bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,169
- 47,316
What argument is that?Uh, you seem confused again. You lost the argument. Your orange lard and master is banned.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What argument is that?Uh, you seem confused again. You lost the argument. Your orange lard and master is banned.
No one is pretending that Twitter is a monopoly. It's more of a monopoly than standard oil ever was..LOL - that's what I figured. Ostrich up. Ignore all the others on the lists and pretend that Twitter is a monopoly regardless. So you'll have an excuse to make them do what you want. This is pure statism.
And you have to go down the "orange skin cult" bullshit. That is leftist retard dogma. Crybaby? Dude, face to face you would never say that so STFU, Internet Rambo.Are you ever going to snap out of crybaby mode?
Bripat says there arent any arguments. Strange...Trump is banned. Maybe snap ya boi back to reality. Redirect that whiny little bitch energy to something good.
Which seems like hot garbage. Like, will get laughed out of court.If i am Twitter and lose this suit, i go straight to court to get federal money to pay the bills.Unlike most of the airhead conservatives in this thread, Bootney actually understands the issue in the lawsuit.
The federal government cannot censor speech protected by the first amendment. Meaning, if the government owned Twitter, they couldn't ban Trump for being an asshat. But the government doesn't own Twitter, obviously. Trump is claiming that the government has enough influence on Twitter and that Twitter is so beholden to the government that they are basically an agent of the government and therefore Twitter must likewise obey the same restrictions that government would have.
Cry me a river. For an insulting prick, you sure are sensitive.And you have to go down the "orange skin cult" bullshit.
Then why are you afraid to let the courts decide. I am pretty sure you're not a lawyer so the only hot garbage I see are you constant leftist leaning posts.Which seems like hot garbage. Like, will get laughed out of court.
Not sensitive as you weren't even talking to me, you leftist dumbass. I am tired of you getting a free pass. You're a leftist welfare troll and now you get got.Cry me a river. For an insulting prick, you sure are sensitive.
As is Instagram. My kids told me. I use neither.do you guys know that Facebook is down?
But not because others cannot enter the market. Cant price anyone out of the market, when the product is free. So not the same. That's why anti trust lawsuits against them are dubious.No one is pretending that Twitter is a monopoly. It's more of a monopoly than standard oil ever was..
Maybe. Not sure. The suit seems better crafted than most against Twitter and I’m not sure it has been tried before.Which seems like hot garbage. Like, will get laughed out of court.If i am Twitter and lose this suit, i go straight to court to get federal money to pay the bills.
This seems like a ridiculous stretch. "Beholden" to government? What? Absurd.Maybe. Not sure. The suit seems better crafted than most against Twitter and I’m not sure it has been tried before.
I read a bunch about state action doctrine and it seems unlikely to pass, especially since conservative judges are really loathe to extend state action to private individuals.
This is an example of Trump “conservatives” abandoning principle for convenience.
Regulation doesn’t make one a state actor. I think there was a case with a liquor store being licensed by the state but wasn’t a state actor. There’s a bunch of ways to be a state actor, one here is trying to demonstrate a nexus between the government and Twitter. Very vague.This seems like a ridiculous stretch. "Beholden" to government? What? Absurd.
The local broadcast stations are more funded and more regulated by government that Twitter is. Same for radio. Does that mean i have a right to force them to broadcast content of my choosing?
How about Sirius radio? LinkedIn?
This seems so absurd on its face that i cannot imagine it not getting laughed out of court.
Agreed.Regulation doesn’t make one a state actor.
You may be a Legal professional, but you know shxt about social media and option vs info vs data.All social media platforms have methods for reporting content to moderators.
Then educate us, instead of just pinching off a whiny turd. Be specific.You may be a Legal professional, but you know shxt about social media and option vs info vs data.
I pointed out already. Opinion, data, info and unknown/known facts are not the same. You cannot say moderators are the ans. Hunter's laptop was a good example.Then educate us, instead of just pinching off a whiny turd. Be specific.
Ahh... So your complaints about government subsidizing, or monopoly power, or publisher status, or whatever, are beside the point. What you really want is to force them to treat everyone equally and impartially. Regardless of those other excuses.Fixing the system means forcing Twitter and Facebook to treat people equally and impartially. What did you have in mind, incessant whining?
Says a douchebag who is constantly demanding that a baker make a cake that says what a couple of homosexuals want it to say.
Great question. Well, does it?Doe it ever occur to your morons that no believes your excuses because the go directly contrary to what you've said in other such controversies?