trump begs Florida judge to restore his Twitter account

[bripat9643]

Twitter is not a common carrier. You can sue it if you want, but you will lose and your lawyers will have a good laugh as they cash your check.

Yes it is. Twitter claims it is immune from lawsuits because of rule 230

 

[Nostra]

Then explain why my second amendment rights don't extend to machine guns?

Owning a machine gun isn't illegal with the proper credentials.

 

[bripat9643]

Not according to Article 3 of the constitution.

Article III doesn't comment on the subject, dumbass.

 

[postman]

By "injury" they mean harm, as in ruining your reputations by illegal slander or libel.
Doesn't mean injury like a broken arm.

You missed no. 3
3) that the injury is likely to be redressed by a favorable decision.

Courts have limited ability to order a person or a company to perform specific acts.

The same as you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink, means certain remedies are unavailable to the courts.

 

[Rigby5]

LOL

Quote the law that makes it illegal.......

Each state has its own laws, but the principle of the 1st amendment applies to all individuals due to the 14th amendment.
That is not what state lawyers are taught, but federal lawyers are.

 

[postman]

Owning a machine gun isn't illegal with the proper credentials.

Owning an atomic bomb isn't illegal with the proper credentials, but why don't my 2nd amendment rights automatically give me those credentials?

 

[bodecea]

Trump wasn't banned based on his politics. He was banned for the same reason he was impeached. Inciting insurrection, which as an act of violence, is against Twitters terms of service.

Inciting insurrection IS his politics.

 

[postman]

Article III doesn't comment on the subject, dumbass.

The Us Supreme Court tells us what Article 3 means. And they have spoken. Saying standing, etc. are a requirement of constitution.

 

[Nostra]

Inciting insurrection IS his politics.

Link to this incitement?

 

[postman]

Each state has its own laws, but the principle of the 1st amendment applies to all individuals due to the 14th amendment.

Really, then why can I tell my daughter to "shut up".

 

[Faun]

Cool.

Bring Trump's quote doing that.

 

[Rigby5]

You missed no. 3
3) that the injury is likely to be redressed by a favorable decision.

Courts have limited ability to order a person or a company to perform specific acts.

The same as you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink, means certain remedies are unavailable to the courts.

I don't get your point?
Since Trump is campaigning, the access to social media obviously is of vital importance to him and would cost him great harm to be deprived.
So then a jury would ruling in his favor would likely redress his grievance either by Twitter reinstating him, or paying a huge compensation amount.

 

[bodecea]

Trump has been banned.

Mad Maxine Watters hasn't.

Another example of Twitter being an arm of the Dimwinger party.

Who?

 

[Nostra]

Major fail. There is no incitement to violence in that. Hell, there isn't even a request to do anything.

Try again, Dumbass.

 

[Faun]

Wrong for 2 reasons.
First of all, Equal Protection requires all levels of government to make the necessary laws to protect against discrimination, a second is that the internet is federal so already requires protection against 1st amendment censorship.

The Internet is not federal.

The 14th Amendment applies to laws, i.e., government. Not private Internet websites.

 

[postman]

I don't get your point?
Since Trump is campaigning, the access to social media obviously is of vital importance to him and would cost him great harm to be deprived.

Tough shit. Trump broke their terms of service.

 

[colfax_m]

Yes it is. Twitter claims it is immune from lawsuits because of rule 230

Twitter is not a common carrier and section 230 is the reason people lose lots of lawsuits.

But you can try!

 

[bodecea]

The impeachments failed to find any guilt.
He was exonerated.
If he was banned for the same reason, that would then be criminal, since the impeachments were found to be groundless.
Inciting violence is not against any terms of agreement with any company.
For example, if you post that Somali pirates should be blown up with drones or that rapists should be castrated, that is not at all illegal or any violation of terms.
And Twitter does not get to be the arbitrary decider.
It has to be decided in court, otherwise it is a 1st amendment violation.
If you can not prosecute Trump, then it is illegal to censor that which can not be prosecuted.

"he was exonerated"...................

 

[pknopp]

Each state has its own laws, but the principle of the 1st amendment applies to all individuals due to the 14th amendment.
That is not what state lawyers are taught, but federal lawyers are.

The 14th makes it apply to the states not individuals. Lol

 

[Faun]

Major fail. There is no incitement to violence in that. Hell, there isn't even a request to do anything.

Try again, Dumbass.

LOL

Even these people, who were incited to assassinate Pence based on Trump's condemnation of his VP for not handing him the election, laugh at you for being such a fucking imbecile...