing them marched off to the Big House. I'd laugh my ass off. Their behavior was very immature and disrespectful. And they got called out for it. They probably won't be laughing so much when those cell doors slam shut. But i will be. :lol:
There will be no jail time, anymore than the yellers got at our town hall meeting in July 2009. They were put under a police bond by the magistrate. Something similar will happen.

Uh, no. A Town Hall meeting is not a Congressional Proceeding. They could get jail time. But will they? I would lean towards thinking they won't. But if they did, i would laugh my ass off.
Uh, yes. Disruption of a public meeting, whether in a country court house or in Congress, is a violation of the law.

This does not seem to meet the standard for prosecution. This seems to be a abuse of authority. About what I would expect from thugs like Trump and Sessions.

Trump and his family do outsource their goods to China. There is no doubt about that.
 
They are not going to spend any time in "the Big House." They will receive a small fine and move on.

Maybe, maybe not? Gotta admit though, it would be hilarious seeing them marched off to the Big House. I'd laugh my ass off. Their behavior was very immature and disrespectful. And they got called out for it. They probably won't be laughing so much when those cell doors slam shut. But i will be. :lol:
There will be no jail time, anymore than the yellers got at our town hall meeting in July 2009. They were put under a police bond by the magistrate. Something similar will happen.

Uh, no. A Town Hall meeting is not a Congressional Proceeding. They could get jail time. But will they? I would lean towards thinking they won't. But if they did, i would laugh my ass off.
Uh, yes. Disruption of a public meeting, whether in a country court house or in Congress, is a violation of the law.

This does not seem to meet the standard for prosecution. This seems to be a abuse of authority. About what I would expect from thugs like Trump and Sessions.

Trump and his family do outsource their goods to China. There is no doubt about that.
Rules of discourse in government meetings need to be followed. By everyone.
 

Forum List

Back
Top