martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 83,046
- 34,363
- 2,300
Define "leaving alone". Government has to be neutral, but when you start ruining bakers over not wanting to bake for a gay wedding, I think it is overreach. PA laws were designed to fight systemic economic discrimination, not butt hurt.
As for gun laws? The 2nd amendment says I have the right to keep and bear arms. The fact that in NYC it takes me 3-6 months and $1000 in fees just to get a revolver license is infringement. The fact that off duty officers and anyone friendly to government types can bypass these laws is tyranny.
The bakers were discriminating based on WHO SOMEONE IS. That's illegal. Period.
If you're a baker, and you want to deny service, deny it. Flatly. Without explanation. No problem. But you can't discriminate based on gender/race/sexual orientation, etc. It's pretty simple.
What kind of fucking retard do you have to be to not realize that issuing guns to a populace in a place where 3 million people are right on top of each other is a different scenario than an area where there are 6 people per square mile?
Either you're for states rights, or you're not.
Why? Why do we care if a couple has to spend 10 more minutes finding another baker? Also, people have the right to free exercise of religion, unless there is a compelling government interest, and butt hurt is not a compelling interest.
Then repeal the 2nd amendment, until then my rights are being infringed.
How about we impose a 2 week waiting period and $100 fee for an abortion? I'm sure that would have you frothing.
Remember you don't support people's rights when you only support the right or the use of said right you agree with.
My rights as enumerated by the bill of rights overrides states rights, but only explicitly.
A simple "I'm a borderline retarded hypocrite" would've sufficed.
Civil rights and equal protection are "enumerated" and codified into federal law. You choose to ignore that, and assume the 2nd Amendment is, by law, more important than the 14th.
It's not. Period.
And wake up, dipshit, Texas/Alabama/The rest of the Retard belt are doing that and far more with regard to abortion.
My position is far more consistent than yours. I don't ignore rights I don't like, and create ones to cover things I do.
You assume the 1st is less important than someone's right to buy a cake. How stupid is that?
Equal protection under the law doesn't mean you get to force people to do things you want them to do, unless there is a compelling government interest. butt hurt soothing and your desire to ruin people you disagree with isn't compelling. It's borderline fascist.
Considering I think Roe is one of the most terrible constitutional concepts ever, I don't care what Texas and Alabama does with Abortion. It's protected by law in NY and that's fine by me, just like I hate Obergfell but am glad NY passed SSM via legislative action.
And its typical you have to go with the "Retard belt" thing, it shows you are a shallow shell of a person, who's worldviews have to be everyone else's OR ELSE.
You and your ilk sicken me.
They're not "exercising their religion" you fucking assclown, they're RUNNING A BUSINESS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.
What is difficult about that to you? And how is their exercise of their own religion impeded by baking a cake? Am I taking crazy pills? Are you trolling?
Equal Protection has to do with discrimination. Not "making someone do something borderline fascist" (Whatever the fuck that means in your Insanity Dictionary).
I call it the "retard belt" because they're last in literacy, last in public schools, and first in science-denial. It's really not an insult if I'm simply stating facts. I get it, you throw your lot in with people who believe in talking snakes and flying Magic Jews. Just own it, stupid.
Why are the two mutually exclusive, especially when it comes to a non-essential, contracted service that is easily replaceable?
So you lose your constitutional rights when you decide to sell something?
The only trolls are people like you who probably jerk off to the ruination of people who think differently than you, and cheer while the government ruins others for though crime.
What about their protection to practice their religion as they see fit, and to associate with who they want to? Oh right, you disagree with how they live their life so they have to be ruined or ordered to BAKE THAT FUCKING CAKE by the government bully you stand behind with a nasty smile on your face, and probably your hand on your dick, stroking furiously.
No it's an insult, not a fact. It's a sad commentary on your need to denigrate others to make your own sad smug life bearable.
When I think of you, all I think of is this, you smug, smarmy little shit-stain.