Trump > Bush 43 - War Crimes?

[Londoner]

Trump just said it again - at his Ohio rally:

Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction.

Trump has said Bush lied about Iraq/ WMDs.

4,000+ Americans died in Iraq, and the Middle East was destabilized for generations, making Bush's lie a war crime of the highest order.

A question for Republicans.

Is Trump right about Bush? Did George Bush lie and thereby commit a war crime?

or

Is Trump an uninformed moron who says things without sufficient evidence, thus making him an untrustworthy commander in chief?

or

Is Trump a liar who merely says things for personal gain, making him unfit for office?



Either Trump is an uninformed moron or a liar or George Bush should be prosecuted for war crimes,

Which is it?

 

[Correll]

Shouldn't you be more worried about the safety of your nation's children?

Or are you sure you guys got all the Rape RINgs?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Trump if elected will turn Bush over to The Hague for war crimes.

 

[Londoner]

Shouldn't you be more worried about the safety of your nation's children?

Absolutely. Why would you entrust the safety of children to a chronic liar or a moron?

Shouldn't you nominate a candidate who doesn't lie?

Your candidate speaks without the correct information. He has no proof of what he is saying about Bush/Iraq, yet he says it anyway. This is what he does. It is dangerous. It makes him unfit to lead the most powerful nation in the world.

We know the Left lies, but your side is claiming to be better.

So how can we trust your nominating process if you elect a liar or a moron? And if he is not lying, why not indict Bush for war crimes? Remember: your side is claiming to bring honesty AND ACCOUNTABILITY back to politics.

Please answer the question.

 

[FJO]

Trump if elected will turn Bush over to The Hague for war crimes.

He might turn over JEB Bush for being low energy. GWB? NO!

 

[JakeStarkey]

Trump if elected will turn Bush over to The Hague for war crimes.

He might turn over JEB Bush for being low energy. GWB? NO!

Yeah, he will.

 

[FJO]

Shouldn't you be more worried about the safety of your nation's children?

Absolutely. Why would you entrust the safety of children to liar or a moron?

Shouldn't you nominate a candidate who doesn't lie?

Your candidate speaks without the correct information. He has no proof of what he is saying about Bush/Iraq, yet he says it anyway. This is what he does. It is dangerous. It makes him unfit to lead the most powerful nation in the world.

We know the Left lies, but your side is claiming to be better.

So how can we trust your nominating process if you elect a liar or a moron? And if he is not lying, why not indict Bush for war crimes? Remember: your side is claiming to bring honesty AND ACCOUNTABILITY back to politics.

Please answer the question.

If the person who leads a nation can only be one who does not lie, the entire world would be without leaders.

And that includes the royal drones as well.

 

[Correll]

Shouldn't you be more worried about the safety of your nation's children?

Absolutely. Why would you entrust the safety of children to a chronic liar or a moron?

Shouldn't you nominate a candidate who doesn't lie?

Your candidate speaks without the correct information. He has no proof of what he is saying about Bush/Iraq, yet he says it anyway. This is what he does. It is dangerous. It makes him unfit to lead the most powerful nation in the world.

We know the Left lies, but your side is claiming to be better.

So how can we trust your nominating process if you elect a liar or a moron? And if he is not lying, why not indict Bush for war crimes? Remember: your side is claiming to bring honesty AND ACCOUNTABILITY back to politics.

Please answer the question.

 

[FJO]

Trump if elected will turn Bush over to The Hague for war crimes.

He might turn over JEB Bush for being low energy. GWB? NO!

Yeah, he will.

You seem very sure about that. Since you know the future, send me PM with the numbers for the next Powerball draw.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

There were WMDs and WMDs were not the only reason we went into Iraq.

 

[JakeStarkey]

If the person who leads a nation can only be one who does not lie, the entire world would be without leaders.

And that includes the royal drones as well.

But a candidate's dishonesty should always be pointed out.

There were no nukes and or capacity for such and that is what GWB meant. We can let The Hague sort it out.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

The Hague has no authority to sort shit out in this casee.

Oddly enough, we all already know that W did not "lie." Even if we assume (without proof) that Saddam had no WMD, it would still only be a "lie" if W knew that for a fact in advance but said he did despite that knowledge.

He could call the former (impeached and disgraced) President, Bubba, as a witness to establish that he didn't know the claim was "false" even if it was ultimately incorrect. And he could call our present incompetent Secretary of State (John F'n Lurch Kerry). And the former incompetent Secretary of State (Shrillary).

And no. There is also no valid evidence that when W spoke of Saddam's WMD, he was alluding to any claim that Saddam had nukes.

 

[FJO]

If the person who leads a nation can only be one who does not lie, the entire world would be without leaders.

And that includes the royal drones as well.

But a candidate's dishonesty should always be pointed out.

There were no nukes and or capacity for such and that is what GWB meant. We can let The Hague sort it out.

The United Nations and the World Court in the Hague will be nothing but a well forgotten exercise in futility before anyone would or could take GWB in front of a bunch of nobodies, who are not nobodies now, due only to the grace of the United States of America.

 

[Freewill]

Trump just said it again - at his Ohio rally:

Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction.

Trump has said Bush lied about Iraq/ WMDs.

4,000+ Americans died in Iraq, and the Middle East was destabilized for generations, making Bush's lie a war crime of the highest order.

A question for Republicans.

Is Trump right about Bush? Did George Bush lie and thereby commit a war crime?

or

Is Trump an uninformed moron who says things without sufficient evidence, thus making him an untrustworthy commander in chief?

or

Is Trump a liar who merely says things for personal gain, making him unfit for office?



Either Trump is an uninformed moron or a liar or George Bush should be prosecuted for war crimes,

Which is it?

or, did Bill and Hillary lie about WMD, vote to go to war and thus should stand trial with GWB?

 

[Freewill]

If the person who leads a nation can only be one who does not lie, the entire world would be without leaders.

And that includes the royal drones as well.

But a candidate's dishonesty should always be pointed out.

There were no nukes and or capacity for such and that is what GWB meant. We can let The Hague sort it out.

The United Nations and the World Court in the Hague will be nothing but a well forgotten exercise in futility before anyone would or could take GWB in front of a bunch of nobodies, who are not nobodies now, due only to the grace of the United States of America.

Might happen when Obama takes control of the UN.

 

[Freewill]

Trump if elected will turn Bush over to The Hague for war crimes.

If that happens then Obama would be next. Hell Obama should be in trial for killing US citizens without due process. Which is pretty funny coming from Obama, who worries so about the rights of terrorists kept at gitmo.

 

[gipper]

Trump just said it again - at his Ohio rally:

Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction.

Trump has said Bush lied about Iraq/ WMDs.

4,000+ Americans died in Iraq, and the Middle East was destabilized for generations, making Bush's lie a war crime of the highest order.

A question for Republicans.

Is Trump right about Bush? Did George Bush lie and thereby commit a war crime?

or

Is Trump an uninformed moron who says things without sufficient evidence, thus making him an untrustworthy commander in chief?

or

Is Trump a liar who merely says things for personal gain, making him unfit for office?



Either Trump is an uninformed moron or a liar or George Bush should be prosecuted for war crimes,

Which is it?

It would be great if W were prosecuted, and even better if he were found guilty and imprisoned. Imagine how that would curtail the actions of future presidents.

However if W is prosecuted for war crimes, it goes without saying...well at least for those of us objective and knowledgeable, that all living presidents should also be prosecuted because they have also committed war crimes...well maybe excepting Jimma.

HW, Bubba, W, and Big Ears all behind bars....oh how wonderful the world it would be.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

If the person who leads a nation can only be one who does not lie, the entire world would be without leaders.

And that includes the royal drones as well.

But a candidate's dishonesty should always be pointed out.

There were no nukes and or capacity for such and that is what GWB meant. We can let The Hague sort it out.

Good luck with that numbnutz.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Bush isn't going to be arrested for war crimes, that's just liberal wet dream they've had for years

 

[gipper]

If the person who leads a nation can only be one who does not lie, the entire world would be without leaders.

And that includes the royal drones as well.

But a candidate's dishonesty should always be pointed out.

There were no nukes and or capacity for such and that is what GWB meant. We can let The Hague sort it out.

This from a silly little dude who will vote for Cankles....too funny.