Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You have no evidence or proof of any of that. I don't give a shytte about town halls or your hateful brainwashing, or Sessions's. THE LAW.More importantly, since you know I believe in reasoned behavior at town halls and government meetings, is that you think it is all right for you types to yell but not those with whom you disagree. Right?And we had those who screamed at the congress critter arrested at the town hall in 2009. Thank you for agreeing. Public meetings should be conduct appropriately by officials and attendees.You might have a point if she were thrown out of the hearing because of her response to something Sessions said, that's not the case. Her response was to something a congressmen said IN THE HEARING. Now run along and keep trying to keep events straight in your little scrambled pea brain.
.
So you agree that this bitch, who went to the hearing, with the intention of disrupting it, should have been arrested for disorderly conduct?
A since you want to bring up town halls, what have you been saying about these organized protests by regressives with their little preprinted cards and loud mouths trying to shut people down?.
No fakey, unlike the left, I think anyone being disorderly should pay the price. If they do it with premeditation like the bitch in the OP and these organized leftist pukes, they should get the max.
.
So now you can get arrested for what you "plan" to do?She laughed and is being prosecuted. The rest is blind hate, hater dupe.And we had those who screamed at the congress critter arrested at the town hall in 2009. Thank you for agreeing. Public meetings should be conduct appropriately by officials and attendees.I made the connection above with the women confronting Sessions and you people confronting congress critters you did not like in 2009 during the town halls.
One of the difs between you and me is I make rock solid comparisons that hurt while you make fallacies of false equivalency that make every
![]()
You might have a point if she were thrown out of the hearing because of her response to something Sessions said, that's not the case. Her response was to something a congressmen said IN THE HEARING. Now run along and keep trying to keep events straight in your little scrambled pea brain.
.
So you agree that this bitch, who went to the hearing, with the intention of disrupting it, should have been arrested for disorderly conduct?
A since you want to bring up town halls, what have you been saying about these organized protests by regressives with their little preprinted cards and loud mouths trying to shut people down?
.
Go back and read her statement dupe, I know you have a learning deficit, but DAMN. She went there with the intent to "dissent" as she put it, now she gets to pay the price for her premeditated conduct. Deal with it.
.
So now you can get arrested for what you "plan" to do?She laughed and is being prosecuted. The rest is blind hate, hater dupe.And we had those who screamed at the congress critter arrested at the town hall in 2009. Thank you for agreeing. Public meetings should be conduct appropriately by officials and attendees.You might have a point if she were thrown out of the hearing because of her response to something Sessions said, that's not the case. Her response was to something a congressmen said IN THE HEARING. Now run along and keep trying to keep events straight in your little scrambled pea brain.
.
So you agree that this bitch, who went to the hearing, with the intention of disrupting it, should have been arrested for disorderly conduct?
A since you want to bring up town halls, what have you been saying about these organized protests by regressives with their little preprinted cards and loud mouths trying to shut people down?
.
Go back and read her statement dupe, I know you have a learning deficit, but DAMN. She went there with the intent to "dissent" as she put it, now she gets to pay the price for her premeditated conduct. Deal with it.
.
So the OP is true...So now you can get arrested for what you "plan" to do?She laughed and is being prosecuted. The rest is blind hate, hater dupe.And we had those who screamed at the congress critter arrested at the town hall in 2009. Thank you for agreeing. Public meetings should be conduct appropriately by officials and attendees.
So you agree that this bitch, who went to the hearing, with the intention of disrupting it, should have been arrested for disorderly conduct?
A since you want to bring up town halls, what have you been saying about these organized protests by regressives with their little preprinted cards and loud mouths trying to shut people down?
.
Go back and read her statement dupe, I know you have a learning deficit, but DAMN. She went there with the intent to "dissent" as she put it, now she gets to pay the price for her premeditated conduct. Deal with it.
.
No retard, you get arrested when you do it, premeditation can enhance the punishment.
.
If she was blocking traffic for BLM, Trump can get her on 2 charges.The Trump admin is going all out with its attempts to shut down free speech. They're literally prosecuting a woman for laughing.
A Woman Is On Trial For Laughing During A Congressional Hearing | HuffPost
---
Samuel Bogash, a lawyer representing Fairooz, showed a video of the audience laughing at another part of the hearing, when Sessions joked about disagreements with his wife. But [assistant U.S. attorney Jason] Covert argued that it was appropriate for the audience to laugh when Sessions made a joke about his marriage but not when Shelby claimed Sessions had a long record of “treating all Americans equally.”
---
In Stalinist Amerikka, Trump-police decide whether it's appropriate for you to laugh. Laugh at the wrong time, and they haul you away. Soon, failing to laugh at approved party jokes will get you hauled away. After that, failing to applaud loudly enough and for long enough will be an OffenseAgainstTheParty.
Needless to say, almost none of the Trump-snowflakes who pretend to care about free speech will have any problems with big government prosecuting people for laughing. Most of them will be giddy with delight over it, as almost all conservatives want free speech for liberals ended.
And this type of government-endorsed free speech suppression is unique to the Republicans. You didn't see Obama prosecuting the guy who screamed "You lie!" during his speech, though Obama could have invoked the same law to do so.
Wrong, AGAIN, dupe. Arrest all the violent a-holes you want.Irony of Irony the people who have no problem with violence or threats of violence being used to keep conservatives from speaking or marching in a parade have now found there morale outrage. Forgive me if I find your sudden concern about protecting free speech less than sincere.
Amazing how Fox and Rush can make 100 anarchists in Berkeley and Seattle into the whole Dem party, RWNJs.Wrong, AGAIN, dupe. Arrest all the violent a-holes you want.Irony of Irony the people who have no problem with violence or threats of violence being used to keep conservatives from speaking or marching in a parade have now found there morale outrage. Forgive me if I find your sudden concern about protecting free speech less than sincere.
So the OP is true...So now you can get arrested for what you "plan" to do?She laughed and is being prosecuted. The rest is blind hate, hater dupe.So you agree that this bitch, who went to the hearing, with the intention of disrupting it, should have been arrested for disorderly conduct?
A since you want to bring up town halls, what have you been saying about these organized protests by regressives with their little preprinted cards and loud mouths trying to shut people down?
.
Go back and read her statement dupe, I know you have a learning deficit, but DAMN. She went there with the intent to "dissent" as she put it, now she gets to pay the price for her premeditated conduct. Deal with it.
.
No retard, you get arrested when you do it, premeditation can enhance the punishment.
.
I am glad you agree that the organized righties in 2009 town halls were punished.More importantly, since you know I believe in reasoned behavior at town halls and government meetings, is that you think it is all right for you types to yell but not those with whom you disagree. Right?And we had those who screamed at the congress critter arrested at the town hall in 2009. Thank you for agreeing. Public meetings should be conduct appropriately by officials and attendees.I made the connection above with the women confronting Sessions and you people confronting congress critters you did not like in 2009 during the town halls.
One of the difs between you and me is I make rock solid comparisons that hurt while you make fallacies of false equivalency that make every
![]()
You might have a point if she were thrown out of the hearing because of her response to something Sessions said, that's not the case. Her response was to something a congressmen said IN THE HEARING. Now run along and keep trying to keep events straight in your little scrambled pea brain.
.
So you agree that this bitch, who went to the hearing, with the intention of disrupting it, should have been arrested for disorderly conduct?
A since you want to bring up town halls, what have you been saying about these organized protests by regressives with their little preprinted cards and loud mouths trying to shut people down?.
No fakey, unlike the left, I think anyone being disorderly should pay the price. If they do it with premeditation like the bitch in the OP and these organized leftist pukes, they should get the max..
Then give me the chair cause I want to piss on trump and GWB,,,,,,,preferably their graves
escort her out Prosecute?? what about the pos republican that called Obama a liar as he was speaking to congress?? was he prosecuted?From the article:
...“the laugh amounted to willful ‘disorderly and disruptive conduct’ intended to ‘impede, disrupt, and disturb the orderly conduct’ of congressional proceedings.” In court, they have tried to emphasize that the laugh was extraordinarily disruptive, with a US Capitol Police officer claiming that Fairooz laughed “very loudly” and people in the hearings turned around when they heard it.
Assuming that's so, the woman's not being prosecuted for laughing at Jeff Sessions. She's being prosecuted for disrupting Congressional proceedings. There are many ways to do that; an inordinately obtrusive laugh is just one of them. Her disrespect for the seriousness of the proceedings -- I don't care what one thinks about the comment that inspired her to laugh, the fact of the matter is that the speaker was not telling a joke, and she should have known as much and respectfully not laughed -- she was attending is emblematic of the cultural insouciance many people these days have toward the serious individuals, institutions, discussions, activities, etc. Callous casualness has pervaded all of our society.