Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Meanwhile, McConnell is despicable in trying to close it down. The turtle is a coward and afraid of the truth. ttps://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/sen-chuck-schumer-calls-mcconnell-speech-despicable-59148357833This won't turn out well for Trump.Trump declares executive privilege over Mueller report
Trump declares executive privilege over Mueller report
05/08/19 ~ By Morgan Chalfant and Jordan Fabian
The White House on Wednesday asserted executive privilege over special counsel Robert Mueller’s full report on Russia’s interference in the 2016 election, ramping up its clash with Congress over its investigations into President Trump.... The move came just before the House Judiciary Committee was scheduled to vote to hold Attorney General William Barr in contempt of Congress for failing to turn over Mueller’s unredacted report and underlying materials, which the panel had subpoenaed.
Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd wrote in a letter to the committee's chairman, Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), that the administration was following through on its threat to assert privilege if the panel refused to delay the contempt vote, saying lawmakers effectively “terminated” negotiations over access to Mueller’s report and underlying evidence.... “As we have repeatedly explained, the attorney general could not comply with your subpoena in its current form without violating the law, court rules and court orders, and without threatening the independence of the Department of Justice’s prosecutorial functions,” Boyd wrote. “Accordingly, this is to advise you that the president has asserted executive privilege over the entirety of the subpoenaed materials.”
~~~~~~
Brought on by Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrats who want Barr to violate the very law they passed about Grand Jury info. If Barr complies with the subpoena then he can be impeached for violating the law. Perfect timing, Mr. President. Now's the time to declassify and release all the Spygate documents and end this Democrat Dog and Pony show.
I heard multiple congress politicians demand all information be made public and that you are afraid to make it public in the hearing today. Time for president Trump to declassify the evidence making Democrats eat crow.
Hmm...., we just went through a two year investigation using over 40 FBI agents and 13 angry Democrat prosecutors, 1.4 million documents, 500 witnesses and 100% transparency and I don't see any charges. In fact, Mueller/Weissman knew by December 2017 that there was no conspiracy or coordination with Russia, so why did the investigation not end right then? Was it because Mueller sought to influence the midterm elections?
A.G. Barr offered Nadler, and a few selected Judiciary Committees to see the un-redacted report behind closed doors but they refused. WHY? I think you know the answer.
Due process requires the presumption of innocence and that the burden of proof be squarely on the prosecutor - or in this case - Congress. They must show cause for anything that the law prohibits them from seeing without cause i.e. grand jury testimony, national security information, and tax returns. Federal case law specifically declares that accusations of corrupt intent leading to obstruction of justice must be resolved in favor of the accused if it can be shown that an action was taken with dual purpose where one purpose is legal and permissible (i.e. fired him because he was a liar.) So the remedy is three cheers and a toast for maintaining a founding principle of our justice system.
Yeah it will.
Barr can't release the unredacted report because it would break the law. Nadler is an attorney and he knows this quite well.
All these Dem dimwits are doing is grand standing.Trying to make themselves look important.
All they look like are idiots.
You sure ain't to smart.
There are members of Congress who have authorization to see the unredacted copy. Trumo claims it clears him, you would think he wants everyone to see that.
Some redacted parts are not classified. Nadler has the right to read it, as do taxpayers. It is Nadler's job.This won't turn out well for Trump.Trump declares executive privilege over Mueller report
Trump declares executive privilege over Mueller report
05/08/19 ~ By Morgan Chalfant and Jordan Fabian
The White House on Wednesday asserted executive privilege over special counsel Robert Mueller’s full report on Russia’s interference in the 2016 election, ramping up its clash with Congress over its investigations into President Trump.... The move came just before the House Judiciary Committee was scheduled to vote to hold Attorney General William Barr in contempt of Congress for failing to turn over Mueller’s unredacted report and underlying materials, which the panel had subpoenaed.
Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd wrote in a letter to the committee's chairman, Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), that the administration was following through on its threat to assert privilege if the panel refused to delay the contempt vote, saying lawmakers effectively “terminated” negotiations over access to Mueller’s report and underlying evidence.... “As we have repeatedly explained, the attorney general could not comply with your subpoena in its current form without violating the law, court rules and court orders, and without threatening the independence of the Department of Justice’s prosecutorial functions,” Boyd wrote. “Accordingly, this is to advise you that the president has asserted executive privilege over the entirety of the subpoenaed materials.”
~~~~~~
Brought on by Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrats who want Barr to violate the very law they passed about Grand Jury info. If Barr complies with the subpoena then he can be impeached for violating the law. Perfect timing, Mr. President. Now's the time to declassify and release all the Spygate documents and end this Democrat Dog and Pony show.
I heard multiple congress politicians demand all information be made public and that you are afraid to make it public in the hearing today. Time for president Trump to declassify the evidence making Democrats eat crow.
Hmm...., we just went through a two year investigation using over 40 FBI agents and 13 angry Democrat prosecutors, 1.4 million documents, 500 witnesses and 100% transparency and I don't see any charges. In fact, Mueller/Weissman knew by December 2017 that there was no conspiracy or coordination with Russia, so why did the investigation not end right then? Was it because Mueller sought to influence the midterm elections?
A.G. Barr offered Nadler, and a few selected Judiciary Committees to see the un-redacted report behind closed doors but they refused. WHY? I think you know the answer.
Due process requires the presumption of innocence and that the burden of proof be squarely on the prosecutor - or in this case - Congress. They must show cause for anything that the law prohibits them from seeing without cause i.e. grand jury testimony, national security information, and tax returns. Federal case law specifically declares that accusations of corrupt intent leading to obstruction of justice must be resolved in favor of the accused if it can be shown that an action was taken with dual purpose where one purpose is legal and permissible (i.e. fired him because he was a liar.) So the remedy is three cheers and a toast for maintaining a founding principle of our justice system.
Yeah it will.
Barr can't release the unredacted report because it would break the law. Nadler is an attorney and he knows this quite well.
All these Dem dimwits are doing is grand standing.Trying to make themselves look important.
All they look like are idiots.
You sure ain't to smart.
Some redacted parts are not classified. Nadler has the right to read it, as do taxpayers. It is Nadler's job.This won't turn out well for Trump.Trump declares executive privilege over Mueller report
Trump declares executive privilege over Mueller report
05/08/19 ~ By Morgan Chalfant and Jordan Fabian
The White House on Wednesday asserted executive privilege over special counsel Robert Mueller’s full report on Russia’s interference in the 2016 election, ramping up its clash with Congress over its investigations into President Trump.... The move came just before the House Judiciary Committee was scheduled to vote to hold Attorney General William Barr in contempt of Congress for failing to turn over Mueller’s unredacted report and underlying materials, which the panel had subpoenaed.
Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd wrote in a letter to the committee's chairman, Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), that the administration was following through on its threat to assert privilege if the panel refused to delay the contempt vote, saying lawmakers effectively “terminated” negotiations over access to Mueller’s report and underlying evidence.... “As we have repeatedly explained, the attorney general could not comply with your subpoena in its current form without violating the law, court rules and court orders, and without threatening the independence of the Department of Justice’s prosecutorial functions,” Boyd wrote. “Accordingly, this is to advise you that the president has asserted executive privilege over the entirety of the subpoenaed materials.”
~~~~~~
Brought on by Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrats who want Barr to violate the very law they passed about Grand Jury info. If Barr complies with the subpoena then he can be impeached for violating the law. Perfect timing, Mr. President. Now's the time to declassify and release all the Spygate documents and end this Democrat Dog and Pony show.
I heard multiple congress politicians demand all information be made public and that you are afraid to make it public in the hearing today. Time for president Trump to declassify the evidence making Democrats eat crow.
Hmm...., we just went through a two year investigation using over 40 FBI agents and 13 angry Democrat prosecutors, 1.4 million documents, 500 witnesses and 100% transparency and I don't see any charges. In fact, Mueller/Weissman knew by December 2017 that there was no conspiracy or coordination with Russia, so why did the investigation not end right then? Was it because Mueller sought to influence the midterm elections?
A.G. Barr offered Nadler, and a few selected Judiciary Committees to see the un-redacted report behind closed doors but they refused. WHY? I think you know the answer.
Due process requires the presumption of innocence and that the burden of proof be squarely on the prosecutor - or in this case - Congress. They must show cause for anything that the law prohibits them from seeing without cause i.e. grand jury testimony, national security information, and tax returns. Federal case law specifically declares that accusations of corrupt intent leading to obstruction of justice must be resolved in favor of the accused if it can be shown that an action was taken with dual purpose where one purpose is legal and permissible (i.e. fired him because he was a liar.) So the remedy is three cheers and a toast for maintaining a founding principle of our justice system.
Yeah it will.
Barr can't release the unredacted report because it would break the law. Nadler is an attorney and he knows this quite well.
All these Dem dimwits are doing is grand standing.Trying to make themselves look important.
All they look like are idiots.
You sure ain't to smart.
Yes they will. The fact is that Obama did not seal his records. A person's school transcripts are confidential unless a court order is issued or the individual gives his consent. Quite lying.
Ya what will they get? 1/10th of 1%So Trump, using Mrs Potato head as a spokesperson, made another absurd remark. The courts will make that decision.
Ya what will they get? 1/10th of 1%So Trump, using Mrs Potato head as a spokesperson, made another absurd remark. The courts will make that decision.
LOL
So Trump, using Mrs Potato head as a spokesperson, made another absurd remark. The courts will make that decision.
Desperation speaks.
Loudly.
The courts will have no part in this. Executive privilege was a right (to you) when Obama sealed his college transcripts, so therefore, it should be in theory (to you), a right when a President of the opposing party exerts it in result of a political charade.
When did Obama seal his college transcripts? You got a credible link? Any king of order specifically sealing his, and only his college transcripts?
Sealed? I mean outright refused to release. My bad. But consider the fact that he exerted privilege over documents related to the Fast and Furious operation that would have implicated his administration in an illicit gun running scandal which got one of our border patrol agents killed.
You have no right to give lectures on executive privilege.
After it went to court the documents were released. No one was implicated or indicted.
Guns don't kill people, or so I've heard.
LOL...Did he make the charge? No. He lazily left that up to congress to decide.
He can't make the charge, dope. No one at the DOJ can. Congress is the only remedy to a criminal president.
Interesting. Very interesting. You take everything he said about "not exonerating" him at face value. But then say he can't charge the president with obstruction.
Either he has the power to exonerate or not.
You just undercut your own argument.
The exit is that way. (points)
Have a good evening.
It's all laid out in the report if you'd care to read it.
I have read it. In sum. But have you? Or did you just cherry pick what you wanted out of it? I'm pretty sure it's the latter.
You're mighty confused for a guy who's supposedly read the report.
LOL...
He can't make the charge, dope. No one at the DOJ can. Congress is the only remedy to a criminal president.
Interesting. Very interesting. You take everything he said about "not exonerating" him at face value. But then say he can't charge the president with obstruction.
Either he has the power to exonerate or not.
You just undercut your own argument.
The exit is that way. (points)
Have a good evening.
It's all laid out in the report if you'd care to read it.
I have read it. In sum. But have you? Or did you just cherry pick what you wanted out of it? I'm pretty sure it's the latter.
You're mighty confused for a guy who's supposedly read the report.
Was that the best you could come up with?
Still irrelevant, crybaby. Stick to events that matter, your whiny opinions of me do not.Irrelevant,crybaby. Try to focus. What I want has no bearing on what the report says and what the underlying evidence shows. Now you are just embarrassing yourself.You want there to be evidence of criminality.
No, it's not irrelevant. You laid bare your hopes that they (the Democrats) bring down the president by any means possible the moment he was elected.
A biased person like you wanting fairness and objectivity? Preposterous. Any partisan rather right or left, demanding fairness and objectivity when all they seek is the ruin of their political opponents? Preposterous.
Oh I'm focused. I see many a hypocrite in this thread. Charlatans and hypocrites all.
You're delusional...they're not even going to win in the stone case in federal court, much less when congress brings its guns to bear....Of course he will win. The law is on his side.
you never lived in the country have you? kids are driving trucks likely around the same time they are using guns.So Trump, using Mrs Potato head as a spokesperson, made another absurd remark. The courts will make that decision.
Desperation speaks.
Loudly.
The courts will have no part in this. Executive privilege was a right (to you) when Obama sealed his college transcripts, so therefore, it should be in theory (to you), a right when a President of the opposing party exerts it in result of a political charade.
When did Obama seal his college transcripts? You got a credible link? Any king of order specifically sealing his, and only his college transcripts?
Sealed? I mean outright refused to release. My bad. But consider the fact that he exerted privilege over documents related to the Fast and Furious operation that would have implicated his administration in an illicit gun running scandal which got one of our border patrol agents killed.
You have no right to give lectures on executive privilege.
After it went to court the documents were released. No one was implicated or indicted.
Guns don't kill people, or so I've heard.
Obama didn't seal his college transcripts, the college did. They seal ALL transcripts.
It didn't go to court, and the transcripts were NEVER released.
People with guns kill people. You have to have more training to drive a car, than to own a gun.
please.You're delusional...they're not even going to win in the stone case in federal court, much less when congress brings its guns to bear....Of course he will win. The law is on his side.
Not sure how that is relevant...useful or not, a federal judge is about to force release of portions of the unredacted report in the disgusting little toad's trial. And then congress will get the whole thing.please.You're delusional...they're not even going to win in the stone case in federal court, much less when congress brings its guns to bear....Of course he will win. The law is on his side.
when was the last time congress did something really useful?
Funny, you had all this time to point them out.Interesting. Very interesting. You take everything he said about "not exonerating" him at face value. But then say he can't charge the president with obstruction.
Either he has the power to exonerate or not.
You just undercut your own argument.
The exit is that way. (points)
Have a good evening.
It's all laid out in the report if you'd care to read it.
I have read it. In sum. But have you? Or did you just cherry pick what you wanted out of it? I'm pretty sure it's the latter.
You're mighty confused for a guy who's supposedly read the report.
Was that the best you could come up with?
What else is there? Your contradictions speak for themselves.
