ShaklesOfBigGov
Restore the Republic
No it isn't moron, you keep swtiching between asking for evidence of Trump compaign's Russian dealings and Clinton's Russians, WITHOUT EVER ADRESSING ANYTHING I EXPLAIN TO YOU ON EACH
There is evidence of Trump campaign colluding with Russian government and clear evidence of Russian government supporting Trump.
There is NO evidence of Clinton campaign collusion with Russian government and clear evidence of Russian government campaign against Hillary.
Clear enough for you?
Saying I don't accept your lies doesn't mean I'm not clear what you're saying, Home Boy.
Putin was trying to disrupt the election. Obviously you only read the news you want to see, but Russians set up both pro-and anti-Trump demonstrations.
No you ARE NOT SAYING, you simply switch topic without directly addressing what I post.
Kremlin's top brass (ALONG WITH ENTIRE FUCKING COUNTRY) were congradulating each other on Trump victory.
Watch Russian parliament burst into applause at the news Donald Trump is US president
Russian media coverage of her own campaign was vicious, portraying her as an aggressive Russophobe, a criminal and a liar.
"Clinton will surround us with nuclear missiles; Trump would recognise Crimea," a typical tabloid headline read on election day.
"We are very glad that relations will improve with Russia and stop the artificial Cold War which Washington and London try to push on the world," pro-Kremlin analyst Sergei Markov told the BBC.
"We're glad the new president will be Donald Trump who respects Vladimir Putin and recognises that Crimea is part of Russia," he said, referring to Mr Trump's comment that Russia's annexation of the peninsula could be 'looked at'.
Russia celebrates Trump win
We have the view of Russia meddling in using “propaganda” to help influence an election, then antontoo wants to now TRUST Russia’s opinions as solid and reliable to his point. When the basis of your argument is that Russia has effectively influenced the outcome of an election, then don’t go around posting Russia’s response as a reliable source. Common sense should tell you that.
You are a total fucking idiot. Their opinions reflect their MOTIVATIONS...are you seriously going to try to say that there was this uber grand public and private conspiracy by Russians to misdirect the west into not-thinking that Russians love Hillary?
It was already confirmed through an investigation by the special council that the Russians used propaganda to play BOTH sides, to even include involvement in an anti-Trump rally. Now what exactly makes the Russians a trustworthy source? Did the findings of 13 individuals working for Russian interests just completely go over your head? Seriously, if that’s your means of a “trustworthy” source, you’ve got issues.
Obviously your information isn’t creditable, if that’s your only dependable source of information. We got a few liberals who aren’t using a full deck trying to still defend their reliance of using Russian information.