![]()
Few legal wins so far as Trump team hunts for proof of fraud
During a Pennsylvania court hearing this week on one of the many election lawsuits brought by President Donald Trump, a judge asked a campaign lawyer whether he had found any signs of fraud from among the 592 ballots challenged. “Accusing people of fraud is a pretty big step,” said the lawyer...www.yahoo.com
And yall wonder why I keep asking for evidence, his lawyers admit there is none:
"During a Pennsylvania court hearing this week on one of the many election lawsuits brought by President Donald Trump, a judge asked a campaign lawyer whether he had found any signs of fraud from among the 592 ballots challenged.
The answer was no.
“Accusing people of fraud is a pretty big step,” said the lawyer, Jonathan Goldstein. “We’re all just trying to get an election done.”
Trump has not been so cautious, insisting without evidence that the election was stolen from him even when election officials nationwide from both parties say there has been no conspiracy."
He said NO, but you right wingers keep saying yes, lol
This OP is a fraud
The OP was not a fraud, they stated in court there was no evidence of fraud over 596 ballots they are challenging, not even enough to tip the state in his favor,![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Here's how stupid you are. Another government school failure.
The article said there was no evidence of fraud.
You said they said there was no fraud.
Only a government educated failure like you doesn't know the difference between those statements. They are not the same. I am not agreeing with the article, just pointing out you couldn't even read it