Trump as healer: lie of 2016

[JakeStarkey]

Nice try at rewriting history but the Klan was the sole creation of Democrats who wanted Republicans out of office and my link proves it. And George H.W. Bush didn't kill Kennedy, despite what you tried to imply in this post. You must be a glutton for punishment for continuing to bring it up, idiot.
Why did Jimmy Carter accomplish so little during his 4 years as president?

Conservatives created the Klan

Sure, Buddy. Go back to your bong.

You can deny it all you want.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Here's one

Ku Klux Klan Facts, information, pictures | Encyclopedia.com articles about Ku Klux Klan

I find the part on Hugo black interesting. Alot more racist progressives than we hear about
Wilson, Sanger, black, fulbright, hmmmmmmm

There's no evidence for most of them. Harding, Coolidge, Truman, often intimated, never documated.

Huh? Coolidge a and harding were not racists, but they were conservative.
Eugenics was racist as he'll, most of your consensus at the time was ravial.superiority through Eugenics. Science can be politicized very badly.

As I said, often intimated, never documated. They all happened to be around at the time the big Klan was peaking, and that was when the Klan actually was buggering in politics, on the state level anyway. Especially in the '20s. A third of the male population of Indiana ... 23% of the population of Maine.... so there's more evidence for others but not really Presidents.

I'm out for the night, it's ridiculously late.

I don't disagree, but Indiana isn't the south

Nice try at rewriting history but the Klan was the sole creation of Democrats who wanted Republicans out of office and my link proves it. And George H.W. Bush didn't kill Kennedy, despite what you tried to imply in this post. You must be a glutton for punishment for continuing to bring it up, idiot.
Why did Jimmy Carter accomplish so little during his 4 years as president?

Conservatives created the Klan

Sure they did, that William Howard taft!!! Oh wait, it wasn't he who showed birth of a nation in the white house or resegregated the government..... no that was a liberal from new jersey

 

[JakeStarkey]

Here's one

Ku Klux Klan Facts, information, pictures | Encyclopedia.com articles about Ku Klux Klan

I find the part on Hugo black interesting. Alot more racist progressives than we hear about
Wilson, Sanger, black, fulbright, hmmmmmmm

There's no evidence for most of them. Harding, Coolidge, Truman, often intimated, never documated.

Huh? Coolidge a and harding were not racists, but they were conservative.
Eugenics was racist as he'll, most of your consensus at the time was ravial.superiority through Eugenics. Science can be politicized very badly.

As I said, often intimated, never documated. They all happened to be around at the time the big Klan was peaking, and that was when the Klan actually was buggering in politics, on the state level anyway. Especially in the '20s. A third of the male population of Indiana ... 23% of the population of Maine.... so there's more evidence for others but not really Presidents.

I'm out for the night, it's ridiculously late.

I don't disagree, but Indiana isn't the south

Nice try at rewriting history but the Klan was the sole creation of Democrats who wanted Republicans out of office and my link proves it. And George H.W. Bush didn't kill Kennedy, despite what you tried to imply in this post. You must be a glutton for punishment for continuing to bring it up, idiot.
Why did Jimmy Carter accomplish so little during his 4 years as president?

Conservatives created the Klan

Sure they did, that William Howard taft!!! Oh wait, it wasn't he who showed birth of a nation in the white house or resegregated the government..... no that was a liberal from new jersey

Yep, the conservatives on race matters from the South and North and West.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Here's one

Ku Klux Klan Facts, information, pictures | Encyclopedia.com articles about Ku Klux Klan

I find the part on Hugo black interesting. Alot more racist progressives than we hear about
Wilson, Sanger, black, fulbright, hmmmmmmm

There's no evidence for most of them. Harding, Coolidge, Truman, often intimated, never documated.

Huh? Coolidge a and harding were not racists, but they were conservative.
Eugenics was racist as he'll, most of your consensus at the time was ravial.superiority through Eugenics. Science can be politicized very badly.

As I said, often intimated, never documated. They all happened to be around at the time the big Klan was peaking, and that was when the Klan actually was buggering in politics, on the state level anyway. Especially in the '20s. A third of the male population of Indiana ... 23% of the population of Maine.... so there's more evidence for others but not really Presidents.

I'm out for the night, it's ridiculously late.

I don't disagree, but Indiana isn't the south

Nice try at rewriting history but the Klan was the sole creation of Democrats who wanted Republicans out of office and my link proves it. And George H.W. Bush didn't kill Kennedy, despite what you tried to imply in this post. You must be a glutton for punishment for continuing to bring it up, idiot.
Why did Jimmy Carter accomplish so little during his 4 years as president?

Conservatives created the Klan

Sure they did, that William Howard taft!!! Oh wait, it wasn't he who showed birth of a nation in the white house or resegregated the government..... no that was a liberal from new jersey

Yep, the conservatives on race matters from the South and North and West.

Yeah and you're a retard......worry about your progressives first.

 

[JakeStarkey]

There's no evidence for most of them. Harding, Coolidge, Truman, often intimated, never documated.

Huh? Coolidge a and harding were not racists, but they were conservative.
Eugenics was racist as he'll, most of your consensus at the time was ravial.superiority through Eugenics. Science can be politicized very badly.

As I said, often intimated, never documated. They all happened to be around at the time the big Klan was peaking, and that was when the Klan actually was buggering in politics, on the state level anyway. Especially in the '20s. A third of the male population of Indiana ... 23% of the population of Maine.... so there's more evidence for others but not really Presidents.

I'm out for the night, it's ridiculously late.

I don't disagree, but Indiana isn't the south

Nice try at rewriting history but the Klan was the sole creation of Democrats who wanted Republicans out of office and my link proves it. And George H.W. Bush didn't kill Kennedy, despite what you tried to imply in this post. You must be a glutton for punishment for continuing to bring it up, idiot.
Why did Jimmy Carter accomplish so little during his 4 years as president?

Conservatives created the Klan

Sure they did, that William Howard taft!!! Oh wait, it wasn't he who showed birth of a nation in the white house or resegregated the government..... no that was a liberal from new jersey

Yep, the conservatives on race matters from the South and North and West.

Yeah and you're a retard......worry about your progressives first.

Yup, it's the cons that make thing so racial. Get over it, son, and work for that vote.

 

[S.J.]

Nice try at rewriting history but the Klan was the sole creation of Democrats who wanted Republicans out of office and my link proves it. And George H.W. Bush didn't kill Kennedy, despite what you tried to imply in this post. You must be a glutton for punishment for continuing to bring it up, idiot.
Why did Jimmy Carter accomplish so little during his 4 years as president?

Conservatives created the Klan

Sure, Buddy. Go back to your bong.

You can deny it all you want.

You can smoke all you want and it won't change the fact that the Klan was founded by Democrats for the purpose of stopping the Republican Party and to keep blacks from voting for them. You think by repeating the same line over and over it'll become true but it won't. Your party has a long history of racism and black oppression and it hasn't changed to this day.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Nice try at rewriting history but the Klan was the sole creation of Democrats who wanted Republicans out of office and my link proves it. And George H.W. Bush didn't kill Kennedy, despite what you tried to imply in this post. You must be a glutton for punishment for continuing to bring it up, idiot.
Why did Jimmy Carter accomplish so little during his 4 years as president?

Conservatives created the Klan

Sure, Buddy. Go back to your bong.

You can deny it all you want.

You can smoke all you want and it won't change the fact that the Klan was founded by Democrats for the purpose of stopping the Republican Party and to keep blacks from voting for them. You think by repeating the same line over and over it'll become true but it won't. Your party has a long history of racism and black oppression and it hasn't changed to this day.

Conservatives founded the Klan. Conservatives have kept the Klan going. You can keep up your nonsense forever and all you will ever get is

 

[Pogo]

Here's one

Ku Klux Klan Facts, information, pictures | Encyclopedia.com articles about Ku Klux Klan

I find the part on Hugo black interesting. Alot more racist progressives than we hear about
Wilson, Sanger, black, fulbright, hmmmmmmm

There's no evidence for most of them. Harding, Coolidge, Truman, often intimated, never documated.

Huh? Coolidge a and harding were not racists, but they were conservative.
Eugenics was racist as he'll, most of your consensus at the time was ravial.superiority through Eugenics. Science can be politicized very badly.

As I said, often intimated, never documated. They all happened to be around at the time the big Klan was peaking, and that was when the Klan actually was buggering in politics, on the state level anyway. Especially in the '20s. A third of the male population of Indiana ... 23% of the population of Maine.... so there's more evidence for others but not really Presidents.

I'm out for the night, it's ridiculously late.

I don't disagree, but Indiana isn't the south

Nope, nobody said it was. And I kinda suspect Maine isn't either. But I wasn't bringing up the South there -- I was bringing up the Klan and who was in it, and who wasn't, or there isn't credible evidence, but stories have been floated on the insatiably gullible internet, including Harding, Coolidge and Truman, none of which are very credible, apparently based simply on their being around at the relevant time.

Might be worth noting that the reason the Klan penetrated so much into Indiana and Maine, as well as Ohio, Kansas, Colorado, the Pacific Northwest and other areas outside the South, was their relentless rail against Catholics --- or Jews, or immigrants in general, or labor unions --- whatever worked in that area, they highlighted.... which were and still are all constituents of the Democratic Party, which is why they elected Republicans in those areas, which underscores again that they had no broad alliance to any one party. They also railed heavily against alcohol (they were strongly pro-Prohibition), which also sold well in some areas, as well as adulterers and 'loose women'. Their fuel came much more from religion (specifically Protestant Christianism) than it did from politics. In one case they pulled a (white) woman out of her home and whipped her for "not going to church". And when her son tried to jump in to defend her, they whipped him too.

If they had a political party affinity as I've noted before it would be with the old Know Nothing nativist party. Not that they claimed such a descendancy, but that's what they had most in common with philosophically, IMHO.

Nice try at rewriting history but the Klan was the sole creation of Democrats who wanted Republicans out of office and my link proves it. And George H.W. Bush didn't kill Kennedy, despite what you tried to imply in this post. You must be a glutton for punishment for continuing to bring it up, idiot.
Why did Jimmy Carter accomplish so little during his 4 years as president?

Conservatives created the Klan

Sure they did, that William Howard taft!!! Oh wait, it wasn't he who showed birth of a nation in the white house or resegregated the government..... no that was a liberal from new jersey

Actually the Klan didn't exist when Taft was in office, but fun fact -- Thomas Dixon, the writer of the book "The Clansman" on which Birth of a Nation was based, was a classmate of Woodrow Wilson's. Wilson, a racist asshole, wasn't from New Jersey formatively. That was just where he worked. He was from Virginia and spent significant growing-up time in southern Georgia (Augusta). That origin should tell you a lot.

That film was stirring a sensation in that already acutely racist period, and "Colonel Joe" Simmons timed his resurrection of the second Klan to coincide with its arrival in Atlanta, charging up Stone Mountain on Thanksgiving 1915 to erect a dramatic fiery cross above the city in its official baptism of fire. And the burning cross was an entirely new concept --- it had never been part of the original Klan. Griffith worked that into the film for dramatic effect and the revived Klan acted out the film.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Here's one

Ku Klux Klan Facts, information, pictures | Encyclopedia.com articles about Ku Klux Klan

I find the part on Hugo black interesting. Alot more racist progressives than we hear about
Wilson, Sanger, black, fulbright, hmmmmmmm

There's no evidence for most of them. Harding, Coolidge, Truman, often intimated, never documated.

Huh? Coolidge a and harding were not racists, but they were conservative.
Eugenics was racist as he'll, most of your consensus at the time was ravial.superiority through Eugenics. Science can be politicized very badly.

As I said, often intimated, never documated. They all happened to be around at the time the big Klan was peaking, and that was when the Klan actually was buggering in politics, on the state level anyway. Especially in the '20s. A third of the male population of Indiana ... 23% of the population of Maine.... so there's more evidence for others but not really Presidents.

I'm out for the night, it's ridiculously late.

I don't disagree, but Indiana isn't the south

Nope, nobody said it was. And I kinda suspect Maine isn't either. But I wasn't bringing up the South there -- I was bringing up the Klan and who was in it, and who wasn't, or there isn't credible evidence, but stories have been floated on the insatiably gullible internet, including Harding, Coolidge and Truman, none of which are very credible, apparently based simply on their being around at the relevant time.

Might be worth noting that the reason the Klan penetrated so much into Indiana and Maine, as well as Ohio, Kansas, Colorado, the Pacific Northwest and other areas outside the South, was their relentless rail against Catholics --- or Jews, or immigrants in general, or labor unions --- whatever worked in that area, they highlighted.... which were and still are all constituents of the Democratic Party, which is why they elected Republicans in those areas, which underscores again that they had no broad alliance to any one party. They also railed heavily against alcohol (they were strongly pro-Prohibition), which also sold well in some areas. Their fuel came much more from religion (specifically Protestant Christianism) than it did from politics. If they had a political party affinity as I've noted before it would be with the old Know Nothing nativist party. Not that they claimed such a descendancy, but that's what they had most in common with philosophically, IMHO.

Nice try at rewriting history but the Klan was the sole creation of Democrats who wanted Republicans out of office and my link proves it. And George H.W. Bush didn't kill Kennedy, despite what you tried to imply in this post. You must be a glutton for punishment for continuing to bring it up, idiot.
Why did Jimmy Carter accomplish so little during his 4 years as president?

Conservatives created the Klan

Sure they did, that William Howard taft!!! Oh wait, it wasn't he who showed birth of a nation in the white house or resegregated the government..... no that was a liberal from new jersey

Actually the Klan didn't exist when Taft was in office, but fun fact -- Thomas Dixon, the writer of the book "The Clansman" on which Birth of a Nation was based, was a classmate of Woodrow Wilson's. Wilson, a racist asshole, wasn't from New Jersey formatively. That was just where he worked. He was from Virginia and spent significant growing-up time in southern Georgia (Augusta). That origin should tell you a lot.

That film was stirring a sensation in that already acutely racist period, and "Colonel Joe" Simmons timed his resurrection of the second Klan to coincide with its arrival in Atlanta, charging up Stone Mountain on Thanksgiving 1915 to erect a dramatic fiery cross above the city in its official baptism of fire. And the burning cross was an entirely new concept --- it had never been part of the original Klan. Griffith worked that into the film for dramatic effect and the revived Klan acted out the film.

Right they have Klan tunnels at the Denver airport, it was everywhere, But the main guy in Indiana was a socialist/democrat. It was very progressive as well.

Buck Homer

I'd show a picture of Starkey, but they won't let me post a pic of him ducking Obama's dick.

 

[Pogo]

There's no evidence for most of them. Harding, Coolidge, Truman, often intimated, never documated.

Huh? Coolidge a and harding were not racists, but they were conservative.
Eugenics was racist as he'll, most of your consensus at the time was ravial.superiority through Eugenics. Science can be politicized very badly.

As I said, often intimated, never documated. They all happened to be around at the time the big Klan was peaking, and that was when the Klan actually was buggering in politics, on the state level anyway. Especially in the '20s. A third of the male population of Indiana ... 23% of the population of Maine.... so there's more evidence for others but not really Presidents.

I'm out for the night, it's ridiculously late.

I don't disagree, but Indiana isn't the south

Nope, nobody said it was. And I kinda suspect Maine isn't either. But I wasn't bringing up the South there -- I was bringing up the Klan and who was in it, and who wasn't, or there isn't credible evidence, but stories have been floated on the insatiably gullible internet, including Harding, Coolidge and Truman, none of which are very credible, apparently based simply on their being around at the relevant time.

Might be worth noting that the reason the Klan penetrated so much into Indiana and Maine, as well as Ohio, Kansas, Colorado, the Pacific Northwest and other areas outside the South, was their relentless rail against Catholics --- or Jews, or immigrants in general, or labor unions --- whatever worked in that area, they highlighted.... which were and still are all constituents of the Democratic Party, which is why they elected Republicans in those areas, which underscores again that they had no broad alliance to any one party. They also railed heavily against alcohol (they were strongly pro-Prohibition), which also sold well in some areas. Their fuel came much more from religion (specifically Protestant Christianism) than it did from politics. If they had a political party affinity as I've noted before it would be with the old Know Nothing nativist party. Not that they claimed such a descendancy, but that's what they had most in common with philosophically, IMHO.

Nice try at rewriting history but the Klan was the sole creation of Democrats who wanted Republicans out of office and my link proves it. And George H.W. Bush didn't kill Kennedy, despite what you tried to imply in this post. You must be a glutton for punishment for continuing to bring it up, idiot.
Why did Jimmy Carter accomplish so little during his 4 years as president?

Conservatives created the Klan

Sure they did, that William Howard taft!!! Oh wait, it wasn't he who showed birth of a nation in the white house or resegregated the government..... no that was a liberal from new jersey

Actually the Klan didn't exist when Taft was in office, but fun fact -- Thomas Dixon, the writer of the book "The Clansman" on which Birth of a Nation was based, was a classmate of Woodrow Wilson's. Wilson, a racist asshole, wasn't from New Jersey formatively. That was just where he worked. He was from Virginia and spent significant growing-up time in southern Georgia (Augusta). That origin should tell you a lot.

That film was stirring a sensation in that already acutely racist period, and "Colonel Joe" Simmons timed his resurrection of the second Klan to coincide with its arrival in Atlanta, charging up Stone Mountain on Thanksgiving 1915 to erect a dramatic fiery cross above the city in its official baptism of fire. And the burning cross was an entirely new concept --- it had never been part of the original Klan. Griffith worked that into the film for dramatic effect and the revived Klan acted out the film.

Right they have Klan tunnels at the Denver airport, it was everywhere, But the main guy in Indiana was a socialist/democrat. It was very progressive as well.

"Klan tunnels"? Wtf is a "Klan tunnel"?

The main guy in Indiana was no "socialist", he was an asshole, and he had the whole state Republican party in his pocket. That scene was anything but "progressive".

Here ya go ....

​

So I had to Google "Klan tunnels". It says Tillamook. Could be either -- both Colorado and Oregon had Klan activity going on. Both of those states had Klan Republicans elected too. In Oregon they had a Klan Republican running Portland and a Klan Democrat running the state. Whatever worked.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The Dems in 1964 beat down the bad side of the party, and in 2016 the GOP is falling to the evil side of the party,

Fallin: Trump 'trying to campaign as a racial healer'

What was bad about Goldwater?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Is there a point you're trying to make with this stupid thread?

Jake <3 Hillary

 

[Pogo]

The Dems in 1964 beat down the bad side of the party, and in 2016 the GOP is falling to the evil side of the party,

Fallin: Trump 'trying to campaign as a racial healer'

What was bad about Goldwater?

You know who the RP could have nominated in '64?

Margaret Chase Smith. She was runnin'. Wooda made an outstanding candidate. She's a heroine. But noooOOOooooo....

 

[CrusaderFrank]

What was wrong with Goldwater?

 

[Pogo]

What was wrong with Goldwater?

Who you askin'?

Fun fact -- Goldwater was a ham radio operator. His sign was K7UGA.

​

 

[Coyote]

Let's get back on topic please...

 

[JakeStarkey]

And I could go into the democrats, but I've done it before. Only one dixiecrat became a republican, Strom Thurmond. The rest of the gang that opposed the 64 civil rights act on race (Goldwater opposed it on the forcing you to do stuff, different reason) never became republicans.

There were in fact only two Dixiecrats -- Thurmond and his running mate Wright -- who died around 1956.

The "rest of the gang" I don't really know who you mean but I know Jesse Helms switched, and so did Trent Lott.

They did there were a few, but not that many. The 64 civil rightmost actually no voters had one democrat switch out of 23. Guys like george wallace and William fulbright never switched.

Tn didn't have a Republican house until 2008.
And if you want to see racism, work for a black republican, the racism doesn't come from the conservative republicans. I worked for rod deberry 1994 9th congressional district as a college kid and I never saw real racism until then. And it was the nasty from both white and black democrats.

This is the next place I would have gone to make that point from the repost --- that point being that it's about regions and cultures and South versus North, not about political parties ----

CRA vote 1964 (for this purpose "Northern" means "everybody not in the South"):

The original House version:

• Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7–93%)
• Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)
• >>> ALL SOUTHERNERS: 7-97 (6.7%--93.3%)

• Northern Democrats: 145–9 (94 – 6%)
• Northern Republicans: 138–24 (85 – 15%)
• >>> ALL NORTHERNERS: 283-33 (89.6%--11.4%)

The Senate version:

• Southern Democrats: 1–20 (5–95%)
• Southern Republicans: 0–1 (0–100%)
• Northern Democrats: 45–1 (98–2%)
• Northern Republicans: 27–5 (84–16%)
• ALL SOUTHERNERS: 1--21 (4.5%--95.5%)
• ALL NORTHERNERS: 72--6 (92.3%--7.7%)

Yes, there is a party pattern in that each line shows slightly more support from the D side than the R side. But again, 94 versus 85 on one side is not at all significant.

But 96 on one side versus 92 on the other side?? You just hit the motherlode.

The numbers don't lie; your pattern is clearly there but it's regional, not political. A

You take the numbers from the North -- both Dems and Repubs are for it.
You take the numbers from the South -- both Dems and Repubs are agin' it.
It's truly bipartisan in both directions. (!)
​

This is where the party-partisan mythology crumbles to dust. This was a regional issue, not a political party one. QED.

Very true. Which is why I laugh at the southern strategy. Very few of those guys changed parties or even voted republican. TN had 2 democrat senators until the 90s, the state house was democrat until the 2000s. The reason it went republican was people like me leaving the north.

Lie all you want, the figures prove you wrong. Trump is a divider and a destroyer of good in America.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Here's one

Ku Klux Klan Facts, information, pictures | Encyclopedia.com articles about Ku Klux Klan

I find the part on Hugo black interesting. Alot more racist progressives than we hear about
Wilson, Sanger, black, fulbright, hmmmmmmm

And I'm sad Sanger was a republican, but the rest democrats.

1/3d of the Indiana KKK and Seattle's as well in the 1920s were GOP.

 

[buckeye45_73]

And I could go into the democrats, but I've done it before. Only one dixiecrat became a republican, Strom Thurmond. The rest of the gang that opposed the 64 civil rights act on race (Goldwater opposed it on the forcing you to do stuff, different reason) never became republicans.

There were in fact only two Dixiecrats -- Thurmond and his running mate Wright -- who died around 1956.

The "rest of the gang" I don't really know who you mean but I know Jesse Helms switched, and so did Trent Lott.

They did there were a few, but not that many. The 64 civil rightmost actually no voters had one democrat switch out of 23. Guys like george wallace and William fulbright never switched.

Tn didn't have a Republican house until 2008.
And if you want to see racism, work for a black republican, the racism doesn't come from the conservative republicans. I worked for rod deberry 1994 9th congressional district as a college kid and I never saw real racism until then. And it was the nasty from both white and black democrats.

This is the next place I would have gone to make that point from the repost --- that point being that it's about regions and cultures and South versus North, not about political parties ----

CRA vote 1964 (for this purpose "Northern" means "everybody not in the South"):

The original House version:

• Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7–93%)
• Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)
• >>> ALL SOUTHERNERS: 7-97 (6.7%--93.3%)

• Northern Democrats: 145–9 (94 – 6%)
• Northern Republicans: 138–24 (85 – 15%)
• >>> ALL NORTHERNERS: 283-33 (89.6%--11.4%)

The Senate version:

• Southern Democrats: 1–20 (5–95%)
• Southern Republicans: 0–1 (0–100%)
• Northern Democrats: 45–1 (98–2%)
• Northern Republicans: 27–5 (84–16%)
• ALL SOUTHERNERS: 1--21 (4.5%--95.5%)
• ALL NORTHERNERS: 72--6 (92.3%--7.7%)

Yes, there is a party pattern in that each line shows slightly more support from the D side than the R side. But again, 94 versus 85 on one side is not at all significant.

But 96 on one side versus 92 on the other side?? You just hit the motherlode.

The numbers don't lie; your pattern is clearly there but it's regional, not political. A

You take the numbers from the North -- both Dems and Repubs are for it.
You take the numbers from the South -- both Dems and Repubs are agin' it.
It's truly bipartisan in both directions. (!)
​

This is where the party-partisan mythology crumbles to dust. This was a regional issue, not a political party one. QED.

Very true. Which is why I laugh at the southern strategy. Very few of those guys changed parties or even voted republican. TN had 2 democrat senators until the 90s, the state house was democrat until the 2000s. The reason it went republican was people like me leaving the north.

Lie all you want, the figures prove you wrong. Trump is a divider and a destroyer of good in America.

But Obama isn't? You're so full of shit.

 

[buckeye45_73]

The Dems in 1964 beat down the bad side of the party, and in 2016 the GOP is falling to the evil side of the party,

Fallin: Trump 'trying to campaign as a racial healer'

What was bad about Goldwater?

Dipshits try to put him in the category with the Dixiecrats, because he didn't want the Feds to tell you how to run your own business. He was right, we didn't listen and now everything is under federal control.