Trump Campaign Paid Researchers To Prove 2020 Fraud But Kept Findings Secret

[0311]

I am not trying to prove anything to a lying troll like you. You are irrelevant.

You keep making claims of Election Fraud/Voter Fraud without any supporting "Evidence" of such fraud. Put up or shut the fuck up.

 

[Faun]

You keep making claims of Election Fraud/Voter Fraud without any supporting "Evidence" of such fraud. Put up or shut the fuck up.

It's obvious he can't since there is no such evidence. But he can whine like the pussy bitch he is. So he's got that going for him.

 

[0311]

The left ought to know....

I'm not the one believed every lie the Traitor ever told, that's all you.

 

[Lastamender]

LOLOL

You would if you could, FruitLoops. I know that... you know that... everyone here knows that.

Everyone?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

How does it feel to want. When evidence is submitted that meets the legal standard and a judge allows it to be brought forward then there can be a trial and it will be televised if the judge allows it.

.


Knew he/she/it couldn't answer it honestly and with a straight face, folks.



.

 

[Faun]

Everyone?

Yeah, FruitLoops. everyone. Who knows who you think you're fooling?

 

[Lastamender]

I'm not the one believed every lie the Traitor ever told, that's all you.

The traitors stole the election. They are running things now with the help of very stupid people like yourself.

 

[Lastamender]

Yeah, FruitLoops. everyone.

Prove it troll.

 

[postman]

The lawsuit of Fox News vs Al Franken never made it to a jury.
The judge dismissed it saying it was "Wholly without merit"

 

[0311]

If a judge allows it.

The judge hearing the case must rule on the admissibility of all "Evidence" presented to him. If the "Evidence" does not the legal standard, it is not admitted. You do understand that right?

 

[Faun]

Prove it troll.

Because everyone here is reading your posts. It's funny how you think everyone is as stupid as you.

 

[postman]

Let me remind people. Rudy Giuliani can no longer practice law because of the quality of "evidence" he presented.

 

[0311]

The lawsuit of Fox News vs Al Franken never made it to a jury.
The judge dismissed it saying it was "Wholly without merit"

From the Associated Press dated August 26, 2003.

Yeah, FruitLoops. everyone. Who knows who you think you're fooling?

Himself apparently.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

If the "Evidence" does not the legal standard

.






.

 

[Rambunctious]

The judge hearing the case must rule on the admissibility of all "Evidence" presented to him. If the "Evidence" does not the legal standard, it is not admitted. You do understand that right?

I understand that out of all the trials asked for by plaintiffs not one judge said okay.... and if the people had a chance to view a trial they may feel as we all know we were screwed....

 

[Rambunctious]

Why should you get one when I showed you a case and you don't understand it?

You are not a judge or a jurist... you are a biased politicized hack....

 

[Faun]

You are not a judge or a jurist... you are a biased politicized hack....

LOL

Rambtard, I gave you a link to the case. There's no amount of bias I can inject into it.

If only you understood the case.

 

[Lastamender]

 

[Faun]

Bullshit, FruitLoops. Trump investigated and found nothing.

Trump hired researchers to try to prove election fraud claims: report

The study, done through a Berkeley Research Group subsidiary, cost the Trump campaign more than $600,000.

nypost.com

 

[MagicMike]

Has a jury ever heard any evidence at all?.... don't call me a liar you idiot... you know not one jury has ever heard any evidence.... so you are the liar....

63 cases were thrown out of federal courts because when Powell and Guilianni were asked for evidence by judges they didn't have any to present.
As a result they both faced disciplinary action for wasting the court's time.

This is FACT.
Not opinion.
Not "fake news."