trump begs Florida judge to restore his Twitter account

[postman]

There’s no law they’re claiming protection under. It is not illegal for people or corporations to have political bias.

The RNC and DNC have political bias. They should be thrown in jail.

 

[Rigby5]

I said nothing about a law. Trump was told what terms he was breaking many times before he was banned.

Wrong.
Terms of Service can ONLY be based on law due to the FCC regulations for the internet.
Nor did Trump ever violate any TOS, so he could not have been warned.
Do you have an example of anything Trump posted that violated anything?
If someone has one, I can be easily convinced if I am wrong about this, since I dislike Trump anyway.

 

[postman]

Is that the only criteria in Twitter's TOS to get banned, Dumbass?

No. But urging people to overthrow the US government (sedition) is high on the hog.

 

[colfax_m]

Wrong.
Terms of Service can ONLY be based on law due to the FCC regulations for the internet.
Nor did Trump ever violate any TOS, so he could not have been warned.
Do you have an example of anything Trump posted that violated anything?
If someone has one, I can be easily convinced if I am wrong about this, since I dislike Trump anyway.

The TOS state Twitter can end your account for any reason they want or no reason.

 

[Nostra]

No. But urging people to overthrow the US government (sedition) is high on the hog.

Cool.

Bring Trump's quote doing that.

 

[colfax_m]

The RNC and DNC have political bias. They should be thrown in jail.

FFS we allow corporations to donate to political parties.

 

[Faun]

Yes it is relevant because the 14th amendment requires equal protection under the law.
If you censor acts by one political party, then you also have to censor the same acts by other parties.

Equal protection under 14th Amendment applies to the government, not private Internet chat forums.

 

[Rigby5]

It is only illegal if it will likely leads to imminent violence, injury or death. Or more of the COVID cure quacks would be in jail.

Wrong.
Anything that infringes upon any right at all is illegal.
For example, when you sue over slander, it is NOT about imminent violence, injury, or death.
You have a right to privacy and respect that slander and libel violate.

 

[Faun]

It most certainly is illegal for them to discriminate in their business based on those political baises.

LOL

Quote the law that makes it illegal.......

 

[Rigby5]

Substantial Interest: Standing

, of the US Constitution: Analysis and Interpretation

law.justia.com

Constitutional Standards: Injury in Fact, Causation, and Redressability.

The Court ... has now settled upon the rule that, “at an irreducible minimum,” the constitutional requisites under Article III for the existence of standing are that the plaintiff must personally have:
1) suffered some actual or threatened injury;
2) that injury can fairly be traced to the challenged action of the defendant; and
3) that the injury is likely to be redressed by a favorable decision.

By "injury" they mean harm, as in ruining your reputations by illegal slander or libel.
Doesn't mean injury like a broken arm.

 

[Rigby5]

It means it's not a religious thing to be against it. Adam and Eve can be viewed as only sinners want to wear clothes.

Sure there could be tiny religious beliefs in nudity, but the majority wins.

 

[Rigby5]

FFS we allow corporations to donate to political parties.

That is Citizen's United ruling, which I think is totally wrong.
Corporations should NOT be allowed to make political contributions.

 

[Rigby5]

Equal protection under 14th Amendment applies to the government, not private Internet chat forums.

Wrong for 2 reasons.
First of all, Equal Protection requires all levels of government to make the necessary laws to protect against discrimination, a second is that the internet is federal so already requires protection against 1st amendment censorship.

 

[bripat9643]

https://www.courthousenews.com/judge-rules-twitter-can-be-sued-for-failing-to-take-down-child-porn-videos/

Child porn is a crime. No one disputes that websites are obligated to censor that.

What a fucking dumbass. Do you NAZIs have any arguments that haven't already been shot down 1000 times already?

 

[postman]

Wrong.
Terms of Service can ONLY be based on law due to the FCC regulations for the internet.

Wrong. Just go to the Fox News, or any of it's hosts websites. Their terms of service specifically say what political things you can't post, with the violators being banned.

Rules of the Forum

[Last Updated July 1st, 2020] The main purpose of this Forum is to promote the name and presence of our esteemed host, Sean Hannity. It is through his generosity, that the forums have been made available. Whether you are new to politics or a seasoned veteran, it is the hope of the moderator...

community.hannity.com

Contempt of Host/Contempt of Friend/Contempt of Moderator:

You are welcome to disagree with Sean Hannity’s views and discuss differing opinion, but personal attacks against our host will not be tolerated. Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin and Oliver North are close, personal friends of Sean Hannity and they are afforded the same protection.

We have a Terms of Service describing your (and our) behavior and rights related to content, privacy, and laws. To use this service, you must agree to abide by our TOS.

 

[bodecea]

I agree but Twitter can't legitimately ban him except as an explicitly political act. that ignores the
Bill of Rights.
The Taliban is allowed on Twitter but Trump is not and the left is defending this purely political
act to their death.

ORLY?

 

[bripat9643]

That is Citizen's United ruling, which I think is totally wrong.
Corporations should NOT be allowed to make political contributions.

Why not? Corporations are owned by people, who all have the right to make political donations. If the people who own them have the right to do it, then why shouldn't they have the right?

 

[bripat9643]

Wrong. Just go to the Fox News, or any of it's hosts websites. Their terms of service specifically say what political things you can't post, with the violators being banned.

Rules of the Forum

[Last Updated July 1st, 2020] The main purpose of this Forum is to promote the name and presence of our esteemed host, Sean Hannity. It is through his generosity, that the forums have been made available. Whether you are new to politics or a seasoned veteran, it is the hope of the moderator...

community.hannity.com

Contempt of Host/Contempt of Friend/Contempt of Moderator:

You are welcome to disagree with Sean Hannity’s views and discuss differing opinion, but personal attacks against our host will not be tolerated. Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin and Oliver North are close, personal friends of Sean Hannity and they are afforded the same protection.

We have a Terms of Service describing your (and our) behavior and rights related to content, privacy, and laws. To use this service, you must agree to abide by our TOS.

FOX News is not immune from lawsuits as the owners of Google, Facebook and Twitter claim they are.

 

[bripat9643]

Are you referring to twitters terms of service, or those of USMB?

Twitter's, dumbass.

 

[postman]

Wrong.
Anything that infringes upon any right at all is illegal.

Then explain why my second amendment rights don't extend to machine guns?